Simultaneously Detected Liver and Lung Metastases from Colorectal Carcinoma: A Potential Treatment Strategy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: No clear treatment strategy for simultaneously detected liver and lung metastases (SLLM) of colorectal carcinoma has been established, to date. We aimed to identify the prognostic factors for SLLM and propose an appropriate treatment option. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 64 patients with SLLM: 32 underwent pulmonary resection after hepatectomy in 32, while the other 32 underwent hepatectomy alone in 32. Poor prognostic factors and a suitable strategy for SLLM were assessed. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level ≥20 ng/ml (p=0.001) and unresected lung metastases (p=0.001) were independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival. Compared with the non-pulmonary resection group, the rate of R1 resection of liver tumors (46.8% vs. 15.6%; p=0.007), incidence of complications after hepatectomy (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III: 21.8% vs. 0%; p=0.005) and having four or more metastatic lung nodules (40.6% vs. 3.2%; p=0.001) were significantly higher in the group that underwent hepatectomy only. CONCLUSION: Preoperative CEA ≥20 ng/ml and unresectable pulmonary nodules were prognostic factors for poor survival of patients with SLLM. Furthermore, the presence of more than four pulmonary nodules was a preoperative predictive factor for unresectable pulmonary nodules. R1 resection and the occurrence of complications after hepatectomy should be avoided; a smooth transition from hepatectomy to pulmonary resection is important.

Glasgow Prognostic Score Predicts Survival and Recurrence Pattern in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The prognostic significance of the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) on outcomes of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear; the aim of the study was to assess its significance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 480 patients with HCC who underwent liver resection with curative intent at the Yokohama City University Hospital and Medical Center were enrolled in the study. Patients were classified into three groups: GPS-0, C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤1.0 mg/dl serum albumin ≥3.5 g/dl; GPS-1, CRP >1.0 mg/dl or serum albumin <3.5 g/dl; and GPS-2, CRP >1.0 mg/dl, serum albumin <3.5 g/dl. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed retrospectively. The recurrence pattern was also investigated using GPS. RESULTS: Of the 480 patients, 382 (79.6%), 81 (16.9%), and 17 (3.5%) were assigned to GPS-0, GPS-1, and GPS-2, respectively. Elevated GPS, indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min, and protein induced by vitamin K antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) were significantly associated with a poor OS. Elevated GPS, alpha-fetoprotein, and PIVKA-II were significantly associated with a poor DFS by multivariate analysis. The number of patients with liver-only recurrence in GPS-0, GPS-1, and GPS-2 was 179 (86.1%), 40 (78.4%), and 9 (69.2%), respectively. The number of patients with four or more intrahepatic metastases in the GPS-0, GPS-1, and GPS-2 groups, was 33 (17.9%), 11 (27.5%), and 8 (88.9%), respectively. The number of patients with four or more intrahepatic metastases in the GPS-2 group was significantly higher (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative GPS is a useful predictor of OS and recurrence pattern after liver resection with a curative intent for HCC.

Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Following Curative Resection of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) following hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is not universally practiced because of the lack of supporting evidence. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy of AC following curative CRLM resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among the 742 patients who underwent their first hepatectomy for CRLM at our institution, 335 were stratified into surgery alone (SA; n=162) and AC (n=173) groups. Poor prognostic factors for SA were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Propensity score matching was used to compare the clinical outcomes between SA and AC groups according to the number of prognostic factors. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels (≥10 ng/ml; p=0.01), primary lymph node metastases (≥1; p=0.0001), and the number (n≥4; p=0.01) and maximum diameter (≥5 cm; p=0.00001) of CRLM tumours were independent poor prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in the SA group. Patients with ≥3 risk factors were categorized as being high risk. After propensity score matching, the 5-year OS rate was significantly higher in the AC group (n=13) than that in the SA group (n=15; 47.9% vs. 7.3%; p=0.03) among high-risk patients. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy after curative CRLM resection may improve the prognosis of patients with three or more risk factors including preoperative CEA levels ≥10 g/ml, primary lymph node metastases ≥1, number (≥4) and maximum diameter (≥5 cm) of CRLM tumours.

Surgical Indications for Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to retrospectively analyse adverse predictors to identify patients with huge hepatocellular carcinoma who were not appropriate candidates for hepatic resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 551 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent hepatectomy between 1992 and 2019, 92 were diagnosed with huge hepatocellular carcinoma (diameter >10 cm) and 115 were diagnosed with large hepatocellular carcinoma (diameter=5-10 cm). Clinical features and overall and disease-free survival rates were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Cumulative overall survival was significantly worse in the huge group than in the large group (p=0.035). In the huge group, multivariate analyses revealed that liver cirrhosis, multiple intrahepatic metastases (≥4), poor histological grade, and macroscopic portal vein invasion were significantly associated with poor prognosis. CONCLUSION: We identified four adverse predictors of survival and determined that patients with two or more predictors are not appropriate candidates for straightforward hepatic resection.

Risk Factors Associated With Early Recurrence of Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy and Curative Resection.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To identify risk factors of early recurrence after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NACRT) and curative pancreatectomy in patients with borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients with BR-PDAC who underwent curative resection after NACRT during July 2009-June 2014 were included. Patients were divided into early recurrence (i.e., developed recurrence within 1 year after pancreatectomy; n=30) and late/non-recurrence groups (n=31). The patient characteristics, clinicopathological factors of early recurrence, and survival time were retrospectively compared between groups. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), microvascular invasion, and lymph node metastasis were associated with early recurrence. In the multivariate analysis, the pre-NACRT SUVmax and microvascular invasion in the early recurrence group were significantly different from that in the late/non-recurrence group. A pre-NACRT SUVmax >4.1 was an independent predictor of poor recurrence-free and overall survival. CONCLUSION: SUVmax and microvascular invasion are independent predictors of poor recurrence-free and overall survival after NACRT for BR-PDAC. Although complete pancreatectomy after NACRT was performed, approximately half of the patients had recurrence within 1 year.