RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To identify the influence of obesity on mortality, time to weaning from mechanical ventilation and mobility at intensive care unit discharge in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was carried out between March and August 2020. All adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit in need of ventilatory support and confirmed to have COVID-19 were included. The outcomes included mortality, time on mechanical ventilation, and mobility at intensive care unit discharge. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-nine patients were included, 36.6% of whom were overweight and 43.8% of whom were obese. Compared with normal body mass index patients, overweight and obese patients had lower mortality (p = 0.002) and longer intensive care unit survival (log-rank p < 0.001). Compared with patients with a normal body mass index, overweight patients had a 36% lower risk of death (p = 0.04), while patients with obesity presented a 23% lower risk (p < 0.001). There was no association between obesity and time on mechanical ventilation. The level of mobility at intensive care unit discharge did not differ between groups and showed a moderate inverse correlation with length of stay in the intensive care unit (r = -0.461; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Overweight and obese patients had lower mortality and higher intensive care unit survival rates. The duration of mechanical ventilation and mobility level at intensive care unit discharge did not differ between the groups.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Obesidad , Respiración Artificial , Humanos , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/terapia , Obesidad/mortalidad , Obesidad/complicaciones , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Desconexión del Ventilador , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
This study aimed to review the prevalence of developmental coordination disorder (DCD) in individuals born preterm and systematically explore this prevalence according to gestational age and different assessment cut-offs and compare it to full-term peers. The eligibility criteria were observational and experimental studies reporting the prevalence of DCD in preterm individuals. A systematic search was performed in databases from inception until March 2022. Two independent reviewers performed the selection. Study quality assessment was performed using the checklists from Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Data analysis was performed on Excel and Review Manager Software 5.4. Among the 1774 studies identified, 32 matched the eligibility criteria. The pooled estimate rate of the DCD rate in preterm was 21% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.8-24.3). The estimate rates were higher as gestational age decreased, and preterm children are two times more likely to have DCD than their full-term peers risk ratio (RR) 2.2 (95% CI 1.77-2.79). The limitation was high heterogeneity between studies; the assessment tools, cut-off points and age at assessment were diverse. This study provided evidence that preterm children are at higher risk for DCD than full-term children, and the risks increased as gestational age decreased.
Asunto(s)
Recien Nacido Prematuro , Trastornos de la Destreza Motora , Humanos , Trastornos de la Destreza Motora/epidemiología , Trastornos de la Destreza Motora/diagnóstico , Recién Nacido , Niño , Edad GestacionalRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective To identify the influence of obesity on mortality, time to weaning from mechanical ventilation and mobility at intensive care unit discharge in patients with COVID-19. Methods This retrospective cohort study was carried out between March and August 2020. All adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit in need of ventilatory support and confirmed to have COVID-19 were included. The outcomes included mortality, time on mechanical ventilation, and mobility at intensive care unit discharge. Results Four hundred and twenty-nine patients were included, 36.6% of whom were overweight and 43.8% of whom were obese. Compared with normal body mass index patients, overweight and obese patients had lower mortality (p = 0.002) and longer intensive care unit survival (log-rank p < 0.001). Compared with patients with a normal body mass index, overweight patients had a 36% lower risk of death (p = 0.04), while patients with obesity presented a 23% lower risk (p < 0.001). There was no association between obesity and time on mechanical ventilation. The level of mobility at intensive care unit discharge did not differ between groups and showed a moderate inverse correlation with length of stay in the intensive care unit (r = -0.461; p < 0.001). Conclusion Overweight and obese patients had lower mortality and higher intensive care unit survival rates. The duration of mechanical ventilation and mobility level at intensive care unit discharge did not differ between the groups.
