Arthroscopic Repair of Anteroinferior Glenoid Rim Fractures: Mean 10-year Clinical and Radiologic Results.

BACKGROUND: To date, long-term results of the arthroscopic repair of glenoid rim fractures are missing. The aim of this study was, to evaluate clinical and radiographic results following arthroscopic repair of anteroinferior glenoid fractures using anchors or bioabsorbable compression screws after a mean follow-up period of ten years. METHODS: Clinical outcome measures included evaluation of recurrent instability, the Constant Score (CS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Rowe Score (RS), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Score (WOSI) and Melbourne Instability Shoulder Score (MISS). X-ray images were obtained for assessment of an instability arthropathy (IA). RESULTS: 23 patients (7 female and 16 male, mean (± SD) age 48 ± 15 years) who underwent arthroscopic repair of an acute substantial solitary or multifragmented anteroinferior glenoid rim fracture were enrolled. After a mean follow-up period of 10 ± 2 years, patients reached a mean CS of 92 ± 10 points, SSV of 93 ± 11%, RS of 84 ± 20 points, WOSI of 98 ±2% and MISS of 91 ± 11 points. No patient suffered recurrent dislocation. Radiographic results were obtained of 18 patients. Signs of IA were noted in nine patients (50%) with progression of IA in all cases in comparison to the preoperative status. Patients with IA were significantly older (52 versus 38 years, p = 0.04). Clinical score results did not show a significant difference in patients with versus without IA except for the RS (74 versus 94 points, p = 0.02). No intra- or postoperative complications were observed, and no patient required revision endoprosthetic surgery. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic repair of acute anteroinferior glenoid rim fractures shows good clinical long-term results. High rates of IA were observed especially in older patients. However, the presence of IA did not seem to influence the subjective shoulder score outcomes.

Clavicular tunnel widening in chronic acromioclavicular joint instabilities after primary versus revision arthroscopically-assisted acromio- and coracoclavicular stabilization.

Purpose: To evaluate joint reduction (loss of reduction [LOR]; dynamic posterior translation [DPT]) and clavicular tunnel widening (cTW) in patients treated with arthroscopically-assisted acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) stabilization after previously failed nonoperative versus surgical treatment. Methods: Patients undergoing arthroscopically-assisted ACJ stabilization (bidirectional tendon allograft with a low-profile TightRope) after previously failed nonoperative versus surgical treatment were included retrospectively. Bilateral anteroposterior stress views served for evaluating LOR (side-comparative coracoclavicular distance [CCD]) and cTW at a 6-weeks- and 6-months-follow-up (FU) and for evaluating the filling ratio (FR, vertical device insertion depth relative to clavicle height) at the 6-weeks-FU. Postoperative DPT was assessed on Alexander's views. Results: Twenty-seven patients (20 male, mean age 46.1 ± 14.8 years) were included (prior treatment: nonoperative: n = 15; surgical: n = 12). There were no differences in LOR, DPT or cTW between groups postoperatively. Initial CCD-symmetry at the 6-weeks-FU (CCD: -0.1 mm [95% confidence interval, CI, -2 to 1.4 mm]) was followed by LOR at the 6-months-FU (CCD: -3.5 mm [95% CI, -5.2 to -1.9 mm]; p < 0.001). cTW increased towards the inferior cortex, compared to the superior cortex and the intermediate level (p < 0.001, respectively). cTW at the inferior cortex was associated with more LOR (r = -0.449; p = 0.024) and DPT (r = 0.421; p = 0.036), dependent on a smaller FR (r = -0.430; p = 0.032). Conclusion: Patients undergoing arthroscopically-assisted ACJ stabilization for chronic bidirectional ACJ instabilities showed comparable radiologic results after previous nonoperative versus surgical treatment. cTW increased towards the inferior cortex and was associated with recurrent vertical and horizontal instability, related to a smaller FR. More research into reduced cTW, for example, by a more filling device, should be performed. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Humeral rotation osteotomy is not associated with glenohumeral and scapulohumeral decentering at long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Weber rotational osteotomy which increases humeral retrotorsion in patients with anterior shoulder instability has become unpopular because of recurrence of instability and high rates of early onset OA. However, the wear pattern in patients after rotational osteotomy remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of surgically increased humerus retrotorsion on glenohumeral and scapulohumeral centering in a long-term follow-up. METHODS: The data of 18 shoulders in 18 patients diagnosed with a unilateral chronic recurrent anterior shoulder instability treated with an internal rotation subcapital humerus osteotomy between 1984 and 1990 were drawn from a previously published cohort and enrolled in the study. All patients had available bilateral CT scans performed after a mean follow-up of 14 (12-18) years. On these CT scans a comparison of the operated and the contralateral healthy side with regards to humerus torsion, glenoid version, glenoid offset, glenohumeral and scapulohumeral subluxation indices, rotator cuff action lines and osteoarthritic changes (OA) was performed. RESULTS: The analysis of follow-up CT scans revealed a significantly higher mean humeral retrotorsion in the operated side compared to healthy side (41.6° ± 14.0° vs. 20.7°±8.2°, p<0.001). No differences were found in terms of glenohumeral subluxation index (0.50 ± 0.08 vs 0.51 ± 0.03, p = 0.259), scapulohumeral subluxation index (0.53 ± 0.09 vs 0.54 ± 0.03, p = 0.283), glenoid version (- 3.9° ± 4.6 vs - 4.1° ± 3.7, p = 0.424), glenoid offset (4.0 mm ± 2.8 vs 4.0 mm ± 1.3, p = 0.484), infraspinatus action lines (102.5° ± 4.7 vs 101.2° ± 2.1, p = 0.116) , subscapularis action lines (74.0° ± 6.0 vs 73.1° ± 2.3, p = 0.260) and resultant rotator cuff action lines (87.8° ± 4.9 vs 87.0° ± 1.8, p = 0.231) between operated and healthy shoulders. Osteoarthritic changes were observed in all operated shoulders and in 13 of 18 healthy shoulders. The OA Grade was mild in 5 patients, moderate in 11 and severe in 2 cases for operated shoulders and mild in 13 healthy shoulders at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: The surgical increase of humeral retrotorsion by 20-30° did not affect glenohumeral and scapulohumeral centering in patients with a Weber rotational osteotomy after a long-term follow-up compared to the healthy side. While a high degree of early onset OA was observed it remains unclear whether the cause is the surgical interventions performed or the joint instability itself.

