Protective effects of safranal on kidney tissue in a rat model of distant ischemia-reperfusion injury with infrarenal aortic occlusion.

Background/aim: Ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury to a part of the body can cause damage to distant organs such as the kidney and heart. This study investigated the protective effects of safranal against IR-induced renal injury. Materials and methods: Used in this study were 24 Wistar Albino male rats, which were divided into 3 equal and randomised groups. The sham group underwent laparotomy only. In the IR group, the infrarenal aorta was clamped for 1 h, and then reperfused for 2 h. In the IR-safranal group, safranal was administered 30 min before the procedure and IR injury was induced in the same way as in the IR group. After the procedure, blood and tissue samples were collected from the rats for biochemical and histopathological analyses. Antioxidant capacity and proinflammatory cytokine analyses were performed on the blood samples. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining was performed to determine the number of cells undergoing apoptosis in the kidney tissue. Results: The estimated glomerular filtration rate, an indicator of renal function, was lower in the IR group (p1 = 0.024 vs. p3 = 0.041, respectively) compared to the other groups, while creatinine levels were higher in the IR group compared to the other groups (p1 = 0.032 vs. p2 = 0.044, respectively). The blood urea nitrogen level was higher in the IR group than in the other groups (p1 = 0.001vs p2 = 0.035, respectively). The total antioxidant and total oxidant status, indicating tissue oxidative stress, did not differ between groups (p = 0.914 vs. p = 0.184, respectively). Among the proinflammatory cytokines, the interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) and IL-6 levels were significantly higher in the IR group (p = 0.034 vs. p = 0.001, respectively), but the tumour necrosis factor-α (p = 0.19), and interferon-γ (p = 0.311) levels did not differ between groups. Histopathological examination showed significantly less damage to glomerular and tubular cells in the IR-safranal group (p < 0.001). The number of TUNEL-positive cells was higher in the IR group compared to the other groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Safranal may have protective effects against kidney damage caused by distant ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Pregnancy and its outcomes in hemodialysis patients in Turkey.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to investigate pregnancy frequency and evaluate the factors affecting live births in hemodialysis (HD) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Female HD patients whose pregnancy was retrospectively reported between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2019. The duration of HD, primary disease, whether the pregnancy resulted in abortion, stillbirth, or live birth, whether the HD duration was prolonged after diagnosing the pregnancy and whether it accompanied preeclampsia were recorded. RESULTS: In this study, we reached 9038 HD female patients? data in the study. A total of 235 pregnancies were detected in 145 patients. The mean age was 35.42 (35 ± 7.4) years. The mean age at first gestation was 30.8 ± 6.5 years. The average birth week was 32 (28 - 36) weeks. 53.8% (no = 78) of the patients had live birth, 51.7% (no = 70) had at least one abortion in the first 20 weeks, and 13.1% (no = 19) had at least one stillbirth after 20 weeks. The rate of patients' increased numbers of dialysis sessions during pregnancy was 71.7%. The abortion rate was 22.4% in those with increased HD sessions, whereas 79.3% in those not increased HD sessions (p < 0.001). Live birth frequency was 67.2% in the increased HD sessions group and 3.4% in those who did not differ in HD sessions (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: For the first time, we reported pregnancy outcomes in HD female patients, covering all regions of Turkey. It has been observed that; increasing the number of HD sessions in dialysis patients will decrease fetal and maternal complications and increase live birth rates.

Role of glutathione S-transferase P1 polymorphism in early transplant complications in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Complications in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) cause serious morbidity and mortality. Predicting patients at risk in advance and changing the symptomatic care and/or preparation regimen according to this risk assessment have been emphasized recently. Several single-nucleotide polymorphisms have been studied, and some were found to be responsible for early complications. Glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) is an enzyme involved in the detoxification process that reduces oxidative stress by reducing the number of free oxygen radicals. AIM: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between GSTP1 polymorphism and early complications of allo-HSCT, iron parameters, overall survival (OS), and transplantation-related mortality (TRM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (n = 23) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 27) who underwent allo-HSCT between May 2008 and February 2011 at Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, were included. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients, 24 (48%) were women and 26 (52%) were men. The median age of the patients was 26 (16-74) years. GSTP1 polymorphism was detected in 23 (46%) patients, and 27 (54%) had no polymorphism (wild type). The two groups were compared in terms of early toxicity after transplantation, according to the preparation regimen. The group with GSTP1 polymorphism was found to have a high transferrin saturation index (P < 0.05). Patients with no GSTP1 polymorphism showed a high grade III-IV anemia ratio (P < 0.05). The presence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and graft-versus-host disease was similar in both groups (P > 0.05). OS and TRM were higher in the GSTP1 polymorphism group, but no statistical difference was found between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: TSI was higher in the GSTP1 polymorphism group. GSTP1 polymorphism had no effect on early transplantation complications. Although the OS and TRM ratios were higher in the GSTP1 polymorphism group, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups. Further studies with larger sample size are needed.

Therapeutic Effect of Plasmapheresis and Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Recipients of Kidney Transplant With High Panel-reactive Antibody Levels: A Single-center Experience.

