Point To Area of Pain: A Clinically Useful Telehealth Physical Exam Technique for Focal Nociceptive and Neuropathic Pain.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a leading cause of disease burden and disability globally. The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed a major paradigm shift in health care delivery with the universal adoption of telemedicine. Telehealth physical examination is particularly challenging and little guidance is available on this topic. OBJECTIVES: We attempt to describe the Point To the Area of Pain (PTAP) test and establish a consensus regarding its utility for musculoskeletal examination (MSK) via telehealth. STUDY DESIGN: The authors drafted an online survey. SETTING: The survey was sent to physicians and nurse practitioners within the authors' respective departments and institutions who routinely use telemedicine to treat pain METHODS: Respondents (n = 61) were asked about their primary specialty, comfort level in evaluating patients in pain, use of the PTAP test and its perceived clinical relevance to patient management, and other relevant questions. RESULTS: Respondents were predominantly trained in Physiatry (47.5%), Anesthesiology (23%), Neurology (13.1%) and Family Medicine (11.5%); 67.2% of providers treat pain related diseases > 75% of the time; 50.8% of respondents were "somewhat comfortable" at performing a virtual MSK exam and 29.5% were "not comfortable"; 65.5% utilize the PTAP test and 88.5% agree or strongly agree that this test provides extrinsic clinically relevant information. LIMITATIONS: The relatively small number of respondents. CONCLUSION: PTAP tests should not replace the standard accepted in-person or virtual physical examination in practice, but in the absence of a hands-on exam, the PTAP test is a clear and concise test that can easily be performed in conjunction with other techniques via telehealth, and in the context of assessing pain provides useful clinical information that can help guide medical decision making.

A physiatrist's understanding and application of the current literature on chronic pelvic pain: a narrative review.

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a highly prevalent condition which is underdiagnosed and poorly understood. The purpose of this review is to outline the various aspects of the nature of CPP, including its etiologies, clinical presentation, and nonoperative treatment options. For data collection, a PubMed search was conducted using indexing terms such as chronic pelvic pain and pelvic pain. Literature reviews and studies focusing on etiologies, clinical presentation, and/or the diagnosis of CPP were compiled for review by a team of 3 physiatrists. Studies investigating conservative treatments, medications, and interventional procedures for CPP and related conditions with comparable etiologies were also included. Of the 502 articles retrieved, 116 were deemed suitable by the team for this study. Although CPP is a complex, multifaceted condition, a particular susceptibility to nociceptive stimuli was demonstrated as an underlying theme in its evolution. There are many treatment options currently used; however, more robust evidence, such as randomized controlled trials, are needed before creating comprehensive guidelines for treating CPP.

A novel, nonopiod-based treatment approach to men with urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome using ultrasound-guided nerve hydrodissection and pelvic floor musculature trigger point injections.

INTRODUCTION: Urological chronic pelvic pain syndrome (UCPPS) represents a group of pain symptoms relating to patients with pelvic pain for which treatment is largely unsatisfactory. The objective of this study is to analyze the effects of a novel treatment strategy in males suffering from UCPPS. METHODS: This retrospective, institutional review board-approved study analyzed eight male patients aged 24 to 61 with UCPPS. All the patients had a trial of antibiotic therapy, NSAIDs, and pelvic floor physical therapy before the study. The Visual Analog scale (VAS) and Functional Pelvic Pain scale (FPPS) were collected pretreatment. While continuing physical therapy, patients underwent weekly ultrasound-guided pelvic floor trigger point injections to the iliococcygeus, pubococcygeus, and puborectalis with lidocaine 1%. Concomitantly, patients received peripheral nerve hydrodissection performed on the pudendal nerve and the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve. The first two injections combined 1% lidocaine with dexamethasone, while the next four injections consisted of 1% lidocaine with traumeel (a homeopathic, plant-derived anti-inflammatory medication). At the 6-week follow-up, each patient retook the VAS and FPPS. RESULTS: The mean age of our patients was 31.8 years and the average duration of symptoms of the UCPPS was 21 months. Pretreatment, the mean VAS was 3.3 (STD 1.7) and the mean VAS posttreatment was 1.8 (STD 1.4); P < .05; 95% CI, 0.73 to 2.27. The mean FPPS pretreatment was 11.0 (STD 8.0) and the mean FPPS posttreatment was 6.3 (STD 5.3); P < .05; 95% CI, 0.03 to 9.22. CONCLUSION: Our results show promise for a novel, nonopioid-based treatment for UCPPS.