RESUMO Objetivo Identificar a influência da obesidade na mortalidade, no tempo de desmame da ventilação mecânica e na mobilidade na alta da unidade de terapia intensiva em pacientes com COVID-19. Métodos Trata-se de estudo de coorte retrospectivo realizado entre março e agosto de 2020. Foram incluídos todos os pacientes adultos internados na unidade de terapia intensiva com necessidade de suporte ventilatório e diagnosticados com COVID-19. Os desfechos incluíram mortalidade, duração da ventilação mecânica e mobilidade na alta da unidade de terapia intensiva. Resultados Identificamos 429 pacientes, dos quais 36,6% estavam acima do peso e 43,8% eram obesos. Em comparação com os pacientes com índice de massa corporal normal, os pacientes com sobrepeso e obesidade apresentaram menor mortalidade (p = 0,002) e maior sobrevida na unidade de terapia intensiva (log-rank p < 0,001). Em comparação com pacientes com índice de massa corporal normal, aqueles com sobrepeso tiveram risco 36% menor de morte (p = 0,04), enquanto os pacientes com obesidade apresentaram risco 23% menor (p < 0,001). Não houve associação entre obesidade e duração da ventilação mecânica. O nível de mobilidade na alta da unidade de terapia intensiva não diferiu entre os grupos e apresentou correlação inversa moderada com o tempo de internação na unidade de terapia intensiva (r = -0,461; p < 0,001). Conclusão Os pacientes com sobrepeso e obesidade tiveram menor mortalidade e maior tempo de sobrevida na unidade de terapia intensiva. A duração da ventilação mecânica e o nível de mobilidade na alta da unidade de terapia intensiva não diferiram entre os grupos.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired weakness (ICUAW) on the functional independence of patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) over 6 months after ICU discharge. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study that included patients who were admitted to the ICU because of COVID-19 and who were monitored for 6 months after discharge from the ICU via telephone. Patients were evaluated at 3 times (30 days, 3 months, and 6 months after discharge from the ICU) for functional independence for personal care and mobility activities (Barthel Scale), independence for self-care (Katz Index), impact of COVID-19 on functional status (post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale [PCFS]), and mobility level (ICU Mobility Scale). The existence of some degree of dependence was considered when the Barthel Scale score was <100 points, the Katz Index was ≥1, and the PCFS score was ≥1. A PCFS score of ≥3 indicated moderate or severe dependence. Patients with a Medical Research Council score of <48 at discharge from the ICU were diagnosed with ICUAW. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were included, with a mean age of 51 (SD = 13) years. The ICUAW rate at ICU discharge was 35%. In the evaluation with the PCFS, the values for the presence of any functional limitation at 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months after ICU discharge were 89.7%, 57.4%, and 38.2%, respectively. The rate of persistence of functional limitations after 6 months was higher in patients with ICUAW than in those without ICUAW (66.7% vs 22.8%; P = .000); the same was true for moderate or severe limitations (20.8% vs 4.5%; P = .035). Likewise, functional independence for personal care, mobility, and self-care activities was poorer in patients with ICUAW. CONCLUSIONS: In patients surviving an ICU stay due to COVID-19, decreased functional independence persists even 6 months after discharge, and patients with ICUAW have worse outcomes. IMPACT: Patients who survive ICU stays due to COVID-19 continue to have greater functional dependence even 6 months after ICU discharge.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Debilidad Muscular , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estado Funcional , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , Unidades de Cuidados IntensivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Airway management is challenging in trauma patients because of the fear of worsening cervical spinal cord damage. Video-integrated and optic-integrated devices and intubation laryngeal mask airways have been proposed as alternatives to direct laryngoscopy with the Macintosh laryngoscope (MAC). We performed a meta-analysis to clarify which devices cause less cervical movement during airway management. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, Embase and LILACS from inception to January 2022. We selected randomised controlled trials comparing alternative devices with the MAC for cervical movement from C0 to C5 in adult patients, evaluated by radiological examination. Additionally, cervical spine immobilisation (CSI) techniques were evaluated. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool to evaluate the risk of bias, and the principles of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations system to assess the quality of the body of evidence. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies (530 patients) were included. Alternative devices caused statistically significantly less cervical movement than MAC during laryngoscopy with mean differences of -3.43 (95% CI -4.93 to -1.92) at C0-C1, -3.19 (-4.04 to -2.35) at C1-C2, -1.35 (-2.19 to -0.51) at C2-C3, and -2.61 (-3.62 to -1.60) at C3-C4; and during intubation: -3.60 (-5.08 to -2.12) at C0-C1, -2.38 (-3.17 to -1.58) at C1-C2, -1.20 (-2.09 to -0.31) at C2-C3. The Airtraq and the Intubation Laryngeal Mask Airway caused statistically significant less movement than MAC restricted to some cervical segments, as well as CSI. Heterogeneity was low to moderate in most results. The quality of the body of evidence was 'low' and 'very low'. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the MAC, alternative devices caused less movement during laryngoscopy (C0-C4) and intubation (C0-C3). Due to the high risk of bias and the very low grade of evidence of the studies, further research is necessary to clarify the benefit of each device and to determine the efficacy of cervical immobilisation during airway management.
