Prognostic thresholds of outcome predictors in severe accidental hypothermia.

Hemodynamically unstable patients with severe hypothermia and preserved circulation should be transported to dedicated extracorporeal life support (ECLS) centers, but not all are eligible for extracorporeal therapy. In this group of patients, the outcome of rewarming may sometimes be unfavorable. It is, therefore, crucial to identify potential risk factors for death. Furthermore, it is unclear what criterion for hemodynamic stability should be adopted for patients with severe hypothermia. The aim of this study is to identify pre-rewarming predictors of death and their threshold values in hypothermic patients with core temperature ≤ 28 °C and preserved circulation, who were treated without extracorporeal rewarming. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study involving patients in accidental hypothermia with core temperature 28 °C or lower, and preserved spontaneous circulation on rewarming initiation. The data were collected from the International Hypothermia Registry, HELP Registry, and additional hospital data. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. We conducted a multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. In the multivariate analysis of laboratory tests and vital signs, systolic blood pressure (SBP) adjusted for cooling circumstances and base excess (BE) were identified as the best predictor of death (OR 0.974 95% CI 0.952-0.996), AUC ROC 0.79 (0.70-0.88). The clinically relevant cutoff for SBP was identified at 90 mmHg with a sensitivity of 0.74 (0.54-0.89) and a specificity of 0.70 (0.60-0.79). The increased risk of death among hypothermic patients with preserved circulation occurs among those with an SBP below 90 mmHg and in those who developed hypothermia in their homes.

Effect of automated head-thorax elevation during chest compressions on lung ventilation: a model study.

Our goal was to investigate the effects of head-thorax elevation (HUP) during chest compressions (CC) on lung ventilation. A prospective study was performed on seven human cadavers. Chest was automatically compressed-decompressed in flat position and during progressive HUP from 18 to 35°. Lung ventilation was measured with electrical impedance tomography. In each cadaver, 5 sequences were randomly performed: one without CC at positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 0cmH2O, 3 s with CC at PEEP0, 5 or 10cmH2O and 1 with CC and an impedance threshold device at PEEP0cmH2O. The minimal-to-maximal change in impedance (VTEIT in arbitrary unit a.u.) and the minimal impedance in every breathing cycle (EELI) the) were compared between flat, 18°, and 35° in each sequence by a mixed-effects model. Values are expressed as median (1st-3rd quartiles). With CC, between flat, 18° and 35° VTEIT decreased at each level of PEEP. It was 12416a.u. (10,689; 14,442), 11,239 (7667; 13,292), and 6457 (4631; 9516), respectively, at PEEP0. The same was true with the impedance threshold device. EELI/VTEIT significantly decreased from - 0.30 (- 0.40; - 0.15) before to - 1.13 (- 1.70; - 0.61) after the CC (P = 0.009). With HUP lung ventilation decreased with CC as compared to flat position. CC are associated with decreased in EELI.

Extracorporeal Rewarming Is Associated With Increased Survival Rate in Severely Hypothermic Patients With Preserved Spontaneous Circulation.

Treatment recommendations for rewarming patients in severe accidental hypothermia with preserved spontaneous circulation have a weak evidence due to the absence of randomized clinical trials. We aimed to compare the outcomes of extracorporeal versus less-invasive rewarming of severely hypothermic patients with preserved spontaneous circulation. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study. The patient population was compiled based on data from the HELP Registry, the International Hypothermia Registry, and a literature review. Adult patients with a core temperature <28°C and preserved spontaneous circulation were included. Patients who underwent extracorporeal rewarming were compared with patients rewarmed with less-invasive methods, using a matched-pair analysis. The study population consisted of 50 patients rewarmed extracorporeally and 85 patients rewarmed with other, less-invasive methods. Variables significantly associated with survival included: lower age; outdoor cooling circumstances; higher blood pressure; higher PaCO 2 ; higher BE; higher HCO 3 ; and the absence of comorbidities. The survival rate was higher in patients rewarmed extracorporeally ( p = 0.049). The relative risk of death was twice as high in patients rewarmed less invasively. Based on our data, we conclude that patients in severe accidental hypothermia with circulatory instability can benefit from extracorporeal rewarming without an increased risk of complications.