Kidney transplantation in HIV-positive patients treated with a steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen.

One of the main concerns associated with renal transplantation in HIV-infected patients is the high risk of acute rejection, which makes physicians reluctant to use steroid-free immunosuppressive therapy in this subset of patients. However, steroid therapy increases cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to define the efficacy of a steroid-sparing regimen in HIV-infected renal transplant recipients. Thirteen HIV-infected patients were consecutively transplanted. The induction therapy consisted of basiliximab and methylprednisolone for 5 days followed by a calcineurin inhibitor plus mycophenolate acid. The mean follow-up was 50 ± 22 months. Eight patients (61.5%) experienced acute rejection, and 75% of the first episodes occurred within 2 months after transplantation. The probability of first acute rejection was 58% after 1 year and 69% after 4 years. Seven of eight patients recovered or maintained their kidney function after antirejection therapy and steroid resumption. At the last follow-up, seven of 13 patients (54%) had resumed steroid therapy. The 4-year patient and graft survivals were 100% and 88.9%, respectively. The benefits of this steroid-free regimen in HIV-infected renal recipients must be reconsidered because of the high rate of acute rejection. New immunosuppressive steroid-free strategies should be identi-fied in this set of patients.

Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine for early steroid withdrawal after renal transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: This study compares cyclosporine (CsA) with tacrolimus (Tac) in preventing acute rejection (AR) after steroid withdrawal (SW) 5 days after renal transplantation (Tx). METHODS: The data were collected from 2 prospective sequential studies carried out from February 2002 to May 2006. Forty-nine patients received CsA, 56 patients Tac. Rapamycin (Rapa) was added to both calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). The studies were homogeneous regarding both clinical procedures and patient demographics. RESULTS: Three years after SW, Tac was more effective than CsA in reducing the risk both of AR (35% vs. 53%; p<0.06) and mainly of relapses (9% vs. 33%; p<0.007). In addition, Tac enabled more patients to go onto a steroid-free regime (88% vs. 65%; p<0.01). No difference arose concerning the timing of AR, graft function, CNI withdrawal, incidence of side effects or patient and graft survival rates. In both groups, rejection after SW was associated with a worse graft function. CONCLUSIONS: Tac was more effective than CsA in preventing AR after early SW, and increased significantly patient probability of maintaining a steroid-free regime. In this setting, Tac and CsA had the same safety profile. However, a follow-up longer than 3 years might be needed to estimate the consequences of the higher rate of AR encountered under CsA therapy.

Early (fifth day) vs. late (sixth month) steroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients treated with Neoral(®) plus Rapamune(®): four-yr results of a randomized monocenter study.

The most advisable timing for steroid withdrawal (CSWD) after renal transplantation (Tx) is still an open issue. This randomized study has compared early CSWD (at day 5) with late (at month 6) in patients under Neoral + Sirolimus. The primary end point was the percentage of success in CSWD at month 48. Ninety-six transplants from deceased donors were randomized to withdraw steroids either early (n = 49) or late (n = 47). At four yr, the two strategies were comparable for: success in CSWD (65% in both), graft survival (95% and 98%), patient survival (92% and 96%) creatininemia (1.7 ± 0.3 and 1.6 ± 0.4 mg/dL), side effects, being still on Sirolimus + Neoral (69% and 74%), reversibility of rejection (AR) (all cases), severity of AR (grade 1A/1B: 81% and 63%). The major differences were incidence of AR: at month twelve (48% vs. 30%, p < 0.04), at 48 (53% and 33%, p < 0.03); timing of AR (72 ± 86 d vs. 202 ± 119 d, p < 0.0001). The timing of CSWD influences neither the rate of successful CSWD nor the long-term results. However, early suspension causes a higher AR rate, mostly arising within month one, but always responsive to steroids. Yet, the early appearance of AR can make patient management easier and safer.

Steroid withdrawal five days after renal transplantation allows for the prevention of wound-healing complications associated with sirolimus therapy.

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus (SRL) can increase the risk of wound complications. In this study, we investigated the impact of steroids when added to SRL, in this side effect. METHODS: One hundred and forty-eight patients entered prospective studies comparing early (fifth day) with late (sixth month) steroid withdrawal. All patients were on SRL, added either to Tacrolimus (n = 56) or to cyclosporine (n = 97). At 15th day after transplantation, 68 patients were on steroids (On-St group) and 80 were not (Off-St group). Wound complications considered were as follows: dehiscence, lymphocele, wound leakage, hematoma and seromas. Risk factors under analysis were as follows: body mass index, diabetes, rejection, creatininemia, length of dialysis before transplantation, recipient age, being on steroids at 15th day, SRL levels. RESULTS: The overall incidence of wound complications was significantly lower in Off-St group than in On-St group: 18.8% vs. 45.6%, respectively (p < 0.0004). In detail, lymphocele: 5.0% vs. 32.3% (p < 0.0001); dehiscence 0% vs. 10.3% (p < 0.009), leakage 6.2% vs. 8.8% (p = NS), seromas 1.4% vs. 7.5% (NS). At multivariate analysis, the addition of steroids to SRL increases 4.2-fold the risk for wound complications. CONCLUSIONS: Early steroid withdrawal is effective in preventing both the incidence and the severity of wound-healing complications because of SRL regime, even when started with a loading dose.

Steroid-free immunosuppression regime reduces both long-term cardiovascular morbidity and patient mortality in renal transplant recipients.

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the impact of steroid therapy on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and patient mortality, in 486 on-CsA renal transplant recipients, with a follow-up of 9.5 +/- 4.3 yr. Two hundred and one patients had their steroids permanently withdrawn at sixth month after transplantation (G1); 285 patients did not (G2) as they were unable (acute rejection after suspension) or unsuitable (because of clinical criteria or immunosuppressive protocols). The CVD considered were coronary artery disease diagnosed by angiography and myocardial infarction. G1 and G2 patients were well-matched regarding CVD risk factors, except for age (G1: 44 +/- 14 yr; G2: 40 +/- 12 yr; p < 0.003), incidence of male (G1: 62%; G2: 72%, p < 0.02) incidence of acute rejection (G1: 39%; G2: 83%, p < 0.0001). Both CVD and deaths occurring during the first year of transplantation were excluded from the analysis. At 20 yr, the cumulative probability of developing a CVD, was 3.8% in G1; 23.8% in G2 (p < 0.0005). Patient survival rate was 95% in G1; 62% in G2 (p < 0.003). Mortality caused by CVD was higher in G2 (4.2% vs. 0.5%; p < 0.03). The Cox analysis identified in steroid therapy the main independent risk factors for both CVD (hazard ratio 9.56 p < 0.0001) and patient mortality (hazard ratio 5.99, p < 0.0001). At 10th and 15th year after transplantation, the mean-daily dose of steroids was 4.2 mg. In the long-term, steroid therapy, even in low-doses, increases significantly both the rate of CVD and patient mortality. This retrospective study suggests that steroid-free regime should always be recommended for the prevention of post-transplant CVD. This relevant statement should be followed by a long-term prospective study.

Transplantation outcome in patients on PD and HD.

In the past, peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been considered a second choice dialysis modality for many aspects and that negative attitude has been extended also to possible negative effects on renal transplantation. In the last years, many papers have faced the question whether PD could attain similar results in renal transplantation as hemodialysis and there is sufficient evidence to answer that question. On the short time after transplantation, patients coming PD have lower prevalence of delayed graft function than hemodialysis patients, but higher prevalence of renal vascular thrombosis, above all in children. Incidence of acute graft rejection is not different between the two dialysis modalities. The long-term outcome of renal transplantation is similar in patients coming from either PD or hemodialysis.

Outcome of pregnancy after organ transplantation: a retrospective survey in Italy.

The number of women who decide to have a child after organ transplantation has increased. We determined the outcomes of 67 pregnancies of women who had undergone kidney, liver or heart transplantation. All recipients had been maintained on immunosuppressive therapy before and during pregnancy. Pregnancy complications at term were observed in 17 out of 67 women (25%), hypertension being the most frequent complication (16.17%). Two transplant rejections were reported. Sixty-eight infants were delivered (including one pair of twins); five women had two pregnancies at term. Twenty-eight miscarriages (29.2%) were recorded. Of these 68 babies (including the pair of twins), 40 (58.8%) were born at term and 28 (41.2%) before term. The babies were followed-up for 2 months to 13 years. According to our previous experience, our study shows that patients who have undergone organ transplantation can give birth to healthy infants as long as they are monitored accurately during pregnancy.

Neoral dose adjustment after conversion from C0 to C2 monitoring in stable renal transplant recipients: a prospective single center study.

To determine the clinical impact of conversion from C0 to C2 Neoral monitoring, we conducted a 6-month prospective study in 62 stable renal transplant recipients. Neoral was given alone (19%), with steroids (31%), combined with azathioprine (Aza) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (50%). C0 and C2 target ranges were, respectively, 130-190 and 700-900 ng/mL. Neoral dosages were adjusted according to the C2 range. At baseline, mean C0 and C2 were 157 and 762 ng/mL. After 6 months C0 was 173 ng/mL (p<0.02) and C2 was 804 ng/mL (ns). Although the mean Neoral dose at 6 months was unchanged from baseline, the dose was reduced in 24 patients from 3.6+/-1.2 to 3.0+/-0.9 mg/kg/day, with a mean reduction in serum creatinine (Cr) from 1.4+/-0.4 to 1.3+/-0.3 mg/dL (p<0.001), stable in 8 patients and increased in 30 patients from 3.3+/-1.0 to 3.8+/-1.2 mg/kg/day with no change in serum Cr. Serum transaminases and blood pressure (BP) were unchanged in the three groups. C0 and C2 showed a positive correlation, but with a large dispersion of values (r2=0.14, p<0.001). Overall concordance between the C0 and C2 ranges was 49%. Therefore, in stable transplant patients C0 cannot be considered a C2 surrogate. The conversion from C0 to C2 led to a Neoral dose reduction in approximately 40% of patients with significant improvement in renal function. Most of the remaining patients required an increased dose; however, without an increased incidence of cyclosporin-induced side-effects.

Severe pancytopenia and hemophagocytosis after HHV-8 primary infection in a renal transplant patient successfully treated with foscarnet.

We report the occurrence of human herpesvirus (HHV)-8 primary infection in an adult male kidney recipient. Four months after transplantation, the patient developed visceral Kaposi sarcoma, and 1 month later he presented with progressive and severe peripheral cytopenia, in the presence of a normocellular or hypercellular bone marrow (BM) with hemophagocytosis. HHV-8 was the sole pathogen detected by polymerase chain reaction either in the serum or in the BM. HHV-8 latent nuclear antigen was detected in immature progenitor cells from the BM. Immunosuppressive therapy was reduced, and the patient was treated with foscarnet for 2 weeks, leading to a dramatic normalization of blood cell counts, concomitantly with the disappearance of HHV-8 viremia. At the end of antiviral therapy, the patient received chemotherapy, and Kaposi sarcoma regressed in 2 months. Severe peripheral cytopenia may be a posttransplant complication after HHV-8 infection, for which treatment with foscarnet seems appropriate.