Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 106(4): 771-774, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32360558

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The posterior branch of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve (MACN) is at risk to be damaged during cubital tunnel surgery. The purpose of this study was to identify the location of the posterior branch of the MACN (PBMACN) in relation to surgical landmarks pertinent in cubital tunnel surgery. METHODS: We performed an anatomical study on 20 limbs from 13 fresh cadavers. The nerve was dissected from 10cm proximal to 10cm distal of the medial epicondyle. We measured the distance between the nerve and the medial epicondyle, and also the distance separating the PBMACN from the ulnar nerve passage between the two heads of the flexor carpi ulnaris. Measurements were performed with the elbow at 45° and 90° of flexion, as well as in full pronation and supination. RESULTS: After its emergence from the main trunk of the MACN, the posterior branch ran anteriorly to the medial epicondyle, taking an oblique direction toward the ulnar shaft. The PBMACN was in average 2.53cm under the medial epicondyle when the elbow was flexed at 45°, and 2.96cm when the elbow was flexed at 90°. Average distance between the PBMACN and the penetrating point of the ulnar nerve within the flexor carpi ulnaris was 1.54cm when the elbow was flexed at 45°, and 1.62cm when the elbow was flexed at 90°. Pronation and supination positions of the forearm did not significantly modify our measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the position of MACN posterior branch during ulnar nerve release surgery at the elbow may help in preventing iatrogenic injury. According to our measurements, incision and superficial dissection anterior to the medial epicondyle or distal to the ulnar nerve penetrating point between the two heads of the flexor carpi ulnaris should be avoided or done with an elbow flexed at 90°.


Asunto(s)
Plexo Braquial , Codo , Cadáver , Antebrazo , Humanos , Nervio Cubital/anatomía & histología
2.
J Orthop ; 17: 69-72, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31879477

RESUMEN

We aimed to report causes of readmission 30 and 90 days following a total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the direct anterior approach (DAA). METHODS: Three hundred and two patients (335 hips) underwent a DAA-THA for primary osteoarthritis. RESULTS: The main reasons for 30 and 90-day readmission were wound related problems, dislocation (rate: 0.9%) and deep infection. The readmission rates at 30 and 90 days were 1.8% and 2.7%, respectively. Age over 60 years and morbidly obese patients were at risk for complications. CONCLUSION: The DAA-THA was associated with low readmission rates. Obesity should be adressed preoperatively.

3.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 104(8): 1205-1208, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30366685

RESUMEN

Bone fixation of the two roots improves meniscal allograft positioning as compared to simple meniscal peripheral wall fixation. An all-arthroscopic 4-point bone fixation technique could provide rigid primary fixation and a more stable allograft. The technique was implemented on 8 fresh cadavers, under arthroscopy, via tibial bone tunnels at the posterior root, popliteal hiatus, anteromedial segment and anterior root, with cortical buttons for tibial graft fixation. Mean surgery time was 65±5minutes (range, 55-80min). The main difficulty lay in creating the tunnel to fix the anterior horn, which sometimes required an additional lateral portal. This 4-point bone fixation technique proved feasible and reproducible, and offers a novel means of stable primary fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, cadaver study.


Asunto(s)
Artroscopía/métodos , Meniscos Tibiales/cirugía , Tibia/cirugía , Aloinjertos/cirugía , Cadáver , Humanos , Tempo Operativo , Trasplante Homólogo/métodos
4.
Case Rep Orthop ; 2017: 2816216, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28386498

RESUMEN

An articular glenoid fracture is an uncommon injury. Usually significantly displaced intra-articular glenoid fractures are treated with open reduction surgery. Conventional open surgery techniques involve high morbidity. Here we describe an arthroscopy-assisted reduction and fixation method of an Ideberg type III glenoid fracture. This method provides good articular reduction without extensive exposure or soft tissue dissection and without nerve and/or vascular lesion.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA