Longitudinal Effects of Cigarette Smoking and Smoking Cessation on Aortic Wave Reflections, Pulse Wave Velocity, and Carotid Artery Distensibility.

Background We evaluated the effects of smoking and smoking cessation on aortic wave reflections (augmentation index), aortic pulse wave velocity, and carotid artery distensibility and stiffness (distensibility coefficient, Young's elastic modulus). Methods and Results Current smokers underwent carotid, radial, and femoral artery tonometry and carotid ultrasound at baseline and 3 years after a quit attempt. Baseline associations of smoking heaviness markers (exhaled carbon monoxide and cigarettes smoked/d) and effects of smoking cessation at year 3 on changes in arterial measures were assessed using multivariable linear regression models. The 1417 smokers (54% female) were mean (SD) 49.3 (11.6) years old and smoked 17.2 (8.3) cigarettes/d (exhaled carbon monoxide 14.7 [8.2] parts per million). Arterial measures were associated more strongly with age, blood pressure (BP), and waist circumference than with smoking heaviness markers. Augmentation index was associated independently with carbon monoxide (P=0.004). Pulse wave velocity, distensibility coefficient, and Young's elastic modulus had small, inconsistent associations with smoking heaviness markers. At year 3, augmentation index improved with smoking cessation (P=0.006) despite more weight gain (2.54 vs 0.36 kg, P<0.001) and insulin resistance (P=0.001) among abstainers, but distensibility coefficient decreased (P=0.004). Changes in arterial measures were related more strongly to changes in BP than smoking cessation. Conclusions Arterial wave reflection and stiffness measures were associated more strongly with age, BP, and waist circumference than smoking heaviness. Smoking cessation was associated with weight gain and increased insulin resistance. Changes in arterial measures were predicted by changes in BP, highlighting the need to address weight gain and BP changes during a quit attempt.

Stable Ischemic Heart Disease in Women.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Paradoxically, although women have a lower burden of coronary atherosclerosis, they experience more symptoms, more frequent hospitalizations, and a worse prognosis compared to men. This is in part due to biological variations in pathophysiology between the two sexes, and in part related to inadequate understanding of these differences, subconscious referral bias, and suboptimal application of existing women-specific guidelines. We sought to review the contemporary literature and provide an update on risk assessment, diagnosis, and management of IHD in women. RECENT FINDINGS: IHD in women is often secondary to diffuse non-obstructive atherosclerosis, coronary spasm, inflammation, and endothelial and microvascular dysfunction, and less commonly due to the male pattern of flow-limiting epicardial stenosis. Both IHD patterns likely represent sex-specific manifestations of the same disease process. Additionally, there is a differential expression of risk factors and symptoms between men and women. Application of male-pattern IHD risk factors and presentation to women contributes to under-recognition, under-testing, and under-treatment of IHD in women compared to men. Traditional diagnostic evaluation has focused on detection of epicardial disease, amenable to revascularization. Our improved understanding of sex-specific pathophysiology of IHD has enabled us to also develop tools for detection of microvascular disease. Advances in stress MRI, flow quantification on stress PET, and provocative invasive angiography have filled this void and offer important diagnostic and prognostic information. Despite our improved understanding of sex-specific differences in presentation, risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnostic testing, and management strategies of IHD, women with IHD continue to experience worse outcomes than men. This disparity underscores the need for improved research and understanding of biological sex differences, elimination of subconscious gender bias in referral patterns, and improved application of existing research into clinical practice.