Management and Long-Term Outcome of Acetabular Fractures in Dogs: A Retrospective Study of 49 Dogs.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to categorize the presentation, management, complications and long-term outcome of canine acetabular fractures, and to determine the factors affecting outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Case records and imaging for dogs with acetabular fractures were reviewed with long-term follow-up via canine brief pain inventory (CBPI) and owner questionnaires. RESULTS: The majority of fractures were in the mid-third (36/52) and caudal-third (13/52) with few in the cranial-third of the acetabulum (3/52). Concurrent injuries were diagnosed in 47/49 dogs; 10/34 dogs had neurological deficits on presentation. Forty-seven fractures received treatment: 25/47 had direct surgical repair (DSR), 10/47 had salvage surgery (SS) and 12/47 had conservative management (CM). Fracture location significantly affected treatment group (p = 0.001). New neurological deficits were documented after DSR in 5/24 dogs and SS in 2/10 dogs. Short-term complications occurred after DSR in 10/18 dogs (five minor, five major) and CM in 1/8 dogs (major). Long-term complications occurred after DSR in 2/15 dogs (major) and CM in 2/7 dogs (catastrophic). Conservative management dogs had worse average owner-reported CBPI scores than DSR or SS dogs. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Acetabular fractures predominate in the mid and caudal acetabulum, with high levels of concurrent injuries. Fracture location significantly influenced the treatment approach taken. Postoperative neurological deficits are common following SS and DSR.

A preliminary study of the effect of closed incision management with negative pressure wound therapy over high-risk incisions.

BACKGROUND: Certain postoperative wounds are recognised to be associated with more complications than others and may be termed high-risk. Wound healing can be particularly challenging following high-energy trauma where wound necrosis and infection rates are high. Surgical incision for joint arthrodesis can also be considered high-risk as it requires extensive and invasive surgery and postoperative distal limb swelling and wound dehiscence are common. Recent human literature has investigated the use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) over high-risk closed surgical incisions and beneficial effects have been noted including decreased drainage, decreased dehiscence and decreased infection rates. In a randomised, controlled study twenty cases undergoing distal limb high-energy fracture stabilisation or arthrodesis were randomised to NPWT or control groups. All cases had a modified Robert-Jones dressing applied for 72 h postoperatively and NPWT was applied for 24 h in the NPWT group. Morphometric assessment of limb circumference was performed at six sites preoperatively, 24 and 72 h postoperatively. Wound discharge was assessed at 24 and 72 h. Postoperative analgesia protocol was standardised and a Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Score (GCPS) carried out at 24, 48 and 72 h. Complications were noted and differences between groups were assessed. RESULTS: Percentage change in limb circumference between preoperative and 24 and 72 h postoperative measurements was significantly less at all sites for the NPWT group with exception of the joint proximal to the surgical site and the centre of the operated bone at 72 h. Median discharge score was lower in the NPWT group than the control group at 24 h. No significant differences in GCPS or complication rates were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Digital swelling and wound discharge were reduced when NPWT was employed for closed incision management. Larger studies are required to evaluate whether this will result in reduced discomfort and complication rates postoperatively.