Asunto(s)
Laringoscopios , Laringoscopía , Adulto , Humanos , Laringoscopía/métodos , Movimiento , Vértebras Cervicales , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodosRESUMEN
RESUMO Este estudo teve como objetivo descrever a função pulmonar e a força muscular respiratória (FMR) na alta hospitalar de pacientes com quadros críticos da COVID-19 e correlacioná-las com a força muscular periférica, tempo de ventilação mecânica (VM) e de internação hospitalar e uso de medicações. Trata-se de um estudo transversal, incluindo pacientes que estiveram internados na UTI devido à COVID-19. A avaliação, na alta hospitalar, incluiu as seguintes variáveis: FMR, função pulmonar e força muscular periférica (escore Medical Research Council (MRC) e dinamometria de preensão palmar). Foram incluídos 25 pacientes, com idade média de 48,7±12,3 anos. Observou-se que 72% dos pacientes apresentaram distúrbio ventilatório restritivo, além de redução da FMR (pressão inspiratória máxima (PImáx) de 74% e pressão expiratória máxima (PEmáx) de 78% do predito). A FMR (PImáx e PEmáx, respectivamente) apresentou correlação negativa com o tempo de VM (r=−0,599, p=0,002; r=−0,523, p=0,007) e de internação hospitalar (r=−0,542, p=0,005; r=−0,502, p=0,01) e correlação positiva com a capacidade vital forçada (CVF) (r=0,825, p=0,000; r=0,778, p=0,000), o volume expiratório forçado no primeiro segundo (VEF1) (r=0,821, p=0,000; r=0,801, p=0,000), o pico de fluxo expiratório (PFE) (r=0,775, p=0,000; r=0,775, p=0,000) e a força de preensão palmar (r=0,656, p=0,000; r=0,589, p=0,002). Concluímos que pacientes com quadros críticos da COVID-19 apresentaram, na alta hospitalar: redução da FMR; alterações da função pulmonar; correlação negativa entre a FMR e o tempo de ventilação mecânica invasiva (VMI) e de internação hospitalar; e correlação positiva com a função pulmonar e a força de preensão palmar.
RESUMEN Este estudio tuvo como objetivo describir la función pulmonar y la fuerza muscular respiratoria (FMR) al alta hospitalaria de pacientes con condiciones críticas del Covid-19 y correlacionarlas con la fuerza muscular periférica, el tiempo de ventilación mecánica (VM) y de hospitalización y uso de medicamentos. Se trata de un estudio transversal con pacientes que ingresaron en Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos por Covid-19. La evaluación en el alta hospitalaria incluyó las siguientes variables: FMR, función pulmonar y fuerza muscular periférica (puntuación Medical Research Council -MRC- y dinamometría manual). Participaron 25 pacientes, con una edad media de 48,7±12,3 años. Se observó que el 72% de los pacientes presentó trastorno ventilatorio restrictivo, además de una reducción de la FMR (presión inspiratoria máxima -PImáx- del 74% y presión espiratoria máxima -PEmáx- del 78% del valor predicho). La FMR (PImáx y PEmáx, respectivamente) mostró una correlación negativa con la duración de la VM (r=−0,599, p=0,002; r=−0,523, p=0,007) y la hospitalización (r=−0,542, p=0,005; r=−0,502, p=0,01), pero una correlación positiva con la capacidad vital forzada (CVF) (r=0,825, p=0,000; r=0,778, p=0,000), el volumen espiratorio forzado en el primer segundo (VEF1) (r=0,821 , p=0,000; r=0,801, p=0,000), el flujo espiratorio máximo (FEM) (r=0,775, p=0,000; r=0,775, p=0,000) y la fuerza de agarre (r=0,656, p=0,000; r =0,589, p=0,002). Se concluye que los pacientes en condiciones críticas del Covid-19 presentaron al alta hospitalaria: reducción de FMR; cambios en la función pulmonar; correlación negativa entre la FMR y de tiempo de ventilación mecánica invasiva (VMI) y de hospitalización; y correlación positiva con la función pulmonar y la fuerza de agarre.
ABSTRACT This study describes the pulmonary function and respiratory muscle strength (RMS) at hospital discharge of severe COVID-19 patients, correlating them with peripheral muscle strength, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), length of hospital stay, and use of medication. A cross-sectional study was conducted with COVID-19 patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. Assessment at hospital discharge included the following variables: RMS, pulmonary function, and peripheral muscle strength (Medical Research Council score [MRC] and handgrip dynamometry). A total of 25 patients with mean age of 48.7±12.3 years were assessed. Out of these, 72% presented restrictive ventilatory disorder, in addition to reduced RMS (maximum inspiratory pressure [MIP] of 74% and maximum expiratory pressure [MEP] of 78% of the predicted value). RMS (MIP and MEP, respectively) correlated negatively with duration of MV (r=−0.599, p=0.002; r=−0.523, p=0.007) and length of hospital stay (r=−0.542, p=0.005; r=−0.502, p=0.01); and positively with FVC (r=0.825, p=0.000; r=0.778, p=0.000), FEV1 (r=0.821, p=0.000; r=0.801, p=0.000), PEF (r=0.775, p=0.000; r=0.775, p=0.000), and handgrip strength (r=0.656, p=0.000; r=0.589, p=0.002). At hospital discharge, severe COVID-19 patients presented: reduced RMS; changes in lung function; negative correlation between RMS and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and length of hospital stay; and a positive correlation with lung function and hand grip strength.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to identify the occurrence and factors associated with intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired weakness (ICUAW) in patients with COVID-19. Secondarily, we monitored the evolution of muscle strength and mobility among individuals with ICUAW and those without ICUAW and the association of these variables with length of stay, mechanical ventilation (MV), and other clinical variables. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, individuals admitted to the ICU for >72 hours with COVID-19 were evaluated for muscle strength and mobility at 3 times: when being weaned from ventilatory support, discharged from the ICU, and discharged from the hospital. Risk factors for ICUAW were monitored. RESULTS: The occurrences of ICUAW at the 3 times evaluated among the 75 patients included were 52%, 38%, and 13%. The length of the ICU stay (29.5 [IQR = 16.3-42.5] vs 11 [IQR = 6.5-16] days), the length of the hospital stay (43.5 [IQR = 22.8-55.3] vs 16 [IQR = 12.5-24] days), and time on MV (25.5 [IQR = 13.8-41.3] vs 10 [IQR = 5-22.5] days) were greater in patients with ICUAW. Muscle strength and mobility were lower at all times assessed in patients with ICUAW. Bed rest time for all patients (relative risk = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.28) and use of corticosteroids (relative risk = 1.01; 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.03) for those who required MV were factors independently associated with ICUAW. Muscle strength was found to have a positive correlation with mobility and a negative correlation with lengths of stay in the ICU and hospital and time on MV. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of ICUAW was high on patients' awakening in the ICU but decreased throughout hospitalization; however, strength and mobility remained compromised at hospital discharge. Bed rest time and use of corticosteroids (for those who needed MV) were factors independently associated with ICUAW in patients with COVID-19. IMPACT: Patients who had COVID-19 and developed ICUAW had longer periods of ICU stay, hospital stay, and MV. Bed rest time and use of corticosteroids (for those who required MV) were factors independently associated with ICUAW.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Debilidad Muscular , COVID-19/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Debilidad Muscular/epidemiología , Debilidad Muscular/etiología , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Most transcutaneous electric diaphragmatic stimulation (TEDS) studies use a stimulation frequency (SF) of 30 Hz, although the reason for this SF value is not completely understood. Objective:The purpose of this study was to compare the acute effect of two TEDS frequencies on the respiratory muscle strength and endurance, muscle activation, muscle thickness, diaphragmatic mobility, cardiovascular variables and safety in healthy subjects. Methods:Randomized crossover clinical trial with 20 healthy subjects subjected to two interventions: SF=30 Hz group and SF=80 Hz group. TEDS was applied at the diaphragm motor points with a symmetric biphasicpulsed current (pulse duration= 500 µs) for 30 minutes. The evaluated outcomes were systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), respiratory muscle strength by maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), inspiratory peak flux (PIF), diaphragm thickness during inspiration (DTI) and expiration (DTE), diaphragm mobility and activation, and endurance (S-Index). Results:SF-30 Hz showed a reduction with respect to baseline values for SBP (p=0.04), HR (p<0.001), DTE (p=0.02), IPF (p=0.01), and S-Index (p=0.03). SF-80 Hz showed a reduction with respect to baseline values for HR (p<0.001) and an increase in MEP (p<0.001). However, these changes were not clinically important and there were no between-groups differences for any of the evaluated outcomes. No complications were observed. Conclusion:TEDS with SF-80 Hz produces similar effects to SF-30 Hz in healthy subjects and bothfrequencies proved to be safe (NCT03844711).
A maioria dos estudos utilizam a estimulação diafragmática elétrica transcutânea (EDET) com frequência (F) de estímulo de 30Hz e testar diferentes frequências torna-se necessário para uma aplicação otimizada. Objetivo: Foi comparar o efeito agudo de duas frequências diferentes da EDET sobre a força muscular respiratória e endurance, ativação diafragmática, espessura muscular e mobilidade diafragmática, variáveis cardiovasculares e segurança em indivíduos saudáveis. Métodos: Estudo randomizado cruzado com 20 indivíduos saudáveis submetidos a duas intervenções: Grupo I com F= 30Hz e Grupo II com F= 80Hz. A aplicação foi nos pontos motores do diafragma, com duração do pulso de 500µs, durante 30 minutos. Foram avaliados a pressão arterial sistólica (PAS) e diastólica (PAD), frequência cardíaca (FC), força muscular respiratória pela pressão inspiratória máxima (PImax), pressão expiratória máxima (PEmax), endurance e espessura muscular em inspiração (EDI) e expiração (EDE), mobilidade e ativação diafragmática. Resultados: O GI apresentou redução significativa em comparação às condições basais para os desfechos de PAS (p= 0.04), FC (p<0.001), EDI (p= 0,02), PIF (p= 0.01), e S-Index (p= 0.03). O GII apresentou redução significativa em comparação às condições basais para FC (p<0.001) e aumento da PEmax (p<0.001). Porém, estas alterações não foram clinicamente importantes e não houve diferença entre os grupos para nenhum desfecho avaliado. Nenhuma intercorrência foi observada. Conclusão: A EDET com F-80Hz produz efeitos semelhantes a F-30Hz em indivíduos saudáveis e ambas as frequências provaram ser seguras (NCT03844711).
