[New support services for the care of young patients with rheumatic diseases]. / Neue Unterstützungsangebote für die Betreuung junger Rheumatiker.

The transition process from pediatric to adult rheumatological and internistic care is a challenge for patients and medical personnel. Every second patient with a pediatric rheumatic disease has not achieved stable drug-free remission at early adulthood and therefore requires continuing rheumatological care. Approximately one third of young people with rheumatic diseases in Germany discontinue regular specialist care on their way to the adult healthcare setting. Newly developed support services and tools to improve the healthcare of young people with rheumatic diseases in Germany are presented.

[Transition from pediatric to adult rheumatological care]. / Transition von der Kinder- und Jugendrheumatologie in die internistische Rheumatologie.

Childhood onset rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases often continue into adulthood. These diseases are associated with a high risk of permanent disability and impairment in the quality of life of people affected. Adolescence and young adulthood represent a particular risk phase for an unfavorable long-term outcome. During this challenging and future health-determining phase at least one in three patients stops seeking regular specialized healthcare and the health status of these people deteriorates after having left pediatric care. The key principles of transitional care have been defined, are generally accepted and are presented in this article. There is emerging evidence of the effectiveness of transitional care programs. The implementation of a structured transition into the routine care of adolescents and young adults with rheumatic diseases is necessary.

[Transitional care in rheumatology in Germany]. / Transition in die Erwachsenenrheumatologie.

Moving from child- to adult-centred services (transition) is a challenge for patients and health care professionals. Every second adolescent with a rheumatic disease will still have active disease that requires treatment when they are adults. A third of these patients do not arrive in adult-centered care, a consequence that is accompanied by negative consequences on the individual course of disease and contributes to socioeconomical costs. The present article describes the current situation: barriers for successful transfer and transition models are discussed. Transitional care and research must be improved in Germany.

IL28B polymorphisms predict reduction of HCV RNA from the first day of therapy in chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with IL28B influence the outcome of peginterferon-α/ribavirin therapy of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We analyzed the kinetics of HCV RNA during therapy as a function of IL28B SNPs. METHODS: IL28B SNPs rs8099917, rs12979860, and rs12980275 were genotyped in 242 HCV treatment-naïve Caucasian patients (67% genotype 1, 28% genotype 2 or 3) receiving peginterferon-α2a (180 µg weekly) and ribavirin (1000-1200 mg daily) with serial HCV-RNA quantifications. Associations between IL28B polymorphisms and early viral kinetics were assessed, accounting for relevant covariates. RESULTS: In the multivariate analyses for genotype 1 patients, the T allele of rs12979860 (T(rs12979860)) was an independent risk factor for a less pronounced first phase HCV RNA decline (log(10) 0.89IU/ml among T carriers vs. 2.06 among others, adjusted p < 0.001) and lower rapid (15% vs. 38%, adjusted p = 0.007) and sustained viral response rates (48% vs. 66%, adjusted p < 0.001). In univariate analyses, T(rs12979860) was also associated with a reduced second phase decline (p = 0.002), but this association was no longer significant after adjustment for the first phase decline (adjusted p = 0.8). In genotype 2/3 patients, T(rs12979860) was associated with a reduced first phase decline (adjusted p = 0.04), but not with a second phase decline. CONCLUSIONS: Polymorphisms in IL28B are strongly associated with the first phase viral decline during peginterferon-α/ribavirin therapy of chronic HCV infection, irrespective of HCV genotype.

[Swiss registry for TNF-alpha blockers in children and adolescents with rheumatological diseases]. / Schweizerisches Register für TNF-alpha-Blocker bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit rheumatologischen Erkrankungen.

We created a registry to evaluate long term outcome, efficacy and adverse events for children treated wit TNF-alpha inhibitors in Switzerland. 106 patients (68 female/38 male) were included. 61 patients were treated with Etanercept (Enbrel) and 45 with Infliximab (Remicade). Concomitant treatment at baseline included corticosteroids in 26% and Methotrexate in 75% of the patients. Subjective disease activity three months after initiation of TNF-alpha was better in 81%, worse in 4% and stable in 15% of the patients. In total 24 adverse events in 21 patients were reported. Treatment with TNF-alpha inhibitors seems to be safe and effective for children and adolescents with rheumatologic diseases.

