Impact of pronated foot on energetic behavior and efficiency during walking.

BACKGROUND: The longitudinal arch of the foot acts like a spring during stance and contributes to walking efficiency. Pronated foot characterized by a collapsed medial longitudinal arch may have the impaired spring-like function and poor walking efficiency. However, the differences in the energetic behavior during walking between individuals with pronated foot and neutral foot have not been considered. RESEARCH QUESTION: How does the energetic behavior within the foot and proximal lower limb joints in pronated foot affect walking efficiency? METHODS: Twenty-one healthy young adults were classified into neutral foot and pronated foot based on the Foot Posture Index score. All subjects walked across the floor and attempted to have the rearfoot and forefoot segments contact separate force plates to analyze the forces acting on isolated regions within the foot. Kinematic and kinetic data were recorded by a three-dimensional motion capture system. The hip, knee, ankle, and mid-tarsal joint power was quantified using a 6-degree-of-freedom joint power method. To qualify total power within all structures of the foot and forefoot, we used a unified deformable segment analysis. Additionally, we calculated the center of mass power to quantify the total power of the whole body RESULTS: There is no difference in the mid-tarsal joint work between the pronated foot and neutral foot. On the other hand, pronated foot exhibited greater net negative work at structures distal to the forefoot during walking. Additionally, pronated foot exhibited less net positive work at the ankle and center of mass during walking compared to neutral foot. SIGNIFICANCE: Individuals with pronated foot generate the mid-tarsal joint work by increasing the work absorbed at structures distal to the forefoot, which results in reduced energy efficiency during walking. That energy inefficiency may reduce positive work at the ankle and affect the walking efficiency in individuals with pronated foot.

Young females with hallux valgus show lower foot joint movement stability compared to controls: An investigation of coordination patterns and variability.

BACKGROUND: A kinematic coupling relationship exists between foot joints during gait. In individuals with hallux valgus, forefoot or hallux kinematics may be affected by adjacent or nonadjacent joint motion. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the foot joint coordination pattern and variability during gait in young females with hallux valgus. METHODS: Twenty-five young females with hallux valgus and 25 healthy young females without hallux valgus were enrolled. Reflective markers were attached according to a multisegment foot model. Kinematic data were obtained using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. Joint angles between distal and proximal segments were calculated using analysis software. Foot joint coordination pattern and variability were assessed using a vector-coding technique. FINDINGS: Individuals with hallux valgus had a larger rearfoot relative to shank eversion and forefoot relative to midfoot dorsiflexion during terminal stance and pre-swing compared with those without hallux valgus. There were no significant differences in coordination patterns, but the consistency of coordination between the rearfoot relative to shank motion in the frontal plane and forefoot relative to midfoot motion in the sagittal plane during terminal stance was greater in the hallux valgus group than in the control group. INTERPRETATION: The soft tissue composing the first ray might suffer from more severe stress due to the large motion that occurred with low variability in individuals with hallux valgus. This finding may suggest that the altered kinematics and coordination variability in foot joints are related to hallux valgus biomechanical etiology.

Psycho-educational interventions focused on maternal or infant sleep for pregnant women to prevent the onset of antenatal and postnatal depression: A systematic review.

AIMS: This systematic review aimed to evaluate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the effect of maternal and infant sleep intervention during women's pregnancy for the purpose of preventing perinatal depression. METHOD: A systematic search (from inception to January 28, 2019) for RCTs using five electronic databases-the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Ichushi Web (Japan Medical Abstracts Society)-was conducted. Twelve investigators independently conducted initial screenings based on title and abstract, and then, two researchers performed full-text reviews one by one. A meta-analysis would be conducted if at least three studies were found. However, only two articles that met inclusion criteria, and narrative data synthesis was conducted for these two articles. The study protocol has been registered at PROSPERO (CRD42019119999). RESULT: A total of 13 654 studies were initially searched. After removing duplicates, 10 547 studies were screened, and finally, two studies met the inclusion criteria. In both studies, the intervention was a one-time face-to-face session during pregnancy to deliver the behavioral knowledge and skills for optimizing sleep hygiene for both infant and mother. Effectiveness of the intervention in improving maternal mood was not significant in one study. In the other, there was a significant difference in maternal mood between the intervention and control group. No mood comparison was made between baseline and postintervention. CONCLUSION: This study found limited evidence to support the effectiveness of sleep intervention for all pregnant women, which means "universal intervention," to protect maternal mental health. Further well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

Antenatal psychological intervention for universal prevention of antenatal and postnatal depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The high prevalence and severe consequences of antenatal and postnatal depression makes their prevention critical. Previous systematic reviews and meta-analysis have shown the effects of psychological interventions on perinatal depression in individuals at risk. However, none have focused explicitly on universal prevention in the antenatal period. The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the effects of antenatal psychological interventions on perinatal depression, specifically focusing on universal prevention. METHODS: Four electronic databases, the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, PubMed, and PsycINFO, were used to search for published randomized controlled trials from inception to January 28, 2019. Twelve investigators conducted the first screening from title and abstract, individually, and then NY and ZN performed full-text review one by one. For the meta-analysis, a random effect model was conducted by using Review Manager 5.3 for Windows. Subgroup analyses were also conducted for studies that employed a cognitive behavioral (CB) based approach. RESULTS: A total of 13,026 studies were initially searched. After removing duplicates, 9,919 studies were screened, and finally 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed a significant effect of antenatal psychological intervention on both antenatal and postnatal depression (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.11 to 0.44, SMD = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.66) with moderate to high level of heterogeneity (I2 = 61%, p = 0.01; I2 = 84%, p < 0.001). For subgroup analysis, a significant effect of a CB based approach on antenatal depression was found in an antenatal period (SMD = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.94) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 85%, p = 0.001), while non-significant results were shown on postnatal depression (SMD = 0.45, 95% CI = -0.03 to 0.92). LIMITATIONS: Limitations include a language bias, as we included only studies published in English, and that the assessment of antenatal and postnatal depression using different methods caused high heterogeneity across studies. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological intervention in an antenatal period could be effective for universal prevention of both antenatal and postnatal depression. However, the results were still inconclusive due to relatively low methodological quality in the included studies. The evidence from more well-designed trials is needed in future studies.

Psychological intervention for universal prevention of antenatal and postnatal depression among pregnant women: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of antenatal and postnatal depression is crucial, given its high prevalence and severe consequences. Although several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have examined the effects of psychological interventions on the population at risk for perinatal depression, few studies have focused on universal prevention and none have focused specifically on universal prevention in pregnancy. The aim of this study is to examine the effects of psychological interventions with a universal prevention focus on perinatal depression during pregnancy by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis based on both the latest articles and a broader literature search. METHODS: The literature search will be conducted using the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, PubMed and PsycINFO, from inception onwards. Randomized controlled trials that examined the association between psychological interventions and universal prevention of antenatal and postnatal depression among pregnant women will be included. Study selection, data collection, quality assessment, and statistical syntheses will be conducted following a priori defined methods in the protocol. DISCUSSION: The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis will have both clinical and political importance in the context of perinatal mental health. In addition, this study will promote future studies and clarify the direction of research on universal prevention of perinatal depression. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019118041.