"I was afraid to go to the hospital": A qualitative analysis and ethical implications of the impacts of COVID-19 on the health and medical care of older adults in Ethiopia.

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought severe health consequences among older adults and posed ethical challenges. The aim of this study was to explore the impacts of COVID-19 on the health and medical care of older adults in Ethiopia and associated ethical implications, regardless of older adults' COVID-19 infection status. Methods: In this qualitative study, we followed an inductive exploratory approach based on reflexive thematic analysis. We conducted semistructured interviews between March 2021 and November 2021 with 20 older adults and 26 health professionals who were selected from healthcare facilities and communities in Ethiopia using purposive and snowball sampling techniques. We audio-recorded, transcribed, translated, and inductively analyzed the interviews using thematic analysis. Results: Participants reported that the pandemic compromised the accessibility and quality of both COVID and non-COVID healthcare services for older adults, which negatively impacted older adults' health conditions and medical care. Moreover, participants elaborated on the health conditions and care of older patients with COVID-19 and highlighted that older COVID-19 patients often have severe health conditions, do not get adequate COVID-19 care, and may receive lower priority for admission to intensive care units compared to younger patients when resources are limited. Conclusions: Results of this study showed that practices of COVID-19 care and measures may have led to adverse consequences such as limited availability and access to aged care in Ethiopia, which could have further health consequences on older patients. Our results contribute to a better understanding of ethical issues such as distributive justice and prioritization arising in the healthcare of older patients in times of global pandemic. It is imperative for local and international health policymakers and ethicists to further analyze and address the challenges that compromise the accessibility and continuity of quality care for older persons during a public healthcare crisis.

The good pain patient: a critical evaluation of patients' self-presentations in specialist pain clinics.

Established research supports collaborative patient-clinician communication as a means of improving pain management and decreasing opioid use by patients with chronic pain. However, much of this scholarship emphasises clinicians' capacities to shape and improve communication; limited research investigates patients' roles in this process. Drawing on 40 ethnographic observations of patient-clinician interactions, clinical spaces and case conferences within one specialist pain clinic in Brisbane, Australia, this paper investigates how and why patients present themselves in particular ways within consultations. Our theoretical lens combines concepts from Goffman on patienthood and stigma with Foucauldian theories of pastoral and disciplinary power. Findings suggest that elements of the clinical environment - namely posters - usher patients towards presenting in what we conceptualise as the 'good pain patient' role. In this role, patients demonstrate that they are moral, responsible, and contributing members of society. Yet, such a role is problematic to opening communication, with the role constraining what is socially acceptable for patients with chronic pain to say, do, or feel. In recognising how clinical contexts facilitate problematic good pain patient presentations, this paper directs attention to the spatial and relational nature of implicit clinical expectations and constrained good pain patient presentations.

Navigating whiteness: affective relational intensities of non-clinical psychosocial support by and for culturally and linguistically diverse people.

Mental health is political, with intersecting economic, cultural, racialized, and affective dimensions making up the care assemblage, signalling how care is conceptualised and who is deserving of care. In this article, we examine emotions circulating in a non-clinical psychosocial support program for culturally and linguistically diverse people experiencing mental ill-health, foregrounding the relations between culture, race, economy, and assumptions underpinning understandings of care. The mental health program under study offers psychosocial support for culturally and linguistically diverse people to manage life challenges and mental ill-health exacerbated by navigating the complexities of Australia's health and social care systems. We draw on interviews with clients, staff, and providers of intersecting services, employing Ahmed's concept of affective economies and Savreemootoo's concept of navigating whiteness to examine the care assemblage within interview transcripts. We provide insight into affective intensities such as hate, anger, and indifference embedded in white Anglo-centric services, positioning culturally and linguistically diverse people on the margins of care. Non-clinical psychosocial support programs can counter such affective intensities by training and employing multicultural peer support workers-people with lived experience-prioritising relational and place-based approaches to care and supporting and providing clients with relevant skills to navigate an Anglo-centric care system. However, this support is filled with affective tensions: (com)passion, frustration and fatigue circulate and clash due to the scarcity of resources, further signalling what type of care (and with/for whom) is prioritised within Australian relations of care.

