Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 9 de 9
1.
Int Endod J ; 42(11): 1032-8, 2009 Nov.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19825038

AIM: To determine the influence of solvents on gutta-percha and sealer remaining on root canal walls and in dentinal tubules. METHODOLOGY: The root canals of 70 teeth were prepared chemomechanically to apical size 40. In group 1 (n = 10; control group), the canals remained unfilled. In groups 2-4 (n = 20 each), the canals were filled using lateral compaction with gutta-percha and sealer. Removal of root fillings was undertaken after 2 weeks using Gates Glidden burs and hand files without solvent (group 2), with eucalyptol (60 microL; group 3) and with chloroform (60 microL; group 4) to size 50. After further irrigation using sodium hypochlorite and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, the roots were split, photographed and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed. The number of filled dentinal tubules (SEM) and the surface covered by root filling remnants (photographs) were evaluated for the coronal, middle and apical third of each root half. Statistical analysis was performed via mixed model for clustered data followed by Tukey's test. RESULTS: After pooling the results of all thirds of the canal, open tubules were more prevalent in the control group, followed by the nonsolvent group, the eucalyptol group and the chloroform group (P < 0.05 between all groups). Less surface was covered by root filling remnants in the nonsolvent group than in the eucalyptol group and the chloroform group (P < 0.05); again, fewer remnants were found in the control group than in all other groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Solvents led to more gutta-percha and sealer remnants on root canal walls and inside dentinal tubules.


Dental Debonding/methods , Dental Pulp Cavity/ultrastructure , Dentin/ultrastructure , Root Canal Preparation/methods , Solvents , Chloroform , Cuspid , Cyclohexanols , Eucalyptol , Gutta-Percha , Humans , Incisor , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Monoterpenes , Retreatment , Root Canal Filling Materials
2.
Int Endod J ; 42(4): 368-74, 2009 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19220512

AIM: To compare ex vivo an experimental setup consisting of an electronic apex locator (EAL) and endodontic motor with an established product (Tri Auto ZX) for accuracy of length control during root canal treatment with three different types of files. METHODOLOGY: An experimental setup consisting of porous spongy material and an electrolyte was used. Sixty anterior teeth were randomly assigned to six groups. Access cavities were prepared. During root canal treatment, constant length monitoring was performed either with the Tri Auto ZX or the Raypex5 apex locator attached to an endodontic motor (Endo IT professional) using ProTaper, M(two) or FlexMaster files. After root canal preparation the distances between file tip and major apical foramen and file tip and minor apical foramen were measured using a microscope and analysed using two-way anova to evaluate the accuracy of the two systems. RESULTS: Distances between the file tip and the major apical foramen were not significantly different between the file systems and the two EALs. In cases treated with FlexMaster significantly larger distances between file tip and minor apical foramen were found compared to M(two) and ProTaper. No significant differences were observed between the two EALs. After preparation of the root canals with the Tri Auto ZX, multiple minor apical foramina were mechanically widened. CONCLUSION: With the limitation of this laboratory study the combination of EAL and endodontic motor was as accurate as the Tri Auto ZX system in terms of length control during root canal preparation.


Dental Equipment , Dental Pulp Cavity/anatomy & histology , Odontometry/instrumentation , Root Canal Preparation/instrumentation , Tooth Apex/anatomy & histology , Dental Instruments , Electric Impedance , Electrical Equipment and Supplies , Humans
3.
Caries Res ; 42(4): 312-8, 2008.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18663301

