New Horizons in Peripheral Artery Disease.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is the lower limb manifestation of systemic atherosclerotic disease. PAD may initially present with symptoms of intermittent claudication, whilst chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI), the end stage of PAD, presents with rest pain and/or tissue loss. PAD is an age-related condition present in over 10% of those aged ≥65 in high-income countries. Guidelines regarding definition, diagnosis and staging of PAD and CLTI have been updated to reflect the changing patterns and presentations of disease given the increasing prevalence of diabetes. Recent research has changed guidelines on optimal medical therapy, with low-dose anticoagulant plus aspirin recommended in some patients. Recently published randomised trials highlight where bypass-first or endovascular-first approaches may be optimal in infra-inguinal disease. New techniques in endovascular surgery have increased minimally invasive options for ever more complex disease. Increasing recognition has been given to the complexity of patients with CLTI where a high prevalence of both frailty and cognitive impairment are present and a significant burden of multi-morbidity and polypharmacy. Despite advances in minimally invasive revascularisation techniques and reduction in amputation incidence, survival remains poor for many with CLTI. Shared decision-making is essential, and conservative management is often appropriate for older patients. There is emerging evidence of the benefit of specialist geriatric team input in the perioperative management of older patients undergoing surgery for CLTI. Recent UK guidelines now recommend screening for frailty, cognitive impairment and delirium in older vascular surgery patients as well as recommending all vascular surgery services have support and input from specialist geriatrics teams.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) in primary care-educational experiences for PAD primary care in England-a mixed-method study.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral artery disease (PAD), the pathophysiologic narrowing of arterial blood vessels of the lower leg due to atherosclerosis, is a highly prevalent disease, with sharp increases in prevalence with age. Primary care is ideally located to identify and manage PAD. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify the educational experiences, opinions, and confidence of primary care clinicians (PCCs) regarding PAD. METHOD: This mixed-method study was conducted within primary care in England. An online survey was completed with follow-on semistructured interviews, between January and September 2021, with PCCs, namely GPs, practice nurses, and allied professionals (survey n = 874, interviews n = 50). RESULTS: PCCs report variation in PAD education received, where the content could not often be recalled. Patient-focussed experiential and self-directed learning, formed the largest method to gain PAD education. All PCCs recognized that they have an important role in recognizing PAD yet confidence in recognizing and diagnosing PAD was lacking. PCCs acknowledged that late or missed PAD diagnosis resulted in significant patient morbidity and mortality. Yet many did not recognize PAD as a common disease. CONCLUSION: As "specialist-generalists" with finite resources, education provided to primary care needs to be applicable for the multimorbid patient presentations often seen, utilizing resources available in primary care, with consideration to the time constraints endured.

The Impact of Anemia on One-Year Amputation-Free Survival in Patients Undergoing Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Anemia is potentially associated with increased morbidity and mortality following vascular surgery procedures. This study investigated whether peri-procedural anemia is associated with reduced 1-year amputation-free survival (AFS) in patients undergoing revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODOLOGY: A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with CLTI between February 2018-February 2019, who subsequently underwent revascularization, was conducted. Hemoglobin concentration measured at index assessment was recorded and stratified by WHO criteria. Subsequent peri-procedural red blood cell transfusions (RBC) were also recorded. The primary outcome was 1-year AFS. Kaplan Meier survival analysis and Cox's proportional hazard modelling were conducted to assess the effect of anemia and peri-procedure transfusion on outcomes. RESULTS: 283 patients were analyzed, of which 148 (52.3%) were anemic. 53 patients (18.7%) underwent RBC transfusion. Patients with anemia had a significantly lower 1-year AFS (64.2% vs. 78.5%, P = 0.009). A significant difference in 1-year AFS was also observed based upon anemia severity (P = 0.008) and for patients who received RBC transfusion (45.3% vs 77.0%, P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, moderately severe anemia was independently associated with increased risk of major amputation/death (aHR 1.90, 95% CI 1.06-3.38, P = 0.030). After adjusting for severity of baseline anemia, peri-procedural RBC transfusion was associated with a significant increase in the combined risk of major amputation/death (aHR 3.15, 95% CI 1.91-5.20, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Moderately severe peri-procedural anemia and subsequent RBC transfusion are independently associated with reduced 1-year AFS in patients undergoing revascularization for CLTI. Future work should focus on investigating alternative measures to managing anemia in this cohort.