Trauma-informed physiotherapy and the principles of safety, trustworthiness, choice, collaboration, and empowerment: a qualitative study.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma is common and may lead to lasting adverse effects on health. Trauma-informed practice does not treat trauma but uses a strengths-based approach to encourage engagement in services. OBJECTIVE: To understand how physiotherapy attends to trauma-informed principles. METHODS: This qualitative ethnographic study was set in an Australian hospital. Three data collection methods were used, including observations of clinical practice, interactive reflexive group discussions with physiotherapists, and interviews with patients. Data analysis included an initial inductive phase followed by thematic mapping to trauma-informed principles. Critical reflexivity was used throughout to examine how the authors' perspectives and assumptions affected the analysis. RESULTS: Twelve observations of consultations, ten interviews with people receiving physiotherapy, and five group discussions with physiotherapists were conducted. Themes produced within each of five principles of trauma-informed care included: Safety: not just a number, uncertainty beyond managing physical risks, upbeat approach as default needs balance, pragmatic environments inadequate; Trustworthiness: touch needs further consideration, assumed consent; Choice: limited options; Collaboration: let's do it together, variable consideration of the patient as expert, task focus, pushing the "right" treatment, missing insight into power imbalance; Empowerment: extending function and independence, building nonphysical skills but lack of clarity. CONCLUSION: Physiotherapy incorporates crucial aspects of trauma-informed care, but opportunities exist to enhance physiotherapists' skills and knowledge, particularly in relation to non-physical safety considerations.

Exploring the Systemic Structures That Affect Access to Physical Therapist Services for Non-Indigenous Black People in Australia.

OBJECTIVE: Physical therapy is generally considered to be a white profession in Western nations. Australia's increasingly diverse population, driven largely by growth in immigration, invites Australian health systems to be responsive to factors that may impact on non-white Australian population's access to health care. Here, the authors sought to explore non-Indigenous Black people's perspectives of physical therapy in Australia. METHODS: Eligible participants (n = 12) took part in semistructured, in-depth interviews and were prompted to discuss their experiences and perceptions of physical therapy. Interview data were analyzed using critical discourse analysis, underpinned by critical race theory. RESULTS: Participants were on average 29.4 years (SD = 12.9) from diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds. Participants described mostly positive experiences with physical therapists, but they noted that it was not widely accessed by their communities, with 2 key discourses underpinning these discussions. Discourse 1, "physiotherapy is a solution for white people," established physical therapy as primarily accessed by and welcoming of white people. "Whiteness" and the perpetuation of Western norms in physical therapy resulted in little consideration of other cultural practices. Participants' discussions also pointed to the intersections of systemic racism and social inequities such as low income and language barriers, impacting Black people's engagement with physical therapy. Discourse 2, "physiotherapists are white," was mostly concerned with how the perceived "whiteness" of professionals and lack of Black physical therapists impacts cultural safety and comfort when accessing physical therapy. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that Westernization and whiteness persist among discourses surrounding physical therapy. Such discourses are likely to inform Black people's perceptions and experiences of physical therapy. Our analyses suggest avenues to enhance the cultural diversity of the profession and improve physical therapy accessibility for Black people in Australia by providing culturally appropriate material, including critical reflexivity, epistemic and cultural humility in the curricula, recruiting staff from diverse backgrounds, and providing outreach services to underserved populations. IMPACT: These findings highlight the need for increased cultural safety and diversity within the physical therapy profession to improve equity.

Fostering equitable change in health services: Using critical reflexivity to challenge dominant discourses in low back pain care in Australia.

OBJECTIVES: Justice and equity-focused practices in health services play a critical but overlooked role in low back pain (LBP) care. Critical reflexivity - the ability to examine and challenge power relations, and broader social issues embedded in everyday life - can be a useful tool to foster practices that are more socially just. No research has yet explored this approach in back pain health services. This study sought to understand how clinicians construct LBP in relation to broader socio-cultural-political aspects of care and explore if those constructions changed when clinicians engaged with critically reflexive dialogues with researchers. METHODS: Using critical discourse analysis methods, this qualitative study explored institutionalised patterns of knowledge in the construction of LBP care. We conducted 22 critically reflexive dialogues with 29 clinicians from two health services in Australia - a private physiotherapy clinic and a public multidisciplinary pain clinic. RESULTS: Our analyses suggested that clinicians and services often constructed LBP care at an individual level. This dominant individualistic discourse constrained consideration of justice-oriented practices in the care of people with LBP. Through dialogues, discursive constructions of LBP care expanded to incorporate systems and health service workplace practices. This expansion fostered more equitable clinical and service practices - such as assisting patients to navigate health care systems, considering patients' socioeconomic circumstances when developing treatment plans, encouraging staff discussion of possible systemic changes to enhance justice, and fostering a more inclusive workplace culture. Although such expansions faced challenges, incorporating broader discourses enabled recommendations to address LBP care inequities. CONCLUSIONS: Critical reflexivity can be a tool to foster greater social justice within health services. By expanding constructions of LBP care beyond individuals, critical reflexive dialogues can foster discussion and actions towards more equitable workplace cultures, services and systems.

