Pregnancy after Tubal Sterilization in the United States, 2002 to 2015.

BACKGROUND: Tubal sterilization is the most commonly used method of contraception in the United States. Because contraceptive effectiveness influences contraceptive selection, we examined typical use failure rates after tubal sterilization in the United States. METHODS: We estimated rates of pregnancy after tubal sterilization using data from four waves of the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), representative samples of U.S. women aged 15 to 44 years, collected in 2002, 2006 to 2010, 2011 to 2013, and 2013 to 2015. Survey weighting was used in survival analysis to examine time to first pregnancy after tubal sterilization. Data from these participants were censored after a tubal reversal procedure, infertility treatment, hysterectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy. Reported pregnancy rates after tubal sterilization procedures were examined by using Kaplan-Meier curves and then multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models to examine the effects of age at tubal sterilization, race/ethnicity, education, Medicaid funding, and postpartum versus interval procedures. RESULTS: Pregnancy after tubal sterilization was reported by 2.9 to 5.2% of participants across NSFG waves. In the most recent survey wave (2013 to 2015), the estimated percentage of participants with pregnancies within the first 12 months after a tubal sterilization procedure was 2.9%; at 120 months after tubal sterilization, the estimated percentage with a pregnancy was 8.4%. At all the time points examined, pregnancy after tubal sterilization was less common after postpartum procedures than after interval procedures; however, this difference was not evident in multivariable models. In multivariable models, chance of pregnancy decreased with age at time of tubal sterilization. Race/ethnicity, education, and Medicaid funding were not consistently associated with pregnancy after tubal sterilization. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that there may be nontrivial rates of pregnancy after tubal sterilization.

Primary care and abortion provider perspectives on mail-order medication abortion: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: This qualitative study aims to assess perspectives of clinicians and clinic staff on mail-order pharmacy dispensing for medication abortion. METHODS: Participants included clinicians and staff involved in implementing a mail-order dispensing model for medication abortion at eleven clinics in seven states as part of a prospective cohort study, which began in January 2020 (before the FDA removed the in-person dispensing requirement for mifepristone). From June 2021 to July 2022, we invited participants at the participating clinics, including six primary care and five abortion clinics, to complete a semi-structured video interview about their experiences. We then conducted qualitative thematic analysis of interview data, summarizing themes related to perceived benefits and concerns about the mail-order model, perceived patient interest, and potential barriers to larger-scale implementation. RESULTS: We conducted 24 interviews in total with clinicians (13 physicians and one nurse practitioner) and clinic staff (n = 10). Participants highlighted perceived benefits of the mail-order model, including its potential to expand abortion services into primary care, increase patient autonomy and privacy, and to normalize abortion services. They also highlighted key logistical, clinical, and feasibility concerns about the mail-order model, and specific challenges related to integrating abortion into primary care. CONCLUSION: Clinicians and clinic staff working in primary care and abortion clinics were optimistic that mail-order dispensing of medication abortion can improve the ability of some providers to provide abortion and enable more patients to access services. The feasibility of mail-order pharmacy dispensing of medication abortion following the Supreme Court Dobbs decision is to be determined. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: Clinicaltrials.gov. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03913104. Date of registration: first submitted on April 3, 2019 and first posted on April 12, 2019.

Special Report: Entrustable Professional Activities in Sex- and Gender-Based Women's Health.

BACKGROUND: A set of core competencies in sex- and gender-based women's health (SGWH) has been endorsed by the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM), but many residencies lack the resources to implement curricula and clinical assessments that would support achievement of these competencies. AIM: Develop entrustable professional activities (EPA) to support implementation and assessment of clinical care for SGIM's SGWH Core Competencies. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Members of SGIM's SGWH Education Interest Group developed 18 SGWH EPAs for internal medicine residents. A team of clinician educators coordinated the preparation, drafting, quality control, and curriculum alignment of the SGWH EPAs through a rigorous process aligned with best practices for EPAs. All EPAs are mapped to the larger competency domains from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), for use with ACGME Milestones. The authors provide suggestions for the implementation of the EPAs into residency training. CONCLUSION: As residency education moves towards a competency-based structure, EPAs are needed to translate broad competencies into observable clinical skills. The SGWH EPAs provide a rigorously developed and ready-made tool for programs to link the SGWH core competencies to residency curriculum development, clinical assessment, and program evaluation.

