Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Food Chem ; 449: 139177, 2024 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38581785

RESUMEN

Edible insects represent a great alternative protein source but food neophobia remains the main barrier to consumption. However, the incorporation of insects as protein-rich ingredients, such as protein concentrates, could increase acceptance. In this study, two methods, isoelectric precipitation and ultrafiltration-diafiltration, were applied to produce mealworm protein concentrates, which were compared in terms of composition, protein structure and techno-functional properties. The results showed that the protein content of the isoelectric precipitation concentrate was higher than ultrafiltration-diafiltration (80 versus 72%) but ash (1.91 versus 3.82%) and soluble sugar (1.43 versus 8.22%) contents were lower. Moreover, the protein structure was affected by the processing method, where the ultrafiltration-diafiltration concentrate exhibited a higher surface hydrophobicity (493.5 versus 106.78 a.u) and a lower denaturation temperature (161.32 versus 181.44 °C). Finally, the ultrafiltration-diafiltration concentrate exhibited higher solubility (87 versus 41%) and emulsifying properties at pH 7 compared to the concentrate obtained by isoelectric precipitation.


Asunto(s)
Interacciones Hidrofóbicas e Hidrofílicas , Proteínas de Insectos , Ultrafiltración , Animales , Proteínas de Insectos/química , Proteínas de Insectos/aislamiento & purificación , Tenebrio/química , Precipitación Química , Solubilidad , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Manipulación de Alimentos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...