'Engaging on a slightly more human level': A qualitative study exploring the care of individuals with back pain in a multidisciplinary pain clinic.

Chronic low back pain is characterised by multiple and overlapping biological, psychological, social and broader dimensions, affecting individuals' lives. Multidisciplinary pain services have been considered optimal settings to account for the multidimensionality of chronic low back pain but have largely focused on cognitive and behavioural aspects of individuals' pain. Social dimensions are usually underexplored, considered outside or beyond healthcare professionals' scope of practice. Employing Actor Network Theorist Mol's concept multiplicity, our aim in this paper is to explore how a pain service's practices bring to the fore the social dimensions of individuals living with low back pain. Drawing on 32 ethnographic observations and four group exchanges with the service's clinicians, findings suggest that practices produced multiple enactments of an individual with low back pain. Although individuals' social context was present and manifested during consultations at the pain service (first enactment: 'the person'), it was often disconnected from care and overlooked in 'treatment/management' (second enactment: 'the patient'). In contrast, certain practices at the pain service not only provided acknowledgement of, but actions towards enhancing, individuals' social contexts by adapting rules and habits, providing assistance outside the service and shifting power relations during consultations (third enactment: 'the patient-person'). We therefore argue that different practices enact different versions of an individual with low back pain in pain services, and that engagement with individuals' social contexts can be part of a service's agenda.

Distress in the care of people with chronic low back pain: insights from an ethnographic study.

Introduction: Distress is part of the experiences and care for people with chronic low back pain. However, distress is often pathologised and individualised; it is seen as a problem within the individual in pain and something to be downplayed, avoided, or fixed. To that end, we situate distress as a normal everyday relational experience circulating, affecting, moving in, through, and across bodies. Challenging practices that may amplify distress, we draw on the theorisation of affect as a relational assemblage to analyse physiotherapy clinical encounters in the care of people with chronic low back pain. Methods: Adopting a critical reflexive ethnographic approach, we analyse data from a qualitative project involving 15 ethnographic observations of patient-physiotherapist interactions and 6 collaborative dialogues between researchers and physiotherapists. We foreground conceptualisations of distress- and what they make (im)possible-to trace embodied assemblage formations and relationality when caring for people with chronic low back pain. Results: Our findings indicate that conceptualisation matters to the clinical entanglement, particularly how distress is recognised and navigated. Our study highlights how distress is both a lived experience and an affective relation-that both the physiotherapist and people with chronic low back pain experience distress and can be affected by and affect each other within clinical encounters. Discussion: Situated at the intersection of health sociology, sociology of emotions, and physiotherapy, our study offers a worked example of applying an affective assemblage theoretical framework to understanding emotionally imbued clinical interactions. Viewing physiotherapy care through an affective assemblage lens allows for recognising that life, pain, and distress are emerging, always in flux. Such an approach recognises that clinicians and patients experience distress; they are affected by and affect each other. It demands a more humanistic approach to care and helps move towards reconnecting the inseparable in clinical practice-emotion and reason, body and mind, carer and cared for.

Lessons learnt from a nationally funded training and mentoring programme for early-mid career musculoskeletal researchers in Australia.

INTRODUCTION: Quality training and mentoring are crucial components of successful career development for early mid career researchers (EMCRs). This paper describes the overarching framework of novel ongoing national Training and Mentoring Programme Melbourne University Sydney Queensland:Impact (MUSQ:Impact) for musculoskeletal researchers, including a description of how it was set up and established, and lessons learned from its implementation. RESULTS: The MUSQ:Impact programme spans four multidisciplinary musculoskeletal research teams across three universities in Australia, comprising 40-60 EMCR members. It was established to provide EMCRs with a unique learning environment and opportunities to gain exposure to, and network with, other national musculoskeletal research teams. Specific goals are to focus on core research competencies (e.g. writing skills, managing grant budgets, public speaking and media engagement, research translation), provide career mentoring, fund development activities (e.g. conference attendance, laboratory visits, skill development courses), and share training resources (e.g. data dictionaries, project summaries). A Steering Committee of 10-12 EMCR members, co-chaired by a senior researcher and one EMCR, is responsible for overseeing MUSQ:Impact and organising regular activities, including a monthly webinar series, a mentor/mentee scheme, annual group research retreats, annual infographic competition, and funding awards. An evaluation survey found that most participants perceived each activity to be beneficial and of value to their research career and development. CONCLUSION: This paper presents the structure of national training and mentoring programme that serves as a potential template for other research teams to adapt within their own contexts.

