Acute rejection post lung transplant.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review what is currently known about the pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of acute rejection (AR) in lung transplantation. RECENT FINDINGS: Epigenomic and transcriptomic methods are gaining traction as tools for earlier detection of AR, which still remains primarily a histopathologic diagnosis. SUMMARY: Acute rejection is a common cause of early posttransplant lung graft dysfunction and increases the risk of chronic rejection. Detection and diagnosis of AR is primarily based on histopathology, but noninvasive molecular methods are undergoing investigation. Two subtypes of AR exist: acute cellular rejection (ACR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Both can have varied clinical presentation, ranging from asymptomatic to fulminant ARDS, and can present simultaneously. Diagnosis of ACR requires transbronchial biopsy; AMR requires the additional measuring of circulating donor-specific antibody (DSA) levels. First-line treatment in ACR is increased immunosuppression (pulse-dose or tapered dose glucocorticoids); refractory cases may need antibody-based lymphodepletion therapy. First line treatment in AMR focuses on circulating DSA removal with B and plasma cell depletion; plasmapheresis, intravenous human immunoglobulin (IVIG), bortezomib, and rituximab are often employed.

Sarcoidosis lung transplantation waitlist mortality, a national registry database study.

Background: The Lung Allocation Score (LAS) prioritises lung transplantation candidates, balancing waitlist mortality and post-transplant survival. The score groups sarcoidosis candidates based on mean pulmonary artery pressure: those with ≤30 mmHg (sarcoidosis A) are grouped with COPD and those with >30 mmHg (sarcoidosis D) with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We hypothesise that sarcoidosis candidates have a higher waitlist mortality than other candidates within their LAS grouping. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive lung transplantation candidates from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database from May 2005 to May 2019. We included candidates aged ≥18 years diagnosed with sarcoidosis, COPD or IPF. Univariate, multivariate and survival estimate analyses were performed. Results: We identified 385 sarcoidosis A, 642 sarcoidosis D, 7081 COPD and 10 639 IPF lung transplantation candidates. 17.3% of sarcoidosis D, 14.8% of IPF, 14.3% of sarcoidosis A and 9.8% of COPD candidates died awaiting transplant. Sarcoidosis A was an independent risk factor for waitlist mortality. Sarcoidosis A had a lower waitlist survival probability compared to COPD. Sarcoidosis D had the highest waitlist mortality. IPF candidates had lower waitlist survival probability than sarcoidosis D in the first 60 days after listing. Conclusion: Based on our results, the grouping of candidates with sarcoidosis in allocation systems should be revised to mitigate waitlist mortality disparity.

Lung Transplantation Waitlist Mortality Among Sarcoidosis Patients by Lung Allocation Score Grouping.

BACKGROUND: The Lung Allocation Score (LAS) system was designed to equalize and minimize waitlist mortality among candidiates for lung transplantation. The LAS stratifies sarcoidosis patients by mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) into group A (mPAP ≤30 mm Hg) and group D (mPAP >30 mm Hg). In this study, we aimed to analyze the effect of diagnostic grouping and patient characteristics on waitlist mortality among sarcoidosis patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of sarcoidosis lung transplantation candidates since LAS implementation in May 2005 through May 2019 in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. We compared baseline characteristics, LAS variables, and waitlist outcomes between sarcoidosis groups A and D. We performed Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable regression to determine associations with waitlist mortality. RESULTS: We identified 1027 sarcoidosis candidates since LAS implementation. Of these, 385 had mPAP ≤30 mm Hg and 642 had mPAP >30 mm Hg. Waitlist mortality was 18% in sarcoidosis group D and 14% in sarcoidosis group A. Kaplan-Meier curve showed lower waitlist survival probability for sarcoidosis group D than group A (log-rank P = .0049). Functional status, oxygen requirement, and sarcoidosis group D were associated with increased waitlist mortality. Cardiac output ≥4 L/min was associated with decreased waitlist mortality. CONCLUSION: Sarcoidosis group D had lower waitlist survival than group A. Decreased survival appears driven by mPAP; sarcoidosis group D, functional status, oxygen requirement, and cardiac output had significant associations with waitlist mortality. These findings suggest that the current LAS grouping does not adequately reflect the risk for waitlist mortality among sarcoidosis group D patients.

Evaluation of physical health status beyond daily step count using a wearable activity sensor.