Prediction of nonSVR to therapy with pegylated interferon-alpha2a and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients after 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment.

In patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1, the current algorithm for treatment discontinuation is based on no early virological response (<2 log decline in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA) at 12 weeks. It is important to determine whether prediction of nonsustained virological response (NR) before 12 weeks can be robustly obtained by statistical methods. We used longitudinal discriminant analysis (LDA) to build and cross-validate models including baseline patient characteristics and measurements of serum HCV-RNA in the first 4, 8 or 12 weeks of treatment. The performance of each model was evaluated by the partial AUC (PA) index, exploring the accuracy of prediction in the range of high negative predictive values. Models were compared by computing 95% confidence intervals for the difference in PA indices. NR was best predicted before week 12 by a single HCV-RNA measurement at week 8 taken together with gender, BMI and age (W8 model, PA index = 0.857). This model was not inferior to models that included a measurement at week 12 (PA index = 0.831). The best model obtained with LDA within the first 4 weeks, which included measurements at days 4, 8 and at week 4, was found to be inferior to the week 8 model (PA index = 0.796). These results indicate that lack of sustained viral response is best predicted after 8 weeks of treatment and that waiting until 12 weeks does not improve the prediction.

Clinical use of interferon in hepatitis B and C.

The concept of antiviral therapy with interferon for chronic hepatitis B emerged in the middle of the seventies and was supported by the suppressive effect of human interferon on HBV-DNA polymerase levels in 3 patients. This effect of leukocyte interferon was confirmed in a small controlled study of patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B; however, no effect was found on other indices of hepatitis B. More than 10 years elapsed before one large RCT demonstrated clinically relevant virological responses in 35% vs. < 10% in placebo and led to registration of interferon for hepatitis B. Responses in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B were very high during treatment but high relapse rates eliminated most of the long-time treatment effect. Interferon has now to compete with highly effective nucleoside analog therapy, but still has a prominent place as a limited duration therapy leading to sustained and sometimes complete responses. In the middle of the eighties, interferon was tested in 10 patients with non-A, non-B chronic hepatitis and ALT normalization was observed in the majority. After the discovery of the hepatitis C virus and the introduction of the HCVRNA PCR test it became clear that interferon therapy can cure hepatitis C infections. Widespread therapy was introduced after a co-drug ribavirin was found to reduce relapse rates and two pivotal trials with recombinant interferon showed sustained virological responses in about 50% of patients, with much higher positive outcomes in genotype 2 and 3. Therapy-induced sustained virological remission has been shown to reduce liver-related death, liver failure and to a lesser extent hepatocellular carcinoma. Interferon has become the key drug for hepatitis C.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection - Dutch national guidelines.

