Serum zinc levels in cancer patients are low and difficult to elevate when complicated by liver cirrhosis: A retrospective study.

In this study, we analyzed blood zinc concentration in patients with various cancer types and the degree of improvement in relation to the underlying disease following treatment with zinc preparations. Serum zinc levels of 530 cancer patients whose blood zinc levels were measured at our hospital from 2016 to 2021 were retrospectively examined in accordance with the primary disease. Changes in zinc levels were analyzed in 155 patients whose zinc levels had been measured on 2 or more occasions in accordance with whether they had received zinc preparations. In addition, the concentration course of zinc before and after zinc formulation administration in 73 patients was examined in accordance with the presence or absence of liver cirrhosis complications. Mean serum zinc levels were below normal in all carcinomas measured, and zinc levels were significantly lower in cirrhosis-hepatocarcinoma cases than in other primary disease cases. Furthermore, serum zinc levels in patients who did not receive zinc preparations decreased significantly over time. In patients who received zinc preparations, the elevated levels of zinc after treatment were significantly lower in patients with cirrhosis than in those without cirrhosis. There was a weak inverse correlation between pre-dose zinc concentration and increased zinc concentration in patients with cirrhosis. In the analysis of covariance, the presence of liver cirrhosis was predominantly correlated with elevated zinc per dose. In summary, serum zinc levels in cancer patients are low and especially low in cancer patients with liver cirrhosis compared with those without cirrhosis after the administration of zinc preparations.

Factors Contributing to the Prognosis after Second-line Therapy with Ramucirumab in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Objective Multiple therapeutic agents exist for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but prognostic factors in second-line and subsequent therapies are unclear. Ramucirumab is a molecular-targeted agent effective against hepatocytes with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) >400 ng/mL after sorafenib failure. We examined the prognostic factors and efficacy of ramucirumab with prior therapy other than sorafenib. Methods In our retrospective multicenter study, 33 patients were treated with ramucirumab for HCC with prior therapy other than sorafenib, including 1 patient who received 2 lines of ramucirumab. We analyzed background factors, liver reserve, the prognosis, and treatment duration and efficacy. Results The median albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) value showed little change during ramucirumab treatment. The ALBI value improved in 32% of patients, and their prognoses were better than in those who did not improve. Response and efficacy rates were not as high as those in the REACH-2 study but were similar when limited to patients with 2,500 ng/mL AFP. Thirteen patients received further treatment after ramucirumab failure and they had a significantly better prognosis from ramucirumab administration and also had a significantly better prognosis from the start of the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor than who did not received further treatment. In univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors, the continuation of treatment with another drug after ramucirumab failure and a good ALBI value at initiation were significant. The presence of a ramucirumab response and treatment duration were not associated with the prognosis. A good ALBI value at initiation and ALBI value improvement during treatment were also identified as independent factors associated with eligibility for further treatment after ramucirumab failure. The treatment line did not correlate with the availability of treatment with another drug after treatment failure. Conclusions ALBI value improvement with ramucirumab treatment allows for subsequent treatment after failure and an improved overall prognosis.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Lenvatinib as First-Line Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

BACKGROUND: A comparison between atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATEZO/BEVA) and lenvatinib (LEN) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the therapeutic effects and safety of ATEZO/BEVA and LEN as first-line therapies for HCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of 810 patients with HCC who underwent ATEZO/BEVA (n = 186) or LEN (n = 624) as first-line systemic therapy between March 2018 to March 2022 at 14 facilities. After propensity score matching, 304 patients (ATEZO/BEVA group: n = 152; LEN group: n = 152) were analyzed. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, although there was no significant difference in objective response rates (ORRs) between the ATEZO/BEVA and LEN groups (ORR 44.8% vs. 46.7%, p = 0.644), the median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) in the ATEZO/BEVA group were significantly higher than those in the LEN group (median PFS: 8.3 months vs. 6.0 months, p = 0.005; median OS: not reached vs. 20.2 months, p = 0.039). The rates of appetite loss, fatigue, and proteinuria of grade 3 or higher in the ATEZO/BEVA group were lower than those in the LEN group. However, the rate of bleeding of grade 3 or higher in the ATEZO/BEVA group was higher than that in the LEN group. The conversion rate was higher in the ATEZO/BEVA group than that in the LEN group (8.6% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: ATEZO/BEVA showed superiority to LEN in terms of prognosis and conversion rate as first-line therapy. Moreover, ATEZO/BEVA had a lower rate of severe adverse events, except for bleeding, than LEN.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma progressing after molecular targeted therapy: A multicenter prospective observational study.