Dynamic Scapular Winging Caused by Long Thoracic Nerve Compression due to Scapular Osteochondroma: A Case Report.

CASE: We report a unique case of dynamic scapular winging due to compression of the long thoracic nerve by a ventral scapular osteochondroma, representing a combination of mechanical and neural causes. Arthroscopic resection of the lesion was performed, which led to complete resolution of the symptoms. CONCLUSION: By reporting this case, we aimed to increase awareness of the importance of a correct etiological diagnosis of dynamic scapular winging, so that targeted treatment can be addressed. Arthroscopic resection seems ideal for this indication because it reduces the risk of complications and patient recovery time.

Metallic Lateralized-Offset Glenoid Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Background: Metallic lateralized-offset glenoid reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for cuff tear arthropathy combines the use of a metallic augmented baseplate with a metaphyseally oriented short stem design that can be applied at a 135° or 145° neck-shaft angle, leading to additional lateralization on the humeral side. Lateralization of the center of rotation decreases the risk of inferior scapular notching and improves external rotation, deltoid wrapping, residual rotator cuff tensioning, and prosthetic stability1-4. Metallic increased-offset RSA (MIO-RSA) achieves lateralization and corrects inclination and retroversion while avoiding graft resorption and other complications of bony increased-offset RSA (BIO-RSA)5-8. Reducing the neck-shaft angle from the classical Grammont design, in combination with glenoid lateralization, improves range of motion9,10 by reducing inferior impingement during adduction at the expense of earlier superior impingement during abduction2,11. Lädermann et al.12 investigated how different combinations of humeral stem and glenosphere designs influence range of motion and muscle elongation. They assessed 30 combinations of humeral components, as compared with the native shoulder, and found that the combination that allows for restoration of >50% of the native range of motion in all directions was a 145° onlay stem with a concentric or lateralized tray in conjunction with a lateralized or inferior eccentric glenosphere. In addition, the use of a flush-lay or a slight-onlay stem design (like the one utilized in the presently described technique) may decrease the risk of secondary scapular spine fracture13,14. The goal of this prosthetic design is to achieve an excellent combination of motion and stability while reducing complications. Description: This procedure is performed via a deltopectoral approach with the patient in the beach-chair position under general anesthesia combined with a regional interscalene nerve block. Subscapularis tenotomy and capsular release are performed, the humeral head is dislocated, and any osteophytes are removed. An intramedullary cutting guide is placed for correct humeral resection. The osteotomy of the humeral head is performed in the anatomical neck with an inclination of 135° and a retroversion of 20° to 40°, depending on the anatomical retroversion. The glenoid is prepared as usual. The lateralized, augmented baseplate is assembled with the central screw and the baseplate-wedge-screw complex is placed by inserting the screw into the central screw hole. Four peripheral screws are utilized for definitive fixation. An eccentric glenosphere with inferior overhang is implanted. The humerus is dislocated, and the metaphysis is prepared. Long compactors are utilized for proper stem alignment, and an asymmetric trial insert is positioned before the humerus is reduced. Stability and range of motion are assessed. The definitive short stem is inserted and the asymmetric polyethylene is impacted, resulting in a neck-shaft angle of 145°. Following reduction, subscapularis repair and wound closure are performed. Alternatives: BIO-RSA is the main alternative to MIO-RSA. Boileau et al.15 demonstrated satisfactory early and long-term outcomes of BIO-RSA for shoulder osteoarthritis. A larger lateral offset may also be achieved with a thicker glenosphere2,16. Mark A. Frankle developed an implant that addressed the drawbacks of the Grammont design: a lateralized glenosphere combined with a 135° humeral neck-shaft angle. The 135° neck-shaft angle provides lateral humeral offset, preserving the normal length-tension relationship of the residual rotator cuff musculature, which optimizes its strength and function. The lateralized glenosphere displaces the humeral shaft laterally, minimizing the potential for impingement during adduction2,9,17,18. The advantage of BIO-RSA and MIO-RSA over lateralized glenospheres is that the former options provide correction of angular deformities without excessive reaming, which can lead to impingement19. Rationale: BIO-RSA has been proven to achieve excellent functional outcomes15,20,21; however, the bone graft can undergo resorption, which may result in early baseplate loosening. Bipolar metallic lateralized RSA is an effective strategy for achieving lateralization and correction of multiplanar defects while avoiding the potential complications of BIO-RSA6,7,22-24. MIO-RSA also overcomes another limitation of BIO-RSA, namely that BIO-RSA is not applicable when the humeral head is not available for use (e.g., humeral head osteonecrosis, revision surgery, fracture sequelae). Expected Outcomes: A recent study evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of metallic humeral and glenoid lateralized implants. A total of 42 patients underwent primary RSA. Patients were documented prospectively and underwent follow-up visits at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. That study demonstrated that bipolar metallic lateralized RSA achieves excellent clinical results in terms of shoulder function, pain relief, muscle strength, and patient-reported subjective assessment, without instability or radiographic signs of scapular notching23. Kirsch et al.25 reported the results of primary RSA with an augmented baseplate in 44 patients with a minimum of 1 year of clinical and radiographic follow-up. The use of an augmented baseplate resulted in excellent short-term clinical outcomes and substantial deformity correction in patients with advanced glenoid deformity. No short-term complications and no failure or loosening of the augmented baseplate were observed. Merolla et al.7 compared the results of 44 patients who underwent BIO-RSA and 39 patients who underwent MIO-RSA, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Both techniques provided good clinical outcomes; however, BIO-RSA yielded union between the cancellous bone graft and the surface of the native glenoid in <70% of patients. On the other hand, complete baseplate seating was observed in 90% of MIO-RSA patients. Important Tips: When performing subscapularis tenotomy, leave an adequate stump to allow end-to-end repair.Tenotomize the superior part of the subscapularis tendon in an L-shape, sparing the portion below the circumflex vessels.As glenoid exposure is critical, perform a 270° capsulotomy.Continuously check the orientation of the baseplate relative to the prepared hole and reamed surface to ensure accurate implantation of the full wedge baseplate to achieve a proper fit.Aim for 70% to 80% seating of the baseplate onto the prepared glenoid surface. Avoid overtightening or excessive advancement of the baseplate into the subchondral bone. Gaps between the baseplate and glenoid surface should also be avoided.In order to avoid varus or valgus malpositioning of the final implant, obtain proper diaphyseal alignment by following "the three big Ls": large, lateral, and long. Use a large metaphyseal component to fill the metaphysis. Place the guide pin for the reaming of the metaphysis slightly laterally into the resected surface of the humerus. Use long compactors for diaphyseal alignment to avoid varus or valgus malpositioning of the final implant.Use an intramedullary cutting guide for correct humeral resection.Utilize the correct liner in order to obtain proper tensioning and avoid instability. Acronyms and Abbreviations: K wire = Kirschner wireROM = range of motion.

