Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 3 de 3
1.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 54(2): 273-285, 2022 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35024997

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) use in hypospadias repair through systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in May 2021. Comparative studies assessing the surgical outcome of hypospadias repair between control versus HBOT utilization were identified and evaluated according to Cochrane collaboration recommendations. The assessed outcome includes hypospadias repair failures and graft failure for staged repair using a buccal graft. Relative risk with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extrapolated. A random-effect model was used to generate pooled effect estimates. Heterogeneity and inter-study variability were assessed using Chi-square and I-square. Subgroup analysis was performed according to primary repair versus redo-hypospadias with buccal graft. PROSPERO registration (CRD42021251423). RESULTS: Five comparative studies with 576 cases (301 HBOT versus 275 controls) were included. Overall pooled effect estimates showed that the HBOT group has significantly lesser hypospadias repair failure (RR 0.52, 95%CI 0.37, 0.72). Subgroup analysis on the use of HBOT for graft take showed lesser graft failure compared to the control group (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05, 0.75), while the use of HBOT for primary and redo single staged hypospadias repair showed lesser complication rate (RR 0.56, 95%CI 0.40, 0.78). Based on ROBINS-I assessment, all included comparative studies are determined to be of serious risk of bias mainly due to presence of confounding. CONCLUSION: The currently available low-quality of evidence suggests that compared to control groups, HBOT as an adjunctive intervention to complicated hypospadias repair was able to reduce surgical outcome failure and graft failure rates.


Hyperbaric Oxygenation , Hypospadias/therapy , Humans , Hyperbaric Oxygenation/adverse effects , Hypospadias/surgery , Male , Treatment Outcome
2.
Low Urin Tract Symptoms ; 10(2): 135-142, 2018 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28150436

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin in comparison to solifenacin succinate and placebo for the treatment of adult patients with overactive bladder (OAB). METHOD: A 12-week, randomized, double-blind, double dummy placebo-controlled, clinical trial was conducted between October 2010 and August 2014 at a tertiary medical center. Eligible and consenting patients included were randomized into three treatment groups (placebo, gabapentin and solifenacin). After a 12-week treatment period, an intention to treat analysis was applied to assess between group differences on the micturitions and urgency episodes per 24 h; which were evaluated by 3-day micturition diary mean change from baseline to post treatment. Health related quality of life (HRQOL) domains were likewise assessed by OAB questionnaire (OAB-q). Adverse event were monitored and summarized. Study results were analyzed at statistical significance of 0.05. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01486706) RESULT: A total of 94 participants were included for end-study efficacy and safety analysis. Compared to placebo, gabapentin and solifenacin have statistically significant improvement in mean number of micturitions per 24 h (adjusted mean difference [AMD] -1.179, 95%CI -1.98, -0.38; P < 0.001; -1.706, 95%CI -2.52, -0.09; P < 0.001; respectively), and in mean number of urgency episodes per 24 h (AMD -0.903, 95%CI -1.44, -0.37; P < 0.001; -0.896, 95%CI -1.44, -0.35; P < 0.001). Gabapentin also demonstrated significant improvement over the solifenacin in the mean number of nocturia episodes/24 h (AMD -0.607, 95%CI -1.04, -0.18; P < 0.001). Adverse event related to gabapentin treatment was lesser than solifenacin, and comparable to placebo. CONCLUSION: Gabapentin treatment with acceptable safety profile, improves OAB symptoms and HRQOL domains.


Amines/administration & dosage , Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids/administration & dosage , Muscarinic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Solifenacin Succinate/administration & dosage , Urinary Bladder, Overactive/drug therapy , Urological Agents/administration & dosage , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Amines/adverse effects , Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Gabapentin , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscarinic Antagonists/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Solifenacin Succinate/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Urological Agents/adverse effects , Young Adult , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/adverse effects
3.
Article En | WPRIM | ID: wpr-632584

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of sodium bicarbonate, citric acid, sodium citrate, and tartaric acid (compound drug) in comparison to potassium citrate in the treatment of kidney stones. METHODS: Prospective randomized controlled trial of patients with kidney stones recruited from February to October 2011 at Out-patient Department was conducted. Ninety subjects, consented and eligible, were enrolled in this study. Random allocation of subjects into two groups was done using computer generated randomization. Subjects assigned to group I were treated with the compound drug(12 grams/day); while group II subjects were given potassium citrate(60mEq/day) for 6 weeks. Urinary pH levels were examined weekly and the effect of medical treatment on stone size changes was evaluated by ultrasonography every two weeks in the six-week treatment period. Intention to treat analysis was done with 95% confidence level(CI). Statistical analysis of results was determined using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with multiple repeated measures for between group urinary pH changes and chi square for between groups difference in stone size changes. RESULTS: A total of 74 subjects completed the study with a dropout rate of 18%, which was mainly due to geographic and financial reasons. Demographic and baseline stone characteristics of both groups were not significantly different. Treatment outcome between the two groups based on stone size changes (in general and both radiolucent and radioopaque stones subgroups) did not show any significant statistic difference. The pH level changes over six-week treatment period between the two groups showed a total mean pH difference of 0.445, (95% CI: 0.213, 0.677), which was statistically significant (P CONCLUSION:  Urinary alkalinization with sodium bicarbonate, citric acid, sodium citrate, and tartaric acid is a well-tolerated and highly effective treatment resulting in dissolution of non-obstructing kidney stones and is comparable to the gold standard potassium citrate.


Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Adult , Young Adult , Adolescent , Kidney Calculi , Nephrolithiasis , Urologic Diseases , Kidney Diseases , Sodium Bicarbonate , Citric Acid , Sodium Citrate , Potassium Citrate , Inorganic Chemicals , Organic Chemicals , Treatment Outcome , Safety
...