To evaluate the efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) previously treated with molecular targeted agents (MTAs). Thirty-one patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable HCC and previously treated with MTAs were enrolled in this study. The treatment lines ranged from second to sixth lines. The treatment effect on HCC differed from that during first-line treatment. The treatment effect was determined using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and modified RECIST. The treatment response was different for each MTA immediately prior to atezolizumab + bevacizumab treatment. Tumors treated with lenvatinib followed by atezolizumab + bevacizumab showed rapid growth for a short period of time followed by shrinkage. However, patients who received ramucirumab, sorafenib, and regorafenib did not show such changes. This was likely because of differences in the mechanism of action of the MTA administered immediately beforehand. The side-effect profile differed from that observed in the IMbrave150 phase 3 study of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, which showed more adverse events related to hepatic reserve. Patients treated with the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab after lenvatinib therapy may experience rapid tumor growth and subsequent shrinkage.

Improved indocyanine green retention after short-term lenvatinib withdrawal in three patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Use of lenvatinib, which has a high response rate in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, sometimes results in tumor shrinkage and resectability of previously unresectable liver cancers. In Asia, including Japan, liver reserve, one of the determinants of resectability, is mainly determined by the indocyanine green (ICG) retention rate. Three patients with advanced liver cancer treated at our institution had very poor ICG retention rates during treatment with lenvatinib. Lenvatinib may reduce blood flow in both cancerous and non-cancerous regions by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor. Therefore, accurate determination of liver function likely requires withdrawal of this treatment several days before ICG retention testing.

[A case of obstructive jaundice and duodenal stenosis caused by vaginal cancer and retroperitoneal metastasis].

A 76-year-old woman with a history of radiation therapy for vaginal cancer was referred to our hospital because of fever and hepatobiliary dysfunction. Computed tomography showed stenosis of the lower bile duct and edema-like changes in the duodenum from the descending to transverse parts. Endoscopic biliary stenting was performed according to the rendezvous method. Squamous cell carcinoma, similar to vaginal cancer, was found on pathological examination of the duodenum. We accordingly diagnosed obstructive jaundice and duodenal stenosis caused by vaginal cancer and retroperitoneal metastasis. To the best of our knowledge, other such cases have not been reported.

Risk factors for de novo hepatitis B during solid cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND: Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) during anticancer treatment is a critical issue. When treating patients with solid tumors, it is unclear whether specific cancer types or treatments affect HBV reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative and hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive patients, so-called de novo hepatitis B patients. The risk of de novo hepatitis B may vary based on different background factors. AIM: To determine the frequency and risk factors for de novo hepatitis B during solid tumor treatment. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study comprised 1040 patients without HBsAgs and with HBcAbs and/or hepatitis B surface antibodies (HBsAbs). The patients were treated for solid cancer from 2008 to 2018 at the National Kyushu Cancer Center and underwent HBV DNA measurements. Patient characteristics and disease and treatment information were investigated. HBV DNA measurements were performed using TaqMan polymerase chain reaction (PCR). To identify the risk factors associated with HBV DNA expression, the age, sex, original disease, pathology, treatment method, presence or absence of hepatitis C virus (HCV), and HBsAb and/or HBcAb titers of all subjects were investigated. In patients with HBV DNA, the time of appearance, presence of HBsAgs and HBsAbs at the time of appearance, and course of the subsequent fluctuations in virus levels were also investigated. RESULTS: Among the 1040 patients, 938 were HBcAb positive, and 102 were HBcAb negative and HBsAb positive. HBV DNA expression was observed before the onset of treatment in nine patients (0.9%) and after treatment in 35 patients (3.7%), all of whom were HBcAb positive. The HBV reactivation group showed significantly higher median HBcAb values [9.00 (8.12-9.89) vs 7.22 (7.02-7.43), P = 0.0001] and significantly lower HBsAb values (14 vs 46, P = 0.0342) than the group without reactivation. Notably, the reactivated group showed a significantly higher proportion of cancers in organs related to digestion and absorption (79.0% vs 58.7%, P = 0.0051). A high HBcAb titer and cancers in organs involved in digestion and absorption were identified as independent factors for HBV reactivation (multivariate analysis, P = 0.0002 and P = 0.0095). The group without HBsAbs tended to have a shorter time to reactivation (day 43 vs day 193), and the frequency of reactivation within 6 mo was significantly higher in this group (P = 0.0459) than in the other group. CONCLUSION: A high HBcAb titer and cancers in organs involved in digestion and absorption are independent factors that contribute to HBV reactivation during solid tumor treatment.

