Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 1 de 1
1.
Digestion ; 105(3): 224-231, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38479373

INTRODUCTION: Comprehensive and standardized colonoscopy reports are crucial in colorectal cancer prevention, monitoring, and research. This study investigates adherence to national and international guidelines by analyzing reporting practices among 21 endoscopists in 7 German centers, with a focus on polyp reporting. METHODS: We identified and assessed German, European, American, and World Health Organization-provided statements to identify key elements in colonoscopy reporting. Board-certified gastroenterologists rated the relevance of each element and estimated their reporting frequency. Adherence to the identified report elements was evaluated for 874 polyps from 351 colonoscopy reports ranging from March 2021 to March 2022. RESULTS: We identified numerous recommendations for colonoscopy reporting. We categorized the reasoning behind those recommendations into clinical relevance, justification, and quality control and research. Although all elements were considered relevant by the surveyed gastroenterologists, discrepancies were observed in the evaluated reports. Particularly diminutive polyps or attributes which are rarely abnormal (e.g., surface integrity) respectively rarely performed (e.g., injection) were sparsely documented. Furthermore, the white light morphology of polyps was inconsistently documented using either the Paris classification or free text. In summary, the analysis of 874 reported polyps revealed heterogeneous adherence to the recommendations, with reporting frequencies ranging from 3% to 89%. CONCLUSION: The inhomogeneous report practices may result from implicit reporting practices and recommendations with varying clinical relevance. Future recommendations should clearly differentiate between clinical relevance and research and quality control or explanatory purposes. Additionally, the role of computer-assisted documentation should be further evaluated to increase report frequencies of non-pathological findings and diminutive polyps.


Colonic Polyps , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Colonoscopy/standards , Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Colonoscopy/methods , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Germany , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Quality Improvement , Gastroenterologists/statistics & numerical data , Gastroenterologists/standards , Documentation/standards , Documentation/statistics & numerical data , Documentation/methods
...