Associations of Clinical Frailty with Severity of Limb Threat and Outcomes in Chronic Limb-threatening Ischaemia.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the relationship of frailty and severity of chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI), and their comparative associations with one-year outcomes, in patients presenting to a vascular limb salvage (VaLS) clinic. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilised data collected from a prospectively maintained VaLS clinic database. Patients aged ≥50 presenting to the VaLS clinic with CLTI between February 2018 and April 2019 were included. Frailty was measured using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and limb threat severity by the Wound, Ischaemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) score. Excessive polypharmacy was defined as ≥10 medications. Anticholinergic burden (ACB) score and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) were calculated for all patients. The primary outcome measure was a composite endpoint of death or amputation at one-year. Associations with outcome were assessed using Cox regression and reported as hazards ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: A total of 198 patients were included, with CFS scores available for 190 patients. 98 patients (52%) were frail (CFS ≥5). 127 patients (67%) initially underwent endovascular revascularisation. Excessive polypharmacy was common (55 patients; 28%). Frailty was associated with increased WIfI stage (P = 0.025) as well as age, female sex, CCI score, number of medications, excessive polypharmacy but not ACB score. Frail patients were more frequently managed non-operatively (P = 0.017). Frailty (HR 1.91; 95% CI 1.09, 3.34; P = 0.024) and WIfI stage 4 (HR 3.29; 95%CI 1.23, 8.80; P = 0.018) were associated with death or amputation on univariable analysis. WIfI stage 4 (HR 2.80; 95%CI 1.04, 7.57; P = 0.042) and CCI score (HR 1.21; 95%CI 1.03, 1.41; P = 0.015), but not frailty (HR 1.25; 95%CI 0.67, 2.33; P = 0.474), were independently associated with death or amputation on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is highly prevalent among CLTI patients and related to severity of limb threat. The CFS may be a useful adjunct to patient risk assessment in CLTI.

Does the Introduction of a Vascular Limb Salvage Service Improve One Year Amputation Outcomes for Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischaemia?

OBJECTIVE: Vascular limb salvage services are recommended by the Global Vascular Guidelines to help improve outcomes for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI), although their description within the literature is limited. This study reports the 12 month outcomes for an outpatient based vascular limb salvage (VaLS) clinic. METHODS: An analysis of a prospectively maintained database, involving all consecutive patients diagnosed with CLTI within the VaLS clinic from February 2018-February 2019, was undertaken. Data were compared with two comparator cohorts, identified from coding data: 1) patients managed prior to the clinic, between May 2017 and February 2018 (Pre-Clinic [PC]); and 2) patients managed outside of clinic, between February 2018 and February 2019 (Alternative Pathways [AP]). Freedom from major amputation at 12 months was the primary outcome. Kaplan-Meier plots and adjusted Cox's proportional hazard models (aHR) were used to compare outcomes. RESULTS: Five hundred and sixty-six patients (VaLS 158, AP 173, PC 235) were included (median age 74 years). Patients managed within the VaLS cohort were statistically significantly more likely to be free from major amputation (90.5%) compared with both the AP (82.1%, aHR 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28 - 0.98, p = .041) and the PC (80.0%; aHR 0.50, 95% CI 0.28 - 0.91, p = .022) cohorts at 12 months, after adjustment for age, disease severity, and presence of diabetes. CONCLUSION: This study supports the recommendations of the Global Vascular Guidelines that vascular limb salvage clinics may improve the rate of major amputation. Furthermore, the study provides a reproducible service model that delivers timely vascular assessment in an ambulatory setting. Further evaluation is required to assess longer term outcomes.