Indicators of sorafenib efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM: To determine significant indicators for the efficacy of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: A total of 46 patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C who received sorafenib for more than 30 d at the Iizuka Hospital from June 2009 to December 2012 were enrolled in this study. Multivariate and univariate analyses were performed to evaluate the associations of hepatic function according to Child-Pugh grade, location and size of the largest tumor and adverse events of sorafenib treatment, such as hand-foot syndrome (HFS), hypertension, diarrhea, and alopecia, with the efficacy of treatment, as measured by overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). RESULTS: Patients included 39 men and 7 women whose ages ranged from 48 to 85 years (70.6 ± 9.6 years). HCC was classified according to etiology as follows: hepatitis C virus (n = 26), hepatitis B virus (n = 9), and other (n = 11). Liver function in patients was categorized as Child-Pugh grade A (n = 30) or B (n = 16). Tumors were categorized by size [< 5 cm (n = 33) or >5 cm (n = 13)] and the location of the largest tumor was used to categorize patients with intrahepatic (n = 28) or extrahepatic (n = 18) HCC. HFS, hypertension, diarrhea, and alopecia were present in 22 (47.8%), 19 (41.3%), 15 (32.6%) and 7 patients (15.2%), respectively. The median OS of all patients was 373 d and the median TTP was 112 d. The etiology of HCC did not correlate with the median OS and TPP. The median OS of patients with tumors < 5 cm was significantly longer than those with larger tumors (496 vs 245 d; HR = 0.19, 95%CI: 0.07-0.48; P < 0.01). According to the results of a multivariate analysis, the size of the largest tumor affected OS (HR = 0.22, 95%CI: 0.08-0.59; P < 0.01). The median TTP was significantly longer in patients with extrahepatic compared to intrahepatic major HCC (224 vs 98 d; HR = 0.32; 95%CI: 0.14-0.67; P < 0.01). The median TTP of patients with HFS was significantly longer than those without it (195 d vs 83 d; HR = 0.41, 95%CI: 0.20-0.82; P < 0.05), and the median TTP was significantly longer in patients with hypertension (195 d vs 84 d; HR = 0.43, 95%CI: 0.21-0.84; P < 0.05). According to the results of the multivariate analysis, extrahepatic major HCC (HR = 0.36, P < 0.01) and HFS (HR = 0.44, P < 0.05) prolonged TTP. CONCLUSION: Extrahepatic major HCC and HFS are associated with prolonged TTP and are useful indicators for judging the efficacy of sorafenib treatment.

[Two cases of advanced pancreatic cancer with cervical lymph node or liver metastasis responding well to S-1 monotherapy].

In two patients with advanced pancreatic cancer with cervical lymph node or liver metastasis and no indication of pancreatic resection and radiotherapy, oral treatment with S-1 (an anti-cancer agent of fluoropyrimidine derivative) exerted high anti-tumor activity on the metastatic lesions. Both cases responded well to this therapy in the late phase II study of S-1 in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer designed to evaluate efficacy and safety. In Case 1 (with cervical lymph node metastasis), the anti-tumor efficacy of this therapy was evaluated as a partial response (PR) after the first four courses of treatment. In Case 2 (with liver metastasis), the efficacy was evaluated as PR for overall response. Thus, the therapy indicated excellent efficacy in both cases. No grade 3 or severe adverse event was noted in either of the two cases. In Case 1, grade 2 anemia, stomatitis, vomiting and fatigue, and some other mild events were noted. When used as a systemic chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer, oral treatment of S-1 is highly effective, tolerable and convenient in an outpatient clinic. This drug is a promising way to improve and preserve the QOL essential to long-term home care.

[Tailored-dose chemotherapy using gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer].

Eighteen patients with metastatic or post-surgery recurrent pancreatic cancer were given weekly gemcitabine therapy. Almost all of these patients were aged or had other complications. We determined the individualized maximum repeatable dose (iMRD)as follows. We started at 500 mg/m(2) gemcitabine and repeated the treatment with an increase or a decrease of 100mg/m(2) each week, if the hematological toxicity was 0 or more than grade 1. If toxicity was grade 1, the same dose was given. And the third-week dose was an iMRD. Dose intensity was 286 mg/m(2)/week. The median survival time was 262 days. Of these 18 patients, 2 (11.1%), 11(61.1%) and 5 (27.8%) patients showed partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, respectively. The therapeutic effects of iMRD equaled those of standard administration of gemcitabine.

[A case of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with rapid progress in a young man].

A 17-year-old man was admitted to hospital because of epigastric pain. Various imaging studies showed a solid tumor (4cm in diameter) in the tail of the pancreas, multiple hypovascular tumors in liver. Serum levels of DUPAN2, SPAN1 and NSE were elevated slightly. Biopsy of hepatic tumor demonstrated that tumor cells had eosinophilic cytoplasm generally and unevenly distributed polymorphic nucleus. These data suggested that this tumor is poorly differentiated pancreatic carcinoma originated from the epithelium. Therefore, we administered 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin, combined with gemcitabine. The clinical status improved temporarily by the treatment, however, worsened rapidly. He died 81days after the treatment. Final diagnosis of autopsy was pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the young patients is rare, and we reported this case in addition to consideration on literature.