Centromedial amygdala is more relevant for phobic confrontation relative to the bed nucleus of stria terminalis in patients with spider phobia.

Recent studies indicate differential involvement of the centromedial amygdala (CM) and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) during processing (anticipation and confrontation) of threat stimuli. Here, temporal predictability was shown to be a relevant factor. In this study, we want to investigate the relevance of these effects, which were found in healthy subjects, for anxiety disorders. Therefore, we investigated the differential involvement of CM and BNST in the anticipation and confrontation of phobic stimuli under variation of temporal predictability in spider phobia. 21 patients with spider phobia and 21 healthy controls underwent a temporally predictable/unpredictable phobic and neutral anticipation and confrontation paradigm using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and ROI analyses. During the anticipation phase, healthy controls showed higher CM and BNST activity during the predictable compared with the unpredictable condition compared with the anxiety patients. During a confrontation phase that followed the anticipation phase, CM was more activated than BNST during the phobic compared with the neutral confrontation. While this effect was independent of threat predictability in patients, healthy controls showed higher activation in the CM compared with the BNST only during the predictable spider confrontation compared with the predictable bird confrontation. The results contribute to a better understanding of the separate roles of the CM and BNST during phobic processes. The CM was found to be more relevant to phobic confrontation in patients with spider phobia compared with the BNST.

Characterizing the nature of emotional-associative learning deficits in panic disorder: An fMRI study on fear conditioning, extinction training and recall.

Emotional-associative learning represents a translational model for the development, maintenance and treatment of anxiety disorders such as panic disorder (PD). The exact nature of the underlying fear learning and extinction deficits however, remains under debate. Using a three-day paradigm to separate the distinct learning and consolidation processes, we aimed to gain insights into the neurofunctional substrates of altered fear conditioning, extinction training and recall in PD. In contrast to studies employing one-session fear conditioning paradigms, a differential fear conditioning and delayed extinction task was conducted for the purpose of disentangling neural networks involved in fear acquisition, extinction training and recall of extinction memories. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), quality-controlled datasets from 10 patients with PD and 10 healthy controls were available from three consecutive days (day 1: acquisition; day 2: extinction training; day 3: extinction recall) with neutral faces serving as CSs and an aversive auditory stimulus (panic scream) as US. PD patients showed heightened fear circuitry (e.g. right amygdala and left insula) activation during early acquisition and prolonged activation in the right insula, left inferior frontal operculum and left inferior frontal gyrus during extinction recall compared to healthy controls. Stronger neural activation in structures conferring defensive reactivity during early acquisition and extinction recall may indicate the accelerated acquisition of conditioned responses, while extinction recall may be attenuated as a function of PD pathophysiology. Future studies should investigate the predictive value of experimental measures of extinction recall for clinical relapse.