A roadmap for implementing a successful clinical experience with intradialytic parenteral nutrition.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) is a safe and effective patient-tailored nutritional strategy for providing nutrient supplementation to malnourished or at risk of malnutrition patients on hemodialysis (HD), who did not adequately respond to intensive dietary counselling and oral nutritional supplementation. Although IDPN is recommended by current ESPEN and KDOQI guidelines for nutrition in HD patients, none of these documents informs how to successfully implement this therapy, being the lack of knowledge on practical aspects of IDPN one of the main limitations to its use. The aim of this narrative review was to provide a practical roadmap for guiding the nephrologists, dietitians, and renal nurses in their everyday clinical practice about the use of IDPN. METHODS: A multidisciplinary group formed by specialists from the areas of Nephrology and Nutrition agreed to address different practical aspects related to IDPN in HD patients. Based on the available evidence in the literature and on the authors' clinical experience, different topics were selected to develop a detailed plan for implementing a successful experience with IDPN, proposing a practical IDPN roadmap. RESULTS: This IDPN roadmap provides practical information on when an IDPN should be started; what type of nutrients should be part of an IDPN; how the IDPN should be administered; how the effectiveness and safety of the IDPN should be monitored; how to determine the effectiveness of IDPN; and the conditions that advise discontinuing the IDPN. CONCLUSIONS: IDPN is a safe and effective nutritional therapy for HD patients, although the lack of staff training may limit its use. This review addresses different practical aspects of IDPN, helping interdisciplinary teams in their daily clinical practice to improve the nutritional care of HD patients, either malnourished or at risk of malnutrition.

COVID 19 and myoclonus, do hemodialysis patients have more risk?

We discuss two recent cases from our hospital in which two patients with ESKD receiving periodical hemodialysis (HD) and SarS-Cov-2 infection suffered movement disorders, being the onset related to the HD sessions in both. First case is a 78 year-old woman who is admitted with generalized myoclonic status epilepticus and second case is a 46 year-old male who starts repeatedly suffering myoclonus during his hemodialysis sessions on day +10 after testing positive (asymptomatic infection). There are two main hypotheses when it comes to myoclonus and CNS disorders in COVID19, post-hypoxic origin and inmunomediated postinfectious origin. We wonder if they could both be interacting in patients with kidney disease, and especially in those who receive hemodialysis, maximizing the risk of suffering this type of disorders.

Standardizing health outcomes for chronic kidney disease. Adaptation of the international consortium for health outcomes measurement standard set to the Spanish setting / Estandarización de los resultados de salud en la enfermedad renal crónica. Adaptación del conjunto de variables de resultados del International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement al entorno español

Background and objectives: We aim to adapt the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurements standard set for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients to the Spanish setting and supplement it with those variables agreed upon through initiatives proposed by the Spanish Society of Nephrologists (S.E.N.). Material and methods: The working group defined a first standard set of variables based on a literature review. The S.E.N. members then assessed the suitability of each variable for inclusion (Consensus≥75%). A second draft of the standard set was generated and evaluated by the Patient advocacy group Federación Nacional de Asociaciones para la Lucha Contra las Enfermedades del Riñón (ALCER). Lastly, the working group established the final standard set of variables (Consensus≥75%). Results: The standard set targets patients with very high-risk CKD (G3a/A3 and G3b/A2-G5) in pre-end-stage kidney disease (pre-ESKD), hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), kidney transplantation (KT) or conservative care (CC). The essential follow-up variables agreed for all patients (All) were patient survival, hospitalizations, cardiovascular events, smoking status, health-related quality of life, pain, fatigue, physical function, daily activities, depression, renal function and hemoglobin. Additionally, it was agreed to collect PD survival (in PD patients), peritonitis (PD), infection/bacteremia (PD, HD, KT), vascular access type (HD), vascular access survival (HD), acute rejection (KT), post-transplant cancer (KT), albuminuria (KT) and kidney allograft survival (KT). (AU)

