Recent systematic reviews suggest that pharmacists' interventions in asthma patients have a positive impact on health-related outcomes. Nevertheless, the association is not well established, and the role of clinical pharmacists is poorly represented. The aim of this overview of systematic reviews is to identify published systematic reviews assessing the impact of pharmacists' interventions on health-related outcomes measured in asthma patients. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to December 2022. Systematic reviews of all study designs and settings were included. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR 2. Two investigators performed study selection, quality assessment and data collection independently. Nine systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was rated as high in one, low in two, and critically low in six. Reviews included 51 primary studies reporting mainly quality of life, asthma control, lung capacity, and therapeutic adherence. Only four studies were carried out in a hospital setting and only two reviews stated the inclusion of severe asthma patients. The quality of the systematic reviews was generally low, and this was the major limitation of this overview of systematic reviews. However, solid evidence supports that pharmaceutical care improves health-related outcomes in asthma patients.
Asthma , Pharmacists , Quality of Life , Asthma/drug therapy , Humans , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Pharmaceutical Services , Professional Role , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/administration & dosage , Systematic Reviews as Topic
OBJECTIVES: De-escalation (DES) from echinocandins to azoles is recommended by several medical societies in Candida infections. We summarise the evidence of DES on clinical and microbiological cure and 30-day survival and compare it with continuing the treatment with echinocandins (non-DES). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus. Studies describing DES in inpatients and reporting any of the outcomes evaluated were included. Pooled estimates of the tree outcomes were calculated with a fixed or random-effects model. Heterogeneity was explored stratifying by subgroups and via meta-regression. This systematic review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023475486). RESULTS: Of 1853 records identified, 9 studies were included, totalling 1575 patients. Five studies stepped-down to fluconazole; one to voriconazole and three to any of azoles. The mean day of DES was 5.2 (4.6-6.5) days. The clinical cure OR was 1.29 (95% CI: 0.88-1.88); the microbiological cure 1.62 (95% CI: 0.71-3.71); and 30-day survival 2.17 (95% CI: 1.09-4.32). The 30-day survival data into subgroups showed higher effect on critically ill patients and serious-risk bias studies. Meta-regression did not identify significant effect modifiers. CONCLUSIONS: DES is a safe strategy; it showed no higher 30-day mortality and a trend towards greater clinical and microbiological cure.
Antifungal Agents , Candidiasis , Humans , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candidiasis/drug therapy , Candidiasis/mortality , Candidiasis/microbiology , Fluconazole/therapeutic use , Candida/drug effects , Voriconazole/therapeutic use , Echinocandins/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Azoles/therapeutic use , Azoles/pharmacology
Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) pathway have revolutionized cancer immunotherapy by enhancing the immune system's ability to combat cancer cells. However, this innovative approach comes with a distinctive set of challenges, as these therapies can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs) due to their mechanism of action. The most common irAEs involve the skin, gastrointestinal tract, liver, endocrine system, and lungs. These events can range from mild skin rashes to severe colitis, pneumonitis, or even autoimmune organ damage. These adverse effects usually appear with an average of 5-15 weeks from the start of treatment depending on the affected organ. This article presents a case report of a delayed related-mediated hepatitis, after 24 months of treatment with pembrolizumab and almost 3 months after its termination, and a review of the scientific literature on cases of delayed immune-related hepatitis caused by anti-PD1. This case highlights the importance of monitoring patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors after cessation as a growing number of patients stop treatment due to achieving durable responses.
