Selective Management of Multiple Anterior Abdominal Stab Wounds: Is it Safe?

BACKGROUND: Selective management of stable patients with anterior abdomen stab wounds (AASWs) has become a gold standard management approach throughout the world. Evidenced-based options for supporting selective management include clinical follow-up, local wound exploration with or without diagnostic peritoneal lavage, diagnostic laparoscopy, and abdominal computerized tomography. The presence of multiple AASWs might signify a more aggressive attack and limit the safety of a selective management approach. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether multiple AASWs are associated with an increased risk of intra-abdominal injury requiring emergency surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all AASW patients admitted to Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel, and Hillel Yaffe Medical Center in Hadera, Israel, from 2007 to 2015. Patients were divided into two groups based on the number of stab wounds: single or multiple. Data were coded for demographics, severity of injury, presence of intra-abdominal injury, laparotomy rate, length of hospital stay (LOS), length of stay in the intensive care unit (LICU), and survival. RESULTS: The study included 169 patients. Of these, 143 patients had a single AASW and 26 had multiple AASWs. There were no differences between the groups regarding demographics, severity of injury, intra-abdominal penetration, specific organ injury, LOS, or LICU. There was no difference in the percentage of patients requiring laparotomy. The overall mortality was 2.36% (4/169). There was no significant difference in the mortality rate between the groups (P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of multiple AASWs is not a risk factor for increased frequency and severity of intra-abdominal injury.

Hemodynamic consequences of extremity injuries following a terrorist bombing attack: retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Extremities are commonly injured following bomb explosions. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of hemorrhagic shock (HS) in victims of explosion suffering from extremity injuries. METHODS: Retrospective study based on a cohort of patient records maintained in one hospital's mass casualty registry. RESULTS: Sixty-six victims of explosion who were hospitalized with extremity injuries were identified and evaluated. Sixteen (24.2%) of these were hemodynamically unstable during the first 24 h of treatment. HS could be attributed to associated injuries in seven of the patients. In the other nine patients, extremity injury was the only injury that could explain HS in seven patients and the extremity injury was a major contributor to HS together with another associated injury in two patients. In those 9 patients, in whom the extremity injury was the sole or major contributor to HS, a median of 10 (range 2-22) pRBC was transfused during the first 24 h of treatment. Six of the nine patients were in need of massive transfusion. Fractures in both upper and lower extremities, Gustilo IIIb-c open fractures and AIS 3-4 were found to be risk factors for HS. CONCLUSIONS: Ample consideration should be given to patients with extremity injuries due to explosions, as these may be immediately life threatening. Tourniquet use should be encouraged in the pre-hospital setting. Before undertaking surgery, emergent HS should be considered in these patients and prevented by appropriate resuscitation.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017.

IMPORTANCE: The human and financial costs of treating surgical site infections (SSIs) are increasing. The number of surgical procedures performed in the United States continues to rise, and surgical patients are initially seen with increasingly complex comorbidities. It is estimated that approximately half of SSIs are deemed preventable using evidence-based strategies. OBJECTIVE: To provide new and updated evidence-based recommendations for the prevention of SSI. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A targeted systematic review of the literature was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library from 1998 through April 2014. A modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess the quality of evidence and the strength of the resulting recommendation and to provide explicit links between them. Of 5759 titles and abstracts screened, 896 underwent full-text review by 2 independent reviewers. After exclusions, 170 studies were extracted into evidence tables, appraised, and synthesized. FINDINGS: Before surgery, patients should shower or bathe (full body) with soap (antimicrobial or nonantimicrobial) or an antiseptic agent on at least the night before the operative day. Antimicrobial prophylaxis should be administered only when indicated based on published clinical practice guidelines and timed such that a bactericidal concentration of the agents is established in the serum and tissues when the incision is made. In cesarean section procedures, antimicrobial prophylaxis should be administered before skin incision. Skin preparation in the operating room should be performed using an alcohol-based agent unless contraindicated. For clean and clean-contaminated procedures, additional prophylactic antimicrobial agent doses should not be administered after the surgical incision is closed in the operating room, even in the presence of a drain. Topical antimicrobial agents should not be applied to the surgical incision. During surgery, glycemic control should be implemented using blood glucose target levels less than 200 mg/dL, and normothermia should be maintained in all patients. Increased fraction of inspired oxygen should be administered during surgery and after extubation in the immediate postoperative period for patients with normal pulmonary function undergoing general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Transfusion of blood products should not be withheld from surgical patients as a means to prevent SSI. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This guideline is intended to provide new and updated evidence-based recommendations for the prevention of SSI and should be incorporated into comprehensive surgical quality improvement programs to improve patient safety.