Arthroscopic Posterior Bone Block Stabilization Using a Tricortical Autograft of the Ipsilateral Scapular Spine.

Posterior bone grafting represents an emerging therapeutic approach for addressing recurrent instability in the posterior shoulder, particularly when coupled with substantial glenoid bone loss. Although not as prevalent as anterior instability, recent years have witnessed the development of numerous open and arthroscopic bony reconstruction methods. A technical gold standard for posterior bone grafting remains undefined, leading to ongoing advancements in bone grafting techniques. In response to past challenges associated with screw fixation, metal-free arthroscopic fixation procedures have been introduced to the realm of bone grafting. These metal-free methods often entail intricate transglenoid drilling, which poses potential surgical complexities and risks to both posterior and anterior soft tissues, as well as neurovascular structures. Therefore, we introduce an arthroscopic approach to posterior bone grafting using PEEK (polyether ether ketone) anchors with interconnected sutures and a scapular spine autograft. This method overcomes previous hurdles by facilitating the restoration of the posterior glenoid bone stock with precise positioning and secure fixation of the tricortical scapular spine bone autograft.

Complications and Revisions in Metal-Backed Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Comparative Study of Revision Rates Between Stemless and Stemmed Humeral Components.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the incidence of complications and revision surgeries between in two of convertible metal-back glenoid systems in total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) groups over a follow-up period of up to five years. METHODS: A retrospective analysis included 69 shoulders from 65 patients with primary aTSA. Patients were divided into Group 1 (n=31), receiving convertible cementless stemmed aTSA (Lima SMR) and Group 2 (n=38), receiving humeral head replacement aTSA (Arthrex, Eclipse) both with metal-back glenoid components. Clinical and radiological assessments were conducted at 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively. Assessments included the following: Constant Score, DASH, SPADI, SSV, Glenohumeral Distance, Critical Shoulder Angle and Lateral Acromion Index. In addition, we compared complications, revision rates and survival rates between groups using Kaplan-Maier curves and Log-Rank-test. RESULTS: Baseline demographics and preoperative outcome scores showed no significant differences between groups (p≥0.05). The overall revision rate did not significantly differ between groups (Group 1:32% vs. Group 2:24%, p=0.60), nor did the mean time to revision (p=0.27). The mean follow-up was 71±41 months (Group 1: 94±48 months, Group 2: 53±23 months, p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed similar mid-term survival probabilities (p=0.94). Revision reasons included rotator cuff insufficiency (n=4 in Group 1, n=2 in Group 2) and glenoid wear/loosening (n=5 in Group 1, n=7 in Group 2). Interestingly, Group 1 demonstrated no occurrence of glenoid metal baseplate or humeral loosening, while complex revisions were more common in the Group 2. At 2 and 5 years, non-revised patients in both groups had similar outcome scores. CONCLUSION: Metal-backed glenoid implants in combination with both stemless and stemmed humeral components in aTSA exhibit comparable revision rates and survival probabilities. Rotator cuff insufficiency and polyethylene wear are the two most common complications leading to revision. To facilitate ongoing monitoring and optimize patient safety, we implemented a modification in the follow-up protocol, transitioning to annual appointments or earlier when necessary. This study underscores the unsolved disadvantages in metal-back components and the importance of a mid- to long-term longitudinal assessment of those patients.

All-Suture Anchor vs. Knotless Suture Anchor for the Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability-A Prospective Cohort Study.