Antecedentes y objetivos: El objetivo del estudio es adaptar el conjunto de variables de resultados del International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurements para pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica al ámbito español y complementarlo con aquellas variables consensuadas en iniciativas de la Sociedad Española de Nefrología. Material y métodos: El grupo de trabajo definió un primer conjunto de variables a partir de una revisión bibliográfica. Seguidamente, los miembros de la Sociedad Española de Nefrología valoraron la idoneidad de cada variable para su inclusión (consenso≥75%). Posteriormente, se generó un segundo borrador que fue evaluado por la asociación de pacientes Federación Nacional de Asociaciones para la lucha contra las enfermedades del riñón. Por último, el grupo de trabajo estableció el conjunto de variables final (consenso≥75%). Resultados: El conjunto de variables se dirige a pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica y muy alto riesgo de progresión (G3a/A3 y G3b/A2-G5) en estadios previos al tratamiento renal sustitutivo, hemodiálisis (HD), diálisis peritoneal (DP), trasplante renal (TR) o tratamiento conservador. Las variables esenciales de seguimiento acordadas para todos los pacientes fueron la supervivencia del paciente, las hospitalizaciones, los eventos cardiovasculares, el hábito tabáquico, la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud, el dolor, la fatiga, la función física, las actividades diarias, la depresión, la función renal y la hemoglobina. Además, se acordó recoger la supervivencia en DP (en pacientes en DP), peritonitis (DP), infección/bacteriemia (DP, HD, TR), tipo de acceso vascular (HD), supervivencia del acceso vascular (HD), rechazo agudo (TR), cáncer postrasplante (TR), albuminuria (TR) y supervivencia del aloinjerto renal (TR). Las variables opcionales acordadas para todos los pacientes fueron los niveles de fósforo y potasio y el control de la diabetes (en pacientes con diabetes). (AU)

[Characterization of hospitalized patients with acute kidney injury associated with COVID-19 in Spain: Renal replacement therapy and mortality. FRA-COVID SEN Registry Data]. / Caracterización de la población con fracaso renal agudo durante la hospitalización por COVID-19 en España: tratamiento renal sustitutivo y mortalidad. Datos del Registro FRA-COVID SEN.

Background and objectives: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and associated with worse prognosis. The Spanish Society of Nephrology created the AKI-COVID Registry to characterize the population admitted for COVID-19 that developed AKI in Spanish hospitals. The need of renal replacement therapy (RRT) therapeutic modalities, and mortality in these patients were assessed. Material and method: In a retrospective study, we analyzed data from the AKI-COVID Registry, which included patients hospitalized in 30 Spanish hospitals from May 2020 to November 2021. Clinical and demographic variables, factors related to the severity of COVID-19 and AKI, and survival data were recorded. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to study factors related to RRT and mortality. Results: Data from 730 patients were recorded. A total of 71.9% were men, with a mean age of 70 years (60-78), 70.1% were hypertensive, 32.9% diabetic, 33.3% with cardiovascular disease and 23.9% had some degree of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Pneumonia was diagnosed in 94.6%, requiring ventilatory support in 54.2% and admission to the ICU in 44.1% of cases.The median time from the onset of COVID-19 symptoms to the appearance of AKI (37.1% KDIGO I, 18.3% KDIGO II, 44.6% KDIGO III) was 6 days (4-10). A total of 235 (33.9%) patients required RRT: 155 patients with continuous renal replacement therapy, 89 alternate-day dialysis, 36 daily dialysis, 24 extended hemodialysis and 17 patients with hemodiafiltration. Smoking habit (OR 3.41), ventilatory support (OR 20.2), maximum creatinine value (OR 2.41) and time to AKI onset (OR 1.13) were predictors of the need for RRT; age was a protective factor (0.95). The group without RRT was characterized by older age, less severe AKI, shorter kidney injury onset and recovery time (p < 0.05). 38.6% of patients died during hospitalization; serious AKI and RRT were more frequent in the death group. In the multivariate analysis, age (OR 1.03), previous chronic kidney disease (OR 2.21), development of pneumonia (OR 2.89), ventilatory support (OR 3.34) and RRT (OR 2.28) were predictors of mortality while chronic treatment with ARBs was identified as a protective factor (OR 0.55). Conclusions: Patients with AKI during hospitalization for COVID-19 had a high mean age, comorbidities and severe infection. We defined two different clinical patterns: an AKI of early onset, in older patients that resolves in a few days without the need for RRT; and another more severe pattern, with greater need for RRT, and late onset, which was related to greater severity of the infectious disease. The severity of the infection, age and the presence of CKD prior to admission were identified as risk factors for mortality in these patients. In addition chronic treatment with ARBs was identified as a protective factor for mortality.