Glasgow Coma Scale Score in Survivors of Explosion With Possible Traumatic Brain Injury in Need of Neurosurgical Intervention.

Importance: Head injury following explosions is common. Rapid identification of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in need of neurosurgical intervention is complicated in a situation where multiple casualties are admitted following an explosion. Objective: To evaluate whether Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score or the Simplified Motor Score at presentation would identify patients with severe TBI in need of neurosurgical intervention. Design, Setting, and Participants: Analysis of clinical data recorded in the Israel National Trauma Registry of 1081 patients treated following terrorist bombings in the civilian setting between 1998 and 2005. Primary analysis of the data was conducted in 2009, and analysis was completed in 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of patients with TBI in need of neurosurgical intervention per GCS score or Simplified Motor Score. Results: Of 1081 patients (median age, 29 years [range, 0-90 years]; 38.9% women), 198 (18.3%) were diagnosed as having TBI (48 mild and 150 severe). Severe TBI was diagnosed in 48 of 877 patients (5%) with a GCS score of 15 and in 99 of 171 patients (58%) with GCS scores of 3 to 14 (P < .001). In 65 patients with abnormal GCS (38%), no head injury was recorded. Nine of 877 patients (1%) with a GCS score of 15 were in need of a neurosurgical operation, and fewer than 51 of the 171 patients (30%) with GCS scores of 3 to 14 had a neurosurgical operation (P < .001). No difference was found between the proportion of patients in need of neurosurgery with GCS scores of 3 to 8 and those with GCS scores of 9 to 14 (30% vs 27%; P = .83). When the Simplified Motor Score and GCS were compared with respect to their ability to identify patients in need of neurosurgical interventions, no difference was found between the 2 scores. Conclusions and Relevance: Following an explosion in the civilian setting, 65 patients (38%) with GCS scores of 3 to 14 did not experience severe TBI. The proportion of patients with severe TBI and severe TBI in need of a neurosurgical intervention were similar in patients presenting with GCS scores of 3 to 8 and GCS scores of 9 to 14. In this study, GCS and Simplified Motor Score did not help identify patients with severe TBI in need of a neurosurgical intervention.

A Consortium Approach to Surgical Education in a Developing Country: Educational Needs Assessment.

IMPORTANCE: Surgical disease is a global health priority, and improving surgical care requires local capacity building. Single-institution partnerships and surgical missions are logistically limited. The Alliance for Global Clinical Training (hereafter the Alliance) is a consortium of US surgical departments that aims to provide continuous educational support at the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (MUHAS). To our knowledge, the Alliance is the first multi-institutional international surgical collaboration to be described in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To assess if the Alliance is effectively responding to the educational needs of MUHAS and Muhimbili National Hospital surgeons. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: During an initial 13-month program (July 1, 2013, to August 31, 2014), faculty and resident teams from 3 US academic surgical programs rotated at MUHAS as physicians and teachers for 1 month each. To assess the value of the project, we administered anonymous surveys. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Anonymous surveys were analyzed on a 5-point Likert-type scale. Free-text answers were analyzed for common themes. RESULTS: During the study period, Alliance members were present at MUHAS for 8 months (1 month each). At the conclusion of the first year of collaboration, 15 MUHAS faculty and 22 MUHAS residents completed the survey. The following 6 areas of educational needs were identified: formal didactics, increased clinical mentorship, longer-term Alliance presence, equitable distribution of teaching time, improved coordination and language skills, and reciprocal exchange rotations at US hospitals. The MUHAS faculty and residents agreed that Alliance members contributed to improved patient care and resident education. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A multi-institutional international surgical partnership is possible and leads to perceived improvements in patient care and resident learning. Alliance surgeons must continue to focus on training Tanzanian surgeons. Improving the volunteer surgeons' Swahili-language skills would be an asset. Future efforts should provide more teaching coverage, equitably distribute educational support among all MUHAS surgeons, and collaboratively develop a formal surgical curriculum.

The "found down" patient: a diagnostic dilemma.