Physical health status defines an individual's ability to perform normal activities of daily living and is usually assessed in clinical settings by questionnaires and/or by validated tests, e.g. timed walk tests. These measurements have relatively low information content and are usually limited in frequency. Wearable sensors, such as activity monitors, enable remote measurement of parameters associated with physical activity but have not been widely explored beyond measurement of daily step count. Here we report on results from a cohort of 22 individuals with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) who were provided with a Fitbit activity monitor (Fitbit Charge HR®) between two clinic visits (18.4 ± 12.2 weeks). At each clinical visit, a maximum of 26 measurements were recorded (19 categorical and 7 continuous). From analysis of the minute-to-minute step rate and heart rate we derive several metrics associated with physical activity and cardiovascular function. These metrics are used to identify subgroups within the cohort and to compare to clinical parameters. Several Fitbit metrics are strongly correlated to continuous clinical parameters. Using a thresholding approach, we show that many Fitbit metrics result in statistically significant differences in clinical parameters between subgroups, including those associated with physical status, cardiovascular function, pulmonary function, as well as biomarkers from blood tests. These results highlight the fact that daily step count is only one of many metrics that can be derived from activity monitors.

Predictors of lung transplant waitlist mortality for sarcoidosis.

RATIONALE: Unlike in other chronic lung diseases, criteria for lung transplant referral in sarcoidosis is not well-established. Waitlist mortality may offer clues in identifying clinical factors that warrant early referral. We aim to identify predictors for transplant waitlist mortality to improve referral criteria for patients with sarcoidosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1034 sarcoidosis patients listed for lung transplantation from May 2005 to May 2019 in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database. All patients were listed after the establishment of the Lung Allocation Score (LAS). We compared patients who died on the transplant waitlist to those who survived to transplantation. Potential predictors of waitlist mortality were assessed utilizing univariate and multivariate analysis performed via logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Of 1034 candidates listed after LAS implementation, 704 were transplanted and 110 died on the waitlist. Significant predictors of waitlist mortality on multivariate analysis include female gender (OR 2.445; 95% CI 1.513-3.951; p = 0.0003) and severe pulmonary hypertension (OR 1.619; 95% CI 1.067-2.457; p = 0.0236). Taller minimum donor height (OR 0.606; 95% CI 0.379-0.969; p = 0.0365) and blood type B (OR 0.524; 95% CI 0.281-0.975 p = 0.0415) were associated with decreased likelihood of death on the waitlist. CONCLUSION: Among patients with sarcoidosis on the lung transplant waitlist, taller minimum donor height and blood type B were found to be protective factors against death on the waitlist. Female gender and severe pulmonary hypertension have a higher likelihood of death and earlier referral for transplantation in patients with these characteristics should be considered.

Recipient selection, timing of referral, and listing for lung transplantation.

Recipient selection for lung transplantation is a balance between providing access to transplantation to maximum patients, while utilizing this limited resource in the most optimal way. This review summarizes the current literature and recommendations about referral, listing, and evaluation of lung transplant candidates, with a focus on patients considered to have high risk characteristics.

Lung Transplantation in Systemic Sclerosis: a Practice Survey of United States Lung Transplant Centers.

Lung transplantation in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) can be complicated by extrapulmonary manifestations of the disease, leading to concerns regarding posttransplant complications and outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a web-based survey of adult lung transplant programs in the United States regarding their practices in patients with SSc. RESULTS: Sixty percent (37/62) of the eligible centers responded to the survey, majority of the respondents were medical directors (81%). Most centers would consider transplanting patients with mild or moderate esophageal disease (92% or 75%, respectively) or gastroparesis (59%). A minority would consider patients with severe esophageal dysmotility (37%), digital ulcers (21%), or low body mass index (19%). Most centers conducted extensive pretransplant gastrointestinal evaluation and use a conservative feeding approach with prolonged nothing by mouth (83%) and postpyloric feeding (89%). Antireflux surgery is commonly considered (40%) with partial fundoplication being the procedure of choice (67%). Most respondents expected similar outcomes of acute or chronic rejection (81% and 51%, respectively), respiratory infections (76%), and 1-year survival (70%). CONCLUSIONS: Most US lung transplant centers do not universally exclude SSc from lung transplant listing, but most support extensive pretransplant gastrointestinal testing and a conservative approach to feeding in the early posttransplant period.