All-suture or soft-anchors (SA) represent a new generation of suture anchor technology with a completely suture-based system. This study's objective was to assess Juggerknot® SA, for arthroscopic Bankart repair in recurrent shoulder instability (RSI), and to compare it to a commonly performed knotless anchor (KA) technique (Pushlock®). In a prospective cohort study, 30 consecutive patients scheduled for reconstruction of the capsulolabral complex without substantial glenoid bone loss were included and operated on using the SA technique. A historical control group was operated on using the KA technique for the same indication. Clinical examinations were performed preoperatively and 12 and 24 months postoperatively. RSI and WOSI at 24 months were the co-primary endpoints, evaluated with logistic and linear regression. A total of 5 out of 30 (16.7%) patients suffered from RSI in the SA group, one out of 31 (3.2%) in the KA group (adjusted odds ratio = 10.12, 95% CI: 0.89-115.35), and 13.3% in the SA group and 3.2% in the KAgroup had a revision. The median WOSI in the SA group was lower than in the KA group (81% vs. 95%) (adjusted regression coefficient = 10.12, 95% CI: 0.89-115.35). Arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for RSI using either the SA or KA technique led to satisfying clinical outcomes. However, there is a tendency for higher RSI and lower WOSI following the SA technique.

Concomitant Glenohumeral Pathologies in Patients with Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations: How Do Acute and Chronic Instabilities Differ?

Background: Concomitant glenohumeral pathologies may be present in patients with acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations. This study aims to record and compare the prevalence and treatment of CGP in cases with acute and chronic ACJ dislocations. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional binational, bicentric study included patients that underwent arthroscopically assisted stabilization for acute (group A) and chronic (group C) ACJ dislocations. Intraoperatively, CGPs and eventual treatments (debridement and reconstructive measures) were recorded. Results: The study included 540 patients (87% men; mean age 39.4 years), with 410 (75.9%) patients in group A and 130 (24.1%) in group C. Patients in group C were older (p < 0.001). The CGP prevalence was 30.7%, without a difference between groups A and C (p = 0.19). Supraspinatus tendon (SSP) and labral lesions were most common. Within group C, CGPs were more prevalent in surgery-naïve patients (p = 0.002). Among 49 patients with previous surgical treatment, CGPs tended to be more common in patients with prior open surgery than arthroscopically assisted surgery (p = 0.392). Increased CGP prevalence was associated with higher age (r = 0.97; p = 0.004) (up to 63% in the oldest age group, but also 17% for youngest age group) and higher in cases with Rockwood type-IIIB injuries compared to type-V injuries (p = 0.028), but type-IIIB injuries included more group C cases (p < 0.001). The most frequently found CGPs were treated by debridement rather than reconstructive interventions (SSP and labrum: p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: This study shows that one in three patients with ACJ instabilities has a CGP, especially elderly patients. Most of the CGPs were treated by debridement rather than constructive interventions.

One-Step Release Technique for Tendon Extraction During Biceps Tenodesis.

All biceps tenodesis techniques involving extra-articular tendon preparation consist of 2 distinct steps for tenotomy and tendon grasping. These 2 maneuvers are performed by different instruments. A single-step tendon release technique is described for both arthroscopic and open shoulder surgery. This technique finds application in arthroscopic proximal suprapectoral tenodesis, open treatment of proximal humerus fractures, and suprapectoral mini-open tenodesis. Herein, we describe an arthroscopic biceps tenodesis technique that combines the actions of cutting and gripping the tendon in a single step.

Evaluation of the efficiency of an ultrasound-supported infiltration technique in patients with tennis elbow applying the ITEC medical device: a multicenter study.

Background: The treatment of lateral epicondylitis remains unsatisfactory in certain cases. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficiency of an ultrasound-guided infiltration combined with fenestration of the extensor tendon postulating a 50% reduction in pain on exertion within 6 months. Methods: In a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study design, 68 patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis and symptoms lasted for at least 6 weeks were included. Each hospital has been assigned for Traumeel (A), autologous whole blood (B), or dextrose (C) in advance. Preinterventional, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 and 12 months after infiltration, patient-related outcome parameter, and dorsal wrist extension strength were documented. Preinterventional (obligate) and after 6 months (optional) radiological evaluation (magnetic resonance imaging) was performed. Results: The Visual Analog Scale showed a significant reduction after 6 months in all groups (A. 4.8-2.5, B. 6.2-2.3, C. 5.8-2.4). Similar results could be observed with Subjective elbow value, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Score, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation. The loss of strength could be completely compensated after about 6 months. Magnetic resonance imaging did not fully reflect clinical convalescence. Re-infiltrations were sometimes necessary for final reduction of symptoms (A = 11, B = 8, C = 4). Switching to surgical intervention was most frequently observed in group C (A = 2, B = 1, C = 5). In 14.5% of the cases, no improvement of the symptoms could be achieved with this method. Conclusion: The primary hypothesis of a significant long-term pain reduction of at least 50% could be achieved regardless of the medication chosen.

