RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Traumatic hemipelvectomies are rare and serious injuries. The surgical management was described in several case studies, with primary amputation often performed to save the patient's life. METHODS: We report of two survivors with complete traumatic hemipelvectomy resulting in ischemia and paralyzed lower extremity. Due to modern emergency medicine and reconstructive surgery, limb salvage could be attained. Long-term outcome with quality of life was assessed one year after the initial accident. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The patients were able to mobilize themselves and live an independent life. The extremities remained without function and sensation. Urinary continence and sexual function were present and the colostomy could be relocated in both patients. Both patients support limb salvage, even having difficulties and follow-up treatments. Concomitant cases are required to consolidate the findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Asunto(s)
Hemipelvectomía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Humanos , Hemipelvectomía/métodos , Recuperación del Miembro , Calidad de Vida , Amputación Quirúrgica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The recently developed Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ2.0) was proven a valid and reliable instrument measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for patients with spinal malignancies. A German version was not available. OBJECTIVE: A cross-cultural adaptation of the SOSGOQ2.0 to the German language and its multicenter evaluation. METHODS: In a multistep process, a cross-cultural adaptation of the SOSGOQ2.0 was conducted. Subsequently, a multicenter, prospective observational cohort study was initiated to assess the reliability and validity of the German adaptation. To assess external construct validity of the cross-cultural adapted questionnaire, a comparison to the established questionnaire QLQ-C30 from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer was conducted. Mean-difference plots were used to measure the agreement between the questionnaires in total score and by domain (deviation from mean up to 10% allowed). Further reliability and validity tests were carried out. Change to baseline was analysed 3-16 weeks later after different interventions occurred. Clinically relevant thresholds in comparison to the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire were evaluated by ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: We could enroll 113 patients from four different university hospitals (58 females, 55 males). Mean age was 64.11 years (sd 11.9). 80 patients had an ECOG performance status of 2 or higher at baseline. External construct validity in comparison to the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire in total score and by domain was confirmed (range of deviation 4.4 to 9.0%). Good responsiveness for the domains Physical Functioning (P < .001) and Pain (P < .001) could be shown. The group mean values also displayed a difference in the domains of Social Functioning (P = .331) and Mental Health (P = .130), but not significant. The minimum clinically relevant threshold values for the questionnaire ranged from 4.0 to 7.5 points. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, the cross-cultural adapted questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool to measure HRQOL in German speaking patients with spinal malignancies. Especially the domains Physical Functioning and Pain showed overall good psychometric characteristics. In this way, a generic questionnaire, such as the EORTC QLQ-C30, can be usefully supplemented by spine-specific questions to increase the overall accuracy measuring HRQOL in patients with spinal malignancies.
Asunto(s)
Aculturación , Lenguaje , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Alemania , Estado de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/instrumentación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , TraduccionesRESUMEN
Biopsy followed by histopathological assessment is the key procedure to establish the correct diagnosis of unclear bone or soft tissue tumors. There are several possibilities to obtain a biopsy specimen. The indication for biopsy should be established in a specialized center, as should the type of biopsy (fine needle, incisional, excisional, percutaneous CT-guided/navigated biopsy), which must be performed according to established guidelines. The tumor biopsy must be representative and adequate in terms of quantity, to enable a conclusive histopathological diagnosis and planning of appropriate treatment. For the correct biopsy tract, the surgical approach for definitive resection must be considered; thus, biopsy should be conducted in the center where the subsequent resection will be performed. Of note, patients whose biopsy is performed at a specialized musculoskeletal tumor center benefit in terms of improved local tumor control.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico , Biopsia , Humanos , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of megaprostheses occur in about 10% of all cases. The criteria for PJI are defined by the "Musculoskleletal Infection Society" (MSIS) and apply to both primary arthroplasty and megaprostheses. MANAGEMENT: The management strategies of PJI in megaprostheses are dependent on the duration of infection and the maturity of the bacterial biofilm. Implant retention with an exchange of the mobile components is only possible in the presence of an immature biofilm. In the presence of a mature biofilm, a one- or two-stage exchange must be performed. A complete exchange of all endoprosthetic components should be performed, if possible, since a partial retention of isolated components results in inferior treatment success rates. RESULTS: The highest success rates are achievable with two-stage exchanges. Multiple risk factors such as skin necrosis, postoperative haematoma, prolonged wound secretion and operative times ≥ 2.5â¯h are risk factors for the development of PJI in megaprostheses. Knowledge regarding these risk factors allows for an identification of high-risk patients and early management of PJI.
