Case Report: Virtual reality training for phantom limb pain after amputation.

Several reports have demonstrated the effectiveness of neurorehabilitation, such as mirror therapy or virtual reality, in treating phantom limb pain (PLP). This case study describes the effect of virtual reality training (VRT) on severe, long-term PLP and upper limb activity on the amputated side in a patient who underwent digit amputation 9 years prior. A woman in her 40 s underwent amputation of 2-5 fingers 9 years prior due to a workplace accident. She experienced persistent pain in the palms of her hand near the amputation sites. A single case design (ABA'B') was applied. Periods A and A' were set as periods without VRT intervention, and Periods B and B' were set as periods with VRT intervention. Periods A, B, A', and B' lasted 4, 10, 8, and 10 weeks, respectively. VRT was a task during which visual stimulation and upper limb movements were linked. The task consisted of catching a rolling ball in the display with a virtual hand, operated with both hands using a controller. VRT was performed once every 2-4 weeks for 30 min. Pain intensity was assessed using the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2. Bilateral upper limb activity was measured continuously for 24 h using a triaxial accelerometer attached to the right and left wrist joints. The pain intensity was 147/220 points during Period A, 128 points during Period B, 93 points during Period A', and 100 points during Period B', showing a gradual decrease. Upper limb activity occurred mainly on the intact side during Periods A and B, whereas the activity on the amputated side increased 2-fold after Period A', and both upper extremities were used equally. Virtual reality training resulted in reduced pain intensity and increased activity in the upper limb. VRT may have induced reintegration of the sensory-motor loop, leading to a decrease in the PLP intensity. The upper limb activity on the amputated side may have also increased with the pain reduction. These results suggest that VRT may be valuable in reducing severe, long-term PLP.

Correlation between kinesthetic motor imagery of an amputated limb and phantom limb pain.

BACKGROUND: Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a frequent painful sensation in amputees, and motor imagery (MI) is a useful approach for the treatment of this type of pain. However, it is not clear regarding the best MI modality for PLP. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the PLP and MI modality in upper limb amputees. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. METHODS: Eleven patients who underwent unilateral upper limb amputation participated in this study. The MI modality (kinesthetic and visual) and PLP intensity were evaluated using the Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ)-20 and a visual analog scale. MI ability was also assessed during the hand mental rotation task. We examined the correlation between MI modalities, ability, and pain intensity. RESULTS: The total KVIQ kinesthetic score was negatively correlated with pain intensity (r = -0.71, P < 0.01): the more vivid the kinesthetic imagery, the weaker the pain. In particular, the reduction in pain intensity was associated with strong kinesthetic imagery of opposing movements of the deficient thumb (r = -0.81, P < 0.01). The KVIQ visual score and MI ability were not associated with pain intensity. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that the reduction of PLP could be associated with the kinesthetic modality of MI but not with visual modality or MI ability. In other words, it was suggested that the more vivid the sensation of moving muscles and joints in the defect area, the lower the PLP intensity. To reduce PLP, clinicians may prefer interventions using the kinesthetic modality.

Virtual reality-based action observation facilitates the acquisition of body-powered prosthetic control skills.

BACKGROUND: Regular body-powered (BP) prosthesis training facilitates the acquisition of skills through repeated practice but requires adequate time and motivation. Therefore, auxiliary tools such as indirect training may improve the training experience and speed of skill acquisition. In this study, we examined the effects of action observation (AO) using virtual reality (VR) as an auxiliary tool. We used two modalities during AO: three-dimensional (3D) VR and two-dimensional (2D) computer tablet devices (Tablet). Each modality was tested from first- and third-person perspectives. METHODS: We studied 40 healthy right-handed participants wearing a BP prosthesis simulator on their non-dominant hands. The participants were divided into five groups based on combinations of the different modalities and perspectives: first-person perspective on VR (VR1), third-person perspective on VR (VR3), first-person perspective on a tablet (Tablet1), third-person perspective on a tablet (Tablet3), and a control group (Control). The intervention groups observed and imitated the video image of prosthesis operation for 10 min in each of two sessions. We evaluated the level of immersion during AO using the visual analogue scale. Prosthetic control skills were evaluated using the Box and Block Test (BBT) and a bowknot task (BKT). RESULTS: In the BBT, there were no significant differences in the amount of change in the skills between the five groups. In contrast, the relative changes in the BKT prosthetic control skills in VR1 (p < 0.001, d = 3.09) and VR3 (p < 0.001, d = 2.16) were significantly higher than those in the control group. Additionally, the immersion scores of VR1 (p < 0.05, d = 1.45) and VR3 (p < 0.05, d = 1.18) were higher than those of Tablet3. There was a significant negative correlation between the immersion scores and the relative change in the BKT scores (Spearman's rs = - 0.47, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Using the BKT of bilateral manual dexterity, VR-based AO significantly improved short-term prosthetic control acquisition. Additionally, it appeared that the higher the immersion score was, the shorter the execution time of the BKT task. Our findings suggest that VR-based AO training may be effective in acquiring bilateral BP prosthetic control, which requires more 3D-based operation.