BACKGROUND: An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) can cause high levels of anxiety and depression, resulting in negative effects on quality of life. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the quality of life, anxiety, and acceptance of the ICD using standardized measurement instruments and identify predictors of better responses for each of the outcomes studied. METHOD: This is a prospective cohort study with patients undergoing initial ICD implantation or reoperation to maintain the device. The study outcomes included quality of life, anxiety, and acceptance of the ICD. The change in scores (30 and 180 days) was assessed using the minimal important difference (MID). Univariate analysis and the multivariate logistic regression model were used to identify predictors of better responses, adopting a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients were included between January/2020 to June/2021, with a mean age of 55.3 ± 13.4 years and a predominance of males (72.1%). The MID for quality of life, anxiety, and ICD acceptance were observed in 33 (22.4%), 36 (24.5%) and 43 (29.3%) patients, respectively. Age equal to or greater than 60 years (OR=2.5; 95%CI=1.14-5.53; p=0.022), absence of atrial fibrillation (OR=3.8; 95%CI=1.26-11.63; p=0.017) and female gender (OR=2.2; 95%CI=1.02-4.97; p=0.045) were independent predictors of better responses to quality of life, anxiety and acceptance of the ICD, respectively. CONCLUSION: The identification of predictors for better quality of life scores, anxiety, and acceptance of the device can support the implementation of specific care for patients with a greater chance of presenting unfavorable results.
FUNDAMENTO: O cardioversor-desfibrilador implantável (CDI) pode causar níveis elevados de ansiedade e depressão, resultando em efeitos negativos na qualidade de vida. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a qualidade de vida, a ansiedade e a aceitação do CDI por meio de instrumentos de medida padronizados e identificar preditores de melhores respostas para cada um dos desfechos estudados. MÉTODO: Coorte prospectiva com pacientes submetidos a implante inicial de CDI ou reoperação para a manutenção do dispositivo. Os desfechos do estudo incluíram: qualidade de vida, ansiedade e aceitação do CDI. A mudança nos escores (30 e 180 dias) foi avaliada por meio da diferença mínima importante (DMI). Foi utilizada a análise univariada e o modelo de regressão logística multivariada para a identificação de preditores de melhores respostas, adotando-se o nível de significância de 5%. RESULTADOS: De janeiro/2020 a junho/2021 foram incluídos 147 pacientes, com idade média de 55,3 ± 13,4 anos e predomínio do sexo masculino (72,1%). A DMI para qualidade de vida, a ansiedade e a aceitação do CDI foram observadas em 33 (22,4%), 36 (24,5%) e 43 (29,3%) pacientes, respectivamente. Idade igual ou maior que 60 anos (OR=2,5; IC 95%=1,14-5,53; p=0,022), ausência de fibrilação atrial (OR=3,8; IC 95%=1,26-11,63; p=0,017) e sexo feminino (OR=2,2; IC 95%=1,02-4,97; p=0,045) foram preditores independentes de melhores respostas para qualidade de vida, ansiedade e aceitação do CDI, respectivamente. CONCLUSÃO: A identificação de preditores para melhores escores de qualidade de vida, ansiedade e aceitação do dispositivo pode subsidiar a implementação de cuidados específicos para os pacientes com maiores chances de apresentar resultados desfavoráveis.
Anxiety , Defibrillators, Implantable , Quality of Life , Humans , Defibrillators, Implantable/psychology , Male , Female , Anxiety/psychology , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Aged , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Depression/therapy , Depression/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Age Factors
Device acceptance is a crucial factor in identifying implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients at risk for psychosocial distress and unfavorable quality of life outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the evidence of the validity of internal structure (construct) and reliability of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (FPAS) in a sample of ICD patients, comparing the psychometric indicators of the complete (FPAS-18 item) and abbreviated (FPAS-12 item) versions. The sample included 151 participants (97 males, mean age of 55.7 ± 14.1 years) who completed the cross-culturally adapted version of the FPAS instrument for the Brazilian context. The psychometric properties of both versions of the FPAS instrument were evaluated by two distinct approaches:â¢Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: used to test the internal structure of the instrumentâ¢Cronbach's Alpha and McDonald's Omega: used to determine the reliability of the instrument The two versions of the FPAS-Br instrument showed consistent evidence of internal structure validity and reliability. However, the FPAS-Br 12-item showed a better psychometric adjustment, confirmed by the analysis of the quality indicators of the models.
Data quality monitoring plays a crucial role in multicenter prospective registries. By maintaining high data accuracy, completeness, and consistency, researchers can improve the overall quality and reliability of the registry data, enabling meaningful conclusions and supporting evidence-based decisions. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate data quality metrics (completeness, accuracy, and temporal plausibility) of a Multicenter Registry of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) and to perform a direct data audit of a random sample of records to assess the agreement levels with the source documents. The CIED Registry was a prospective, multicenter, real-world observational study carried out from January 2020 to December 2022 in five designated centers across Sao Paulo, Brazil. We assessed the data quality of the CIED Registry by using two distinct approaches:â¢Dynamic data monitoring using features of the REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) software, including data reports and data quality rulesâ¢Direct data audit in which information from a random sample of 10 % of cases from the coordinating center was compared with original source documents Our findings suggest that the methodological approach applied to the CIED Registry resulted in high data completeness, accuracy, temporal plausibility, and excellent agreement levels with the source documents.
