RESUMEN
Introduction: Hemodialysis (HD) units require large quantities of water. To reduce water consumption without compromising the adequacy and safety of dialysis, we studied a novel HD prescription with high temperature and low flow dialysate. Methods: This was a single-center nonrandomized open-label cross-over pilot trial in patients with end-stage kidney disease on maintenance HD. Each participant was subjected to 3 different dialysis prescriptions for 1 month each as follows: (i) normal temperature with normal flow dialysate (NTNF prescription), (ii) high temperature with normal flow dialysate (HTNF prescription), and (iii) high temperature with low flow dialysate (HTLF prescription). The primary outcome, assessed at the end of each dialysis session, was the delivery of "adequate" dialysis, as defined by a single-pool Kt/V (spKt/V) ≥1.2. Outcomes were evaluated by comparing the NTNF and HTLF prescriptions. Results: A total of 863 sessions of HD were performed in 30 patients over 3 months, with 287 to 288 sessions in each of the 3 dialysis prescriptions. The primary outcome was not significantly different between the NTNF prescription (202 sessions [70.14%]) and the HTLF prescription (198 sessions [68.75%]) (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.52; P = 0.45). The mean spKt/V and urea reduction ratio (URR) were not significantly different. Clinically evident hemodynamic instability occurred in only 1 dialysis session in the HTNF prescription. Conclusion: Increasing dialysate temperature while reducing dialysate flow rate (QD) can be used as a water conservation strategy without compromising the adequacy and safety of dialysis in young and hemodynamically stable patients. Reducing the QD from 500 ml/min to 300 ml/min reduces water consumption by 40%.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In this observational study, we describe the change in the clinical profile and outcome of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) over the course of the outbreak, among patients requiring dialysis, including chronic haemodialysis therapy. METHODS: This is a single-centre prospective observational study of patients with COVID-19 (as confirmed by RT-PCR) and renal failure requiring haemodialysis. Their clinical profiles and outcomes were analysed, vis-à-vis the changing disease severity. FINDINGS: A total of 483 patients were included, of whom 416 had end-stage renal disease and were on maintenance haemodialysis. Patients who were symptomatic at presentation had significantly higher levels of Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p < 0.001), C-reactive protein (CRP) (p < 0.001), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (p < 0.001), higher degrees of lung involvement (p < 0.001) and required more respiratory support (p < 0.001). The overall mortality observed was 18.8%. In the late phases of the outbreak, there was a significant increase in disease severity without a statistically significant increase in mortality. Predictors of mortality on univariate analysis were age, diabetes mellitus, acute on chronic kidney disease, presence of symptoms on admission, NLR, CRP, LDH, computed tomography (CT) chest grades 3 and 4, and need for respiratory support; however, only age and the renal syndrome of acute on chronic kidney disease retained significance on multivariate analysis (p0.003 and p0.019, respectively). CONCLUSION: Among patients on haemodialysis, higher mortality was observed in patients who were older, and among those with acute on chronic kidney disease. In the late phase of the outbreak, there was a statistically significant increase in disease severity without a corresponding increase in mortality.