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Metabolites produced during muscle exercise can sensitize types III and IV fibers, which account for increasing blood pressure (BP) and vascular resistance in non-exercising limbs, as well as for redistributing the blood flow to active muscles; reflex response is called metaboreflex. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) induces greater local muscle metabolic demand than voluntary isometric contractions. Metabolic accumulation is essential to activate muscle metaboreflex; thus, the hypothesis of the current study is that one NMES session can induce metaboreflex with different hemodynamic responses in upper and lower limbs. Objective - to investigate whether one acute NMES session could activate metaboreflex by inducing different hemodynamic responses between arms and legs. METHODS: Twenty (20) healthy subjects (mean age = 47.7±9.4 years, 13 women, mean body mass index = 26 ± 3 kg/m2) participated in this randomized crossover study. All participants were subjected to two NMES interventions, one in the upper limbs (UPL) and the other in the lower limbs (LL). Mean blood pressure (MBP), blood flow (BF) and vascular resistance (VR) were used to selectively evaluate metaboreflex responses at baseline, during NMES interventions, and recovery periods with, and without, postexercise circulatory occlusion (PECO+ and PECO-, respectively) through the area under the curve (AUC) in VR. RESULTS: MBP increased by 13% during UPL interventions and only remained high during PECO+. Changes in MBP were not observed in LL, although BF in the contralateral leg has decreased by 14% during PECO+ protocol. Muscle metaboreflex activation (AUC differences in VR between PECO+ and PECO-) was not different between UPL and LL (P=0.655). CONCLUSIONS: Acute NMES session has induced similar metaboreflex activation in both arms and legs, although hemodynamic responses differed between interventions.
Asunto(s)
Hemodinámica , Músculo Esquelético , Adulto , Estudios Cruzados , Estimulación Eléctrica , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is a widely-used technique for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Here we developed and tested the reliability of a new NMES-dynamometer system for bedside evaluation of knee extensor muscle function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two healthy participants (16 men, 16 women; 27±5 years) completed two testing sessions, 7 days apart. On day 1, a single experienced rater, who repeated the evaluation on day 2 with two other raters, completed a standardized testing procedure. Participants were placed supine, with knees flexed and legs connected to the dynamometer. Maximal voluntary knee extensor isometric force (MVF) and supramaximal twitch force (TwF) were obtained. RESULTS: High intra-rater intraclass correlation coefficients were observed for both MVF (0.91) and TwF (0.94). MVF and TwF standard error of measurements (8.2%, 5.9%) and minimal detectable changes (16%, 11.6%) were low compared to mean values. High intraclass correlation coefficients were also observed for inter-rater comparisons of MVF (0.89) and TwF (0.86). Standard errors of measurements (MVF: 8.7%, TwF: 5.5%) and minimal detectable changes (MVF: 17.2%, TwF: 10.8%) were similar to intra-rater comparisons. CONCLUSION: The good reliability of the novel NMES-dynamometer system suggests it as an appropriate tool for the bedside evaluation of knee extensor muscle function.
Asunto(s)
Rodilla , Fuerza Muscular , Femenino , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/fisiología , Masculino , Fuerza Muscular/fisiología , Dinamómetro de Fuerza Muscular , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra and inter-rater and inter-analyzer reliability of neuromuscular variables and functional tests. METHODS: Cross-sectional crossover design. Two independent raters and analyzers evaluated twenty-two healthy subjects. Knee-extensor strength was assessed from three maximal voluntary isometric contractions. Muscle activation was obtained from the vastus lateralis (VL), rectus femoris (RF), and vastus medialis (VM) muscles. VL and RF muscles' architecture [fascicle length (FL), pennation angle (PA), muscle thickness (MT)] was obtained at rest by ultrasound. The time from five sit-to-stand (STS) trials, and the distance from the 6-min walk test (6MWT) were obtained. Intraclass correlation coefficient was determined and classified as strong (r = 0.75-1.00), moderate (r = 0.40-0.74), and weak (r < 0.40). RESULTS: Strong intra-rater reliability values were observed for strength (r = 0.97), muscle activation [VL (r = 0.91); RF (r = 0.92); VM (r = 0.80)], VL [FL (r = 0.90); PA (r = 0.94); MT (r = 0.99)] and RF [MT (r = 0.85)] muscle architecture, STS (r = 0.95), and 6MWT (r = 0.98). Inter-rater reliability also presented strong values for strength (r = 0.97), muscle activation [VL (r = 0.94); RF (r = 0.79); VM (r = 0.78)], muscle architecture VL [PA (r = 0.81) and MT (r = 0.88)] and RF [MT (r = 0.80)], STS (r = 0.93), and 6MWT (r = 0.98). A moderate correlation VL muscle architecture [FL (r = 0.69)]. Inter-analyzer muscle architecture reliability presented strong VL [FL (r = 0.77); PA (r = 0.76); MT (r = 0.91)] and RF [MT (r = 0.99)]. CONCLUSION: The high intra and inter-rater and inter-analyzer reliability values for most variables is evidence that they can be used for clinical evaluation. Muscle architecture might need a longer training period by different raters and analyzers to increase reliability.