Prevalence of Cognitive Impairment in Individuals with Vascular Surgical Pathology: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: A significant proportion of vascular surgery patients may have undiagnosed cognitive impairment; however, its true prevalence and impact on outcomes are unknown. The aim of this review was to estimate the prevalence of cognitive impairment among individuals with clinically significant vascular surgical pathology and investigate its associations with post-operative outcomes in those undergoing vascular surgery. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMCare, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus were searched for relevant studies. Included studies assessed cognitive function among individuals with either symptomatic vascular surgical pathology, or disease above threshold for intervention, using a validated cognitive assessment tool. The primary outcome measure was prevalence of cognitive impairment. Secondary outcomes included incidence of post-operative delirium (POD). Two reviewers independently extracted relevant study data and assessed risk of bias (ROBINS-E or RoB 2 tool). Prevalence (%) of cognitive impairment was calculated for individual studies and presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Prevalence data from comparable studies were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method (random effects model) for separate vascular disease types. Certainty of effect estimates was assessed using the GRADE criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies (2 564 participants) were included in the systematic review, and nine studies (1 310 participants) were included in the meta-analyses. The prevalence of cognitive impairment was 61% (95% CI 48 - 74; 391 participants; low certainty) in studies including multiple vascular surgical pathologies, 38% (95% CI 32 - 44; 278 participants; very low certainty) in carotid artery disease, and 19% (95% CI 10 - 33; 641 participants; low certainty) in those with intermittent claudication. Lower cognitive assessment scores were associated with POD (five studies; 841 participants), but data were not suitable for pooling. CONCLUSION: Screening elective vascular surgery patients for cognitive impairment may be appropriate given its high prevalence, and the association of worse cognition with POD, among individuals with clinically significant vascular surgical pathology.

Missed Opportunities for Timely Recognition of Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia in Patients Undergoing a Major Amputation: A Population Based Cohort Study Using the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

OBJECTIVE: Opportunities for timely recognition of chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) within primary care, such as performing cardiovascular assessment during clinical consultation, are possibly being missed. This study aimed to investigate for potential "missed opportunities" within primary care. METHODS: This was a population based cohort study, using the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Patients undergoing a major amputation for CLTI between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2016 were included. Primary care consultation and patient clinical data within the one year period prior to amputation were extracted from the CPRD. Dates of last primary care consultation and cardiovascular assessment prior to amputation were evaluated. Timings of latest cardiovascular assessments were stratified into "recent" (7-90 days before amputation) and "late" (> 91 days). RESULTS: In total, 3 260 patients were included. In the year prior to amputation, patients attended a median of 19 (range 9-32) primary care consultations; however, prescription of secondary preventive medications was poor (antiplatelet 49.7%; lipid lowering agent 40.7%). Overall, 2 175 patients (66.7%) attended a primary care consultation 7-30 days before their amputation. However, only 416 (12.8%) underwent a cardiovascular assessment within this period, with 2 073 (63.6%) undergoing no assessment within 90 days of their amputation. Of these 2 073 patients, 1 230 (59.3%) had a primary care consultation 7-30 days before their procedure. Patients undergoing "late" assessment were younger (p = .003), with higher systolic (p = .008) and diastolic (p = .001) blood pressures than those undergoing "recent" assessment. Differences were also observed between assessment timings by deprivation (p = .003) and ethnicity (p = .006). CONCLUSION: Missed opportunities for timely recognition potentially exist and may be related to age, deprivation, and ethnicity. Further work is required to investigate these factors, as well as individual amputations to identify the causes precipitating amputation. Greater emphasis on the medical management of peripheral arterial disease and identifying cardiovascular risk factors in patients who may not fit the "at risk" stereotype, are also required.