Awareness of the Maternal Health Benefits of Lactation Among U.S. Pregnant Individuals.

INTRODUCTION: We assessed awareness of the maternal health benefits of lactation among a sample of nulliparous pregnant individuals in the United States, identified variables associated with awareness of these benefits, and examined whether awareness of these benefits impacts breastfeeding attitudes or intentions. METHODS: We administered a web-based survey to nulliparous U.S.-born individuals carrying a singleton gestation of at least 28 weeks. We assessed awareness of the maternal health benefits of lactation using 10 items to create a summative score. We examined variation in awareness of these benefits by demographic characteristics, health insurance, and personal or family health history and used multivariable models to estimate associations between awareness of the maternal health benefits of lactation and breastfeeding intentions. RESULTS: Of the 675 individuals invited to complete surveys, 451 (67%) responded. Only 50% were aware that breastfeeding lowers maternal risk of breast cancer; fewer were aware that breastfeeding lowers the risk of ovarian cancer (35%), diabetes (27%), and hypertension and heart disease (26%). Awareness of the maternal benefits of lactation did not vary by age or race/ethnicity. However, significant regional variation was noted. In multivariable models, scores of awareness of the maternal health benefits of breastfeeding were significantly associated with intentions to breastfeed for at least 12 months (adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.11, 1.37). CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to increase awareness of the maternal health benefits of lactation are still needed. Increasing awareness of the maternal health benefits of lactation may strengthen intentions to breastfeed as recommended.

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Developmental Delay in Young US Children.

INTRODUCTION: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are common and have been associated with poor developmental outcomes. We aimed to investigate the relationship between early ACE exposure, subsequent diagnosis of developmental delay, and receipt of developmental delay services by young children. In addition, we aimed to assess the impact of health-promoting behaviors such as breastfeeding and daily reading on these relationships. METHODS: In this cross-sectional analysis of nationally-representative data from the 2017-2018 National Survey of Children's Health, we examined the relationship between ACEs, prior breastfeeding, daily reading, and developmental delay diagnosis among 7837 children aged 3-5 years, using multivariate logistic regression to adjust for family, personal, and sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: We found a dose-dependent relationship between ACEs and developmental delay diagnosis; compared to those without ACEs, developmental delay was more common among those with either one ACE (aOR = 2.03, 95% CI 1.17-3.52) or two or more ACEs (aOR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.25-4.37). Neither breastfeeding (exclusively breastfed for 6 months vs. never breastfed aOR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.33-1.46) nor daily reading (no reading versus daily reading aOR = 1.15, CI 0.57-2.33) were associated with incidence of developmental delay among study participants. There was no significant difference in receipt of services intended to meet developmental needs between children with and without ACEs. DISCUSSION: Children with very early ACE exposure are at increased risk for diagnosis of developmental delay. Early screening for ACEs and developmental delay may mitigate the early developmental manifestations of ACE exposure in vulnerable children.

As poor developmental outcomes are related to ACEs, children aged 3­5 years should be routinely screened for ACE exposure. Although breastfeeding and daily reading have multiple benefits to children, they do not adequately mitigate the developmental delays associated with ACE exposure.

Primary Care Physicians' Perspectives on High-Quality Discharge Summaries.

BACKGROUND: Successful transitions of care require communication between inpatient and outpatient physicians. The discharge summary is the main communication tool used by physicians during these transitions. OBJECTIVE: With the goal of improving care transitions, we explored primary care physicians (PCPs) perspectives on characteristics of high-quality discharge summaries. DESIGN: We conducted semi-structured individual interviews in this qualitative study and surveyed participants for sociodemographic characteristics. PARTICIPANTS: PCPs were recruited from multiple health systems in California. APPROACH: An interview guide was created by the study authors to solicit PCPs' experiences with discharge summaries and perspectives on four discharge summary templates previously used by large health systems. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and qualitative data were analyzed interactively through thematic analysis. KEY RESULTS: Twenty PCPs participated in interviews lasting an average of 35 min (range 26-47 min). Sixty percent were female. Most (70%) had trained in internal medicine (IM); 5% had trained in both IM and pediatrics and 25% in family medicine. Some (45%) participants practiced both inpatient and outpatient medicine; 55% had exclusively outpatient practices. Half worked in university-affiliated clinics, 15% community clinics, 15% public health clinics, 5% private practice, and 15% multiple clinic types. Many PCPs (65%) had been in practice for ≥ 10 years. Participants reported multiple concerns with typical discharge summaries, including frustration with lengthy documents containing information irrelevant to outpatient care. Suggested recommendations included beginning the discharge summary with action items, clear identification of incidental findings requiring follow-up, specifying reasons for any medication changes, and including dates for treatment regimens rather than expected duration of treatment. Participants highlighted the importance of feedback to trainees to assist in crafting succinct discharge summaries containing relevant information. CONCLUSION: Clinical training programs and healthcare systems must optimize discharge summaries for PCPs to achieve goals of providing high-quality care that improves population health.