There is only little information on the remineralising capability of regularly applied highly concentrated fluoride gels. The aim of this in situ study was to test the hypothesis that weekly application of a 1.25% fluoride gel results in a significantly higher fluoride uptake and a significantly higher mineral gain compared to a 0.5% fluoride or a placebo gel, respectively. Thirty-six subjects were included in this double-blind, three-way, crossover, placebo-controlled study and randomly assigned to a treatment scheme. Two weeks before the study, between treatment periods as well as during the study periods, subjects were instructed to abstain from any fluoride source other than the study medication. At the beginning of each of three 4-week periods specimen holders, each containing 10 bovine enamel slabs, were placed in the subjects' mouths. During the experimental periods the volunteers brushed the specimens with placebo gel, 0.5% fluoride gel or 1.25% fluoride gel once a week. Fluoride uptake was significantly higher after treatment with the 1.25% fluoride gel than after treatment with the 0.5% fluoride gel (p = 0.007) or the placebo gel (p < 0.001). Treatment with 0.5% fluoride gel led to a significantly higher fluoride uptake compared to placebo treatment (p < 0.001). Changes in mineral gain and lesion depth were not statistically significantly different between the three groups. Under the present experimental conditions repeated application of highly concentrated fluoride gels did not promote remineralisation significantly.


Cariostatic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Dental Caries/prevention & control , Dental Enamel/metabolism , Fluorides, Topical/pharmacokinetics , Tooth Remineralization/methods , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Animals , Cariostatic Agents/administration & dosage , Cattle , Cross-Over Studies , Dental Enamel/drug effects , Dental Enamel/pathology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Delivery Systems , Female , Fluorides, Topical/administration & dosage , Gels/chemistry , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Statistics, Nonparametric , Tooth Demineralization/prevention & control
4.
Int Endod J ; 40(7): 538-43, 2007 Jul.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17459116

AIM: To evaluate the tensile bond strength between two different composite resin cores and (Clearfil Core, MultiCore Flow) and fibre posts (DT Light Post), with and without silanization of the post surface. METHODOLOGY: Forty fibre posts were shortened to a length of 15 mm. Specimens were then produced by covering the upper 3 mm of the posts with standardized composite core build-ups. The bonding surfaces of twenty posts were treated with silane coupling agent (Monobond-S). Four experimental groups were formed: G1: Clearfil Core; G2: Monobond-S + Clearfil Core; G3: MultiCore Flow; G4: Monobond-S + MultiCore Flow. Each post was positioned upright in a post centric device with moulds to ensure standardized shapes of the abutments. After tensile bond strength testing, the type of failure at the interface was determined. The results obtained were compared using an unpaired sample t-test. RESULTS: The mean tensile bond strengths and standard deviations were [MPa] 10.08 +/- 0.92 for Clearfil Core, 10.47 +/- 1.05 for Clearfil Core + silane; 6.65 +/- 0.79 for MultiCore Flow and 6.91 +/- 0.83 for MultiCore Flow + silane. Statistical analysis revealed that Clearfil Core achieved significantly higher bond strengths than MultiCore Flow (P < 0.0001). Post silanization had no significant effect. All tested specimens had an adhesive failure mode. CONCLUSION: Type of composite had a significant effect on tensile bond strength. Silanization of fibre post surfaces had no effect on core retention.


Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Bonding , Epoxy Resins/chemistry , Post and Core Technique/instrumentation , Quartz/chemistry , Silanes/chemistry , Dental Cements/chemistry , Dental Restoration Failure , Humans , Materials Testing , Methacrylates/chemistry , Resin Cements/chemistry , Stress, Mechanical , Surface Properties , Tensile Strength
5.
Caries Res ; 41(2): 108-14, 2007.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17284911

The purpose of this randomized, cross-over in situ study was to determine the effects of 4 chewing gums on artificial caries-like subsurface lesions. Two chewing gums (1 with zinc citrate and 1 without) contained dicalcium phosphate (3.9%), calcium gluconate (1.8%) and calcium lactate (0.45%), 1 chewing gum contained casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate nanocomplexes (0.7%), and another one contained no calcium. Fifteen subjects without current caries activity (7 male, 8 female; mean age: 27.5 +/- 2.5 years) wore removable buccal appliances in the lower jaw with 4 bovine enamel slabs with subsurface lesions. The appliances were inserted immediately before gum chewing for 20 min and then retained for an additional 20 min. This was performed 4 times per day. Every subject chewed 4 different chewing gums over 4 periods of 14 days each. During a fifth period (control) the subjects only wore the appliances without chewing gum. At completion of each period the enamel slabs were embedded, sectioned and subjected to transversal microradiography. With regard to change of mineral loss and of lesion depth no significant differences could be found between chewing gums containing calcium and calcium-free chewing gums. Moreover, the chewing gum groups and the control group did not differ significantly if adjustments were made for baseline values (p > 0.05; ANCOVA). Under the conditions of the present study it may be concluded that the use of chewing gum offers no additional remineralizing benefit to buccal tooth surfaces, even if the chewing gum contains calcium compounds.


