The clinical significance of lymphovascular space invasion in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of lymphovascular space invasion on recurrence and disease-free survival in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer. METHODS: The study included patients with stage 1A, grade 1-2 endometrioid endometrial cancer who underwent a total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Independent prognostic predictors of endometrial cancer recurrence were assessed using the Cox regression model. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify the predictors of distant recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to describe survival curves, and the log-rank test was used to compare the differences in survival curves. RESULTS: A total of 189 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 24 (12.7%) had lymphovascular space invasion. The median follow-up time was 60 (3-137) months. Distant recurrence was present in 11 of 22 patients who developed recurrence. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the 5-year disease-free survival rates of patients with lymphovascular space invasion(+) and lymphovascular space invasion(-) were 62.5 and 91.9%, respectively, which were significantly lower (p<0.001). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, the presence of lymphovascular space invasion (p<0.001) and age ≥60 years (p=0.017) remained as prognostic factors for reduced disease-free survival. In binary logistic regression analysis, only lymphovascular space invasion (adjusted OR=13, 95%CI=1.456-116.092, p=0.022) was a prognostic factor for distant recurrence. CONCLUSION: lymphovascular space invasion is a prognostic risk factor for recurrence and distant metastasis and also a predictor of poorer disease-free survival outcomes in low-risk endometrial cancer.

Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of mucinous ovarian carcinoma and mucinous borderline ovarian tumors.

OBJECTIVE: This study was carried out to investigate the differentiation of mucinous borderline ovarian tumor from mucinous ovarian carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: We evaluated 77 women patients who underwent abdominal magnetic resonance imaging due to pelvic mass. magnetic resonance imaging was reviewed by an experienced radiologist. A total of 70 women patients were included in the study. The magnetic resonance imaging features were retrospectively evaluated and compared between the two pathologies. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups in terms of maximum tumor size. Age at diagnosis was 56.29±11.92 in the mucinous ovarian carcinoma group and 44.74±13.60 in the mucinous borderline ovarian tumor group (p<0.05). A significant difference was found between the two groups, and it was observed that mucinous borderline ovarian tumors appeared in the younger age group compared to mucinous ovarian carcinomas. Presence of ascites, peritoneal dissemination, lymphadenopathy, and mural nodules was found significantly more frequently in mucinous ovarian carcinomas than in mucinous borderline ovarian tumors. Honeycomb appearance was found more frequently in mucinous borderline ovarian tumor patients than in mucinous ovarian carcinoma patients. CONCLUSION: magnetic resonance imaging findings of these two pathologies overlapped considerably. Compared with mucinous borderline ovarian tumors, mucinous ovarian carcinomas frequently had mural nodules larger than 5 mm, larger tumor size, peritoneal dissemination, and abnormal ascites.

Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of mucinous ovarian carcinoma and mucinous borderline ovarian tumors

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study was carried out to investigate the differentiation of mucinous borderline ovarian tumor from mucinous ovarian carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: We evaluated 77 women patients who underwent abdominal magnetic resonance imaging due to pelvic mass. magnetic resonance imaging was reviewed by an experienced radiologist. A total of 70 women patients were included in the study. The magnetic resonance imaging features were retrospectively evaluated and compared between the two pathologies. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups in terms of maximum tumor size. Age at diagnosis was 56.29±11.92 in the mucinous ovarian carcinoma group and 44.74±13.60 in the mucinous borderline ovarian tumor group (p<0.05). A significant difference was found between the two groups, and it was observed that mucinous borderline ovarian tumors appeared in the younger age group compared to mucinous ovarian carcinomas. Presence of ascites, peritoneal dissemination, lymphadenopathy, and mural nodules was found significantly more frequently in mucinous ovarian carcinomas than in mucinous borderline ovarian tumors. Honeycomb appearance was found more frequently in mucinous borderline ovarian tumor patients than in mucinous ovarian carcinoma patients. CONCLUSION: magnetic resonance imaging findings of these two pathologies overlapped considerably. Compared with mucinous borderline ovarian tumors, mucinous ovarian carcinomas frequently had mural nodules larger than 5 mm, larger tumor size, peritoneal dissemination, and abnormal ascites.