Asunto(s)
Articulación de la Rodilla , Rodilla , Estudios Transversales , Electromiografía , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Músculo Esquelético , Músculo Cuádriceps/diagnóstico por imagen , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effectiveness of positive expiratory pressure blow-bottle device compared to expiratory positive airway pressure and conventional physiotherapy on pulmonary function in postoperative cardiac surgery patients in intensive care unit. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS: Tertiary care. SUBJECTS: 48 patients (16 in each group; aged 64.5 ± 9.1 years, 38 male) submitted to cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized into conventional physiotherapy (G1), positive expiratory pressure blow-bottle device (G2) or expiratory positive airway pressure, both associated with conventional physiotherapy (G3). G2 and G3 performed three sets of 10 repetitions in each session for each technique. MAIN MEASURES: Pulmonary function (primary); respiratory muscle strength, radiological changes, pulmonary complications, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay (secondary) assessed preoperatively and on the 3rd postoperative day. RESULTS: Pulmonary function (except for forced expiratory volume in one second/ forced vital capacity % predicted) and respiratory muscle strength showed significant reduction from the preoperative to the 3rd postoperative in all groups (P < 0.001), with no difference between groups (P > 0.05). Regarding radiological changes, length of intensive care unit stay and length of hospital stay, there was no significant difference between groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both positive expiratory pressure techniques associated with conventional physiotherapy were similar, but there was no difference regarding the use of positive expiratory pressure compared to conventional physiotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03639974.https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03639974.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/rehabilitación , Cuidados Críticos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/rehabilitación , Terapia Respiratoria , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fuerza Muscular , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Músculos Respiratorios/fisiopatología , Capacidad VitalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The benefits of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) have already been demonstrated in patients with heart failure (HF), but the best mode of training and which patients benefit from this intervention are not clear. The purpose of this study was to review the effects of IMT on respiratory muscle strength, functional capacity, pulmonary function, quality of life, and dyspnea in patients with HF; IMT isolated or combined with another intervention (combined IMT), the presence of inspiratory muscle weakness, training load, and intervention time were considered. METHODS: The search included the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and LILACS database through September 2019. The review included randomized studies that assessed IMT in isolation or combined with another intervention-in comparison with a control group, a placebo, or another intervention-in patients with HF. Fourteen studies were included, 13 for meta-analysis (10 for isolated IMT and 3 for combined IMT). RESULTS: Isolated IMT demonstrated an increase in maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) (25.12 cm H2O; 95% CI = 15.29 - 34.95), 6-Minute Walk Test (81.18 m; 95% CI = 9.73 - 152.63), maximum oxygen consumption (12 weeks: 3.75 mL/kg/min; 95% CI = 2.98 to 4.51), and quality of life (-20.68; 95% CI = -29.03 to -12.32). The presence of inspiratory muscle weakness, higher loads, and longer intervention times resulted in greater increases in MIP. IMT combined with another intervention demonstrated an increase only in MIP. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated IMT resulted in an increase in inspiratory muscle strength, functional capacity, and quality of life. IMT combined with another intervention resulted only in a small increase in inspiratory strength. Isolated IMT with higher loads can be considered an adjuvant intervention, especially for those who do not adhere to conventional rehabilitation and who have respiratory muscle weakness. IMPACT: A systematic review was necessary to review the effects of IMT on respiratory muscle strength, lung function, functional capacity, quality of life, and dyspnea in patients with HF. Various clinical issues important for a better training prescription were considered; these included whether the performance of the training IMT as a form of isolated training benefits patients with HF, whether the combination of IMT with another intervention has additional effects, whether any patient with HF can benefit from IMT (alone or combined with another intervention), and whether only patients who already have respiratory muscle weakness benefit. Also important was establishing which training load provides the best result and the best intervention time, so that health care can be provided more efficiently. LAY SUMMARY: For people with heart failure, IMT by itself, without being combined with other exercise, can improve ease of breathing, increase the amount of distance that they can walk, and improve quality of life. Inspiratory training with higher loads might be helpful for those with respiratory muscle weakness who are unable to do conventional exercise.
