Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Bipolar Disord ; 15(7): 774-86, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23941660

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Bipolar I disorder is a disabling illness affecting 1% of people worldwide. Family and twin studies suggest that psychotic bipolar disorder (BDP) represents a homogeneous subgroup with an etiology distinct from non-psychotic bipolar disorder (BDNP) and partially shared with schizophrenia. Studies of auditory electrophysiology [e.g., paired-stimulus and oddball measured with electroencephalography (EEG)] consistently report deviations in psychotic groups (schizophrenia, BDP), yet such studies comparing BDP and BDNP are sparse and, in some cases, conflicting. Auditory EEG responses are significantly reduced in unaffected relatives of psychosis patients, suggesting that they may relate to both psychosis liability and expression. METHODS: While 64-sensor EEGs were recorded, age- and gender-matched samples of 70 BDP, 35 BDNP {20 with a family history of psychosis [BDNP(+)]}, and 70 psychiatrically healthy subjects were presented with typical auditory paired-stimuli and auditory oddball paradigms. RESULTS: Oddball P3b reductions were present and indistinguishable across all patient groups. P2s to paired stimuli were abnormal only in BDP and BDNP(+). Conversely, N1 reductions to stimuli in both paradigms and P3a reductions were present in both BDP and BDNP(-) groups but were absent in BDNP(+). CONCLUSIONS: Although nearly all auditory neural response components studied were abnormal in BDP, BDNP abnormalities at early- and mid-latencies were moderated by family psychosis history. The relationship between psychosis expression, heritable psychosis risk, and neurophysiology within bipolar disorder, therefore, may be complex. Consideration of such clinical disease heterogeneity may be important for future investigations of the pathophysiology of major psychiatric disturbance.


Asunto(s)
Corteza Auditiva/fisiopatología , Trastorno Bipolar/patología , Potenciales Relacionados con Evento P300/fisiología , Familia , Estimulación Acústica , Adulto , Antidepresivos/farmacología , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Corteza Auditiva/efectos de los fármacos , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Bipolar/genética , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Análisis Discriminante , Electroencefalografía , Potenciales Relacionados con Evento P300/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis de Componente Principal , Trastornos Psicóticos/genética , Trastornos Psicóticos/psicología
2.
Biol Psychiatry ; 72(9): 766-74, 2012 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22572033

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reduced amplitude of the P300 event-related potential in auditory oddball tasks may characterize schizophrenia (SZ) but is also reported in bipolar disorder. Similarity of auditory processing abnormalities between these diagnoses is uncertain, given the frequent combination of both psychotic and nonpsychotic patients in bipolar samples; abnormalities may be restricted to psychosis. In addition, typically only latency and amplitude of brain responses at selected sensors and singular time points are used to characterize neural responses. Comprehensive quantification of brain activations involving both spatiotemporal and time-frequency analyses could better identify unique auditory oddball responses among patients with different psychotic disorders. METHODS: Sixty SZ, 60 bipolar I with psychosis (BPP), and 60 healthy subjects (H) were compared on neural responses during an auditory oddball task using multisensor electroencephalography. Principal components analysis was used to reduce multisensor data before evaluating group differences on voltage and frequency of neural responses over time. RESULTS: Linear discriminant analysis revealed five variables that best differentiated groups: 1) late beta activity to standard stimuli; 2) late beta/gamma activity to targets discriminated BPP from other groups; 3) midlatency theta/alpha activity to standards; 4) target-related voltage at the late N2 response discriminated both psychosis groups from H; and 5) target-related voltage during early N2 discriminated BPP from H. CONCLUSIONS: Although the P300 significantly differentiated psychotic groups from H, it did not uniquely discriminate groups beyond the above variables. No variable uniquely discriminated SZ, perhaps indicating utility of this task for studying psychosis-associated neurophysiology generally and BPP specifically.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar/fisiopatología , Ondas Encefálicas/fisiología , Potenciales Relacionados con Evento P300/fisiología , Esquizofrenia/fisiopatología , Psicología del Esquizofrénico , Estimulación Acústica/métodos , Estimulación Acústica/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Percepción Auditiva/fisiología , Trastorno Bipolar/psicología , Análisis Discriminante , Electroencefalografía/métodos , Electroencefalografía/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Componente Principal/métodos , Tiempo de Reacción/fisiología , Factores de Tiempo
3.
Psychophysiology ; 49(4): 522-30, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22176721

RESUMEN

Individuals with schizophrenia (SZ) or bipolar disorder with psychosis (BPP) may share neurophysiological abnormalities as measured in auditory paired-stimuli paradigms with electroencephalography (EEG). Such investigations have been limited, however, by quantifying only event-related potential peaks and/or broad frequency bands at limited scalp locations without considering possible mediating factors (e.g., baseline differences). Results from 64-sensor EEG collected in 180 age- and gender-matched participants reveal (i) accentuated prestimulus gamma oscillations and (ii) reduced P2 amplitudes and theta/alpha oscillations to S1 among participants with both SZ and BPP. Conversely, (iii) N1s in those with SZ to S1 were reduced compared to healthy volunteers and those with BPP, whereas (iv) beta range oscillations 200-300 ms following S2 were accentuated in those with BPP but not those with SZ. Results reveal a pattern of both unique and shared neurophysiological phenotypes occurring within major psychotic diagnoses.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar/psicología , Trastornos Psicóticos/psicología , Psicología del Esquizofrénico , Estimulación Acústica , Adolescente , Adulto , Percepción Auditiva/fisiología , Ritmo beta , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Análisis Discriminante , Electroencefalografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fenotipo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA