RESUMEN
Vial and syringe filling by peristaltic pump has been widely implemented by contract manufacturing organizations and biopharmaceutical companies. Fill volume is commonly considered as critical quality attribute related in aseptic filling process and the variation needs to be well controlled to guarantee the safety, efficacy and consistency of drug products. However, the criteria for justifying the filling variation and underlying mechanisms that affect the variability are not fully revealed quantitatively in the literatures. This study selected filling accuracy, filling process capability and filling precision as three criteria for evaluating the filling process performance with four statistical indexes: Relative Error Mean, Critical Control Limit (Cpk ≥ 1.33), Relative Standard Deviation and Relative Moving Range Mean. The impact of liquid properties, pump tubing sizes and pump settings on above indexes were investigated using a bench-top system with a peristatic pump and a high-precision balance. The results showed that the viscosity, target fill volume, pump tubing size, pump speed, acceleration/deceleration rate and suck-back had statistical significance on the fill volume variability. Definitive Screening Design was further applied to clarify and visualize the priorities and interaction impact of above factors on fill volume variability. Stepwise approach for fill volume variability optimization and control based on predictive models was established and verified for drug product solution with viscosity between 1-23 cp and target fill volume between 0.2-2.0 mL.
RESUMEN
High boron (B) stress degrades the soil environment and reduces plant productivity. Sugar beet has a high B demand and potential for remediation of B-toxic soils. However, the mechanism regarding the response of sugar beet plants and rhizosphere soil microbiome to high B stress is not clear. In the potted soil experiment, we set different soil effective B environments (0.5, 5, 10, 30, 50, and 100 mg kg-1) to study the growth status of sugar beets under different B concentrations, as well as the characteristics of soil enzyme activity and microbial community changes. The results showed that sugar beet growth was optimal at 5 mg kg-1 of B. Exceeding this concentration the tolerance index decreased. The injury threshold EC20 was reached at an available B concentration of 35.8 mg kg-1. Under the treatment of 100 mg kg-1, the B accumulation of sugar beet reached 0.22 mg plant-1, and the tolerance index was still higher than 60%, which had not yet reached the lethal concentration of sugar beet. The abundance of Acidobacteriota, Chloroflexi and Patescibacteria increased, which was beneficial to the resistance of sugar beet to high B stress. In summary, under high B stress sugar beet had strong tolerance, enhanced capacity for B uptake and enrichment, and changes in soil microbial community structure. This study provides a theoretical basis for clarifying the mechanism of sugar beet resistance to high B stress and soil remediation.