"I felt uncertain about my whole future"-a qualitative investigation of people's experiences of navigating uncertainty when seeking care for their low back pain.

ABSTRACT: Uncertainty pervades low back pain (LBP). This study aimed to explore individuals' experiences of navigating uncertainty when seeking care for their LBP, with a view to better understanding the contexts in which they experience uncertainty and gaining insight into how uncertainty may be better navigated during clinical encounters. We conducted 15 semistructured interviews with people who have experienced LBP. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Analysis produced 4 themes. To reflect the unsettled nature of participants' discussions of navigating uncertainty, themes are framed as questions: (1) What will happen over time?; (2) Can clinicians help me? Are they willing to?; (3) What are clinicians talking about?; and (4) Am I being taken seriously? Participants also discussed how clinicians could better navigate these uncertainties. Suggestions included making time to (actively) listen to, and acknowledge, patients' concerns; asking open-ended questions; being honest about uncertainty; creating management plans and returning to them; challenging assumptions; remaining curious about patients' context; and providing guidance on how to manage LBP rather than simply giving certainty that symptoms will worsen, lessen, or continue. These findings indicate that many of the uncertainties individuals with LBP experience are intertwined with relational aspects of their interactions with clinicians. Clinicians therefore may need to consider these broader and relational aspects of care when navigating uncertainty with people who experience LBP, bringing attention to the importance of drawing from knowledge produced outside of the usual hierarchy of evidence (eg, systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials).

"It's just as remarkable as being left-handed, isn't it?": exploring normativity through Australian physiotherapists' perspectives of working with LGBTQIA+ patients.

INTRODUCTION: Individuals identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual and other related identities (LGBTQIA+) experience challenges with healthcare, including physiotherapy. To understand potential contributions to poor experiences, this study explored physiotherapists' experiences and perspectives about working with members of LGBTQIA+ communities. METHODS: This study employed a qualitative research design, suitable for exploring the experiences and perspectives of individuals within the physiotherapy context. The sample consisted of physiotherapists working in Australia who participated in a larger survey study. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews which were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was conducted using a relativistic and queer theoretical framework with a reflexive thematic approach. RESULTS: Eighteen physiotherapists with diverse sexual orientations participated in the interviews. While all participants identified as women or men, not all used binary gender pronouns. Five key themes were developed: 1) "anti-discrimination" regarding choice of language and providing safe environments; 2) "current and historical discrimination" against LGBTQIA+ individuals; 3) "taking an equality approach" when working with LGBTQIA+ patients; 4) "knowledge of LGBTQIA+ health" in a broad sense and specifically with transgender and gender-diverse people; and 5) "managing own reactions" with respect to individual biases and discomfort. CONCLUSION: Underpinning all themes was the overarching concept of cis/hetero/endonormativity. Assuming normativity when working with LGBTQIA+ patients, is likely to have negative effects on patients' mental health, the therapeutic relationship and quality of care. In order to improve diversity, safety, inclusion and equity of care for LGBTQIA+ individuals, it is vital that normativity within physiotherapy is challenged.

Exploring physiotherapy education in Australia from the perspective of Muslim women physiotherapy students.

BACKGROUND: Despite Australia's multiculturalism, physiotherapists from minority ethnic groups, including Muslim women, may experience social exclusion in physiotherapy training based on research in other countries. OBJECTIVE: Explore Muslim women's experiences of physiotherapy education in Australia and how these experiences could be improved (if needed). METHODS: Qualitative research approach. Data were produced through semi-structured interviews and analyzed with reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Eleven participants were interviewed. Four main themes were produced: 1) omnipresent concerns about disrobing, physical proximity and touch in mixed-gender settings; 2) physiotherapy seen as a culturally inappropriate profession for Muslim women; 3) prevalence of an "Aussie" student environment; and 4) lack of systemic inclusivity. Suggestions to improve inclusivity, involved: systemically embedding measures such as alternatives for disrobing and proximity between genders; and promoting diverse social activities. CONCLUSION: Results suggest Australian physiotherapy education lacks systemic cultural sensitivity for Muslim women. To reduce the burden for change being placed on Muslim women students, culturally responsive institutional protocols and staff training could be established.

