Case log trends of urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery fellows: A comparison of urology- and gynecology-based fellowship programs.

AIMS: Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (URPS) fellowship can be pursued after completion of either a urology (URO) or obstetrics and gynecology (GYN) residency. Our aim is to determine differences in graduating fellow cohort (GFC) case logs between URO- and GYN-based URPS programs. METHODS: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case logs for URPS GFCs in both GYN- and URO-based programs were analyzed for the 2019-2023 academic years (AY). Unpaired t-tests with Welch's correction were used to compare annual mean logged cases between URO- versus GYN-based GFCs for select surgical categories and the top 11 most logged index cases. RESULTS: GYN-based GFCs logged more cases for all pelvic organ prolapse (POP) categories including surgery on apical POP, anterior wall POP, and posterior wall POP (all p < 0.01), while URO-based GFCs logged more cases for surgery on the urinary system (p = 0.03). For the top 11 logged procedures, URO-based GFCs logged more sacral neuromodulation cases (p = 0.02), whereas GYN-based GFCs logged more slings, vaginal hysterectomies, minimally-invasive hysterectomies, vaginal apical POP, vaginal posterior POP, vaginal anterior POP, and minimally-invasive apical POP cases (all p < 0.01). There was no difference between URO- and GYN-based GFCs for complex urodynamics, cystoscopy with botox injection, or periurethral injection cases. CONCLUSIONS: URO-based URPS fellows tend to graduate with more surgery on the urinary system and sacral neuromodulation cases, while GYN-based fellows perform more slings, hysterectomies, and POP surgery. These findings may help fellowships better understand potential differences in training among graduates from URO- and GYN-based programs and encourage collaboration to lessen these discrepancies.

Understanding basal cell adenocarcinoma of the head and neck: Population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Using a population-based database, this study investigates the risk factors, epidemiology, and outcomes of basal cell adenocarcinoma (BCAC) of the head and neck. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was analyzed for all patients with BCAC of the head and neck from 1973 to 2015. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-two cases of BCAC of the head and neck were identified. Mean age of diagnosis was 64.1 years. 52.5% were male and 77.3% were white. The most common primary site was the parotid gland (71.7%). Most patients underwent surgery alone (51.9%). Five-year disease-specific survival (5Y-DSS) was 95.6%, and 10Y-DSS was 90.3%. Highest survival was seen with surgery alone followed by combined surgery and radiation (10Y-DSS: 93.9% vs. 88.9%, p = 0.001). Age, primary site, T-classification, grade, and treatment type significantly affected survival. CONCLUSIONS: BCAC of the head and neck presents most frequently in the parotid glands. Surgery alone is associated with highest survival.

Single-Port Robotic Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Bowel Diversion: Initial Experience and Review of Surgical Outcomes.

Introduction and Objective: Scant literature is available on surgical outcomes of radical cystectomies on the new single-port (SP) system. This study compares short-term outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with those undergoing intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) on the multiport (MP) vs SP platform. Methods: This institutional review board approved study used a prospective cystectomy database and nonparametric testing including chi-squared, Mann-Whitney U, and Fisher exact tests to analyze all variables stratified by surgical approach. Results: Thirty-four patients underwent radical cystectomy with ICUD from September 1, 2019, to February 8, 2021. Twenty patients were in the MP cohort, whereas 14 were in the SP group. Table 1 presents the demographics of both groups and shows no statistically significant differences. Intra- and postoperative as well as pathology data are given in Table 2. Patients in the SP group had less narcotic use (MP: 25 morphine milligram equivalent [MME] vs SP: 11.5 MME, p = 0.047) and shorter return of bowel function (MP: 3 days vs SP: 2 days, p = 0.032). Operative times were similar between both groups despite having fewer patients undergoing ileal conduit (MP: 85% vs SP: 50%, p = 0.027) in the SP group. In Table 3, we list the early short-term postoperative follow-up data for each group that showed no significant differences between the two groups with an average follow-up of 4.9 months for MP and 4.4 months for SP. Conclusions: Our initial experience with SP robotic cystectomy and ICUD appears to be safe and an effective alternative to MP cystectomies. A learning curve was involved but the overall transition from MP to SP was smooth. Operative times were similar despite fewer patients undergoing ileal diversion, shorter return of bowel function, and less narcotic use in the SP group. Further studies including longer follow-ups with multi-institutional data are underway.