Asunto(s)
Ejercicios Respiratorios/métodos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/rehabilitación , Presiones Respiratorias Máximas , Músculos Respiratorios/fisiología , Sesgo , Disnea/fisiopatología , Tolerancia al Ejercicio/fisiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Pulmón/fisiología , Fuerza Muscular/fisiología , Debilidad Muscular/fisiopatología , Consumo de Oxígeno/fisiología , Calidad de Vida , Prueba de PasoRESUMEN
Expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) is widely applicable, either as a strategy for pulmonary reexpansion, elimination of pulmonary secretion or to reduce hyperinflation. However, there is no consensus in the literature about the real benefits of EPAP in reducing dynamic hyperinflation (DH) and increasing exercise tolerance in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). To systematically review the effects of EPAP application during the submaximal stress test on DH and exercise capacity in patients with COPD. This meta-analysis was performed from a systematic search in the PubMed, EMBASE, PeDRO, and Cochrane databases, as well as a manual search. Studies that evaluated the effect of positive expiratory pressure on DH, exercise capacity, sensation of dyspnea, respiratory rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, sense of effort in lower limbs, and heart rate were included. GRADE was used to determine the quality of evidence for each outcome. Of the 2,227 localized studies, seven studies were included. The results show that EPAP did not change DH and reduced exercise tolerance in the constant load test. EPAP caused a reduction in respiratory rate after exercise (- 2.33 bpm; 95% CI: - 4.56 to - 0.10) (very low evidence) when using a pressure level of 5 cmH2O. The other outcomes analyzed were not significantly altered by the use of EPAP. Our study demonstrates that the use of EPAP does not prevent the onset of DH and may reduce lower limb exercise capacity in patients with COPD. However, larger and higher-quality studies are needed to clarify the potential benefit of EPAP in this population.
Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Espiración , Respiración con Presión Positiva , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The benefits of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) for patients with COPD are documented in the literature, but its isolated effect or association with other interventions, the best training methods, and what type of patient benefits the most are not clear. We sought to assess the effects of IMT on respiratory muscle strength, pulmonary function, dyspnea, functional capacity, and quality of life for subjects with COPD, considering IMT isolated or association with other interventions, presence of inspiratory muscle weakness, training load, and intervention time. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PEDro, Cochrane CENTRAL, and LILACS databases in June 2018. We also performed a manual search of references in the studies found in the database search and included in this analysis. We included randomized controlled trials that investigated the above-mentioned outcomes and assessed IMT, either isolated or associated with other interventions, in comparison with a control group, placebo, or other interventions, in subjects with COPD. We used the GRADE approach to evaluate the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: Of 1,230 search results, 48 were included (N = 1,996 subjects). Isolated IMT increased PImax (10.64 cm H2O, 95% CI 7.61-13.66), distance walked in 6-min-walk test (34.28 m; 95% CI 29.43-39.14), and FEV1 (0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.13). However, there was no improvement in dyspnea and quality of life. The presence of inspiratory muscle weakness did not change the results; higher loads (60-80% of PImax) promoted a greater improvement in these outcomes, and a shorter intervention time (4 weeks) improved PImax, but longer intervention times (6-8 weeks) are required to improve functional capacity. IMT associated with other interventions only showed an increase in PImax (8.44 cm H2O; 95% CI 4.98-11.91), and the presence of inspiratory muscle weakness did not change this result. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated IMT improved inspiratory muscle strength, functional capacity, and pulmonary function, without changing dyspnea and quality of life. Associated IMT only increased inspiratory muscle strength. These results indicate that isolated IMT can be considered as an adjuvant intervention in patients with COPD.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Calidad de Vida , Ejercicios Respiratorios , Disnea/etiología , Tolerancia al Ejercicio , Humanos , Fuerza Muscular , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Músculos RespiratoriosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) compared to placebo TENS and a control group on pain, pulmonary function, respiratory muscle strength, and analgesic medications in the postoperative period of thoracotomy in an Intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: Patients who had undergone posterolateral thoracotomy were randomly allocated to receive TENS during ICU stay, or placebo TENS, or into the control group. All groups received conventional physiotherapy. We analysed the intensity of pain, pulmonary function, respiratory muscle strength, and use of analgesia medications. Outcomes were evaluated before surgery, immediately after, 24 and 48 h after ICU admission. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included. Regarding pain perception, there was no difference between groups (p = 0.172), but there was a significant reduction in pain intensity for patients receiving TENS after first physiotherapy session compared to baseline (4.7 ± 3.2 vs 3.3 ± 2.6; p < 0.05). All groups had a decrease in forced vital capacity (FVC) after surgery (p < 0.001). There was no difference between the groups regarding the use of analgesic medications, but a higher intake of morphine and acetaminophen were observed for the control (p = 0.037) and placebo group (p = 0.035), respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of TENS provides a little benefit of pain (in the first 12 h) but failed to demonstrate any improvement in the recovery of ICU patients after 48 h of posterolateral thoracotomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02438241.