OBJECTIVE: High panel-reactive antibody (PRA) levels limit patients' access to kidney transplantation from potential living donor candidates and decrease renal graft survival by causing acute antibody-mediated rejection (AAMR). In this article, we report our experiences about the efficiency of plasmapheresis (PP) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in reduction of serum PRA levels in candidates for renal transplantation and in patients with AAMR. METHODS: We examined retrospectively 47 patients with high PRA levels (18 for desensitization (DS) and 29 with AAMR) at Ankara University. The reduction in PRA class 1 and PRA class 2 levels before and after the PP, IVIG, and rituximab or eculizumab therapy were evaluated. RESULTS: In the DS group, mean reduction in PRA class I ± SD was 28.0 ± 9.10 to 22.1 ± 8.14 (P <.05), and mean reduction in PRA class II ± SD was 40.3 ± 6.89 to 32.2 ± 5.68 (P < .05). In the AAMR group; mean reduction in PRA class I ± SD was 23.9 ± 9.56 to 17.8 ± 8.64 (P > .05), and mean reduction in PRA class II ± SD was 28.1 ± 8.37 to 26.7 ± 7.96 (P > .05). In total, mean reduction in PRA class I was 25.7 ± 6.66 to 19.7 ± 6.00 (P < .01). Mean reduction in PRA class II was 33.8 ± 5.93 to 29.2 ± 4.96 (P > .05). In the DS group, 3 (16.7%) patients were treated with rituximab. In the AAMR group, 9 (31.0%) patients were treated with rituximab, and 1 (5.5%) patient received eculizimab.In the DS group, the mean follow-up period in years ± SD was 5.06 ± 3.01 and no patient had graft loss. In the AAMR group, the mean follow-up period in years was 5.06 ± 2.74 and 6 (33.3%) patients had graft loss with acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS: PP and IVIG treatment provide significant reduction in PRA levels and can be used in DS protocols.

Long-term Results of Kidney Transplantation in Patients With Familial Mediterranean Fever and Amyloidosis.

INTRODUCTION: Amyloid A amyloidosis is most commonly caused by familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) in Turkey. Amyloidosis secondary to FMF is an important cause of end-stage renal failure, and kidney transplantation (KT) in these cases can be complicated, with long-term results oftentimes inferior compared with organ transplant in patients without FMF. The present study aims to show the long-term results of patients with secondary amyloidosis caused by FMF undergoing KT . METHODS: We enrolled 27 patients with a history of FMF amyloidosis undergoing KT and a control group of 614 patients undergoing KT between 2005 and 2018 at Ankara University Medical School. All data were recorded retrospectively from patients files. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (81.5%) were treated with triple immunosuppressive therapy consisting of mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and a steroid; 5 patients (18.5%) were treated with tacrolimus, azathioprine, and prednisolone. Acute cellular rejection was seen in 3 patients (11.1%), and acute cellular- and antibody-mediated rejection occurred in 1 patient (3.7%). During the follow-up period, graft loss due to acute cellular rejection was observed in only 1 patient. One patient was lost to follow-up.

Outcomes of Canakinumab Treatment in Recipients of Kidney Transplant With Familial Mediterranean Fever: A Case Series.

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is an important and preventable cause of chronic kidney disease due to secondary amyloidosis. Although colchicine is the first-line therapy in patients with FMF with 60% to 65% complete remission rates, 5% to 10% of patients are colchicine-resistant and 5% to 10% of them are intolerant to the therapy. Anti-interleukin-1 agents, such as anakinra and canakinumab, are safe and efficient therapeutic options in patients with colchicine resistance or intolerance. However, the data on management of these targeted agents is limited in recipients of kidney transplant (RKT). In this case series, we aim to share our experience on canakinumab therapy of 4 RKTs with FMF-related amyloidosis, who were followed up in our clinic between 2010 and 2017. All of the 4 patients with end-stage renal disease were colchicine- resistant and on other alternative therapies, which provided poor disease control. For efficient control of secondary amyloidosis, canakinumab therapy was initiated in 1 of the patients before the renal transplant, and for the remaining patients after renal transplant. Any serious adverse effect, development of proteinuria, or graft dysfunction has not been observed in any of the patients. Under the canakinumab treatment, complete clinical responses, prevent typical familial Mediterranean fever attacks with fever and arthritis and abdominal pain, normalized serum amyloid A and C-reactive protein levels were achieved in all patients. Canakinumab treatment is a safe and effective therapeutic option for RKTs with FMF who are resistant or intolerant to colchicine and anakinra.

Maintenance Immunosuppressive Treatment of Renal Transplant Recipients in the Critical Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: In intensive care unit (ICU), although there is no standard protocol for maintenance of immunosuppressive (IS) treatments for the kidney transplant recipients (KTx), the dose and the number of IS drugs are decreased according to the center's experience. The aim of this study is to evaluate the changes in IS treatment during stays in the ICU and to evaluate the safety and results of this modification on the IS treatment in the ICU arbitrarily. METHOD: We evaluated retrospectively our kidney transplant recipients in ICU between 2012 and 2017. The immunosuppressive protocols and the results were taken from the ICU documents. RESULTS: A total of 31 (18 male, 13 female) patients were suitable for the analysis. They were all under the triple IS protocol including Tacrolimus (Tac) + Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + steroid before the admission. The reason for ICU admission were severe sepsis in all patients. In ICU, 16 patients (51.6%) died, and a total of 10 patients were lost with functional graft. Change in IS treatment is as follows: a total of the 23 patients (74.2%) were given only steroids, and 8 patients (25.8%) were changed from triple to 2 drugs. Acute kidney injury developed in 42% (13 patients) of the patients in ICU. CONCLUSION: In our study, we observed that life-threatening severe infections were the main cause of ICU admission in KTx. Reduction in IS treatments are common practice, and reduction to a single dose of steroid was the most frequently chosen IS treatment. Eighty percent of patients are discharged with reduction of steroid gradually. None of the patients developed acute rejection and permanent graft injury.