Physiotherapists vary in their knowledge of and approach to working with patients who are LGBTQIA+: a qualitative study.

QUESTION: What are the attitudes, beliefs and knowledge gaps of physiotherapists in Australia regarding working with patients who identify as LGBTQIA+? DESIGN: Qualitative design using a custom online survey. PARTICIPANTS: Physiotherapists currently practising in Australia. METHODS: Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 273 participants met the eligibility criteria. Participating physiotherapists were predominantly female (73%), aged between 22 and 67 years, residing in a large Australian city (77%) and working in musculoskeletal physiotherapy (57%), in private practice (50%) and hospital (33%) settings. Almost 6% self-identified as part of the LGBTQIA+ community. Only 4% of the participants had received training related to healthcare interactions or cultural safety for working with patients who identify as LGBTQIA+ in the context of physiotherapy. Three main themes regarding approaches to physiotherapy management were identified: treating the whole person in context, treating everyone the same, and treating the body part. Gaps in knowledge were primarily related to understandings of the relevance of sexual orientation and gender identity to physiotherapy and health issues specific to LGBTQIA+ patients. CONCLUSION: Physiotherapists can be considered to approach gender identity and sexual orientation in three distinct ways and suggest a range of knowledge and attitudes about working with patients who identify as LGBTQIA+. Physiotherapists who consider gender identity and sexual orientation to be relevant to physiotherapy consultations appear to have higher levels of knowledge and understanding of this topic and may also understand physiotherapy as multifactorial and not only biomedical.

Towards an ethical multiplicity in low back pain care: Practising beyond the biopsychosocial model.

The biopsychosocial model is currently considered by most researchers and clinicians to be the best approach to low back pain (LBP) care. The model was popularised in LBP care in response to some clear deficiencies in earlier biomedical approaches and is now widely recommended in clinical guidelines and policy statements. Yet the biopsychosocial approach has also been critiqued for its narrow conceptualisation and application. In this article, we explore how attending to the multidimensionality of LBP in practice goes beyond a biopsychosocial approach. We engaged with 90 ethnographic observations of clinical practices, 22 collaborative dialogues with clinicians, and eight consultatory meetings with people with experience of LBP to consider the sociomaterialities of clinical practices in two settings: a private physiotherapy practice and a public multidisciplinary pain clinic. Drawing on the work of Annemarie Mol and Rosi Braidotti, our analyses suggest that sociomaterial practices, involving human and non-human actors, produced multiple objects of clinical attention and ethical concerns about how to attend to this multiplicity well. We argue that the multiplicity of LBP is attended well by reimagining: (1) clinical settings as 'becoming more-than-sterile environments' where objects, furniture and elements such as tears and laughter help to provide a relational, welcoming and comfortable space to all bodies with LBP; (2) differences through 'becoming minoritarian' where considering power relations allows actions towards connectiveness and belonging; and (3) disciplinary boundaries through 'becoming interdisciplinary within' where actions expand traditional scopes of practice. The flux of these multiple becomings moves clinical practice and conceptualisations beyond the biopsychosocial approach to consider a new ethico-onto-epistemological approach to LBP care. They invite clinical practices that engage with an ethical multiplicity of LBP care, providing a better understanding of how places, objects, emotions, power, bodies and professions are interconnected and come together in everyday practice.

The ubiquity of uncertainty in low back pain care.

Despite clinicians being important actors in the context of uncertainty, their experiences navigating uncertainty remain largely unexplored. Drawing on a theory-driven post-qualitative approach, we used Mol's logic of choice/care as a lens through which we made sense of interviews with 22 clinicians who work with patients who experience low back pain (LBP). Our analysis suggests that uncertainty is ubiquitous in LBP care and not limited to particular domains. Clinicians navigated uncertainty when considering patients' personal and social contexts; making therapeutic decisions; navigating emotions and mental health; communicating with, and educating, patients, among others. These uncertainties are intertwined with clinical aspects such as treatment choices and evidence-based education about LBP. At times, clinicians resolved these uncertainties by producing certainty at the cost of attending to human aspects of care. We argue that epistemic shifts, theorisation and practical engagement with theory in training, research and clinical practice may prompt clinicians to embrace uncertainty and enact the logic of care.

Reciprocity in Low Back Pain Care and Its Role in Power Dynamics: A Give-and-Take Approach.