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Postoperatorio , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Toracotomía/efectos adversos , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/métodos , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fuerza Muscular , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/fisiopatología , Dolor Postoperatorio/terapia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Recuperación de la Función , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria/métodos , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Músculos Respiratorios , Toracotomía/rehabilitación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJETIVO: Avaliar a eficácia da alta frequência na cicatrização de feridas por queimadura durante internação hospitalar. MÉTODO: Trata-se de um estudo de caso, realizado com uma voluntária do sexo feminino, 19 anos, em um hospital de pronto-socorro. Foram aplicados a alta frequência e curativos convencionais, com a amostra única sendo dividida em área de intervenção e área controle. Foram avaliados dados clínicos e sociodemográficos, registros fotográficos pré e pós as intervenções, dimensão da área da ferida por meio de planimetria digitalizada, aspecto da cicatriz através da Escala Vancouver e a qualidade de vida por meio do questionário Burn Specific Health Scale. RESULTADOS: A área da ferida teve redução de 54% na área de intervenção e 26% na área controle. Aspectos como vascularização e flexibilidade também apresentaram discreta melhora. O questionário de qualidade de vida reduziu dois pontos, relacionados à melhora da sensibilidade da pele e aos cuidados com a queimadura. CONCLUSÃO: A utilização de alta frequência combinada com uso de curativos durante a internação hospitalar mostrou resultados favoráveis em comparação a apenas o uso de curativos na cicatrização de feridas. Contudo, mais estudos são necessários.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the high frequency in the healing of burn wounds during hospitalization. METHODS: This is a case study, conducted with a 19-year-old female volunteer, in an emergency room. The high frequency and conventional dressings were applied, with the single sample being divided into the intervention area and the control area. Clinical and sociodemographic data, photographic records before and after the interventions, dimension of the wound area through digitalized planimetry, the aspect of the scar through the Vancouver Scale and quality of life through the Burn Specific Health Scale questionnaire were evaluated. RESULTS: The wound area decreased 54% in the intervention area and 26% in the control area. Aspects such as vascularity and flexibility also showed a slight improvement. The quality of life questionnaire reduced two points, related to the improvement of skin sensitivity and care for burns. CONCLUSION: The use of the high frequency combined with the use of dressings during hospitalization showed favorable results compared to only the use of dressings in wound healing. However, more studies are needed.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Cicatrización de Heridas , Quemaduras/terapia , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/instrumentación , Sulfadiazina de Plata/administración & dosificación , Vendajes/provisión & distribuciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The ultrasound technique has been extensively used to measure echo intensity, with the goal of measuring muscle quality, muscle damage, or to detect neuromuscular disorders. However, it is not clear how reliable the technique is when comparing different days, raters, and analysts, or if the reliability is affected by the muscle site where the image is obtained from. The goal of this study was to compare the intra-rater, inter-rater, and inter-analyst reliability of ultrasound measurements obtained from two different sites at the rectus femoris muscle. METHODS: Muscle echo intensity was quantified from ultrasound images acquired at 50% [RF50] and at 70% [RF70] of the thigh length in 32 healthy subjects. RESULTS: Echo intensity values were higher (p = 0.0001) at RF50 (61.08 ± 12.04) compared to RF70 (57.32 ± 12.58). Reliability was high in both RF50 and RF70 for all comparisons: intra-rater (ICC = 0.89 and 0.94), inter-rater (ICC = 0.89 and 0.89), and inter-analyst (ICC = 0.98 and 0.99), respectively. However, there were differences (p < 0.05) between raters and analysts when obtaining/analyzing echo intensity values in both rectus femoris sites. CONCLUSIONS: The differences in echo intensity values between positions suggest that rectus femoris's structure is not homogeneous, and therefore measurements from different muscle regions should not be used interchangeably. Both sites showed a high reliability, meaning that the measure is accurate if performed by the same experienced rater in different days, if performed by different experienced raters in the same day, and if analyzed by different well-trained analysts, regardless of the evaluated muscle site.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT), in comparison with those of continuous exercise, on functional capacity and cardiovascular variables in patients with COPD, through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. METHODS: We searched PubMed, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE, as well as performing hand searches, for articles published up through January of 2017. We included studies comparing exercise regimens of different intensities, in terms of their effects on functional capacity and cardiovascular variables in patients with COPD. RESULTS: Of the 78 articles identified, 6 were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) did not differ significantly between HIIT and control interventions. That was true for relative VO2max (0.03 mL/kg/min; 95% CI: -3.05 to 3.10) and absolute VO2max (0.03 L/min, 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: The effects of HIIT appear to be comparable to those of continuous exercise in relation to functional and cardiovascular responses. However, our findings should be interpreted with caution because the studies evaluated present a high risk of bias, which could have a direct influence on the results.