Background: The management of frozen shoulder (FS) differs depending on experience level and variation between scientific guidelines and actual practice. Purpose: To determine the current trends and practices in the management of FS among shoulder specialists and compare them with senior shoulder specialists. Study Design: Consensus statement. Methods: A team of 15 senior shoulder specialists (faculty group) prepared a questionnaire comprising 26 questions regarding the definition, terminology, clinical signs, investigations, management, and prognosis of FS. The questionnaire was mailed to all the registered shoulder specialists of Shoulder and Elbow Society, India (SESI) (specialist group; n = 230), as well as to the faculty group (n = 15). The responses of the 2 groups were compared, and levels of consensus were determined: strong (>75%), broad (60%-74.9%), inconclusive (40%-59.9%), or disagreement (<40%). Result: Overall, 142 of the 230 participants in the specialist group and all 15 participants in the faculty group responded to the survey. Both groups strongly agreed that plain radiographs are required to rule out a secondary cause of FS, routine magnetic resonance imaging is not indicated to confirm FS, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be administered at bedtime, steroid injection (triamcinolone or methylprednisolone) is the next best option if analgesics fail to provide pain relief, passive physical therapy should be avoided in the freezing phase, <10% of patients would require any surgical intervention, and patients with diabetes and thyroid dysfunction tend to fare poorly. There was broad agreement that routine thyroid dysfunction screening is unnecessary for women, a single 40-mg steroid injection via intra-articular route is preferred, and arthroscopic capsular release (ACR) results in a better outcome than manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). Agreement was inconclusive regarding the use of combined random blood sugar (RBS) and glycosylated hemoglobin versus lone RBS to screen for diabetes in patients with FS, preference of ACR versus MUA to treat resistant FS, and the timing of surgical intervention. There was disagreement over the most appropriate term for FS, the preferred physical therapy modality for pain relief, the most important movement restriction for early diagnosis of FS, and complications seen after MUA. Conclusion: This survey summarized the trend in prevalent practices regarding FS among the shoulder specialists and senior shoulder surgeons of SESI.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between Posterior Tibial slope in terms of medial and lateral in Anterior cruciate ligament deficient patients. METHODS: Magnetic resonance images (MRI) of the knee of 100 ACL injured patients and 100 ACL intact patients were studied. Their medial and lateral posterior tibial slopes were measured using MRI. Of 200 subjects, 100 (Male- 63, Female- 37) were controls, other 100 (Male - 68, Female-32) were ACL injured cases. Using DIACOM viewer software,the slopes of both medial and lateral slopes were measured. Range of Variation, mean value and standard deviation of medial tibial plateau slope (MTS), lateral tibia plateau slope (LTS) of controls and ACL injured patients were measured. The data collected were entered into Microsoft excel worksheet and analysed using statistical package for social sciences, Version 15.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). Distribution of data was confirmed using Shapiro's Wilk Test and appropriate parametric statistics were applied. For all analysis p value < 0.05 was set to be significant. RESULTS: In control (ACL uninjured) population mean MTS was 5.95° with SD 3.09°, mean LTS was 6.08° with SD 3.48°. In ACL injured population mean MTS 6.41° with SD 2.66°, mean LTS was 8.12° with SD 3.65°. So ACL injured population had MTS steeper than control population with no statistical significance (p value < 0.27) and LTS was steeper than control population with statistical significance (p value < 0.001),where as there were comparable results between male and females. CONCLUSION: Our current results indicate that lateral PTS is a risk factor for patients with primary ACL tears as compared with ligament-intact controls. Therefore,PTS should be considered as independent modifiable risk factors in ACL injury.