OBJECTIVE: The shift toward patient-centered care in physical therapy fostered a deeper consideration of power-sharing in clinical interactions. Elements of reciprocity may enhance such power considerations between physical therapist and patients, but there has been little investigation into how reciprocity is enacted in physical therapy, its value, and how to improve it if required. This study investigates forms of reciprocity during physical therapist-patient interactions in low back pain (LBP) care with the aim of enhancing patient-centered approaches. METHODS: The qualitative design involved (1) ethnographic observations at a fee-for-service practice in Australia, and (2) reflexive discussions between researchers and participating clinicians. To understand reciprocity, the analysis drew from the concepts of "accepting'"(or "blocking") "offers" that have been previously applied to physical therapy interactions. The analysis is a sub-study using a larger dataset and analyses in which we partnered with physical therapists and people living with LBP. RESULTS: Forty-nine observations and 13 reflexive discussions were undertaken with 42 people with LBP and 10 physical therapists. Analysis developed 3 themes suggesting that forms of reciprocity depended on physical therapists accepting or blocking patients' offers, inviting patients to make an offer, and offering personal stories. These elements of reciprocity are relevant to power-sharing during interactions and may impact patient-centered care. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that attending to forms of reciprocity can help physical therapists shift power in clinical interactions. By inviting and accepting "offers," physical therapists may build collaborative interactions, support individuals to guide the treatment narrative, and shift away from biomedically centered management approaches. Such recommendations create reciprocal environments that might enhance patient-centered care. IMPACT: This is one of the few studies to explore how reciprocity is enacted in interactions between physical therapists and s with LBP. Our findings highlight how engaging with the concept of reciprocity could assist with sharing power, improving physical therapist-patient relationships, and enhancing patient-centered care.

Supporting sexuality after spinal cord injury: a scoping review of non-medical approaches.

PURPOSE: There has been a significant focus on medical interventions to improve sexual function and support other aspects of sexuality after spinal cord injury. However, it is not well understood what non-medical approaches are described within existing literature. This study sought to identify, summarise and describe existing literature on non-medical approaches to sexuality following spinal cord injury. METHOD: This scoping review included studies identified by systematic searching of 10 databases. Findings were thematically analysed in order to summarise and report the results. RESULTS: Thirty articles met the inclusion criteria. Three themes were identified, including: the importance of individuality and timing, the health care professional role, and, provision of non-medical interventions and strategies. Analyses suggested the importance of providing individualised client-centred care and utilising a team approach. Many non-medical interventions and strategies were identified; however, most studies discussed that information provided and/or access to information is limited. CONCLUSION: Although non-medical approaches may be used in practice, provision of support appears to be limited with no consistent approach. Practice implications include the importance of addressing individualised factors, broadening scope of practice, and increasing the resources available for clients and professionals.Implications for rehabilitationNon-medical approaches to support sexuality after a spinal cord injury exist, however, there appears to be no consistent approach.Individualised person-centred care which addresses personal factors and includes intimate partners is essential when supporting sexuality.The health care professional team should seek to address the wider understanding of sexuality which extends beyond a purely medical focus.More sexuality resources and training should be available for both people with spinal cord injuries and health care professionals.

Sexuality Support After Spinal Cord Injury: What is Provided in Australian Practice Settings?: Sexuality Support After Spinal Cord Injury.

This study sought to understand what sexuality support Australian health professionals currently provide to people with spinal cord injury (SCI) and their perspectives on what changes may better support the sexuality needs of people with SCI. Australian Health professionals who had worked with people with SCI within the last 10 years were invited to participate in an online survey. Results were analyzed using content analysis and descriptive statistics. The 39 participants were from a range of health professions including medical, allied health, nursing, and peer support. Participants worked in various service settings, with the highest frequency in the community (33%) or inpatient rehabilitation (28%). Analysis indicated 85% of participants had provided sexuality support, however this provision was rarely routine. Discussing sexuality education topics were reported to be routinely provided for less than 16% of participants. Overall, 32% of participants felt sexuality was addressed 'not well at all' in their workplace. Qualitative analysis of open-ended responses produced five themes: barriers to supporting sexuality, health professionals require training, utilizing a team approach, responsibility to initiate conversation, and involving others in support. Barriers to provision included stigma and lack of education. Commonly suggested strategies to improve practice included: increasing sexuality training, utilizing a team approach, initiating the conversation of sexuality early, and consensual inclusion of significant others in sexuality support. The results therefore indicate sexuality support is not routinely provided to people with SCI and findings suggest a need for sexuality training, utilizing a team approach, initiating the conversation, and including significant others.