Standardizing health outcomes for chronic kidney disease. Adaptation of the international consortium for health outcomes measurement standard set to the Spanish setting.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We aim to adapt the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurements standard set for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients to the Spanish setting and supplement it with those variables agreed upon through initiatives proposed by the Spanish Society of Nephrologists (S.E.N.). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The working group defined a first standard set of variables based on a literature review. The S.E.N. members then assessed the suitability of each variable for inclusion (Consensus≥75%). A second draft of the standard set was generated and evaluated by the Patient advocacy group Federación Nacional de Asociaciones para la Lucha Contra las Enfermedades del Riñón (ALCER). Lastly, the working group established the final standard set of variables (Consensus≥75%). RESULTS: The standard set targets patients with very high-risk CKD (G3a/A3 and G3b/A2-G5) in pre-end-stage kidney disease (pre-ESKD), hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), kidney transplantation (KT) or conservative care (CC). The essential follow-up variables agreed for all patients (All) were patient survival, hospitalizations, cardiovascular events, smoking status, health-related quality of life, pain, fatigue, physical function, daily activities, depression, renal function and hemoglobin. Additionally, it was agreed to collect PD survival (in PD patients), peritonitis (PD), infection/bacteremia (PD, HD, KT), vascular access type (HD), vascular access survival (HD), acute rejection (KT), post-transplant cancer (KT), albuminuria (KT) and kidney allograft survival (KT). The optional variables agreed were phosphorus (All), potassium (All), diabetes control (All with diabetes), and albuminuria (pre-ESKD). CONCLUSIONS: This standard set may constitute a highly efficient tool allowing the evaluation of patient outcomes and helping to define strategies to enhance CKD patients' quality of care in the Spanish healthcare system.

Real clinical experience after one year of treatment with tolvaptan in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Background: Tolvaptan (TV) is the first vasopressin-receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). No publications report TV experience in real clinical practice during the first year of treatment. Methods: A prospective study of an initial cohort of 220 rapidly progressing patients treated with TV for 12 months. The tolerability of TV, the evolution of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), analytical parameters, and blood pressure were analyzed. Results: A total of 163 patients (78.2%) received TV for 1 year. The main causes of treatment withdrawal were the aquaretic effects (11%), eGFR deterioration (5%), and hepatic toxicity (2.3%). eGFR decreased significantly after 1 month of treatment without further changes. The decrease in eGFR in the first month was higher in patients with an initially higher eGFR. The eGFR drop during the first year of treatment with TV was lower than that reported by patients in the 2 years prior to TV treatment (-1.7 ± 7.6 vs. -4.4 ± 4.8 mL/min, p = 0.003). Serum sodium and uric acid concentrations increased, and morning urinary osmolality decreased in the first month, with no further changes. Blood pressure decreased significantly without changes in antihypertensive medication. Conclusion: TV treatment is well tolerated by most patients. Liver toxicity is very rare and self-limited. TV reduces eGFR in the first month without showing further changes during the first year of treatment. Patients with a higher starting eGFR will suffer a greater initial drop, with a longer recovery. We suggest using the eGFR observed after a month of treatment as the reference for future comparisons and calculating the rate of eGFR decline in patients undergoing TV treatment.

Management of Kidney Failure in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: What Are the Best Options?