Asunto(s)
Prótesis de la Rodilla , Neoplasias , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Antibacterianos , Humanos , Prótesis e Implantes , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tumourous destruction of the periacetabular region and the proximal femur is a typical consequence of either primary malignant bone tumour manifestation or skeletal metastatic diseases. Pathological fractures of the proximal femur and periacetabular regions due to primary manifestation or metastatic disorders are frequent. OBJECTIVES: Presentation of the most common complications of tumour endoprostheses at the hip and a description of management strategies, including therapeutic recommendations and concepts for complication avoidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current knowledge and our own experience of complication management with the use of megaprostheses around the hip are presented. RESULTS: Compared to elective/primary total hip arthroplasty, megaprosthetic reconstructions following tumour resections have an increased rate of postoperative deep infections, dislocations, incidence of pathological and periprosthetic fractures and of deep vein thrombosis. The postoperative mortality and local tumour recurrence along with deep infections represent the most serious complications. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to primary arthroplasty, the risk of failure and complications following tumour-endoprosthetic replacement is increased. Precise surgical planning and careful selection and preoperative preparation of suitable patients should be performed in close interdisciplinary cooperation with final decision-making on an interdisciplinary tumour board. Wide resection and advanced reconstruction, as well as complicated palliative stabilization due to malignant bone tumour growth around the hip joint should be performed in musculoskeletal tumour centres with profound expertise in osteosynthetic and endoprosthetic reconstruction and consecutive complication management of the pelvis and the proximal femur.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Neoplasias Óseas , Fracturas Periprotésicas , Fémur , Articulación de la Cadera , Humanos , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Spinal tumors are a continuously growing pathology group among the spinal diseases. The often-difficult circumstances increase vulnerability to a wide range of intervention-related complications, which can occur at different times in the course of the disease and must be included in the consideration of the indication. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the work is to present the wide spectrum of complications in the surgical treatment of spinal tumors, as well as their treatment and prophylaxis through optimal therapy management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The article summarizes the current literature. RESULTS: The literature describes complication rates of 10-67% after metastatic surgery of the spinal column. The most common complications are infections and internal, especially pulmonary, complications. Other relevant complications include surgical positioning/surgical access/instrumentation/mechanical failure, and anesthesiological, neurological, vascular and oncological complications. The socio-economic costs for patients with complications compared to those for patients without complications are twice as high. A special risk situation exists with radical spinal tumor resections. Negative predictors are previous operations, previous irradiation and local recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: An early, interdisciplinary concept can reduce complications significantly. Due to the planning intensity, surgical expertise and comprehensive structural requirements, treatment in an interdisciplinary tumour centre is necessary.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Columna Vertebral , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Questionnaire survey among the members of the German Spine Society (Deutsche Wirbelsäulen-Gesellschaft, DWG) to objectify oncological infrastructure and current standard of care in spinal tumor treatment in Germany. METHODS: All DWG-members were contacted via the society's e-mail and asked to respond in anonymized form to a related questionnaire. Questions were asked regarding surgical specialty, type of institution involved, numbers of spinal procedures, as well as questions on treatment for primary tumors, whether the respondent belonged to a tumor center, decision-making procedures for surgery, and the type of procedure. RESULTS: 84 centers providing surgical treatment for spinal tumors in their departments were identified. 52.6% were carrying out more than 500 spinal procedures per year. There was a significant association (Pâ¯≤â¯0.05) between the numbers of spinal surgeries, the number of treated tumor patients per year, the organisation in a tumor center and the treatment of primary tumors. 76% are part of a local tumor center for interdisciplinary decision making (i.e.surgical treatment and adjuvant therapy). 74% of the institutions stated that conventional postoperative radiotherapy is standardly administered in the case of secondary lesions, with 24% of them referring patients to external services for radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: In spite of often large numbers of spinal operations, the centers perform relatively small numbers of tumor operations, particularly for primary tumors. A nearly three-quarter majority of the departments are integrated into interdisciplinary tumor care. However, there is a marked number that do not belong to an interdisciplinary organisation. Further advances in multidisciplinarity and oncology training are a continuous issue to increase treatment quality in spinal tumor patients.