The development of this guideline was initiated and coordinated by the Netherlands Association of Gastroenterologists and Hepatologists (Nederlandse Vereniging van Maag-Darm-Leverartsen). The aim is the establishment of national standards in the evaluation and antiviral treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. This includes recommendations on the initial evaluation of patients, choice and duration of antiviral therapy, follow-up after antiviral therapy and monitoring of patients not currently requiring antiviral therapy. The initial evaluation of chronic HBV-infected patients should include testing of liver biochemistry, virus serology and abdominal imaging. In patients without cirrhosis, antiviral treatment is recommended for those with a serum HBV DNA of at least 1.0 x 105 c/ml (>or=2.0 x 10(4) IU/ml) in combination with: a) elevation of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) level above twice the upper limit of normal during at least three months, and/or b) histological evidence of porto-portal septa or interface hepatitis on liver histology. In patients with cirrhosis, antiviral treatment is recommended if serum HBV DNA is 1.0 x 10(4)c/ml (>or=2.0 x 10(3) IU/ml) or higher, independent of ALAT levels or histological findings. If the patient has decompensated cirrhosis, antiviral treatment is recommended if serum HBV DNA is 1000 c/ml (>or=200 IU/ml) or higher. Patients who do not have an indication for antiviral treatment should be monitored because there is a risk of (re)activation of disease activity. Monitoring every three to six months is recommended for HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients with high viraemia (HBV DNA >or=1.0 x 10(5) c/ml or >or=2.0 x 10(4) IU/ml) and normal ALAT levels. For patients with serum HBV DNA below 1.0 x 10(5) c/ml (<2.0 x 10(4) IU/ml) the recommended frequency of monitoring is every three to six months for HBeAg-positive patients and every six to 12 months for HBeAg-negative patients. Peginterferon (PEG-IF N) therapy should be considered as initial therapy in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients without contraindications for treatment with this drug because of the higher chance of achieving sustained response compared with nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy. In patients starting nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, the use of lamivudine is not preferred if long-term antiviral treatment is expected due to the high risk of antiviral resistance against this drug. Of the currently licensed nucleos(t)ide analogues, entecavir has the lowest risk of antiviral resistance (compared with lamivudine, adefovir and telbivudine), while suppression of viral replication seems most profound with either entecavir or telbivudine. The recommended duration of treatment with PEG-IF N is one year for both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. In HBeAg-positive patents, nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy should at least be continued until HBeAg seroconversion and a decline in HBV DNA to below 400 c/ml (80 IU/ml) has been achieved and maintained for six months during therapy. Whether nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy can be safely discontinued in HBeAg-negative patients is unknown; usually prolonged or indefinite antiviral treatment is necessary. Patients receiving PEG-IF N should be monitored once a month, while three monthly monitoring suffices for those receiving nucleos(t)ide analogues. Genotypic analysis of the HBV polymerase is indicated if an increase in serum HBV DNA of at least 1 log(10) c/ml (IU/ml) compared with the nadir value is observed during nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy. Antiviral therapy should be changed as soon as possible in case of confirmed genotypic resistance. Adding a second antiviral agent seems beneficial over switching to another agent. With the availability of multiple new antiviral drugs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, effective treatment is now possible for more patients and for longer periods. However, the complexity of HBV therapy has also increased. Nowadays, virtually all chronic HBV-infected patients can be effectively managed, either by inducing sustained off-treatment response or by maintaining an on-treatment response.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection - Dutch national guidelines.

The development of this guideline was initiated and coordinated by the Netherlands Association of Gastroenterologists and Hepatologists (Nederlandse Vereniging van Maag-Darm-Leverartsen). The aim is the establishment of practical guidelines in the evaluation and antiviral treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. This includes recommendations for the initial evaluation of patients, the choice and duration of antiviral therapy and the follow-up after antiviral therapy. Hepatitis C is a slowly progressive disease. The initial evaluation of chronically HCV-infected patients should include liver biochemistry testing, virological testing and abdominal ultrasound imaging. Liver biopsy is no longer a routine procedure. Antiviral treatment should be considered for all HCV-infected patients. Current antiviral treatment is a long-term process and is associated with substantial side effects. When deciding whether to start treatment or not, the chance of successful treatment (80% with hepatitis C genotype 2 and 3 and 50% with hepatitis C genotype 1 and 4), the fibrosis stage, the expected side effects and the compliance of the patient should be taken into consideration. In the absence of significant fibrosis and necroinflammation in liver biopsy, postponing treatment is an option. Current antiviral treatment is contraindicated in patients with Child-Pugh-class B or C cirrhosis. The possibility of a liver transplantation should be investigated in these patients. Significant comorbidity with a limited life expectancy is an absolute contraindication for antiviral treatment Treatment of chronic hepatitis C consists of administration of peginterferon and ribavirin for 24 or 48 weeks. Patients with hepatitis C genotype 1 or 4 are treated for 48 weeks. Patients with hepatitis C genotype 2 or 3 are treated for 24 weeks. In patients with undetectable HCV RNA after four weeks (28 days) of treatment, a shorter treatment is equally effective (12 to 16 weeks for hepatitis C genotype 2 or 3; 24 weeks for hepatitis C genotype 1 or 4). Outpatient clinic visits are recommended at the start and after 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment, and thereafter every four to six weeks until the end of treatment. It is recommended to stop treatment if the HCV RNA level has not decreased by at least 2 log10 IU/ml (c/ml) after 12 weeks of treatment or when HCV RNA is still detectable after 24 weeks of treatment. The recommended frequency of outpatient clinic visits for patients who are not being treated is once every six months in patients with cirrhosis, otherwise every 12 months. It is expected that new anti-HCV-medication (STAT-C, specifically targeted antiviral therapy for HCV) will become available in the near future. Therefore treatment of chronic HCV infection will probably be more effective in the future.