Analysis of three different reverse shoulder arthroplasty designs for cuff tear arthropathy - the combination of lateralization and distalization provides best mobility.

BACKGROUND: The two major reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) designs are the Grammont design and the lateralized design. Even if the lateralized design is biomechanically favored, the classic Grammont prosthesis continues to be used. Functional and subjective patient scores as well as implant survival described in the literature so far are comparable to the lateralized design. A pure comparison of how the RSA design influences outcome in patients has not yet been determined. The aim of this study was a comparison focused on patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA). METHODS: We analyzed registry data from 696 CTA patients prospectively collected between 2012 and 2020 in two specialized orthopedic centers up to 2 years post-RSA with the same follow-up time points (6,12 24 months). Complete teres minor tears were excluded. Three groups were defined: group 1 (inlay, 155° humeral inclination, 36 + 2 mm eccentric glenosphere (n = 50)), group 2 (inlay, 135° humeral inclination, 36 + 4 mm lateralized glenosphere (n = 141)) and group 3 (onlay, 145° humeral inclination, + 3 mm lateralized base plate, 36 + 2 mm eccentric glenosphere (n = 35)) We compared group differences in clinical outcomes (e.g., active and passive range of motion (ROM), abduction strength, Constant-Murley score (CS)), radiographic evaluations of prosthetic position, scapular anatomy and complications using mixed models adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: The final analysis included 226 patients. The overall adjusted p-value of the CS for all time-points showed no significant difference (p = 0.466). Flexion of group 3 (mean, 155° (SD 13)) was higher than flexion of group 1 (mean, 142° (SD 18) and 2 (mean, 132° (SD 18) (p < 0.001). Values for abduction of group 3 (mean, 145° (SD 23)) were bigger than those of group 1 (mean, 130° (SD 22)) and group 2 (mean, 118° (SD 25)) (p < 0.001). Mean external rotation for group 3 (mean, 41° (SD 23)) and group 2 (mean, 38° (SD 17)) was larger than external rotation of group 1 (mean, 24° (SD 16)) (p < 0.001); a greater proportion of group 2 (78%) and 3 (69%) patients reached L3 level on internal rotation compared to group 1 (44%) (p = 0.003). Prosthesis position measurements were similar, but group 3 had significantly less scapular notching (14%) versus 24% (group 2) and 50% (group 1) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Outcome scores of different RSA designs for CTA revealed comparable results. However, CTA patients with a lateralized and distalized RSA configuration were associated with achieving better flexion and abduction with less scapular notching. A better rotation was associated with either of the lateralized RSA designs in comparison with the classic Grammont prosthesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level III.

[Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty - Current Concepts]. / Inverse Schulterendoprothetik ­ aktueller Stand.

Due to first promising long term outcome data, reverse shoulder arthroplasty experienced an immense increase of usage during the past decade. Moreover, the initial Grammont concept has constantly been refined and adapted to current scientific findings. Therefore, clinical and radiological problems like scapular notching and postoperative instability were constantly addressed but do still remain an area of concern.This article summarises current concepts in reverse shoulder arthroplasty and gives an overview of actual indications like cuff tear arthropathy, severe osteoarthritis, proximal humerus fractures, tumours, fracture sequelae as well as revision surgery and their corresponding clinical and radiological results.

