Cosyntropin Stimulation Testing is More Selective than Postoperative Day 1 Basal Cortisol for Diagnosing Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency After Unilateral Adrenalectomy.

BACKGROUND: Secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI) may occur in patients after unilateral adrenalectomy for adrenal-dependent hypercortisolism (HC) or primary aldosteronism (PA). This study aimed to assess whether postoperative day (POD) 1 basal cortisol was predictive of an abnormal cosyntropin stimulation test (CST) result and the need for glucocorticoid replacement (GR). METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy for HC, PA, or both between September 2014 and September 2022 was performed. On POD1, CST was performed for all the patients with HC, and before 2021 for all the patients with PA. The patients with an abnormal CST result were deemed at risk of SAI and discharged with GR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to evaluate the sensitivity (SN) and specificity (SP) of basal cortisol thresholds to predict an abnormal CST result. RESULTS: The patients underwent unilateral adrenalectomy for overt hypercortisolism (OH; n = 42), mild autonomous cortisol excess (MACE; n = 70), mixed PA/HC (n = 22), or PA (n = 73). On POD1, CST was performed for 152 patients (93% OH, 96% MACE,73% PA/HC, 41% PA), and 80 patients (53%) had SAI (67% OH, 55% MACE, 44% PA/HC, 33% PA). The SN and SP of a basal cortisol level of 10 µg/dL or lower to predict an abnormal CST were respectively 92% and 77% for OH, 94% and 73% for MACE, 100% and 85% for PA, and 100% and 67% for PA/HC. The optimal basal cortisol level for predicting an abnormal CST for patients with PA or PA/HC was 5 µg/dL or lower (SN/SP, 100%). CONCLUSIONS: After unilateral adrenalectomy for HC, PA, or mixed PA/HC, POD1 CST improved identification of patients at risk for SAI compared with basal cortisol levels alone. The authors recommend that POD1 CST be performed to determine the risk for SAI and the need for postoperative GR after unilateral adrenalectomy for patients with HC.

From Alpha to Omicron and Beyond: Associations Between SARS-CoV-2 Variants and Surgical Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly influenced surgical practices, with SARS-CoV-2 variants presenting unique pathologic profiles and potential impacts on perioperative outcomes. This study explores associations between Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2 and surgical outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the National COVID Cohort Collaborative database, which included patients who underwent selected major inpatient surgeries within eight weeks post-SARS-CoV-2 infection from January 2020 to April 2023. The viral variant was determined by the predominant strain at the time of the patient's infection. Multivariable logistic regression models explored the association between viral variants, COVID-19 severity, and 30-d major morbidity or mortality. RESULTS: The study included 10,617 surgical patients with preoperative COVID-19, infected by the Alpha (4456), Delta (1539), and Omicron (4622) variants. Patients infected with Omicron had the highest vaccination rates, most mild disease, and lowest 30-d morbidity and mortality rates. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that Omicron was linked to a reduced likelihood of adverse outcomes compared to Alpha, while Delta showed odds comparable to Alpha. Inclusion of COVID-19 severity in the model rendered the odds of major morbidity or mortality equal across all three variants. CONCLUSIONS: Our study examines the associations between the clinical and pathological characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 variants and surgical outcomes. As novel SARS-CoV-2 variants emerge, this research supports COVID-19-related surgical policy that assesses the severity of disease to estimate surgical outcomes.

Association of Daily Step Count and Postoperative Complication among All of Us Research Participants.

BACKGROUND: The association between preoperative wearable device step counts and surgical outcomes has not been examined using commercial devices linked to electronic health records (EHR). This study measured the association between daily preoperative step counts and postoperative complications. STUDY DESIGN: Data was obtained using the All of Us (AOU) Research program, a nationwide initiative to collect EHR and health-related data from the population. Included were patients who underwent a surgical procedure included in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) targeted procedures dataset. Excluded were patients who did not have available physical activity FitBit data. Primary outcome was the development of a postoperative complication. All analyses were performed in the AOU researcher workbench. RESULTS: Of 27,150 patients who underwent a surgical procedure, 475 participants with preoperative wearable data were included. 74.7% were female and 85.2% were White. The average age was 57.2 years. The overall rate of postoperative complications was 12.6%. Patients averaging fewer than 7,500 daily steps were at increased odds for developing a postoperative complication (OR 1.83, 95% CI [1.01, 3.31]). Following adjustment for age, sex, race, comorbid disease, body mass index (BMI), and relative procedure risk, patients with a baseline average steps/day < 7,500 were at increased odds for postoperative complication (aOR = 2.06, 95% CI [1.05, 4.06]). CONCLUSIONS: This study found an increase in overall postoperative complication rate in patients recording lower average preoperative step counts. Patients with a baseline of less than 7,500 steps per day had increased odds of postoperative complications in this cohort. This data supports the use of wearable devices for surgical risk stratification and suggests step count may measure preoperative fitness.

Syndromes of Concurrent Hypertension, Diastolic Dysfunction, and Pulmonary or Peripheral Edema in Cardio-Oncology: Case Studies, Literature Review, and New Classification System.

OPINION STATEMENT: Individuals who have ever been diagnosed with cancer are at increased risk for cardiovascular conditions during and after cancer treatment. Especially during cancer treatment, cardiovascular conditions can manifest in many ways, including peripheral or pulmonary edema. Edema can indicate volume overload affecting the heart even without other unequivocal evidence of apparent diastolic or systolic left ventricular dysfunction, particularly at rest. We propose a novel algorithm to streamline the diagnostic evaluation and cardiovascular classification for cancer patients with edema. We initially advise prompt evaluation with a chest X-ray and echocardiogram. We then suggest classification into one of five categories based on the timing of presentation of edema relative to cancer treatment, as well as echocardiography results and the presence or absence of hypertension or lymphatic causes of edema. This classification tool can then be utilized to guide further cardiovascular management suggestions. These concurrent syndromes presenting as edema may indicate the development or aggravation of undiagnosed diastolic dysfunction with or without hypertension, even if transiently present only while on cancer treatment.