[The practice guideline 'Viral hepatitis and other liver diseases' (second revision) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners; a response from the perspective of gastroenterology]. / De standaard 'Virushepatitis en andere leveraandoeningen' (tweede herziening) van het Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap; reactie vanuit de maag-darm-levergeneeskunde.

The treatment of chronic viral hepatitis B and C is now so effective that the efforts of health care workers should now be concentrated on tracing infected persons and determining antiviral therapies. It is for these reasons in particular that this revision from the Dutch College of General Practitioners' practice guideline 'Viral hepatitis and other liver diseases' is so necessary. It is estimated that there are 46 patients with chronic viral hepatitis in each general practice of 2300 people, and that only 1 in 64 is registered as such. This calls for active case finding. If a risk factor is present, a feasible approach might be to ask about symptoms and complaints and to establish serum transaminase levels.

In vivo immunization in combination with peg-interferon for chronic hepatitis B virus infection.

Only in a minority of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) will treatment with interferon (IFN)-alpha or nucleoside analogues lead to sustained virological response. In vivo immunization (IVI) following virus suppression aims to optimize conditions for an effective immune response: following rapid and profound virus suppression by interferon-lamivudine combination therapy, lamivudine is withdrawn intermittently during continued interferon therapy. It is thought that withdrawal of lamivudine will lead to increased viral replication and increased antigen expression with subsequent immune stimulation. The aim of this prospective pilot study was to evaluate IVI as a therapeutic approach for CHB. Fourteen HBeAg-positive CHB patients were treated for 42 weeks with a combination of pegylated interferon-alpha 2b and lamivudine. After 12 weeks of combination therapy lamivudine was withdrawn intermittently for three consecutive periods of 4 weeks until it was permanently stopped on week 36. At the end of follow-up (week 52) all patients had remained HBeAg positive and the median viral load was similar to baseline. During the initial 12 weeks of treatment, there was a reduction of both the hepatitis B virus (HBV)-specific proliferation capacity of Th-cells and the frequencies of IFNgamma-producing cells. During the lamivudine interruption-cycle there was an inverse relation between the increase of HBV-DNA, and the decrease in proliferation capacity and frequency of IFN-gamma-producing cells. The intrahepatic fraction of CD8(+) T-cells increased during lamivudine withdrawal. In conclusion, IVI was able to transiently stimulate the HBV-specific immune responsiveness of T-cells, but the magnitude of the response was insufficient to cause a beneficial virological effect.

Prolonged antiviral therapy for hepatitis B virus-infected health care workers: a feasible option to prevent work restriction without jeopardizing patient safety.

To prevent transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) from health care workers (HCWs) to patients, highly viraemic HCWs are often advised to restrict performing exposure prone procedures (EPPs). To prevent loss of highly qualified medical personnel and simultaneously minimize transmission risk to patients, we offered highly viraemic HCWs antiviral therapy and evaluated the effects of this strategy. Eighteen chronic HBV-infected HCWs have been monitored every 3-6 months for a median period of 5.6 years (range 1.1-12.5 years). Antiviral therapy was offered if HBV DNA was above 10(5) copies/mL and EPPs were performed or active liver disease was present. Median HBV DNA levels, the percentage of days with HBV DNA above 10(3), 10(4) and 10(5) copies/mL, and reduction of HBV DNA during antiviral treatment have been analysed for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative HCWs separately. Prolonged viral suppression was achieved in both HBeAg-positive, as well as HBeAg-negative HCWs. In HBeAg-negative HCWs treatment with interferon or lamivudine maintained HBV DNA levels below 10(5) copies/mL. For HBeAg-positive HCWs continuous treatment with tenofovir or entecavir was essential for reaching low viraemia persistently. In 2004, median HBV DNA levels in both HBeAg-negative and HBeAg-positive HCWs were below 10(3) copies/mL and all HCWs executed their professional work full-range. For both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative HCWs, antiviral treatment is effective in persistent suppression of virus levels below 10(5) copies/mL. This observation supports antiviral therapy as a viable management option instead of work restriction, with the provision of regular expert monitoring including quantification of HBV DNA.