Frailty Factors and Outcomes in Vascular Surgery Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and critique tools used to assess frailty in vascular surgery patients, and investigate its associations with patient factors and outcomes. BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence shows negative impacts of frailty on outcomes in surgical patients, but little investigation of its associations with patient factors has been undertaken. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting frailty in vascular surgery patients (PROSPERO registration: CRD42018116253) searching Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus. Quality of studies was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa scores (NOS) and quality of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria. Associations of frailty with patient factors were investigated by difference in means (MD) or expressed as risk ratios (RRs), and associations with outcomes expressed as odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs). Data were pooled using random-effects models. RESULTS: Fifty-three studies were included in the review and only 8 (15%) were both good quality (NOS ≥ 7) and used a well-validated frailty measure. Eighteen studies (62,976 patients) provided data for the meta-analysis. Frailty was associated with increased age [MD 4.05 years; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.35, 4.75], female sex (RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.14, 1.54), and lower body mass index (MD -1.81; 95% CI -2.94, -0.68). Frailty was associated with 30-day mortality [adjusted OR (AOR) 2.77; 95% CI 2.01-3.81), postoperative complications (AOR 2.16; 95% CI 1.55, 3.02), and long-term mortality (HR 1.85; 95% CI 1.31, 2.62). Sarcopenia was not associated with any outcomes. CONCLUSION: Frailty, but not sarcopenia, is associated with worse outcomes in vascular surgery patients. Well-validated frailty assessment tools should be preferred clinically, and in future research.

Knowledge of peripheral artery disease: What do the public, healthcare practitioners, and trainees know?

This systematic review evaluated the knowledge and awareness of peripheral artery disease (PAD) within the general public (including patients with peripheral vascular disease), nonspecialist healthcare professionals (nsHCP), and trainees (medical students and trainee doctors). Relevant articles were identified from electronic databases using key search terms: 'peripheral artery disease'; 'limb ischaemia'; 'intermittent claudication'; 'knowledge'; 'understanding'; 'public'; 'medical professional'. The heterogeneous results were described narratively. A lack of knowledge and understanding of PAD (disease awareness) were identified in all groups. Among nsHCPs, factors which affect knowledge include the level of training, early clinical exposure and the presence of family members with cardiovascular/vascular disease. Within the general public, knowledge and awareness was improved if a family member/friend had a diagnosis, or following a patient-centred consultation with any HCP. Public campaigns are proven effective in improving disease knowledge/awareness in conditions such as stroke alongside sustained patient education. These may provide future avenues to improve PAD knowledge and awareness, in order to effectively manage risk factors and minimise delayed or missed diagnosis of PAD. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018117304).

A systematic review investigating the identification, causes, and outcomes of delays in the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia and diabetic foot ulceration.

OBJECTIVE: Patients presenting with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) are at high risk of major lower limb amputation. Long-standing concern exists regarding late presentation and delayed management contributing to increased amputation rates. Despite multiple guidelines existing on the management of both conditions, there is currently no accepted time frame in which to enact specialist care and treatment. This systematic review aimed to investigate potential time delays in the identification, referral, and management of both chronic limb-threatening ischemia and DFU. METHODS: A systematic review conforming to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement standards was performed searching MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from inception to November 14, 2018. All English-language qualitative and quantitative articles investigating or reporting the identification, causes, and outcomes of time delays within "high-income" countries (annual gross domestic product per person >$15,000) were included. Data were extracted independently by the investigators. Given the clinical crossover, both conditions were investigated together. A study protocol was designed and registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. RESULTS: A total of 4780 articles were screened, of which 32 articles, involving 71,310 patients and 1388 health care professionals, were included. Twenty-three articles focused predominantly on DFU. Considerable heterogeneity was noted, and only 12 articles were deemed of high quality. Only four articles defined a delay, but this was not consistent between studies. Median times from symptom onset to specialist health care assessment ranged from 15 to 126 days, with subsequent median times from assessment to treatment ranging from 1 to 91 days. A number of patient and health care factors were consistently reported as potentially causative, including poor symptom recognition by the patient, inaccurate health care assessment, and difficulties in accessing specialist services. Twenty articles reported outcomes of delays, namely, rates of major amputation, ulcer healing, and all-cause mortality. Although results were heterogeneous, they allude to delays being associated with detrimental outcomes for patients. CONCLUSIONS: Time delays exist in all aspects of the management pathway, which are in some cases considerable in length. The causes of these are complex but reflect poor patient health-seeking behaviors, inaccurate health care assessment, and barriers to referral and treatment within the care pathway. The adoption of standardized limits for referral and treatment times, exploration of missed opportunities for diagnosis, and investigation of novel strategies for providing specialist care are required to help reduce delays.