Tobacco and Cannabis Use During and After Pregnancy in California.

OBJECTIVES: As the social and legal acceptance of cannabis use grows, health professionals must understand and mitigate the impact of cannabis use in the perinatal period. Here we compare the prevalence of tobacco and cannabis use during and after pregnancy in California, a state that recently legalized cannabis use. METHODS: Measures of tobacco and cannabis use during and after pregnancy were obtained from California's Maternal and Infant Health Assessment, an annual population-based survey of California resident women with a live birth. To allow analysis of county-level variation, we pooled data from the 35 counties with the largest numbers of births from 2017 to 2019. RESULTS: Cannabis use was more than twice as common as cigarette smoking among pregnant women (4.9% vs. 2.1%) in California. This difference was even more pronounced in some counties; for example, in Los Angeles, cannabis use was four times more prevalent than cigarette use. Either during or soon after birth, 7.3% of women in California reported cannabis use. Of those who smoked tobacco cigarettes prior to pregnancy, 73% quit before their third trimester of pregnancy, though 33.0% of these women reported a post-partum relapse in cigarette use. CONCLUSIONS: States that have legalized cannabis must attend to the increasing prevalence of perinatal cannabis use, as well as concurrent use with tobacco and other substances. Efforts to support cannabis cessation should draw from successful public health approaches in tobacco control.

Managing Undesired Pregnancy After Dobbs.

Although both medication abortion (MAB) and aspiration procedures are safe and effective, the Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization removed federal protection of access to abortion services. Abortion access is now illegal or severely limited in many states, leading to delays in abortion care for patients in all states. In this rapidly evolving landscape, primary care physicians (PCPs) must be familiar with laws surrounding abortion care in their own and neighboring states. PCPs must also be prepared to expedite abortion care by sharing resources, obtaining testing when needed, and counseling patients about expected outcomes following abortion.

Perceived Contraceptive Counseling Quality Among Veterans Using VA Primary Care: Data from the ECUUN Study.

BACKGROUND: High-quality contraceptive counseling is critical to support Veterans' reproductive autonomy and promote healthy outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To describe perceived quality of contraceptive counseling in Veterans Health Administration (VA) primary care and assess factors associated with perceived high- and low-quality contraceptive counseling. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using data from the Examining Contraceptive Use and Unmet Need in women Veterans (ECUUN) national telephone survey. PARTICIPANTS: Veterans aged 18-44 who received contraceptive services from a VA primary care clinic in the past year (N=506). MAIN MEASURES: Perceived quality of contraceptive counseling was captured by assessing Veterans' agreement with 6 statements regarding provider counseling adapted from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey. High-quality counseling was defined as a top score of strongly agreeing on all 6 items; low-quality counseling was defined as not agreeing (neutral, disagreeing, or strongly disagreeing) with >3 items. We constructed two multivariable models to assess associations between patient-, provider-, and system-level factors and perceived high-quality (Model 1) and perceived low-quality counseling (Model 2). KEY RESULTS: Most participants strongly agreed that their providers listened carefully (74%), explained things clearly (77%), and spent enough time discussing things (71%). Lower proportions strongly agreed that their provider discussed more than one option (54%), discussed pros/cons of various methods (44%), or asked which choice they thought was best for them (62%). In Model 1, Veterans who received care in a Women's Health Clinic (WHC) had twice the odds of perceiving high-quality counseling (aOR=1.99; 95%CI=1.24-3.22). In Model 2, Veterans who received care in a WHC (aOR=0.49; 95%CI=0.25-0.97) or from clinicians who provide cervical cancer screening (aOR=0.49; 95%CI=0.26-0.95) had half the odds of perceiving low-quality counseling. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities exist to improve the quality of contraceptive counseling within VA primary care settings, including more consistent efforts to seek patients' perspectives with respect to contraceptive decisions.