Asunto(s)
Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Oncología Quirúrgica/métodos , Alemania , Humanos , Sociedades Médicas , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tumor endoprostheses are available as modular systems with which bone defects can be partially reconstructed, usually close to the joints, or as a total replacement of long tubular bones. As a result of continuously improved survival times, they are used with bone tumors, skeletal metastases and, increasingly, in revision arthroplasty. OBJECTIVES: Presentation of the most common complications of tumor endoprostheses and a description of their management, including treatment recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current knowledge and our own experience of complication management with the use of megaprostheses are presented. RESULTS: The number of tumor endoprostheses procedures is limited, so that a limited number of studies and classifications are available. Periprosthetic infections involving the soft tissues represent the most serious failure after perioperative dying and local recurrence of the tumor. Two-stage revision remains the gold standard in periprosthetic infection, even if one-stage revision is justifiable in selective indications. Periprosthetic infection and local recurrence is associated with the risk of secondary amputations. Mechanical failure can be treated more easily. Specific socket systems for proximal femoral replacement and attachment tubing allow for adequate soft tissue reconstruction, restoration of joint function, and minimize the risk of dislocation. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to primary arthroplasty, the risk of failure following tumor endoprosthetic replacement is increased but is basically controllable by revision surgery.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Óseas/complicaciones , Fémur , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/complicaciones , Falla de Prótesis , Reoperación/instrumentación , Reoperación/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIMS: Periprosthetic fracture is a significant complication of total hip and knee arthroplasty. This study aimed to describe the survival of patients sustaining periprosthetic femoral fractures and compare this with that of the general population, as well as to identify the factors that influence survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 151 patients (women: men 116:35, mean age 74.6 years, standard deviation 11.5) that sustained a periprosthetic fracture between January 2005 and October 2012 were retrospectively analysed. Epidemiological data, comorbidities, type of surgical management, type of implant, and mortality data were studied. RESULTS: The mean survival time was 77 months (95% confidence interval 71 to 84; numbers at risk: 73) and was lower than that of the general population. The risk analyses showed that previous cardiac disease, particularly ischaemic heart disease, cardiac arrhythmias, and heart failure, age over 75 years and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores above 3 were associated with a significantly higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Periprosthetic fractures carry a high risk of post-operative mortality. Our data demonstrate that advanced age (> 75 years) and previous cardiac disease are associated with a significantly higher risk of mortality. The ASA score is an appropriate instrument for risk stratification. Pre-operative cardiac status should be optimised before surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:921-6.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/complicaciones , Fracturas del Fémur/etiología , Fracturas del Fémur/mortalidad , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugía , Fracturas Periprotésicas/etiología , Fracturas Periprotésicas/mortalidad , Fracturas Periprotésicas/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and long-bone fractures can show increased callus formation. This effect has already been reproduced in wild-type (wt) mice. However, the mechanisms remain poorly understood. Leptin is significantly increased following TBI, while its role in bone healing remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate fracture healing in leptin-deficient ob/ob mice and to measure any possible impact of TBI on callus formation. 138 female, 12 weeks old, ob/ob mice were divided into four groups: Control, fracture, TBI and combined trauma. Osteotomies were stabilized with an external fixator; TBI was induced with Controlled Cortical Impact Injury. Callus bridging was weekly evaluated with in vivo micro-CT. Biomechanical testing was performed ex vivo. Micro-CT showed high non-union rates after three and four weeks in the fracture and combined trauma group. No differences were observed in callus volume, density and biomechanical properties at any time point. This study shows that bony bridging is impaired in the present leptin-deficient trauma model. Furthermore, the phenomenon of increased callus formation after TBI could not be reproduced in ob/ob mice, as in wt mice. Our findings suggest that the increased callus formation after TBI may be dependent on leptin signaling.