Calcium Compounds/therapeutic use , Cariostatic Agents/therapeutic use , Chewing Gum , Dental Caries/drug therapy , Tooth Remineralization/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Animals , Calcium Compounds/administration & dosage , Calcium Gluconate/administration & dosage , Calcium Gluconate/therapeutic use , Calcium Phosphates/administration & dosage , Calcium Phosphates/therapeutic use , Cariostatic Agents/administration & dosage , Caseins/administration & dosage , Caseins/therapeutic use , Cattle , Cross-Over Studies , Dental Enamel , Female , Humans , Lactates/administration & dosage , Lactates/therapeutic use , Male , Microradiography , Middle Aged
6.
Int Endod J ; 40(2): 133-8, 2007 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17229119

AIM: To compare the accuracy of two electronic apex locators (EALs) in the same teeth in vivo. METHODOLOGY: The working lengths in 20 teeth with a single canal were determined with two different EALs (Root ZX; J. Morita Corporation, Tokyo, Japan and Raypex 5 VDW, Munich, Germany) before extraction. When the first EAL was used the files were advanced until the display indicated the 'apical constriction'. The files were then fixed in removable and replaceable light curing composite patterns. The procedure was repeated in the same tooth with the second EAL and a different file. The teeth were then extracted and the apical 4 mm of the root canals were exposed. After that the apical parts with the repositioned files in the canals were digitally photographed under a light microscope. On the images the minor diameter and the major foramen of each sample were marked and the respective distances of the file tips from these positions were measured with a computer program. Subsequently the values of the two groups of EALs were compared using a paired sample t-test. RESULTS: The minor foramen was located within the limits of +/-0.5 mm in 75% of the cases with the Root ZX and in 80% of the cases with Raypex 5. The paired sample t-test showed no significant difference between the EALs regarding determination of the minor foramen. CONCLUSION: The use of EALs is a reliable method for determining working length. The differences between the two EALs were not statistically significant.


Dental Instruments , Dental Pulp Cavity/anatomy & histology , Odontometry/instrumentation , Tooth Apex/anatomy & histology , Adult , Aged , Electric Impedance , Electronics, Medical , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Middle Aged
7.
Int Endod J ; 39(7): 558-65, 2006 Jul.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16776760

AIM: To compare the detectability of residual Epiphany and gutta-percha after root canal retreatment using a dental operating microscope and radiographic examination with the residual area measured after rendering the roots transparent. METHODOLOGY: Sixty extracted single-rooted maxillary central incisor teeth were enlarged to apical size 40. Thirty canals were filled using vertically compacted Epiphany, the remainder were filled with vertically compacted gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer. After re-instrumentation to apical size 50, radiographs of the roots were taken in buccolingual and mesiodistal direction. Residual filling material was categorized by three observers using the radiographs and a dental operating microscope. The area of remaining material that was made visible by radiographs was measured with the aid of a computer image analysis programme. After clearing the roots, areas of residual filling material on the root canal wall were measured using a microscope. RESULTS: Computer image analysis of the radiographs showed significantly smaller areas of remaining gutta-percha and Epiphany compared with the analysis of the transparent teeth that revealed only one absolutely clean root (Epiphany). Especially in the gutta-percha group, the scores determined by the observers using radiographic examination gave an over-optimistic impression of cleanliness compared with the scores determined by the visualization through the microscope. CONCLUSION: Especially for remaining gutta-percha, the operating microscopes provided better detection of residual root filling material in retreated maxillary incisor teeth.