BACKGROUND: "Found down" patients present to the emergency department (ED) after being discovered unconscious and are selected for trauma or medical evaluation based on ED triage. Occult injury is an important part of the differential diagnosis in these patients. Rational use of trauma resources and optimal care of these patients requires clear triage criteria and timely evaluation. METHODS: After an institutional review board approval was obtained, we retrospectively identified 201 "found down" patients from ED triage logs at an urban Level I trauma center between 2007 and 2011. Physician researchers reviewed these records for demographics, injuries, medical diagnoses, and mortality. RESULTS: Of the 201 "found down" patients, 86 (42.7%) had injuries on evaluation in the ED and 9 (4.5%) required urgent surgical intervention. Previous ED visits, homelessness, psychiatric diagnoses, and alcohol and substance use were strikingly common. The 41 patients (20.4%) triaged to admission by the trauma service were younger, predominantly male, and more likely to be intoxicated. Overall, 28 patients (13.4%) required consultation by the service to which they were not initially triaged. Nineteen (11.9%) of the medically triaged patients required trauma service consultation. Eight (19.5%) of the patients triaged to the trauma service required medical consultation, and 4 patients (9.8%) were ultimately admitted to a medicine service after a complete trauma evaluation. Six (14.6%) of the trauma patients and 3 (1.9%) of the medical patients had a delay in diagnosis of occult injuries. CONCLUSION: Nearly half of "found down" patients had clinically significant injuries, and late identified injuries were present in both trauma and medical patients. Twenty-eight (13.4%) of patients required consultation by the medical or trauma surgery service to which they were not initially triaged, highlighting pervasive triage discordance in this population. Early trauma surgery consultation and triage flexibility are critical to avoid missed injuries in "found down" patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological study, level IV.

Pediatric penetrating trauma: the epidemic continues.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric penetrating injuries plague inner cities. Based on our clinical observations, we hypothesized that pediatric penetrating trauma (PPT) is increasing with the major increase occurring in communities with lower socioeconomic status. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the trauma databases between 2000 and 2009 of the three major trauma centers in Alameda and San Francisco counties. Patients with PPT aged 16 years or younger were included. Demographics, Injury Severity Score, probability of survival, and length of hospital stay were collected. Median family incomes (MFI) were obtained from US Census data. RESULTS: We identified 598 patients with PPT: 432 gunshot wounds (GSWs), 141 stabbings, and 25 other. The rate of PPT increased by 138% from 2000 to 2009 (p = 0.003). The mean (SEM) age of the patients was 13.8 (0.1) years, which did not change during the study period (p = 0.12). The incidence of single GSW to the head increased from 3% to 7% (p = 0.01) and carried a 63% mortality rate. Blacks and Hispanics sustained 82.5% of PPT. The MFI of PPT victims was $39,209. PPT was more prevalent in zip codes with an MFI below the Bay Area MFI of $68,954, (mean [SEM], 8.0 [1.5] victims per zip code below MFI vs. 1.9 [0.3] victims per zip code above MFI; p = < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PPT in the Bay Area increased during the last decade, and the increased PPT was associated with lower MFIs. Black and Hispanic children experienced the greatest proportion of penetrating injuries and had the lowest MFIs. The prevalence of single GSW to the head is increasing, which may suggest a deliberate attempt to fatally injure these children. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level II.

Primary blast injuries--an updated concise review.

Blast injuries have been increasing in the civilian setting and clinicians need to understand the spectrum of injury and management strategies. Multisystem trauma associated with combined blunt and penetrating injuries is the rule. Explosions in closed spaces increase the likelihood of primary blast injury. Rupture of tympanic membranes is an inaccurate marker for severe primary blast injury. Blast lung injury manifests early and should be managed with lung-protective ventilation. Blast brain injury is more common than previously appreciated.

Management of enterocutaneous fistulas.

Management of enterocutaneous fistulas (ECFs) involves (1) recognition and stabilization, (2) anatomic definition and decision, and (3) definitive operation. Phase 1 encompasses correction of fluid and electrolyte imbalance, skin protection, and nutritional support. Abdominal imaging defines the anatomy of the fistula in phase 2. ECFs that do not heal spontaneously require segmental resection of the bowel segment communicating with the fistula and restoration of intestinal continuity in phase 3. The enteroatmospheric fistula (EAF) is a malevolent condition requiring prolonged wound care and nutritional support. Complex abdominal wall reconstruction immediately following fistula resection is necessary for all EAFs.