Scapulothoracic orientation has a significant influence on the clinical outcome after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Computer simulation has indicated a significant effect of scapulothoracic orientation and posture on range of motion (ROM) after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). We analyzed this putative effect on the clinical and radiologic outcome post-RTSA. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 2-year follow-up data of RTSA patients treated at our clinic between 2008 and 2019. Patients were categorized into posture types A, B, and C based on an established method using scapular internal rotation on preoperative cross-sectional imaging. We compared differences in clinical ROM, pain, Subjective Shoulder Value, Constant Score, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Level utility index), and radiologic outcomes between posture types using linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Of 681 included patients, 225 had type A posture, 326 type B, and 130 type C. Baseline group characteristics were comparable, although the type C group had a higher proportion of females (60% [A], 64% [B], 80% [C]) with lower abduction strength (0.7 kg [A], 0.6 kg [B], 0.3 kg [C]) and a slightly higher proportion with a Grammont design RTSA (41% [A], 48% [B], 54% [C]). There were significant adjusted differences in mean (±standard deviation) active flexion (A: 137° ± 21°; B: 136° ± 20°; C: 131° ± 19°) and passive flexion (A: 140° ± 19°; B: 138° ± 19°; C: 134° ± 18°), active (A: 127° ± 26°; B: 125° ± 26°; C: 117° ± 27°) and passive abduction (A: 129° ± 24°; B: 128° ± 25°; C: 121° ± 25°), SPADI (A: 81 ± 18; B: 79 ± 20; C: 73 ± 23), and pain (A: 1.2 ± 1.7; B: 1.6 ± 2.2; C: 1.8 ± 2.4) between posture types at 2 years (P ≤ .035). A higher distalization shoulder angle was associated with better abduction in type C patients (P = .016). Type C patients showed a trend toward a higher complication rate (3.9% vs. 1.1% [A], 3.2% [B]) (P = .067). CONCLUSIONS: Type C posture influences the 2-year clinical outcome of RTSA patients in terms of worse flexion, abduction, SPADI, and pain. Scapulothoracic orientation and posture should be considered during the patient selection process, preoperative planning, and implantation of an RTSA.

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation-Enhanced Physical Therapist Intervention for Functional Posterior Shoulder Instability (Type B1): A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Functional posterior shoulder instability (FPSI) (type B1) is a severe type of instability, mainly in teenagers and young adults, that leads to loss of function, pain, and stigmatization among peers. An experimental nonsurgical treatment protocol based on neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) showed very promising early results in the treatment of FPSI. The hypothesis of this study was that NMES-enhanced physical therapy leads to better outcomes than physical therapy alone as the current gold standard of treatment in patients with FPSI. METHODS: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, patients with FPSI were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either 6 weeks of physical therapy or 6 weeks of physical therapy with simultaneous motion-triggered NMES. Baseline scores as well as outcome scores at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the intervention were obtained. The predefined primary outcome of this trial was the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) at the 3-month time point. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were randomized and eligible for the trial. The group that received physical therapy with simultaneous motion-triggered NMES showed a significantly better main outcome measurement in terms of the 3-month WOSI score (64% [SD = 16%] vs 51% [SD = 24%]). Two-thirds of the patients from the physical therapist group crossed over to the group that received physical therapy with simultaneous motion-triggered NMES due to dissatisfaction after the 3-month follow-up and showed a significant increase in their WOSI score from 49% [SD = 8%] to 67% [SD = 24%]. The frequency of instability episodes showed a significant improvement in the group that received physical therapy with simultaneous motion-triggered NMES at the 3-month follow-up and beyond, while in the physical therapist group, no significant difference was observed. CONCLUSION: The current study shows that NMES-enhanced physical therapy led to statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in outcomes in the treatment of FPSI compared to conventional physical therapy alone-from which even patients with prior unsatisfactory results after conventional physical therapy can benefit. IMPACT: Based on the results of this study, NMES-enhanced physical therapy is an effective new treatment option for FPSI, a severe type of shoulder instability. NMES-enhanced physical therapy should be preferred over conventional physical therapy for the treatment of patients with FPSI.