Venous thromboembolism in lung transplant recipients real world experience from a high volume center.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) post lung transplantation is common and has been associated with worse post transplant survival. We report a comprehensive single center review of VTE incidence in the first post transplant year, investigate modifiable risk factors and assess impact on short term outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review of all lung transplant recipients between August 2016 to 2018 at Temple University Hospital. Patients were followed for 1 year post transplant. All patients were screened for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) within the first 2 weeks with a venous duplex study. Pre transplant, intra operative, post operative variables, and peri-operative practice patterns were compared between VTE positive and VTE negative groups. Logistic regression modeling was used to identify risk factors for early VTE (VTE within 30 days after transplant). RESULTS: A total of 235 patients were included in the study, 58 patients (24.7%) developed a VTE in the first post transplant year. Median time to diagnosis was 17 days. Of the patients with VTE, 76% had an isolated DVT, 13.5 % had an isolated pulmonary embolism (PE), and 10.3% had concomitant DVT and PE. In a multivariate logistic regression model, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (OR 1.93 p = 0.015) and interruption of VTE prophylaxis (OR 4.42 p < 0.0001) were predictive of early VTE. CONCLUSION: VTE post lung transplant is common despite the use of prophylactic anticoagulation. CPB use and interruption of DVT prophylaxis are risk factors for early post transplant VTE. Measures to ensure consistent and uninterrupted prophylaxis may help decrease VTE incidence after lung transplantation.

COVID-19 in hospitalized lung and non-lung solid organ transplant recipients: A comparative analysis from a multicenter study.

Lung transplant recipients (LTR) with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may have higher mortality than non-lung solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR), but direct comparisons are limited. Risk factors for mortality specifically in LTR have not been explored. We performed a multicenter cohort study of adult SOTR with COVID-19 to compare mortality by 28 days between hospitalized LTR and non-lung SOTR. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess comorbidity-adjusted mortality among LTR vs. non-lung SOTR and to determine risk factors for death in LTR. Of 1,616 SOTR with COVID-19, 1,081 (66%) were hospitalized including 120/159 (75%) LTR and 961/1457 (66%) non-lung SOTR (p = .02). Mortality was higher among LTR compared to non-lung SOTR (24% vs. 16%, respectively, p = .032), and lung transplant was independently associated with death after adjusting for age and comorbidities (aOR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-2.6, p = .04). Among LTR, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (aOR 3.3, 95% CI 1.0-11.3, p = .05) was the only independent risk factor for mortality and age >65 years, heart failure and obesity were not independently associated with death. Among SOTR hospitalized for COVID-19, LTR had higher mortality than non-lung SOTR. In LTR, chronic allograft dysfunction was independently associated with mortality.

Guiding therapeutic plasma exchange for antibody-mediated rejection treatment in lung transplant recipients - a retrospective study.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR) due to donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is associated with poor outcomes after lung transplantation. Currently, there are no guidelines regarding the selection of treatment protocols. We studied how DSA characteristics including titers, C1q, and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values in undiluted and diluted sera may predict a response to therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and inform patient prognosis after treatment. Among 357 patients consecutively transplanted without detectable pre-existing DSAs between 01/01/16 and 12/31/18, 10 patients were treated with a standardized protocol of five TPE sessions with IVIG. Based on DSA characteristics after treatment, all patients were divided into three groups as responders, partial responders, and nonresponders. Kaplan-Meier Survival analyses showed a statistically significant difference in patient survival between those groups (P = 0.0104). Statistical analyses showed that MFI in pre-TPE 1:16 diluted sera was predictive of a response to standardized protocol (R2  = 0.9182) and patient survival (P = 0.0098). Patients predicted to be nonresponders who underwent treatment with a more aggressive protocol of eight TPE sessions with IVIG and bortezomib showed improvements in treatment response (P = 0.0074) and patient survival (P = 0.0253). Dilutions may guide clinicians as to which patients would be expected to respond to a standards protocol or require more aggressive treatment.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Solid Organ Transplant: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to significant reductions in transplantation, motivated in part by concerns of disproportionately more severe disease among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, clinical features, outcomes, and predictors of mortality in SOT recipients are not well described. METHODS: We performed a multicenter cohort study of SOT recipients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Data were collected using standardized intake and 28-day follow-up electronic case report forms. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for the primary endpoint, 28-day mortality, among hospitalized patients. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-two SOT recipients from >50 transplant centers were included: 318 (66%) kidney or kidney/pancreas, 73 (15.1%) liver, 57 (11.8%) heart, and 30 (6.2%) lung. Median age was 58 (interquartile range [IQR] 46-57), median time post-transplant was 5 years (IQR 2-10), 61% were male, and 92% had ≥1 underlying comorbidity. Among those hospitalized (376 [78%]), 117 (31%) required mechanical ventilation, and 77 (20.5%) died by 28 days after diagnosis. Specific underlying comorbidities (age >65 [adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-5.5, P < .001], congestive heart failure [aOR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4-7.0, P = .004], chronic lung disease [aOR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.2, P = .018], obesity [aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0-3.4, P = .039]) and presenting findings (lymphopenia [aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.5, P = .033], abnormal chest imaging [aOR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.5, P = .027]) were independently associated with mortality. Multiple measures of immunosuppression intensity were not associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality among SOT recipients hospitalized for COVID-19 was 20.5%. Age and underlying comorbidities rather than immunosuppression intensity-related measures were major drivers of mortality.

COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients.

Solid organ transplant recipients are considered at high risk for COVID-19 infection due to chronic immune suppression; little data currently exists on the manifestations and outcomes of COVID-19 infection in lung transplant recipients. Here we report 8 cases of COVID-19 identified in patients with a history of lung transplant. We describe the clinical course of disease as well as preexisting characteristics of these patients.

Activity monitors in pulmonary disease.

Physical activity is reduced in patients with chronic pulmonary diseases. Activity monitors can measure physical activity objectively and accurately over prolonged periods of time. Research grade and commercially available devices, using accelerometer technology, are being increasingly used in clinical studies. Physical activity levels have been found to have a moderate to strong correlation with important measures such as pulmonary function, exercise capacity, quality of life, and mortality and hospitalizations in patients with COPD, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary arterial hypertension and cystic fibrosis. Their use as a clinical trial end-point and as a tool to augment rehabilitation efforts has also been explored in patients with COPD with variable results. Due to the ease of use, economic viability, widespread availability and good patient compliance, their use in adult and pediatric medicine is expanding. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence of use of activity monitors in COPD, interstitial lung disease, asthma, pulmonary arterial hypertension, cystic fibrosis and lung transplant patients for the purposes of prognostication, monitoring, outcome measures and intervention.

Counting Steps: A New Way to Monitor Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

RATIONALE: Activity levels in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have correlated with surrogate markers of disease severity. It is not known whether physical activity measures are useful in monitoring patients with PAH. OBJECTIVES: This pilot study aimed to evaluate whether change in physical activity measured by an accelerometer correlates with changes in six-minute walk distance (6MWD), echocardiographic parameters, NT-proBNP, or health-related quality-of-life measures (HRQOL). METHODS: The study design was a prospective, observational study in subjects with prevalent PAH. Subjects wore a wrist-worn accelerometer (Fitbit Charge HR®) between two outpatient visits. Daily step count and activity levels were recorded, and the change over time was correlated with changes in 6MWD, echocardiographic parameters, HRQOL, and NT-proBNP. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 30 subjects were enrolled, of which 20 patients had adequate accelerometer data to be analyzed over the study duration. The mean duration of follow-up was 136.4 ( ± 47.3) days. The change in daily step count correlated with a change in 6MWD (r 0.43, p 0.05). Changes in duration spent in moderately active (r 0.52, p 0.02), lightly active (r 0.48, p 0.05), and sedentary activity levels (r - 0.54, p 0.02) correlated with a change in HRQOL. Changes in activity levels did not correlate with echocardiographic measures or NT-pro BNP. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in daily step count and time spent at fairly active, lightly active, and sedentary activity levels correlate with changes in 6MWD, and HRQOL in subjects with PAH suggesting that accelerometry may be a useful monitoring tool.

Review of checkpoint immunotherapy for the management of non-small cell lung cancer.

Checkpoint immunotherapy uses highly selective humanized monoclonal antibodies against checkpoint signals such as programmed cell death receptor (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand (PD-L1). By blocking these receptors and signals, the immune system can be reactivated to fight the tumor. Immunotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has resulted in a new paradigm of treatment options resulting in improved survival and response rates and has a less severe yet unique toxicity profile when compared to chemotherapy. PD-1 inhibitors, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, and PD-L1 inhibitor, atezolizumab, are currently approved by regulatory authorities for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. This article provides a detailed review of these newer agents, their mechanism of action, side-effect profile, therapeutic indications and current evidence supporting their use in the management of NSCLC.

Pirfenidone and Nintedanib for Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is one of the most common entities of the family of disorders known as the interstitial lung diseases. It is a chronic, progressive, and often-fatal disease with a median survival time of 3 to 5 years. In 2014 the US Food and Drug Administration approved pirfenidone and nintedanib, two antifibrotic agents for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Because these are the only drugs approved that can alter the course of this rare but fatal disease, this article reviews the major studies that led to the approval of these drugs and examines the indications for treatment and the expected outcomes of therapy.