Cohort Profile: The Swiss Eosinophilic Esophagitis Cohort Study (SEECS).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The prospective, observational Swiss Eosinophilic Esophagitis Cohort Study (SEECS) was set up in 2015 with the following goals in mind: (1) to provide up-to-date epidemiologic data; (2) to assess the appropriateness of care; (3) to evaluate the psychosocial impact; and (4) to foster translational research projects. Data capture relies on validated instruments to assess disease activity and focuses on epidemiologic variables and biosamples (esophageal biopsies and blood specimens). An annual inclusion of 70 new patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) or proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilia (PPI-REE) is intended. We herein describe the SEECS cohort profile. METHODS: The SEECS includes adult patients (age ≥18 years) with EoE or PPI-REE diagnosed according to published criteria. After inclusion, the patients are typically seen once a year for a clinical and endoscopic/histologic follow-up examination. Data are captured using validated questionnaires. Biosamples from patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and controls with a healthy esophagus are collected as well. RESULTS: From January 2016 to July 2017, a total of 111 patients with EoE and 10 patients with PPI-REE were recruited. In addition, esophageal biopsies and blood samples from 11 patients with GERD and 20 controls with a healthy esophagus were collected. The mean age of the patients with EoE and those with PPI-REE was 39.6 ± 12.9 and 44.6 ± 15.6 years, respectively. A male predominance was found among both the patients with EoE (77.5%) and those with PPI-REE (70%). Concomitant allergic disorders were found in 79.3% of the patients with EoE and 90% of the patients with PPI-REE. At inclusion, the EoE patients were treated with the following therapeutic regimens: no therapy (0.9%), PPI (36%), swallowed topical corticosteroids (82.9%), elimination diets (15.3%), and esophageal dilation (19.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The SEECS is the first national cohort study of patients with EoE or PPI-REE. The SEECS will provide up-to-date epidemiologic data and foster translational research projects.

[Functional abdominal pain]. / Funktionelle Abdominalschmerzen.

Functional abdominal pain is an inhomogeneous group of disorders concerning aetiology and clinical presentation. Support for classification is provided by the ROME-Foundation with its criteria catalogue, ROME-III being the most recent one. However, basic approach consists of exclusion of somatic or psychiatric as well as psychosomatic disorders that are sharply defined and readily diagnosable. This article outlines a pragmatic gastroenterological approach by exemplary means of dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome. Dyspepsia includes a broad complex of mainly epigastric located symptoms, whereas irritable bowel syndrome is symptomatic with altered bowel habits and mid-abdominal pain in the majority. Gastreoenterologic therapy modalities are mainly based on empirical and symptomatic grounds, more than on precisely explaining pathophysioligic understanding.

Corticosteroid-dependent eosinophilic oesophagitis: azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine can induce and maintain long-term remission.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EO) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the oesophagus that is rapidly increasing in prevalence. Although systemic and topical corticosteroids are effective in treating EO, some patients develop corticosteroid dependency. Alternative therapeutic approaches that avoid corticosteroids are scarce. AIM: To analyse our experience at inducing and maintaining remission with an immunomodulatory therapy in steroid-dependent EO patients. METHODS: We analysed the clinical and histological response to azathioprine (AZA) and 6-mercaptopurine in three patients with EO (one also with eosinophilic gastroenteritis) and corticosteroid dependency. RESULTS: In all three patients, AZA or 6-mercaptopurine-induced clinical and histological remission that was maintained during the follow-up period (range 3-8 years). Two patients experienced relapses after ceasing AZA therapy. Remission, however, resumed when short-term corticosteroid treatment was followed by AZA. In all the patients, blood eosinophilia disappeared under AZA treatment. Only jumbo biopsies confirmed suspected EO with predominant muscle-layer involvement in one patient. CONCLUSION: In adult patients with corticosteroid-dependent EO, immunomodulatory treatment with purine analogues is a promising therapeutic approach for inducing and maintaining long-term remission without the need for further corticosteroids. Jumbo forcep biopsies might be needed to confirm a diagnosis of muscle-layer predominant EO.