Prospective randomized trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for common bile duct stone disease.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcome parameters for good-risk patients with classic signs, symptoms, and laboratory and abdominal imaging features of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis randomized to either laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LC+LCBDE) or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography sphincterotomy plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ERCP/S+LC). DESIGN: Our study was a prospective trial conducted following written informed consent, with randomization by the serially numbered, opaque envelope technique. SETTING: Our institution is an academic teaching hospital and the central receiving and trauma center for the City and County of San Francisco, California. PATIENTS: We randomized 122 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1 or 2) meeting entry criteria. Ten of these patients, excluded from outcome analysis, were protocol violators having signed out of the hospital against medical advice before 1 or both procedures were completed. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment was preoperative ERCP/S followed by LC, or LC+LCBDE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was efficacy of stone clearance from the common bile duct. Secondary end points were length of hospital stay, cost of index hospitalization, professional fees, hospital charges, morbidity and mortality, and patient acceptance and quality of life scores. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the 2 randomized groups were similar. Efficacy of stone clearance was likewise equivalent for both groups. The time from first procedure to discharge was significantly shorter for LC+LCBDE (mean [SD], 55 [45] hours vs 98 [83] hours; P < .001). Hospital service and total charges for index hospitalization were likewise lower for LC+LCBDE, but the differences were not statistically significant. The professional fee charges for LC+LCBDE were significantly lower than those for ERCP/S+LC (median [SD], $4820 [1637] vs $6139 [1583]; P < .001). Patient acceptance and quality of life scores were equivalent for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both ERCP/S+LC and LC+LCBDE were highly effective in detecting and removing common bile duct stones and were equivalent in overall cost and patient acceptance. However, the overall duration of hospitalization was shorter and physician fees lower for LC+LCBDE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00807729.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatic trauma.

BACKGROUND: : Pancreatic injury occurs in from 3% to 12% of patients with abdominal trauma. In many instances, a lack of impressive findings in the first 24 hours leads to a delay in diagnosis. Because pancreatic duct disruption is the major cause of traumatic pancreatitis, we evaluated our experience with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients suspected of having of having pancreatic injury. METHODS: : We reviewed the medical records of 26 patients evaluated perioperatively by ERCP for suspected pancreatic duct injury. The examinations were performed in the endoscopy suite or radiography special procedures or operating rooms under direct fluoroscopic control using fiberoptic or videooptic duodenoscopes. RESULTS: : Seventeen men and nine women with a mean age of 32.8 +/- 2.2 years suffered severe abdominal trauma. ERCP was performed in these patients a mean of 19 +/- 11.3 days after trauma. Seven patients underwent ERCP just before or at laparotomy. Eight of 26 (31%) patients were found to have intact pancreatic and bile ducts, whereas 18 (69%) patients had substantial findings unsuspected by pre-ERCP imaging. Nine of these 18 patients with documented ductal injury underwent endoscopic treatment alone without further surgical intervention, including pancreatic sphincterotomies and/or pancreatic ductal stenting. CONCLUSIONS: : ERCP is feasible and strongly indicated in the care of many patients with pancreatic trauma. Patient care and overall surgical and hospital needs may be substantially impacted by the use of both diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde colongiopancreatography.

Operation Access: a proven model for providing volunteer surgical services to the uninsured in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have shown that patients without insurance lack coordinated health care and access to surgical procedures. Operation Access (OA) has coordinated uncompensated, low-risk outpatient surgical and specialty services to the uninsured in a volunteer setting for 15 years. Our objective was to evaluate the quality of outpatient surgical care provided by OA volunteers. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using data from OA's secure database to evaluate the quality of care provided to all patients eligible for OA services from 1994 through 2008. Primary outcomes included quality of care as measured by the Institute of Medicine's six quality aims, ie, safety, efficiency, effectiveness, timeliness, patient-centered care, and equity. RESULTS: Six-thousand five-hundred and forty-two patients were referred to OA during the past 15 years; 83.4% met eligibility criteria. Of these, 3,518 unduplicated patients received 3,098 surgical, endoscopic, and minor procedures. Only 12 of 1,880 surgical patients experienced a complication requiring hospitalization. Patient care was efficient, with a 95.3% overall compliance rate; approximately $7.56 of services were provided for every dollar of philanthropic support. OA's strong emphasis on case management, focus on continuity of care, and patient-selection criteria contributed to the organization's provision of safe, efficient, effective, timely, and patient-centered care. A higher percentage of Latinos and a lower percentage of African Americans relative to the geographic demographics received OA services. CONCLUSIONS: A volunteer program providing low-risk outpatient operations using the OA model delivers safe, efficient, effective, timely, and patient-centered care.

Inadequate mass-casualty knowledge base adversely affects treatment decisions by trauma care providers: Survey on hospital response following a terrorist bombing.

Healthcare professionals require a unique knowledge base to function effectively during a hospital's response to a mass-casualty incident (MCI). A survey of 128 physicians, nurses, and emergency medical technicians involved in trauma care was conducted to assess their knowledge base and how it affected their decision-making in response to a MCI following a terrorist bombing. Three-quarters of the study group responded that = or >20% of the surviving victims were critically injured. Only half of the responders indicated that the main objective of medical management is identifying and treating patients with critical injuries. Forty percent of responders indicated that they would not triage a critically injured victim to immediate care. This survey indicates that further education in the principles of MCI management should be based on critical evaluation of the literature.