Dental Pulp Cavity/pathology , Gutta-Percha/chemistry , Root Canal Filling Materials/chemistry , Root Canal Therapy/methods , Dental Pulp Cavity/diagnostic imaging , Epoxy Resins/chemistry , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Incisor , Microscopy/instrumentation , Observer Variation , Radiography, Dental , Retreatment , Root Canal Preparation/methods , Surface Properties
8.
Clin Oral Investig ; 10(3): 181-6, 2006 Sep.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16721551

The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the clinical performance of a new restorative material (Ceram.X) in combination with a new primer-adhesive (K-0127). One operator placed two Class I or II restorations in molars of 43 patients. One molar was restored with Ceram.X/K-0127, the other one with Tetric Ceram/Syntac Classic. At baseline, after 1 and 2 years, the restorations were evaluated by one evaluator using modified Ryge's criteria. After 2 years, 31 patients were examined. One Ceram.X-restoration had to be removed for root canal treatment due to pulpitis. Thus, failure rate of Ceram.X was 3.2% and of Tetric Ceram, 0%. In both groups, no sensitivity, no recurrent caries, and no changes in surface texture were recorded after 2 years. One restoration in each group showed slight changes in color stability (score B). Marginal discoloration (score B) was found concerning three Ceram.X-restorations (10.0%) and two Tetric Ceram-restoration (6.5%). Marginal integrity was score B for four Ceram.X-restorations (13.3%) and for four Tetric Ceram-restorations (12.9%). No statistically significant differences were found (p>0.05). After 2 years of clinical service, 96.8% of Ceram.X/K-0127 and 100% of Tetric Ceram/Syntac Classic restorations were in place and performed clinically well.


Ceramics , Dental Cements , Dental Porcelain , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Ceramics/chemistry , Composite Resins , Dental Bonding , Dental Cements/chemistry , Dental Porcelain/chemistry , Dental Restoration Failure , Female , Humans , Male , Nanostructures , Organically Modified Ceramics , Prospective Studies , Silanes , tert-Butyl Alcohol
9.
Int Endod J ; 39(2): 150-6, 2006 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16454796

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of hand and rotary instrumentation for removal of vertically compacted Epiphany and gutta-percha during retreatment. METHODOLOGY: Sixty extracted single-rooted maxillary central incisors were enlarged to size 40 using FlexMaster instruments. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups of 15 specimens each. The canals of two groups were obturated using vertically compacted Epiphany. The others were filled with vertically compacted gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer. One Epiphany group and one gutta-percha group was reinstrumented with Gates Glidden burs and Hedström files. In the other two groups, obturation material was removed using Gates Glidden burs and RaCe rotary instruments. After clearing the roots, the area of remaining obturation material on the root canal wall was measured using a computer image analysis program. Statistical analysis was performed using Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance and anova. RESULTS: Retreatment of specimens obturated with gutta-percha showed significantly more remaining obturation material than specimens filled with Epiphany (P < 0.05). No difference was found between the removal with Hedström files and with RaCe instruments (P > 0.05). Regarding the mean time of retreatment and time required for reaching the working length, Hedström files were significantly faster than RaCe instruments (P < 0.05). The times did not depend on the kind of obturation material (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Vertically compacted Epiphany in combination with Epiphany Root Canal Sealant was removed more effectively than gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer. Hedström files were more rapid than RaCe rotary instruments.


Root Canal Filling Materials/chemistry , Root Canal Preparation/instrumentation , Dental Pulp Cavity/ultrastructure , Epoxy Resins/chemistry , Equipment Design , Gutta-Percha/chemistry , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Incisor , Materials Testing , Retreatment , Root Canal Obturation/methods , Rotation , Surface Properties , Time Factors
...