Special Considerations for Women of Reproductive Age on Anticoagulation.

Anticoagulation poses unique challenges for women of reproductive age. Clinicians prescribing anticoagulants must counsel patients on issues ranging from menstruation and the possibility of developing a hemorrhagic ovarian cyst to teratogenic risks and safety with breastfeeding. Abnormal uterine bleeding affects up to 70% of young women who are treated with anticoagulation. As such, thoughtful clinical guidance is required to avoid having young women who are troubled by their menses, dose reduce, or prematurely discontinue their anticoagulation, leaving them at increased risk of recurrent thrombosis. Informed by a review of the medical literature, we present current recommendations for assisting patients requiring anticoagulation with menstrual management, prevention of hemorrhagic ovarian cysts, and avoiding unintended pregnancy. The subdermal implant may be considered a first-line option for those requiring anticoagulation, given its superior contraceptive effectiveness and ability to reliably reduce risk of hemorrhagic ovarian cysts. All progestin-only formulations-such as the subdermal implant, intrauterine device, injection, or pills-are generally preferred over combined hormonal pills, patch, or ring. Tranexamic acid, and in rare cases endometrial ablation, may also be useful in managing menorrhagia and dysmenorrhea. During pregnancy, enoxaparin remains the preferred anticoagulant and warfarin is contraindicated. Breastfeeding women may use warfarin, but direct oral anticoagulants are not recommended given their limited safety data. This practical guide for clinicians is designed to inform discussions of risks and benefits of anticoagulation therapy for women of reproductive age.

Opportunities for improving provision of emergency contraception in California.

OBJECTIVES: To assess emergency contraception (EC) service provision by California's family planning clinics. STUDY DESIGN: We made 2 scripted calls to a random sample of 309 family planning clinics. RESULTS: We reached one hundred ninety-four clinics on 2 occasions, although only 183 (59%) could be reached with the information provided online by California's office of family planning. Of these 194 clinics, 27% responded that the clinic did not provide EC and 43% offered only levonorgestrel EC. Only 1 clinic asked about recent sexual assault and one other about their weight. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt access to effective EC remains challenging in California. Clinic staff responding to requests for EC should provide trauma-informed care.

Comparative effectiveness of hysteroscopic and laparoscopic sterilization for women: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare real-world effectiveness of hysteroscopic to laparoscopic sterilization. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort of Medicaid claims for hysteroscopic or laparoscopic sterilization procedures performed in California, 2008-2014. After excluding postpartum procedures, we applied log-linear (Poisson) event-history regression models for clustered person-period data, weighted for propensity to receive either sterilization procedures, and adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical variables to examine the poststerilization pregnancy rates. SETTING: Clinics, hospitals. PATIENT(S): Women aged 18-50 years with Medicaid claims between January 1, 2008, and August 31, 2014. INTERVENTION(S): Hysteroscopic or laparoscopic sterilization procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Poststerilization pregnancy measured by pregnancy-related claims. RESULT(S): Among women with hysteroscopic (n = 5,906) or laparoscopic (n = 23,965) sterilization, poststerilization pregnancy claims were identified for 4.74% of women after hysteroscopic sterilization and 5.57% after laparoscopic sterilization. The pregnancy rates decreased over time after either procedure. Twelve months after the procedure, the crude incidence of pregnancy claims was higher for hysteroscopic sterilization than for laparoscopic sterilization (3.26 vs. 2.61 per 100 woman-years), but the propensity-weighted adjusted incidence rate ratio was 1.06 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-1.26). Between 13 and 24 months after the procedure, there were fewer pregnancies for women after hysteroscopic sterilizations than for those after laparoscopic sterilizations (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.45-0.88]), with no statistically significant differences in later years. The cumulative pregnancy rates 5 years after sterilization were lower with hysteroscopic sterilization than with laparoscopic sterilization (6.26 vs. 7.22 per 100 woman-years; propensity-weighted, adjusted risk ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.62-0.90]). The poststerilization pregnancy rates varied by age and race/ethnicity. CONCLUSION(S): The pregnancy rates after female sterilization are higher than expected, whether performed hysteroscopically or laparoscopically. These findings are reassuring that the effectiveness of hysteroscopic sterilization was not inferior to laparoscopic sterilization. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03438682.

