Peri-lead edema after deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson's disease: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to define the prevalence and characteristics of peri-electrode edema in a prospective cohort of patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery and to correlate it with clinical findings. METHODS: We performed brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between 7 and 20 days after surgery in 19 consecutive patients undergoing DBS surgery for Parkinson's disease. The T2-weighted hyperintensity surrounding DBS leads was characterized and quantified. Any evidence of bleeding around the leads was also evaluated. Clinical and follow-up data were recorded. In a subgroup of patients, a follow-up MRI was performed 3-6 weeks after surgery. We also retrospectively reviewed the post-operative computed tomography scans of patients who underwent DBS at our center since 2013. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance imaging showed a peri-lead edematous reaction in all (100%) patients, which was unilateral in three patients (15.8%). In six patients (31.6%), we detected minor peri-lead hemorrhage. Edema completely resolved in eight out of 11 patients with a follow-up MRI and was markedly reduced in the others. Most patients were asymptomatic but six (31.6%) manifested various degrees of confusional state without motor symptoms. We found no significant correlation between edema volume, distribution and any clinical feature, including new post-operative neurological symptoms. The retrospective computed tomography analysis showed that peri-electrode hypodensity consistent with edema is absent at early post-operative imaging but is common at scans performed >3 days after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Peri-electrode edema is a common, transient reaction to DBS lead placement and a convincing relation between edema and post-operative clinical status is lacking.

Multiparametric MR imaging of Parkinsonisms at 3 tesla: Its role in the differentiation of idiopathic Parkinson's disease versus atypical Parkinsonian disorders.

OBJECTIVES: The Nigrosome-1 and putaminal hypointensity depicted on susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), and midbrain atrophy assessed on T1-weighted are some of the most common radiological parameters to diagnose Parkinsonism at Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging. Our aim is to assess the feasibility of these signs in the differentiation of Idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) patients versus disease (DC) and healthy controls (HC) and in the assessment of the Atypical Progressive Parkinsonisms (APPs). METHODS: Presence or loss of the Nigrosome-1 was assessed retrospectively on multiple-echo SWI obtained on a 3 T scan by two neuroradiologists. Results were compared with the 123I-FP-CIT SPECT images. Morphologic diagnostic features suggestive of APPs such as midbrain atrophy and putaminal hypointensity were evaluated by qualitative scores. The midbrain and putaminal scores were summed (combined score) and then added to the Nigrosome-1 score (global score). RESULTS: The study included 126 patients with IPD (n = 56), APPs patients (n = 30; 18 PSP, 3 MSA-C, 9 MSA-P), 16 DC and 24 HC. Sensitivity and specificity of the Nigrosome-1 in discriminating IPD from controls were 96,43% and 85.00%, APPs from controls were 100% and 85%, IPD from APPs were 96,43% and 0% respectively. Combined score for midbrain atrophy and putaminal hypointensity resulted in the most accurate for distinguishing APPs from IPD with a value of ≥ 2 (AUC = 0.98). CONCLUSION: Nigrosome-1 is a valid tool to differentiate IPD-APPs from controls. The combined score of midbrain atrophy and putaminal hypointensity represents a valid diagnostic pointer in the differential diagnosis of APPs from IPD.

Barriers to complaints: a survey of mental health service users.

Reports on a survey of 222 mental health service users in two health service trusts, which provides evidence to support and elaborate Wood's analysis of barriers to effective complaints procedures. Identifies key confounding factors such as: lack of awareness of the existence of procedures, the fears of service users about making a complaint, and the lack of awareness of rights and expectations of services. Notes key implications for managers including: the provision of accurate, comprehensive information to service users about complaints procedures, the need to recognize the many factors which inhibit service users from using procedures and the need to inform service users about their rights and services.