Cardiac Mechanics Evaluation in Preschool-Aged Children with Preterm Birth History: A Speckle Tracking and 4D Echocardiography Study.

Background: The premature-born adult population is set to grow significantly, and prematurity has emerged as an important cardiovascular risk factor. We aimed to comprehensively assess cardiac mechanics and function in a cohort of ex-preterm preschoolers. Methods: Ex-preterm children (<30 weeks of gestation), aged 2 to 5 years, underwent transthoracic 2D, speckle-tracking, and 4D echocardiography. The findings were compared with 19 full-term children. Results: Our cohort of 38 children with prematurity history showed a normal morpho-functional echocardiographic assessment. However, compared to controls, the indexed 3D end-diastolic volumes of ventricular chambers were reduced (left ventricle 58.7 ± 11.2 vs. 67.2 ± 8.5 mL/m2; right ventricle 50.3 ± 10.4 vs. 57.7 ± 11 mL/m2; p = 0.02). Left ventricle global and longitudinal systolic function were worse in terms of fraction shortening (32.9% ± 6.8 vs. 36.5% ± 5.4; p = 0.05), ejection fraction (59.2% ± 4.3 vs. 62.3% ± 3.7; p = 0.003), and global longitudinal strain (-23.6% ± 2.4 vs. -25.5% ± 1.7; p = 0.003). Finally, we found a reduced left atrial strain (47.4% ± 9.7 vs. 54.9% ± 6.8; p = 0.004). Conclusions: Preschool-aged ex-preterm children exhibited smaller ventricles and subclinical impairment of left ventricle systolic and diastolic function compared to term children. Long-term follow-up is warranted to track the evolution of these findings.

Impact of macronutrients intake on glycemic homeostasis of preterm infants: evidence from continuous glucose monitoring.

Nutritional intake could influence the blood glucose profile during early life of preterm infants. We investigated the impact of macronutrient intake on glycemic homeostasis using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). We analyzed macronutrient intake in infants born ≤ 32 weeks gestational age (GA) and/or with birth weight ≤ 1500 g. CGM was started within 48 h of birth and maintained for 5 days. Mild and severe hypoglycemia were defined as sensor glucose (SG) < 72 mg/dL and <47 mg/dL, respectively, while mild and severe hyperglycemia were SG > 144 mg/dL and >180 mg/dL. Data from 30 participants were included (age 29.9 weeks (29.1; 31.2), birthweight 1230.5 g (1040.0; 1458.6)). A reduced time in mild hypoglycemia was associated to higher amino acids intake (p = 0.011) while increased exposure to hyperglycemia was observed in the presence of higher lipids intake (p = 0.031). The birthweight was the strongest predictor of neonatal glucose profile with an inverse relationship between the time spent in hyperglycemia and birthweight (p = 0.007).  Conclusions: Macronutrient intakes influence neonatal glucose profile as described by continuous glucose monitoring. CGM might contribute to adjust nutritional intakes in preterm infants. What is Known: • Parenteral nutrition may affect glucose profile during the first days of life of preterm infants. What is New: • Continuous glucose monitoring describes the relationship between daily parenteral nutrient intakes and time spent in hypo and hyperglycemic ranges.

Glucose variability increases during minimally invasive procedures in very preterm infants.

The objective of this study is to assess the effect of neonatal procedures on glucose variability in very preterm infants. Preterm infants (≤ 32 weeks gestation and/or birthweight ≤ 1500 g) were started on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on day 2 of birth and monitored for 5 days. Minimally invasive (heel stick, venipunctures) and non-invasive (nappy change, parental presence) procedures were recorded. CGM data were analyzed 30 min before and after each procedure. The primary outcome was the coefficient of glucose variation (CV = SD/mean) before and after the procedure; SD and median glucose were also evaluated. We analyzed 496 procedures in 22 neonates (GA 30.5 weeks [29-31]; birthweight 1300 g [950-1476]). Median glucose did not change before and after each procedure, while CV and SD increased after heel prick (p = 0.017 and 0.030), venipuncture (p = 0.010 and 0.030), and nappy change (p < 0.001 and < 0.001), in the absence of a difference during parental presence. CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive and minimally invasive procedures increase glucose variability in the absence of changes of mean glucose. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Minimally invasive procedures - including nappy change - may increase neonatal stress in preterm infants. WHAT IS NEW: • Continuous glucose monitoring provides a quantitative measure of neonatal stress during neonatal care procedures demonstrating an increase of glucose variability.