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Skin
Introducción las revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis recientes sugieren que las intervenciones por parte de farmacéuticos en pacientes asmáticos tienen un impacto positivo en resultados en salud. Sin embargo, la asociación no está bien establecida y el papel de los farmacéuticos clínicos está pobremente representado, así como el de los pacientes con asma grave. El objetivo de esta revisión de revisiones es identificar revisiones sistemáticas publicadas que evalúen el impacto de las intervenciones farmacéuticas en resultados en salud medidos en pacientes asmáticos, así como describir los componentes clave de las intervenciones, los resultados medidos y cualquier asociación entre las intervenciones farmacéuticas y los resultados en salud medidos. Métodos se hará una busqueda en PubMed, Embase, Scopus y la Cochrane Library desde el primer registro hasta diciembre de 2022. Se considerará la inclusión de revisiones sistemáticas de todo tipo de estudios primarios, severidad del asma o nivel asistencial que midan resultados en salud. La calidad metodológica se medirá usando A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2. Dos investigadores independientes realizarán la selección de los estudios, la evaluación de la calidad y la extracción de datos. Cualquier discrepancia será solventada por un tercer investigador. Ambos resultados, narrativos y metaanálisis, de los estudios primarios incluidos en las revisiones sistemáticas serán sintetizados. Si los datos son apropiados para un análisis cuantitativo, las medidas de asociación se expresarán como cociente de riesgos y diferencia de medias. Discusión los primeros resultados del establecimiento de una red multidisciplinar para el manejo de los pacientes asmáticos mostraron beneficios en integrar los diferentes niveles asistenciales en el control de la enfermedad y la reducción de la morbilidad...(AU)
Introduction Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that pharmacists' interventions in asthma patients have a positive impact on health-related outcomes. Nevertheless, the association is not well established and the role of clinical pharmacists is poorly represented, as well as severe asthma patients. The aim of this overview of systematic reviews is to identify published systematic reviews assessing the impact of pharmacists' interventions on health-related outcomes measured in asthma patients, as well as to describe key components of the interventions, the outcomes assessed and any associations between pharmacists' interventions and health-related outcomes. Methods PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library will be searched from inception to December 2022. Systematic reviews of all study designs, severity of asthma and level of care that measured health-related outcomes will be considered. Methodological quality will be assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2. Two independent investigators will perform the study selection, quality assessment and data collection, any discrepancy will be solved by a third investigator. Both narrative findings and meta-analysis of primary study data included in the systematic reviews will be synthesized. If data are appropriate for quantitative synthesis, the measures of association will be expressed as the risk ratio and difference in means. Discussion The first results on the establishment of a multidisciplinary network for the management of asthmatic patients have shown the benefits of integrating different levels of care in disease control and morbidity reduction. Further studies showed benefits in hospital admissions, patients' basal oral corticosteroid dose, exacerbations and quality of life of asthma patients...(AU)
Humans , Asthma , Pharmaceutical Services , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pharmacists , Pharmacy Service, Hospital , Systematic Reviews as Topic
INTRODUCTION: Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that pharmacists' interventions in asthma patients have a positive impact on health-related outcomes. Nevertheless, the association is not well established and the role of clinical pharmacists is poorly represented, as well as severe asthma patients. The aim of this overview of systematic reviews is to identify published systematic reviews assessing the impact of pharmacists' interventions on health-related outcomes measured in asthma patients, as well as to describe key components of the interventions, the outcomes assessed and any associations between pharmacists' interventions and health-related outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library will be searched from inception to December 2022. Systematic reviews of all study designs, severity of asthma and level of care that measured health-related outcomes will be considered. Methodological quality will be assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2. Two independent investigators will perform the study selection, quality assessment and data collection, any discrepancy will be solved by a third investigator. Both narrative findings and meta-analysis of primary study data included in the systematic reviews will be synthesized. If data are appropriate for quantitative synthesis, the measures of association will be expressed as the risk ratio and difference in means. DISCUSSION: The first results on the establishment of a multidisciplinary network for the management of asthmatic patients have shown the benefits of integrating different levels of care in disease control and morbidity reduction. Further studies showed benefits in hospital admissions, patients' basal oral corticosteroid dose, exacerbations and quality of life of asthma patients. A systematic review is the most appropriate design in order to summarize the literature and identify the evidence of the benefits of interventions performed by clinical pharmacists in asthma patients, especially those with severe uncontrolled asthma, and encourage future studies to stablish the role of clinical pharmacists in asthma units. REGISTRATION DETAILS: Systematic review registration number: CRD42022372100.
Asthma , Pharmaceutical Services , Humans , Asthma/drug therapy , Hospitalization , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Quality of Life , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Review Literature as Topic