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/metabolismo , Curación de Fractura/fisiología , Leptina/deficiencia , Animales , Callo Óseo/metabolismo , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/metabolismo , Fracturas del Fémur/patología , Ratones , Ratones Obesos , Distribución AleatoriaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Benign bone lesions are much more common than malignant lesions. Some benign bone tumors have a characteristic and typical radiographic appearance, while others are more challenging. Therapy of benign bone tumors differs greatly. While the majority of benign bone tumors do not require surgical therapy, other specific lesions, e. g. aneurysmal bone cysts or giant cell tumors (GCT) of the bone require surgery due to their locally aggressive behavior. DIAGNOSTICS: The major challenge for the radiologist and/or pathologist is the differentiation between a benign and low-grade malignant lesion (e. g. enchondroma versus low-grade chondrosarcoma) for which all available clinical and radiographic information is mandatory. Therefore, surgical therapy is rather more often performed than necessary due to uncertainty in many cases. THERAPY: Novel systemic therapies are available for fibrous dysplasia and GCT of the bone: Fibrous dysplasia can be treated with bisphosphonates, and GCT responds to denosumab. In fact, denosumab has been approved for the treatment of irresectable GCT. Osteoid osteoma is fairly easy to recognize and also to treat given the characteristic clinical presentation and rapid and effective response to local therapy (possible as percutaneous thermo-/laser ablation). In summary, several therapeutic options exist for benign bone tumors, and the choice depends upon the tendency/risk of local recurrence, the rate of surgical complications, options for defect reconstruction, postoperative functional deficits, and specific patient characteristics.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Óseas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico , Quistes Óseos Aneurismáticos/diagnóstico , Quistes Óseos Aneurismáticos/patología , Quistes Óseos Aneurismáticos/cirugía , Enfermedades Óseas/clasificación , Enfermedades Óseas/patología , Enfermedades Óseas/cirugía , Neoplasias Óseas/clasificación , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Huesos/patología , Huesos/cirugía , Condroma/clasificación , Condroma/diagnóstico , Condroma/patología , Condroma/cirugía , Condrosarcoma/clasificación , Condrosarcoma/diagnóstico , Condrosarcoma/patología , Condrosarcoma/cirugía , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Displasia Fibrosa Ósea/diagnóstico , Displasia Fibrosa Ósea/patología , Displasia Fibrosa Ósea/cirugía , Tumor Óseo de Células Gigantes/diagnóstico , Tumor Óseo de Células Gigantes/patología , Tumor Óseo de Células Gigantes/cirugía , Humanos , Pronóstico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Correcion of elbow joint deformities that usually develop secondary to direct or indirect trauma of the arm or elbow with subsequent inadequate healing and consecutive axial/rotational malalignment and may be associated with cosmetic or functional deficits of the arm. INDICATIONS: Relevant malalignment of the arm axis with corresponding cosmetic or functional deficits for the patient. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Pre-existing degenerative and chronic inflammatory changes. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Generally, two-dimensional supracondylar open or closed wedge osteotomies are used. In the presence of a three-dimensional deformity (with rotational component), an additional derotational correction is necessary. Extra-articular deformities following extension fractures should be treated preferably with an open wedge osteotomy, extra-articular deformities of flexion fractures with a closed wedge osteotomy. Valgus/varus deformities may also require a closed/open wedge osteotomy primarily through a dorsal or alternatively radial approach. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: The arm should be immobilized with a brachial cast splint for 2-3 weeks, with passive exercises of the elbow starting on postoperative day 7. RESULTS: In general, the results for a three-dimensional osteotomy of the distal humerus are expected to be good to very good. Only in rare cases (2.5%) is a mostly transient irritation of the ulnar nerve observed.