Remotely Educating Young Women About Alcohol: A Randomized Trial of the PartyWise Intervention.

Background: Alcohol and binge drinking pose significant health risks, especially for underage women; nonetheless, binge drinking is common. Materials and Methods: To evaluate the effectiveness of the PartyWise intervention in increasing awareness of sex differences in the risks of binge drinking, we used social media to enroll 520 female adolescents aged 15-19 years in a randomized controlled trial. Intervention participants received telephone screening, a brief counseling intervention with web-based resources (http://www.partywise.org), and up to 8 weekly text messages. Results: At baseline, most (71%) participants reported alcohol consumption in the prior month and 44% reported binge drinking (four or more drinks on one occasion), without differences between study groups; 79% of participants were aware of sex-based differences in alcohol risks. At follow-up, intervention recipients were more knowledgeable about sex-based differences in alcohol risks (adjusted odds ratio [adj OR] 8.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.35-23.49 at 3 months; adj OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.21-4.90 at 9 months) and more likely to accurately define binge drinking (adj OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.02-2.60 at 3 months; OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.89-2.06 at 9 months). Although rates of any binge drinking in the past month remained similar between groups, intervention recipients were less likely to report binge drinking more than once in the past 30 days (22% vs. 32%, adj OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.99 at 3 months; 27% vs. 30%, adj OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.60-1.55 at 9 months). Conclusions: The PartyWise intervention is a promising approach to increasing awareness of the risks of binge drinking for underage women in a remotely delivered platform. Clinical Trials Registration: The Share Health Study: Teen Social Connections and Health (Phase 2), NCT03842540, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03842540?id=NCT03842540&draw=2&rank=1.

Patient-Centered Safety Outcomes After Hysteroscopic Compared With Laparoscopic Sterilization.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the real-world safety of hysteroscopic compared with laparoscopic surgical sterilization. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Medicaid claims for hysteroscopic or laparoscopic sterilization procedures performed in California, 2008-2014, among women aged 18-50 years. After excluding postpartum procedures, we applied log-linear (Poisson) event-history regression models for clustered person-period data, weighted for propensity to receive either sterilization procedures, and adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics that may affect outcomes of interest to patients and physicians. We assessed the following outcomes: procedural complications, additional surgical procedures (eg, hysterectomy), repeat sterilization procedures, pelvic pain, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), abdominal pain, nonabdominal pain, and abnormal uterine bleeding. RESULTS: We identified 5,906 women who had undergone hysteroscopic and 23,965 who had undergone laparoscopic sterilization. After adjusting for sociodemographic and health history, women who had hysteroscopic sterilization were less likely to have claims for procedural complications (eg, transfusion, P<.001) on the day of surgical sterilization and additional surgical procedures (eg, hysterectomy, P=.002 at day 2-3 months postprocedure) than laparoscopic sterilization. Claims for a repeat attempt at sterilization were more common after hysteroscopic sterilization within 1 year (adjusted incident rate ratio 3.48, 95% CI 2.69-4.27) and within 5 years (adjusted incident rate ratio 2.32, 95% CI 1.84-2.79) than laparoscopic sterilization. Claims for pelvic pain (adjusted incident rate ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.92 at 2 years), abdominal pain (adjusted incident rate ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.93 at 7-12 months), and PID (adjusted incident rate ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.93 at 2 years) were less common after hysteroscopic than laparoscopic sterilization. Although abnormal uterine bleeding claims were more common after hysteroscopic than laparoscopic sterilization up to 12 months postprocedure (adjusted incident rate ratio 1.37, 95% CI 1.06-1.77 at 7-12 months), there were no significant differences between methods 1 year after the procedure. CONCLUSION: Compared with laparoscopic sterilization, hysteroscopic sterilization was followed by more claims for repeat sterilization procedures and abnormal uterine bleeding, but fewer procedural complications and fewer claims for pelvic or abdominal pain. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03438682.