Reversibility of severe mitral valve regurgitation after left ventricular assist device implantation: single-centre observations from a real-life population of patients.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the impact of untreated preoperative severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR) on outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. METHODS: Of the 234 patients who received LVAD therapy in our centre during a 6-year period, we selected those who had echocardiographic images of good quality and excluded those who underwent mitral valve replacement prior to or mitral valve repair during LVAD placement. The 128 patients selected were divided into 2 groups: Group A with severe MR (n = 65) and Group B with none to moderate MR (n = 63, 28 with moderate MR). We evaluated transthoracic echocardiography preoperatively [15 (7-28) days before LVAD implantation; median (interquartile range)] and postoperatively up to the last available follow-up [501 (283-848) days after LVAD]. We collected mortality, complications and clinical status indicators of the patient cohort. RESULTS: We observed a significant decrease in the severity of MR after LVAD implantation (severe MR 51% pre- vs 6% post-LVAD implantation, P < 0.001). There was no difference between groups in terms of right heart failure, rate of urgent heart transplantation, pump thrombosis or ventricular arrhythmias. There was no difference in 1-year survival and 3-year survival (87.7% vs 88.4% and 71.8% vs 66.6% for Groups A and B, respectively, P = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative severe MR resolves in the majority of patients early on after LVAD implantation and is not associated with worse clinical outcomes or intermediate-term survival.

Quantification of Aortic Valve Regurgitation by Pulsed Doppler Examination of the Left Subclavian Artery Velocity Contour: A Validation Study with Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

BACKGROUND: Reflux of the aortic regurgitation (AR) causes an increased diastolic reverse flow in the aorta and its branching vessels. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of Doppler measurements in the left subclavian artery (LSA) for quantification of AR in a cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) validation study. METHODS: Systolic and diastolic flow profiles of the LSA (subclavicular approach) were evaluated prospectively by use of pulsed wave Doppler in 59 patients (55.5 ± 15 years; 44 men), 47 with a wide spectrum of AR and 12 as control group. Using CMR phase-contrast sequences (performed 1 cm above the aortic valve), the AR was divided into three groups: mild, regurgitant fraction (RF) < 20% (n = 17); moderate, RF 20%-40% (n = 10); and severe, RF > 40% (n = 20). The LSA Doppler-derived RF was calculated as the ratio between diastolic and systolic velocity-time integrals (VTI). RESULTS: Quality LSA Doppler signal could be obtained in all cases. Patients with CMR severe AR had higher values of LSA Doppler-derived RF (51% ± 9% vs 36% ± 11% vs 16% ± 8%; P < .0001). LSA Doppler showed a good correlation with CMR, with a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 89%, and diagnostic accuracy for severe AR of 91.5%. Finally, Bland-Altman plots showed agreement in the group with moderate to severe AR (mean bias = -2.2% ± 8%, 95% CI, -17.7 to 13.3; P = .145) but differed in mild AR. CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of the RF for quantification of AR using LSA Doppler are comparable to those of CMR, highlighting the potential role of LSA Doppler as an adjunctive technique to assess the severity of AR.

Advanced symptoms are associated with myocardial damage in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Once aortic stenosis (AS) is severe, patients develop symptoms at different stages. Indeed, symptom status may correlate poorly with the grade of valve narrowing. Multiple pathophysiological mechanisms, other than valvular load, may explain the link between AS and symptom severity. We aimed to describe the relationship between the severity of symptoms and the characteristics of a cohort of patients with severe AS already referred for aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: We analyzed 118 consecutive patients (70±9 years, 55% men) with severe AS referred for AVR. We identified 84 patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) I-II, and 34 with NYHA III-IV symptoms. Clinical and echocardiographic parameters were compared between these two groups. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal peak systolic strain (GLPS), NT-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and high-sensitive troponin T (hs-TNT) were determined at the time of admission. RESULTS: AS severity was similar between groups. Compared with the NYHA I-II group, patients in NYHA III-IV group were older and more likely to have comorbidities, worse intracardiac hemodynamics and more LV damage. Variables independently associated with NYHA III-IV symptomatology were the absence of sinus rhythm, higher E/e' ratio, and increased hs-TNT. GLPS showed a good correlation not only with hs-TNT as a marker of myocardial damage, but also with markers of increased afterload imposed on LV, being not directly related with advanced symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced symptoms in patients with severe AS referred for AVR are associated with worse intracardiac hemodynamics, absence of sinus rhythm, and more myocardial damage. It supports the concept of transition from adaptive LV remodeling to myocyte death as an important determinant of symptoms of heart failure.