Validated Calculators Predicting Cesarean Delivery After Induction: Accuracy in an External Population.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of two previously published calculators in predicting cesarean delivery after induction of labor in an external population. METHODS: This was a cohort study including all nulliparous pregnant patients with singleton, term, vertex fetuses; intact membranes; and unfavorable cervices who underwent induction of labor between 2015 and 2017 at an academic tertiary care institution. Individual predicted cesarean risk scores were calculated with two previously published calculators. For each calculator, patients were stratified into three risk groups (lower, middle, and upper thirds) of approximately equivalent size. Predicted and observed incidences of cesarean delivery were compared with two-tailed binomial tests of probability in the overall population and in each risk group. RESULTS: A total of 846 patients met inclusion criteria, and 262 (31.0%) had cesarean deliveries, which was significantly lower than overall predicted rates of 40.0% and 36.2% with the two calculators (both P <.01). Both calculators significantly overestimated risk of cesarean delivery in higher risk tertiles (all P <.05). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic for both calculators were 0.57 or less in the overall population and in each risk group, suggesting poor predictive value. Higher predicted risk tertile in both calculators was not associated with any maternal or neonatal outcomes except wound infection. CONCLUSION: Both previously published calculators had poor performance in this population, with neither calculator accurately predicting the incidence of cesarean delivery. Patients and health care professionals might be discouraged regarding trial of labor induction by falsely high predicted risk-of-cesarean scores. We caution against widespread implementation of these calculators without further population-specific refinement and adjustment.

Contraceptive counseling and choices in pregnancies with maternal cardiac disease.

OBJECTIVE: Unplanned pregnancies in women with maternal cardiac disease (MCD) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but the majority of these individuals do not use highly reliable contraception on postpartum hospital discharge. Contraceptive counseling in this population outside of pregnancy is incomplete and counseling during pregnancy remains poorly characterized. Our objective was to evaluate the provision and quality of contraceptive counseling for individuals with MCD during pregnancy. METHODS: All individuals with MCD who delivered between 2008 and 2021 at a tertiary care institution with a multidisciplinary cardio-obstetrics team were sent a 27-question survey. A subset of questions were derived from the validated Interpersonal Quality in Family Planning (IQFP) survey, which emphasizes interpersonal connection, adequate information, and decision support for the individual. Each participant received a $15 gift card for survey completion. We performed chart review for clinical and demographic details, including cardiac risk score. RESULTS: Of 522 individuals to whom the survey was sent, 133 responded and met inclusion criteria. Overall, 67% discussed contraception with their general obstetrician, 36% with their maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) specialist, and 24% with their cardiologist. Compared to individuals with low cardiac risk scores, those with high cardiac risk scores had a nonsignificant trend toward being more likely to discuss contraception with a MFM provider (52% vs 33%, p = .08). 65% reported that their provider was 'excellent' or 'good' in all IQFP domains. Respondents valued providers who respected their autonomy and offered thorough counseling. Respondents disliked feeling pressured or uninformed about the safety of contraceptive options. CONCLUSION: Most individuals with MCD reported excellent contraceptive counseling during pregnancy. Additional work is needed to understand barriers to and enablers for effective, patient-centered contraceptive counseling and use in this population.

High-level correction of the sickle mutation is amplified in vivo during erythroid differentiation.

Background: A point mutation in sickle cell disease (SCD) alters one amino acid in the ß-globin subunit of hemoglobin, with resultant anemia and multiorgan damage that typically shortens lifespan by decades. Because SCD is caused by a single mutation, and hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) can be harvested, manipulated, and returned to an individual, it is an attractive target for gene correction. Results: An optimized Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) with an ssDNA oligonucleotide donor together generated correction of at least one ß-globin allele in more than 30% of long-term engrafting human HSCs. After adopting a high-fidelity Cas9 variant, efficient correction with minimal off-target events also was observed. In vivo erythroid differentiation markedly enriches for corrected ß-globin alleles, indicating that erythroblasts carrying one or more corrected alleles have a survival advantage. Significance: These findings indicate that the sickle mutation can be corrected in autologous HSCs with an optimized protocol suitable for clinical translation.