Understanding giant cell sarcoma of the head and neck: A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Giant cell sarcomas (GCS) are rare head and neck neoplasms. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was analyzed for all patients who have been diagnosed with GCS from 1973 to 2014. RESULTS: Four hundred and forty cases of GCS of the head and neck were identified. The average age at diagnosis was 74.4 years, 86.8% were white, 82.5% were male, 70.7% were insured, and 88.2% lived in an urban metropolitan region. Connective tissue was the most frequent primary site (42.5%). The 5Y-DSS rate was 91.1%, while the 5Y-OS was 54.6% for all cases. Patients treated with surgery alone had the highest 5Y-DSS rate of 94.5. T-classification odds ratio was a significant predictor of survival accounting for confounding variables on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: GCS presents most frequently in connective tissue of the head and neck with overall high probability of survival. The treatment of choice is surgery alone.

YouTube and Men's Health: A Review of the Current Literature.

INTRODUCTION: YouTube is the most used social media website, and there is a growing body of literature examining the reliability of healthcare information on this platform. Patients seeking men's health information may be more likely to use YouTube owing to the sensitivity of these issues. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to review the literature for studies related to the reliability of YouTube videos about men's health topics. METHODS: A literature review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar for publications related to the reliability of YouTube videos about men's health as of July 1, 2020. RESULTS: There were 17 studies related to YouTube and Men's Health. Most videos were found to be unreliable, and videos uploaded by physicians or healthcare organizations were usually more reliable. However, there were no studies in which more reliable videos had higher metrics of user engagement (views, likes, comments) than unreliable videos and there were several studies where unreliable videos had higher metrics of user engagement. In addition, the methods used to evaluate YouTube videos are not uniform across studies including the way that terms are searched (filtering by relevance vs view count) and the way in which reliability is assessed. For example, some studies create custom evaluation forms based on clinical guidelines, whereas others use validated questionnaires. The only validated questionnaire used across multiple studies was the DISCERN score criterion. CONCLUSIONS: Most information on YouTube about men's health is unreliable. Videos created by physicians and healthcare organizations are more reliable, and videos that are advertisements are less reliable. Physicians and healthcare systems should continue to upload educational YouTube videos but work to increase their views and user engagement. It may benefit patients if physician organizations could work with YouTube to create verified videos disseminating healthcare information that are favored in the search algorithm. Warren CJ, Sawhney R, Shah T, et al. YouTube and Men's Health: A Review of the Current Literature. Sex Med Rev 2021;9:280-288.

Outcome and Cost Analysis of Hand-Sewn and Stapled Anastomoses in the Reversal of Loop Ileostomy.

Diverting loop ileostomies are common procedures for protecting high-risk anastomoses. There is little consensus on the most ideal technique both in terms of cost efficiency and outcome. Data for this study were collected from 101 patients who underwent loop ileostomy reversal between 2009 and 2014 at Morristown Medical Center. Of the 101 patients included in the review, 57 received a hand-sewn anastomosis (HS-A) and 44 received a stapled anastomosis (S-A). Average total hospital charges for stapled anastomoses were significantly greater than that for hand-sewn anastomoses, as were total operating room supply costs. When the total cost of the operation itself was considered, S-A cases were still found to be significantly greater than HS-A cases. Hospital room charges, total lab charges, pathology charges, and EKG/ECG charges were all greater for S-A cases than HS-A cases. Overall costs were greater for S-As than hand-sewn anastomoses and because of a lack of difference in procedure length, stapler supply costs were not offset. Complication rates and length of stay were also similar between the techniques. We found S-A cases to be more costly and have a greater cost/hour than HS-A cases.

Post-assembly transformations of porphyrin-containing metal-organic framework (MOF) films fabricated via automated layer-by-layer coordination.

Herein, we demonstrate the robustness of layer-by-layer (LbL)-assembled, pillared-paddlewheel-type MOF films toward conversion to new or modified MOFs via solvent-assisted linker exchange (SALE) and post-assembly linker metalation. Further, we show that LbL synthesis can afford MOFs that have proven inaccessible through other de novo strategies.