Asunto(s)
Articulación del Codo/anomalías , Articulación del Codo/cirugía , Deformidades Adquiridas de la Articulación/cirugía , Osteotomía/métodos , Osteotomía/rehabilitación , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/rehabilitación , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Deformidades Adquiridas de la Articulación/rehabilitación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Lesiones de CodoRESUMEN
Treatment with a variable angle locking plate can, in theory, maintain near anatomic reduction of intra-articular distal radius fractures, but it is unknown to what extent reduction is maintained as measured by computed tomography. We assessed changes in radiographic fracture position 1 year post-operatively. We included 73 patients of whom 66 patients (90%) had radiographs available for review at 1 year post-operatively. We found a small (less than 2 mm or 2°) but statistically significant change in several measures. Accounting for inter-observer variability, this is probably within measurement error. We found no difference in change in fracture position or range of motion, grip strength or patient-reported outcome between the use of one or two distal rows of screws. Our results show that minimal changes in reduction can be expected after volar plate fixation in most patients. We recommend using only one screw row routinely, limiting costs, surgical time and the risk of misplacement of screws. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas Intraarticulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Intraarticulares/cirugía , Fracturas del Radio/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Radio/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Fuerza de la Mano , Humanos , Fracturas Intraarticulares/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Fracturas del Radio/fisiopatología , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Background: Since the combination of orthopaedic and traumatology surgery as a single speciality, an extremely wide variety of orthopaedic and trauma surgery centres have been founded in Germany. The present investigation analysed the degree to which additional value has been generated by merging two previously independent university departments - one for orthopaedics, the other for trauma surgery - into a single orthopaedics and trauma surgery centre. Material and Methods: The centre, merged in 1 June 2013, is led by two equal co-chairs (a full professor for orthopaedics and a full professor for trauma surgery). It consists of an acute division and five other divisions for specific parts of the body. The pre-existing certifications (level 1 trauma- and joint arthroplasty centre) were maintained in the new merged entity. Data from patient and employee questionnaires, as well as key economic indicators, were compared before and after the merger. Results: 11â% of the patients rated the medical treatment as mediocre or bad before the merger. After the merger, 5.7â% of the patients were moderately satisfied or unsatisfied; 92â% would recommend the merged centre to others and would return for further treatment. The evaluation of patient complaints before and after the merger showed no change. The evaluation of the employee questionnaires showed heterogeneous results. Overall, positive evaluations predominated, but in areas where there had been major changes, negative aspects were occasionally reported. The merger did not bring about any essential change in the number of in-patients (2012: 6693; 2014: 6649) or in the severity of the medical cases (CMI in 2012: 1.41; in 2014: 1.45). But in 2015, there was an increase in the number of in-patients (6837) and in the CMI (1.54). In the out-patient clinic, the merger led to a reduction in the material costs per patient (2012: 3.53 /patient; 2014: 3.07 /patient) and in the staff costs. The material costs for the entire centre were also reduced by 14â%. Conclusion: By merging the university orthopaedic and trauma surgery centres, transdisciplinary and transdepartmental improvements in patient care were achieved for musculoskeletal illnesses and injuries, and a sustainable structure was established for the advanced training for the joint specialist title of orthopaedics and trauma surgery. The merger also led to additional economic synergies, with a mid-term potential for increases in the number of patients and in CMI. To improve or at least maintain the level of employee satisfaction, staff must be actively included in the process.
Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , Instituciones Asociadas de Salud/organización & administración , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Ortopedia/organización & administración , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatología/organización & administración , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Alemania , Colaboración Intersectorial , Modelos Organizacionales , Objetivos Organizacionales , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de SaludRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Reconstruction/stable fixation of the acetabular columns to create an adequate periacetabular requirement for the implantation of a revision cup. INDICATIONS: Displaced/nondisplaced fractures with involvement of the posterior column. Resulting instability of the cup in an adequate bone stock situation. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Periprosthetic acetabulum fractures with inadequate bone stock. Extended periacetabular defects with loss of anchorage options. Isolated periprosthetic fractures of the anterior column. Septic loosening. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Dorsal approach. Dislocation of hip. Mechanical testing of inlaying acetabular cup. With unstable cup situation explantation of the cup, fracture fixation of acetabulum with dorsal double plate osteosynthesis along the posterior column. Cup revision. Hip joint reposition. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Early mobilization; partial weight bearing for 12 weeks. Thrombosis prophylaxis. Clinical and radiological follow-ups. RESULTS: Periprosthetic acetabular fracture in 17 patients with 9 fractures after primary total hip replacement (THR), 8 after revision THR. Fractures: 12 due to trauma, 5 spontaneously; 7 anterior column fractures, 5 transverse fractures, 4 posterior column fractures, 1 two column fracture after hemiendoprosthesis. 5 type 1 fractures and 12 type 2 fractures. Operatively treated cases (10/17) received 3 reinforcement ring, 2 pedestal cup, 1 standard revision cup, cup-1 cage construct, 1 ventral plate osteosynthesis, 1 dorsal plate osteosynthesis, and 1 dorsal plate osteosynthesis plus cup revision (10-month Harris Hip Score 78 points). Radiological follow-up for 10 patients: consolidation of fractures without dislocation and a fixed acetabular cup. No revision surgeries during follow-up; 2 hip dislocations, 1 transient sciatic nerve palsy.
Asunto(s)
Acetábulo/lesiones , Acetábulo/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Prótesis de Cadera , Fracturas Periprotésicas/cirugía , Acetábulo/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Curación de Fractura , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fracturas Periprotésicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Reoperación/instrumentación , Reoperación/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The combination of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and long-bone fractures has previously been reported to lead to exuberant callus formation. The aim of this experimental study was to radiographically and biomechanically study the effect of TBI on bone healing in a mouse model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 138 female C57/Black6N mice were assigned to four groups (fracture (Fx) / TBI / combined trauma (Fx/TBI) / controls). Femoral osteotomy and TBI served as variables: osteotomies were stabilized with external fixators, TBI was induced with controlled cortical impact injury. During an observation period of four weeks, in vivo micro-CT scans of femora were performed on a weekly basis. Biomechanical testing of femora was performed ex vivo. RESULTS: The combined-trauma group showed increased bone volume, higher mineral density, and a higher rate of gap bridging compared to the fracture group. The combined-trauma group showed increased torsional strength at four weeks. DISCUSSION: TBI results in an increased formation of callus and mineral density compared to normal bone healing in mice. This fact combined with a tendency towards accelerated gap bridging leads to increased torsional strength. The present study underscores the empirical clinical evidence that TBI stimulates bone healing. Identification of underlying pathways could lead to new strategies for bone-stimulating approaches in fracture care.