Device positioning with LISA vs. INSURE: a crossover randomized controlled manikin trial.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare time of device positioning, success of procedure and operator's opinion with LISA vs. INSURE in a manikin simulating an extremely low birthweight infant. METHODS: A randomized controlled crossover (AB/BA) trial of surfactant administration with LISA vs. INSURE in a preterm manikin. Forty-two tertiary hospital consultants and pediatric residents with previous experience with LISA and INSURE participated. The primary outcome measure was the time of device positioning. The secondary outcome measures were: success of the first attempt, number of attempts, correct depth, and participant's opinion on difficulty in using the device. RESULTS: Median time of device positioning was shorter with LISA vs. INSURE (median difference -8 s, 95% confidence interval -16 to -1 s; p = .04). Success at first attempt was 35/40 with LISA (83%) and 31/40 with INSURE (74%) (p = .42). Median number of attempts was 1 (IQR 1-1) with LISA and 1 (IQR 1-2) with INSURE (p = .08). Correct depth was achieved in 30/40 with LISA (71%) and 37/40 with INSURE (88%) (p = .12). Participants found LISA easier to insert in the trachea (p = .002) but INSURE easier to place at the correct depth (p = .008). Handling the device (p = .43), visualizing the glottis (p = .17) and overall difficulty in using the device (p = .13) were not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: In a preterm manikin model, positioning a thin catheter (LISA) was quicker and easier than a tracheal tube (INSURE), but the magnitude of the difference was unlikely to be clinically relevant and the tracheal tube was easier to place at the correct depth. REGISTRATION: clinicaltrial.gov NCT04944108.

Sonographic Evaluation of the Endotracheal Tube Position in the Neonatal Population: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Endotracheal intubation in neonates is challenging and requires a high level of precision, due to narrow and short airways, especially in preterm newborns. The current gold standard for endotracheal tube (ETT) verification is chest X-ray (CXR); however, this method presents some limitations, such as ionizing radiation exposure and delayed in obtaining the radiographic images, that point of care ultrasound (POCUS) could overcome. Primary Objective: To evaluate ultrasound efficacy in determining ETT placement adequacy in preterm and term newborns. Secondary Objective: To compare the time required for ultrasound confirmation vs. time needed for other standard of care methods. Search Methods: A search in Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar and in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was performed. Our most recent search was conducted in September 2021 including the following keywords: "newborn", "infant", "neonate", "endotracheal intubation", "endotracheal tube", "ultrasonography", "ultrasound". Selection Criteria: We considered randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, prospective, retrospective and cross-sectional studies published after 2012, involving neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients needing intubation/intubated infants and evaluating POCUS efficacy and/or accuracy in detecting ETT position vs. a defined gold-standard method. Three review authors independently assessed the studies' quality and extracted data. Main Results: We identified 14 eligible studies including a total of 602 ETT evaluations in NICU or in the delivery room. In about 80% of cases the gold standard for ETT position verification was CXR. Ultrasound was able to identify the presence of ETT in 96.8% of the evaluations, with a pooled POCUS sensitivity of 93.44% (95% CI: 90.4-95.75%) in detecting an appropriately positioned ETT as assessed by CXR. Bedside ultrasound confirmation was also found to be significantly faster compared to obtaining a CXR. Conclusion: POCUS appears to be a fast and effective technique to identify correct endotracheal intubation in newborns. This review could add value and importance to the use of this promising technique.