Non-operative management of humeral periprosthetic fracture after stemless shoulder arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Periprosthetic fractures around a stemless implant often involve lesser and greater tuberosities with a well-fixed implant in the metaphysis. This exposes the surgeon to unique questions and challenges as no surgical option (open reduction and internal fixation or revision to a stem) appears satisfactory to address them. Purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes after non-operative management of periprosthetic fractures after stemless shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted to identify all patients who had sustained non-operative management of a periprosthetic fracture after a stemless shoulder. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) intraoperative fractures and (2) implant loosening. Primary outcomes included mean Constant score and mean active range of motion. Secondary outcomes were VAS, radiological analysis, and complications. RESULTS: Nine patients were included. One was excluded due to the loss of follow-up at three months. Mean age was 79 years. At the last follow-up, no significant difference was observed between the Constant score, VAS, or the range of motion before fracture and at the last follow-up. Fracture healing did not result in any change in angulation in the frontal plane in seven cases and was responsible for a varus malunion in two cases of anatomic arthroplasty. No change in lateralization or distalization was reported. No cases of implant loosening after fracture have been observed. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative management seems to be appropriate in cases of minimally displaced fractures without implant loosening.

Missed Osteochondral Shear Injury of the Humeral Head Following Anterior Shoulder Dislocation - A Case Report.

CASE: Two months after anterior shoulder dislocation and spontaneous reduction, a 41-year-old man presented movement-related shoulder pain and a functional deficit. An initially missed osteochondral shearing injury of the humeral head with a Bankart lesion was diagnosed. Due to an extensive posteroinferior defect, an open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using bioabsorbable chondral darts was performed. At the 1-year follow-up, magnetic resonance images showed a completely healed osteochondral fragment and the patient presented an unrestricted shoulder function. CONCLUSION: Even in missed osteochondral shear injuries, ORIF with bioabsorbable implants can be associated with an excellent functional outcome and sufficient integrity of the fragment. The absorbable implants are biocompatible, therefore the risk of revision surgery due to implant irritations is minimized.

Lateralization and distalization shoulder angles do not predict outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy.

BACKGROUND: In reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), there are a plethora of measurements regarding implant lateralization and distalization to optimize the center of rotation. Two specific measurements known as the "lateralization shoulder angle" (LSA) and "distalization shoulder angle" (DSA) have been the recent focus of studies to assess their association with RSA and postoperative function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic clinical value of the LSA and DSA in a large cohort of patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) who were treated with different RSA systems. METHODS: Two local shoulder arthroplasty registries were reviewed for all RSA patients documented to have undergone a radiologic assessment and complete 2-year follow-up examination. The main inclusion criterion was primary RSA in patients with CTA. Patients with either a complete teres minor tear, os acromiale, or acromial stress fracture reported between the time of surgery and the 24-month follow-up were excluded. Five RSA implant systems with 4 neck-shaft angles (NSAs) were assessed. The Constant score, Subjective Shoulder Value, and range of motion at 2 years were correlated with both the LSA and DSA assessed on 6-month anteroposterior radiographs. Linear and parabolic univariable regressions were calculated for both shoulder angles, for each prosthesis system, and for the entire patient cohort. RESULTS: Between May 2006 and November 2019, there were a total of 630 CTA patients who had undergone primary RSA. Of this large cohort of patients, 270 were treated with the Promos Reverse prosthesis system (NSA, 155°); 44, Aequalis Reversed II (NSA, 155°); 62, Lima SMR Reverse (NSA, 150°); 25, Aequalis Ascend Flex (NSA, 145°); and 229, Univers Revers (NSA, 135°). The mean LSA was 78° (standard deviation [SD], 10°; range, 6°-107°), and the mean DSA was 51° (SD, 10°; range, 7°-91°). The average Constant score at 24 months' follow-up was 68.1 points (SD, 13 points; range, 13-96 points). Neither the linear nor parabolic regression calculations for the LSA or DSA revealed significant associations with any of the clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Different patients may achieve different clinical outcomes despite having identical LSA and DSA values. There is no association between angular radiographic measurements and 2-year functional outcomes after RSA.

Current Trends in Orthopaedics and Trauma in Germany.

During the Guest Nation Symposium (cobranded with the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie, and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie) at the 2023 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Congress in Las Vegas, the goal was to compile nationally important content from German orthopaedics and trauma surgery. This resulted in a mix of content on the latest developments in trauma care, knee arthroplasty, spinopelvic importance for hip arthroplasty, stemless shoulder endoprostheses, joint preservation for ankle osteoarthritis, trauma education, and research. Of course, this is only a small selection of the important issues that are being driven forward in Germany.