Asunto(s)
Callo Óseo/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones Encefálicas/complicaciones , Curación de Fractura/fisiología , Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones , Animales , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Femenino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Osteogénesis/fisiología , Microtomografía por Rayos XRESUMEN
This study compared the quality of reduction and complication rate when using a standard ilioinguinal approach and the new pararectus approach when treating acetabular fractures surgically. All acetabular fractures that underwent fixation using either approach between February 2005 and September 2014 were retrospectively reviewed and the demographics of the patients, the surgical details and complications were recorded. A total of 100 patients (69 men, 31 women; mean age 57 years, 18 to 93) who were consecutively treated were included for analysis. The quality of reduction was assessed using standardised measurement of the gaps and steps in the articular surface on pre- and post-operative CT-scans. There were no significant differences in the demographics of the patients, the surgical details or the complications between the two approaches. A significantly better reduction of the gap, however, was achieved with the pararectus approach (axial: p = 0.025, coronal: p = 0.013, sagittal: p = 0.001). These data suggest that the pararectus approach is at least equal to, or in the case of reduction of the articular gap, superior to the ilioinguinal approach. This approach allows direct buttressing of the dome of the acetabulum and the quadrilateral plate, which is particularly favourable in geriatric fracture patterns.
Asunto(s)
Acetábulo/lesiones , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Acetábulo/diagnóstico por imagen , Acetábulo/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Peri-implant infections (PII) are one of the most frequent postoperative complications and require an individualized combined surgical and antibiotic management. In this review article we provide up to date scientific knowledge regarding the pathogenesis, classification, diagnosis and therapy of PII. The aim of this article is to explain the rational background and evidence of individual treatment options in order to elaborate concrete management recommendations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The relevant scientific publications were critically reviewed for diagnostics, therapy and prevention of PII. Based on these data we present a combined surgical and antibiotic treatment algorithm for PII. RESULTS: With a consistent interdisciplinary action high healing rates with eradication of PII can be achieved. In acute PII (< 6 weeks) the implant can normally be retained but this is dependent on the soft tissue conditions, while in chronic PII (> 6 weeks) the implant generally has to be removed in a one or two step exchange, depending on the soft tissue, bone defects and pathogen. CONCLUSION: Scientific knowledge and clinical data have led to new treatment algorithms for PII with improved outcome, decreased morbidity and shortened hospitalization. Systemic individualized antimicrobial therapy, radical septic and plastic surgery are the cornerstones for successful treatment of acute and chronic PII. The local use of antibiotics and application of bone substitute materials are other techniques for treatment but the exact importance must still be determined.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Prótesis e Implantes/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/terapia , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Conducta Cooperativa , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , ReoperaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The present study aimed to analyse both, the functional outcome and quality of life after surgical treatment of periprosthetic fractures following TKA. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective review of all periprosthetic fractures following knee arthroplasty which have been surgically treated at our institution between January 2005 and January 2012 was conducted. Beside epidemiologic data, type of surgery and postoperative complications were recorded. The functional outcome was assessed using range of motion, Knee Society Score and VAS to evaluate pain. Quality of life was evaluated using SF-36 and WOMAC. Furthermore patients mobility and comorbidities were analysed. RESULTS 25 (mean age 76 ± 8 years; m:w 5:20) patients were included. The overall complication rate was 24%. Mean KSS knee score was 73 ± 19 and a function score was 41 ± 36. Range of motion revealed 95° ± 24° (active) and 98° ± 16° (passive). The total SF-36 scored a mean of 41 ± 6 and 29 ± 19 in average considering the WOMAC index (pain: 19 ± 20; stiffness: 23 ± 27; daily: 47 ± 29). 20% were able to mobilise without help as opposed to 80% that were in need for assistance. Our analysis revealed no influence of the final outcome as a function of fracture type or type of treatment. Multiple regression analysis could not reveal significant influence of the comorbidities. CONCLUSION Periprosthetic fractures following knee arthroplasty are accompanied by a significant decrease of the knee function and quality of life as well as high complication rates. Since patient's quality of life apparently depends on the functional outcome, future efforts should aim to improve these parameters. Key words: periprosthetic fracture, total knee arthroplasty, quality of life, functional outcome, locking plate.