[Changes in the management of patients with side effects from the treatment of hepatitis C]. / Wijzigingen in het beleid bij patiënten met bijwerkingen van de behandeling van hepatitis C.

Since hepatitis C can be treated more and more successfully, treatment should be considered in every patient. In some of the patients infected by viral genotype I, the duration of treatment can be shortened: 24 weeks instead of 48 weeks. Maintaining the optimal dosage of ribavirin and peginterferon alpha is of great importance for successful treatment. For this purpose, new guidelines are proposed with reference to the haematological side effects, recommending more restraint with the reduction of the dosage and treatment in case of complaints. Treatment with peginterferon alpha frequently causes psychiatric problems, particularly depressive symptoms that are sometimes severe. Adequate treatment and support, including the use of antidepressants, are necessary in such cases and are often effective.

Impact of hepatic steatosis on viral kinetics and treatment outcome during antiviral treatment of chronic HCV infection.

Liver steatosis is highly prevalent in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, especially in patients infected with genotype 3 virus, but its significance for the outcome of antiviral treatment is not fully understood. We have monitored steatosis in liver biopsies from 231 patients with chronic HCV infection who received pegylated recombinant interferon-alpha and ribavirin in a phase III study (DITTO trial). The degree of steatosis, along with relevant metabolic parameters, was correlated with the early disappearance of virus and with the final outcome of treatment. Our data suggest that the presence of steatosis impairs the early reduction of viral load during treatment in patients infected with HCV genotype 3 and non-3. Steatosis negatively affected the final outcome of treatment mainly in patients infected with HCV genotype non-3 virus. Based on these findings, we propose that interventions aiming at reducing hepatic steatosis prior to the onset of antiviral therapy may be of benefit to patients infected with HCV of the non-3 genotypes. Patients infected with genotype 3, on the other hand, should be offered early antiviral treatment.

Determinants of quality of life in chronic liver patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Health-related quality of life of patients with chronic liver disease has been shown to be impaired in numerous studies. However, the factors which influence health-related quality of life in treated chronic liver patients are not quite known. This is the first study to assess the impact of physical and psychosocial determinants on a weighted score of health-related quality of life in patients with chronic liver disease. METHODS: The data of 1175 chronic liver patients were used to assess the relationship between items of the disease-specific Liver Disease Symptom Index 2.0 and the Short Form (SF)-6D weighted utility score by means of linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Health-related quality of life was most strongly related to disease severity (B = -0.029) and joint pain (B = -0.023). Depression (B = -0.014), pain in the right upper abdomen (B = -0.014), decreased appetite (B = 0.014) and fatigue (B = -0.013) were also strongly related to health-related quality of life. In hepatitis C virus patients, disease severity (B = -0.037) and depression (B = -0.030) were strong determinants of health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that health-related quality of life in chronic liver patients is clearly determined by disease severity, joint pain, depression, decreased appetite and fatigue. These patients may benefit most from interventions aimed at improving adaptation to the symptoms described.

Different composition of intrahepatic lymphocytes in the immune-tolerance and immune-clearance phase of chronic hepatitis B.

Based on virological and biochemical parameters patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) are divided into distinct clinical phases: the immune-tolerance phase, the immune-clearance phase, and the inactive carrier state. Unclear is whether these phases have characteristic intrahepatic immune responses. The composition of liver-derived lymphocytes in patients with chronic HBV infection was studied. In 47 patients the composition of liver-derived lymphocytes was analyzed by flow cytometry of fine needle aspiration biopsies of the liver. The proportion natural killer (NK) cells in the liver was significantly higher in immune-tolerant than in immune-clearance patients and inactive carriers. No differences were found in proportion CD4+ T-cells and CD8+ T-cells, in these phases. However, when patients in the immune-clearance phase, with similar alanine transaminase (ALT), were grouped according to viral load, the proportion CD8+ T-cells was higher in those with high viral load. In contrast, the proportion CD4+ T-cells was increased in patients with low HBV-DNA. These differences were absent in the peripheral blood (PB). Intrahepatic HBV-specific CD8+ T-cells were mainly found in immune-clearance patients with low viral load. In conclusion, clear differences in the intrahepatic cellular infiltrate were found between the various clinical phases of chronic HBV infection. These findings are relevant to the design of new, individualized anti-viral strategies.

