RESUMEN
Background: Vascular graft infection (VGI) is a serious complication after implantation of arterial vascular grafts. Optimal surgical and pathogen-specific antimicrobial treatment regimens for VGI are largely unknown. We evaluated patients with arterial VGI according to onset, location, microbiological and imaging characteristics, and surgical and antimicrobial treatment and performed an outcome evaluation. Methods: Consecutive patients with VGI treated in 2 hospitals from 2010 through 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Uniform definition criteria and standardized outcome evaluation were applied. Logistic regression was used for multiple analysis; survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier analysis and a log-rank test. Results: Seventy-eight patients with VGI were included: 30 early-onset cases (<8 weeks after graft implantation) and 48 late-onset cases, involving 49 aortic and 29 peripheral grafts. The median time from initial implantation to diagnosis of VGI was significantly longer in aortic than peripheral VGIs (363 vs 56 days, P = .018). Late-onset VGI (odds ratio [OR], 7.3; P = .005) and the presence of surgical site infection/complication (OR, 8.21; P = .006) were independent risk factors for treatment failure. Surgical site infection/complication was associated with a higher risk for early-onset VGI (OR, 3.13; P = .040). Longer infection-free survival was observed in cases where the infected graft was surgically removed (P = .037). Conclusions: This study underlines the importance of timely diagnosis of VGI and preventing surgical site infections/complications at graft implantation. It highlights the complexity of infection eradication, especially for late-onset infections, and the importance of adequate antimicrobial and surgical treatment.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a well-established surgical treatment for radiculopathy and myelopathy. Previous studies showed that empty PEEK cages have lower radiographic fusion rates, but the clinical relevance remains unclear. This paper's aim is to provide high-quality evidence on the outcomes of ACDF with empty PEEK cages and on the relevance of radiographic fusion for clinical outcomes. METHODS: This large prospective multicenter clinical trial performed single-level ACDF with empty PEEK cages on patients with cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. The main clinical outcomes were VAS (0-10) for pain and NDI (0-100) for functioning. Radiographic fusion was evaluated by two investigators for three different aspects. RESULTS: The median (range) improvement of the VAS pain score was: 3 (1-6) at 6 months, 3 (2-8) at 12 months, and 4 (2-8) at 18 months. The median (range) improvement of the NDI score was: 12 (2-34) at 6 months, 18 (4-46) at 12 months, and 22 (2-44) at 18 months. Complete radiographic fusion was reached by 126 patients (43%) at 6 months, 214 patients (73%) at 12 months, and 241 patients (83%) at 18 months. Radiographic fusion was a highly significant (p < 0.001) predictor of the improvement of VAS and NDI scores. CONCLUSION: This study provides strong evidence that ACDF is effective treatment, but the overall rate of radiographic fusion with empty PEEK cages is slow and insufficient. Lack of complete radiographic fusion leads to less improvement of pain and disability. We recommend against using empty uncoated pure PEEK cages in ACDF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN42774128. Retrospectively registered 14 April 2009.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To optimize postoperative pain therapy after a radical inguinal/iliacal lymph node dissection (RILND), we investigated the influence of a continuous application of a local anaesthetic via a subfascial wound catheter in the abdominal wall in addition to a standardized systemic analgesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2007 and December 2009, 50 patients with stage III/IV of melanoma disease received, in an observational study, a systemic analgesic therapy. Of these patients, 30 were additionally treated with a subfascial catheter. Main outcome criterion was the pain under mobilisation at the first postoperative morning registered via a visual analogue score. Minor criteria were the analgesic requirement, the specific (surgical) complications and the day of discharge. RESULTS: Patients treated with the subfascial catheter had significant less pain at the first postoperative morning in rest (p = 0.02) and after mobilisation (p = 0.03) without increased morbidity (p = 0.45). Less patients of the treatment group needed a supplementary analgesic medication (p = 0.01) and were able to leave hospital earlier than patients of the control group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A subfascially placed pain catheter enhances postoperative pain therapy after RILND.