Leg ischaemia management collaboration (LIMb): study protocol for a prospective cohort study at a single UK centre.

INTRODUCTION: Severe limb ischaemia (SLI) is the end stage of peripheral arterial occlusive disease where the viability of the limb is threatened. Around 25% of patients with SLI will ultimately require a major lower limb amputation, which has a substantial adverse impact on quality of life. A newly established rapid-access vascular limb salvage clinic and modern revascularisation techniques may reduce amputation rate. The aim of this study was to investigate the 12-month amputation rate in a contemporary cohort of patients and compare this to a historical cohort. Secondary aims are to investigate the use of frailty and cognitive assessments, and cardiac MRI in risk-stratifying patients with SLI undergoing intervention and establish a biobank for future biomarker analyses. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-centre prospective cohort study will recruit patients aged 18-110 years presenting with SLI. Those undergoing intervention will be eligible to undergo additional venepuncture (for biomarker analysis) and/or cardiac MRI. Those aged ≥65 years and undergoing intervention will also be eligible to undergo additional frailty and cognitive assessments. Follow-up will be at 12 and 24 months and subsequently via data linkage with NHS Digital to 10 years postrecruitment. Those undergoing cardiac MRI and/or frailty assessments will receive additional follow-up during the first 12 months to investigate for perioperative myocardial infarction and frailty-related outcomes, respectively. A sample size of 420 patients will be required to detect a 10% reduction in amputation rate in comparison to a similar sized historical cohort, with 90% power and 5% type I error rate. Statistical analysis of this comparison will be by adjusted and unadjusted logistic regression analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this study has been granted by the UK National Research Ethics Service (19/LO/0132). Results will be disseminated to participants via scientific meetings, peer-reviewed medical journals and social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04027244.

The Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)--number and type of positive criteria predict interventions and outcomes in acute surgical admissions.

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is a syndrome that reflects the widespread activation of inflammatory pathways. The goal of this study was to find whether the presence or absence of SIRS on emergency surgical admissions is related to the subsequent clinical outcome in terms of in-hospital interventions, length of stay, and mortality. METHODS: The presence of SIRS at admission, final diagnosis of the underlying disease, treatments, and clinical outcomes were prospectively recorded for 1 month. Comparisons of interventions and outcomes were performed between SIRS+ vs. SIRS- patients. In patients with SIRS, the contribution of each positive criterion was evaluated with regards to mortality. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients were recruited. The prevalence of SIRS at admission was 35.2%. SIRS+ patients required less diagnostic procedures compared with SIRS- (28.6% vs. 34.5%) but had more therapeutic interventions (39.7% vs. 16.4%), surgical interventions (33.3% vs. 3.4%), intensive treatments (11.1% vs. 0.9%; p < 0.05), longer hospital stay (median 6 days vs. 2 days), and more frequent deaths (11.1% vs. 2.6%). SIRS+ patients with four positive criteria had more surgical interventions, intensive treatments, and fatal outcomes compared with the others. Of importance the most influent factor was the respiratory rate followed by the white cell count and the heart rate/temperature. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SIRS at admission apparently receive more interventions, have longer length of stay, and increased mortality than those patients without SIRS. These findings require separate validation in a larger cohort study.