Impact of infection control measures on the related costs and the amount of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents used in a hospital: A time-series analysis.

Health care-associated infections (HAIs) worsen patient prognoses and increase medical costs. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS), which involves appropriate use of antimicrobial agents and antiseptics, may be beneficial for addressing the issue of HAIs. In hospitals, an infection control team (ICT) plays an important role on the appropriate use of antimicrobial agents and antiseptics based on AMS. We aimed to conduct a time-series analysis of the efficacies of infection control measures in terms of related costs, amount of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents used (carbapenems and quinolones), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) detection rates. This retrospective cross-sectional study included in-hospital patients treated at a single institute between January 2012 and December 2015. The intervention start point (initiation of infection control measures) was January 2014. All survey items were subjected to segmented regression analysis using an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model. Differences between pre-intervention and postintervention levels and their trends were assessed, using a statistical significance cutoff of P < .05. The infection control costs demonstrated a significantly increasing trend, despite significant decreases in the amount of carbapenems used. Accordingly, the implementation of infection control measures was associated with increased costs, whereas carbapenem use decreased immediately after intervention. Postintervention levels, trends of quinolone use, or MRSA detection rates did not reveal significant changes. Although implementation of infection control measures induced gradual increases in related costs, these measures led to immediate reductions in carbapenem use. Our study findings will support the establishment of more effective and economical infection control measures.

Cost-effectiveness analysis and effectiveness of pharmacist-managed outpatient clinics in Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori is involved in many upper gastrointestinal diseases such as peptic ulcers and gastric cancers. In this study, we compared the cost-effectiveness of lansoprazole and vonoprazan in H. pylori eradication therapy and examined the effectiveness of pharmacist-managed outpatient clinics. METHODS: We investigated the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of pharmacist-managed outpatient clinics in H. pylori eradication therapy at our hospital from January 2015 to December 2017. The subjects were classified into three groups: lansoprazole group; vonoprazan group; and the medication instruction group, which received instructions at the pharmacist-managed outpatient clinics (intervention group). We examined the eradication rate and cost-effectiveness ratio of each group. RESULTS: The eradication rate of primary eradication therapy was 75.2% in the lansoprazole group, 87.8% in the vonoprazan group and 91.4% in the intervention group. When mental component summary was used as quality of life score, cost-effectiveness ratio was 224.7 yen in lansoprazole group, 223.9 yen in vonoprazan group and 222.2 yen in intervention group. Setting up pharmacist-managed outpatient clinics increases the pharmacist labour cost necessary for eradication therapy. However, if the medication instructions provided by the pharmacist can lead to improved disinfection efficiency, improvement in cost efficiency can be expected. CONCLUSION: Although medication instructions provided at the pharmacist-managed outpatient clinics incur additional labour costs, they improve patient quality of life as well as disinfection rate in H. pylori eradication therapy. Therefore, pharmacist-managed outpatient clinics are useful from the viewpoint of pharmacoeconomics.