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the most frequent cause of kidney failure (KF). There are large variations in the incidence rates of kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Late referral to nephrology services has been associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. In many countries, when patients reach severely reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR), they are managed by multidisciplinary teams led by nephrologists. In these clinics, efforts will continue to halt chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and to prevent cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. In patients with diabetes and severely reduced GFR and KF, treating hyperglycemia is a challenge, since some drugs are contraindicated and most of them require dose adjustments. Even more, a decision-making process will help in deciding whether the patient would prefer comprehensive conservative care or KRT. On many occasions, this decision will be conditioned by diabetes mellitus itself. Effective education should cover the necessary information for the patient and family to answer these questions: 1. Should I go for KRT or not? 2. If the answer is KRT, dialysis and/or transplantation? 3. Dialysis at home or in center? 4. If dialysis at home, peritoneal dialysis or home hemodialysis? 5. If transplantation is desired, discuss the options of whether the donation would be from a living or deceased donor. This review addresses the determinant factors with an impact on DKD, aiming to shed light on the specific needs that arise in the management and recommendations on how to achieve a comprehensive approach to the diabetic patient with chronic kidney disease.

Consulta monográfica de onconefrología. Justificación y puesta en marcha / Monographic consultation of onconephrology. Rationale and implementation

El incremento de la demanda asistencial por afección renal asociada a enfermedades neoplásicas es una realidad en la mayoría de los servicios de nefrología. Para dar respuesta a esta situación, debe considerarse la creación de modelos asistenciales como consultas monográficas y desarrollar programas de formación en onconefrología que permitan optimizar la atención de estos pacientes. A través de un estudio exploratorio y descriptivo, identificamos cuál es la situación actual de la afectación renal en pacientes con cáncer. El objetivo del presente estudio es establecer los criterios para la asistencia específica en el ámbito de la onconefrología. Para ello hemos revisado aspectos clave y analizado la situación actual en nuestro entorno, mediante una encuesta dirigida a todos los nefrólogos a través de la SEN, junto a la experiencia de 2 centros españoles. A partir de esta información hemos establecido una serie de requisitos y recomendaciones para la puesta en marcha de estas consultas

The increase in demand for medical care for renal complications associated with neoplastic diseases is a reality in most nephrology departments. In response to this overall situation, the creation of healthcare models such as monographic consultations and develop training programs in onconephrology could improve the care of these patients. Through an exploratory and descriptive study, we identified current situation of kidney involvement in cancer patients. The objective of the present study is to establish the criteria for specific assistance in the field of onconephrology. For this, we have reviewed key aspects and analyzed the current situation in our country, through a survey addressed to all nephrologists through the Spanish Society of Nephrology, together with the experience of 2 Spanish centers. From this information, we have established some requirements and recommendations for the start-up of these consultations

Monographic consultation of onconephrology. Rationale and implementation.

The increase in demand for medical care for renal complications associated with neoplastic diseases is a reality in most nephrology departments. In response to this overall situation, the creation of healthcare models such as monographic consultations and develop training programs in Onconephrology could improve the care of these patients. Through an exploratory and descriptive study, we identified current situation of kidney involvement in cancer patients. The objective of the present study is to establish the criteria for specific assistance in the field of Onconephrology. For this, we have reviewed key aspects and analyzed the current situation in our country, through a survey addressed to all nephrologists through the Spanish Society of Nephrology., together with the experience of two Spanish centers. From this information, we have established some requirements and recommendations for the start-up of these consultations.

Monographic consultation of onconephrology. Rationale and implementation. / Consulta monográfica de onconefrología. Justificación y puesta en marcha.

The increase in demand for medical care for renal complications associated with neoplastic diseases is a reality in most nephrology departments. In response to this overall situation, the creation of healthcare models such as monographic consultations and develop training programs in onconephrology could improve the care of these patients. Through an exploratory and descriptive study, we identified current situation of kidney involvement in cancer patients. The objective of the present study is to establish the criteria for specific assistance in the field of onconephrology. For this, we have reviewed key aspects and analyzed the current situation in our country, through a survey addressed to all nephrologists through the Spanish Society of Nephrology, together with the experience of 2 Spanish centers. From this information, we have established some requirements and recommendations for the start-up of these consultations.

Survival and factors predicting mortality in hemodialysis patients over 75 years old.