Quantitative HBV DNA levels as an early predictor of nonresponse in chronic HBe-antigen positive hepatitis B patients treated with interferon-alpha.

To reduce unnecessary exposure to treatment, physicians must decide at an early stage whether continuation of treatment has a reasonable chance of success for the individual patient. The objectives of our study were to evaluate the previously described quantitative hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) measurements vs quantitative hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA measurements for prediction of nonresponse and response in interferon (IFN)-alpha treated HBeAg positive chronic HBV patients. Serum HBV DNA and HBeAg levels were assessed at baseline and weeks 8 and 12. For each test (HBV DNA level at baseline, HBV DNA decrease between baseline and weeks 8 and 12, or the combination of these two, as well as HBeAg level at baseline, HBeAg decrease between baseline and weeks 8 and 12, and the combination of these two), we calculated the positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity and specificity. Monitoring with quantitative HBV DNA levels (area under ROC 0.87) was superior to monitoring with quantitative HBeAg levels (0.76, P < 0.05). Step-wise logistic regression identified HBV DNA at baseline and decrease in HBV DNA from baseline to week 12, as independent predictors of response. The overall test performance of predicting nonresponse (predictive value 100%) was best for log HBV DNA testing at week 12 compared with testing at week 8 due to a better prediction of sustained response (46%vs 38%) and lower misidentification of nonresponse (39%vs 54%). This study showed that quantitative HBV DNA testing at baseline in combination with a decrease between baseline and week 12 has a high predictive value for identifying patients who have virtually no chance of reaching a sustained response with IFN therapy.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels and the management of HBV-infected health care workers.

Different guidelines exist for the management of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected health care workers (HCWs). Various HBV DNA levels are used as a cutoff level to determine whether an HBV-infected HCW is allowed to perform exposure-prone procedures (EPPs) or not. In this paper we discuss the factors that determine HBV DNA levels and the implications of different HBV DNA cutoff levels for EPP performing HCWs. If the level of HBV DNA in the serum of HCWs is used to determine acceptability for the conduct of EPPs, it is necessary to take into account the variability in time of HBV DNA levels in HBV carriers and the reliability and reproducibility of the molecular diagnostic test involved. The issue of standardization has to be addressed, before a universal, maximum level of viraemia for EPP performing HCWs can be introduced.

Flow cytometry of fine-needle-aspiration biopsies: a new method to monitor the intrahepatic immunological environment in chronic viral hepatitis.

SUMMARY: Information about the character and grade of the intrahepatic immune response in viral hepatitis is important for the evaluation of disease stage and effect of therapy. Complications like haemorrhage limit the frequent performance of tissue-needle biopsies (TB), and the cells of peripheral blood have to be used as surrogate markers instead. Fine-needle-aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of the liver represents a safe and atraumatic method that allows frequent cytological sampling. Our aim was to investigate whether flow cytometry of FNAB specimens allows co-analysis of phenotype, function and specificity of key populations of liver-infiltrating lymphocytes (LIL). In 20 consecutive patients with chronic viral hepatitis [10 hepatitis B virus (HBV), 10 hepatitis C virus (HCV)], flow cytometry was performed on FNAB cytology, and simultaneously on lymphocytes isolated from a TB and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). The ratio of CD8+/CD4+ lymphocytes in FNAB correlated well with LIL from TB (r =0.78, P < 0.05) but differed from PBMC (mean ratio: 2.6, 2.1 and 0.7, respectively). Similarly, a correlation was observed for percentage CD56+ natural killer (NK) cells (mean %: 29.9, 32.3 and 14.5, respectively; r = 0.69, P < 0.05). The percentage of interferon (IFN)-gamma-producing CD3+ lymphocytes in both FNAB and TB was higher than in PBMC (mean %: 41, 44 and 22, respectively; P < 0.05). Furthermore, tetrameric complexes allowed analysis of HBV-specific T cells in FNAB specimens. In conclusion, flow cytometry of FNAB allows easy, atraumatic and reliable analysis of lymphocytes obtained from the intrahepatic compartment. Therefore, the FNAB is a valuable tool in the study of the immunopathology of viral hepatitis, and it may contribute to the improved clinical evaluation of chronic viral liver disease.