BACKGROUND: Patients starting dialysis treatments are increasingly elderly and with high morbidity and mortality. Survival and factors influencing mortality are discussed. METHODS: We studied 2,601 patients who started hemodialysis in Andalucía (Spain) between 2004 and 2007. Of these, 71 patients died in the first 90 days of hemodialysis treatment and were excluded. Three groups were considered: group A, 694 patients aged less than 60 years; group B, 1,203 patients between 60 and 75 years; and group C, 704 patients aged over 75. Survival and factors associated with mortality were studied. RESULTS: Mean survival was 46 months in group A, 41.6 in group B and 35 in the very elderly group. In univariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model, survival in the very elderly patients was significantly influenced by low body mass index (BMI), venous catheter as initial vascular access, arterial hypertension, congestive heart failure (CHF), late referral to nephrologist (<6 months), C-reactive protein (CRP) >10 mg/dL, serum albumin <3.5 g/dL, Kt/V (Daugirdas) <1.2 and time of dialysis session <180 minutes. In multivariate analysis, BMI, CHF, CRP, low serum albumin, Kt/V and time of dialysis session remained as independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Survival of the very elderly patients who remained on hemodialysis more than 90 consecutive days was poor (about 3 years). Heart failure and malnutrition/inflammation are prognostic factors related to mortality in these patients on chronic hemodialysis.

Analysis of patient flow into dialysis: role of education in choice of dialysis modality.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in predialysis care, morbidity and mortality remain high. OBJECTIVES: To analyze end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patient demographics and clinical data on education on dialysis treatment options, type of chronic renal replacement therapy (RRT), and effects of planned versus non-planned dialysis start. METHODS: 621 patients, from 24 Spanish hospitals, who started RRT in 2002. Peritoneal or vascular access at dialysis initiation was considered "planned." RESULTS: 304 (49%) patients were non-planned and half of them had prior nephrology follow-up. Of the patients with >3 months nephrology follow-up (76% of all), only half were educated on dialysis modalities. Dialysis education was associated with planned start in 73.4% versus 26% in non-educated patients (p < 0.05), shorter follow-up (55 vs 65 months, p = 0.033), more medical visits in the prior year (6.5 vs 4.4, *p < 0.001), more patients starting peritoneal dialysis (31% vs 8.3%*), and more specific follow-up by ESRD unit versus general nephrology care (63% vs 26%*). Non-planned start was associated with older age (63 vs 60.6 years, p = 0.06), fewer medical visits (4.6 vs 6.4*), less education about modality options, and greater use of hemodialysis (92% vs 75%*). Planned patients had better biochemical parameters at start of dialysis. CONCLUSION: Despite nephrology follow-up, half the patients did not have a planned dialysis start. Planned start was associated with better clinical status. More patients chose peritoneal dialysis when educated about dialysis modality options. ESRD-specific units were more likely to provide patient education.

Vascular calcification in the uremic patient: a cardiovascular risk?

BACKGROUND: Several factors suggest that the presence of vascular calcification (VC) is associated with a high risk of cardiac events in uremic patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of VC on cardiac morbidity and mortality in our hemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS: We studied 79 patients on HD: 43 males, mean age 48 +/- 15 years old, mean time on HD 83 +/- 63 months. The presence of VC was evaluated by radiologic series. Other cardiovascular risk factors analyzed were arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, cigarette smoking, anemia, and dyslipidemia. All patients underwent M-mode, two-dimensional, Doppler echocardiography. Patients were followed for two years. During this time, clinical information collected included predialysis blood pressure, incidence of ischemic heart disease, episodes of congestive heart failure, and mortality due to cardiovascular event. RESULTS: VC was observed in 55.7% of patients. Left ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, and cardiac valve calcification were significantly associated with VC. Ischemic heart disease (71.4% vs. 28.6%) and episodes of cardiac failure (0.41 vs. 0.18 per year; P < 0.05) appeared more frequently in the patient group with VC. VC was present in 80.6% of patients who developed episodes of heart failure. Eight patients died from cardiac disease; each of them had VC. CONCLUSION: The presence of VC can help to identify those HD patients with a higher cardiovascular risk.