Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 2 de 2
1.
Can Fam Physician ; 65(10): e443-e452, 2019 Oct.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31604755

OBJECTIVE: To determine access to opioid agonist therapy (OAT) for those entering residential treatment for opioid use disorder; to report on treatment outcomes for those taking OAT and those not taking OAT; and to determine the association between OAT use and residential treatment completion. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with opioid use disorder admitted to publicly funded residential treatment programs in the province of Ontario between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Access to OAT during residential treatment using descriptive statistics. Treatment outcomes (ie, completed the program, voluntarily left early, involuntary discharged, and other) for the entire cohort and for the OAT and non-OAT groups using descriptive statistics. Association between OAT use at admission and treatment completion (a binary outcome) using bivariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: Among an identified cohort of 1910 patients with opioid use disorder, 52.8% entered programs that permitted access to OAT. Overall, 56.8% of patients completed treatment, 23.3% voluntarily left early (eg, were no-shows, dropped out), 17.0% were involuntarily discharged, and 2.9% were discharged early for other reasons. Those taking OAT were as likely to complete treatment as those not taking OAT (53.9% vs 57.5%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio of 1.07, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.38). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates 2 large gaps in care for patients with opioid use disorder. First, these patients have poor access to OAT-the first-line treatment of opioid use disorder-while in publicly funded residential treatment programs; and second, many are involuntarily discharged from treatment. Additionally, this study indicates that patients taking OAT have similar likelihood of completing residential treatment as those not taking OAT do. Limitations of this study are that it is based on observational data for patients who self-selected before admission to use OAT or not, and it is likely not all confounders were accounted for.


Analgesics, Opioid/agonists , Opiate Substitution Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Residential Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Retention in Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Methadone/therapeutic use , Ontario , Opiate Substitution Treatment/economics , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
2.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 20(7): 353-6, 2014 Oct.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25275760

BACKGROUNDS: Ramadan fast is a religious custom in Islam. Increased serum uric acid level during this month had been reported in past studies of nongout patients. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of Ramadan fast on patients with gout. METHODS: All Moslem patients with gout from the registry of Nazareth Hospital, who intended to fast during Ramadan, were asked to participate in our study (group 1). Data regarding age, gender, income, education, duration of gout, meds, adherence to low-purine diet, and gouty attacks were documented. Age- and gender matched Moslem patients from the same registry, but who did not intend to fast during Ramadan, were asked to participate as a control group (group 2). Just prior to and at the end of Ramadan, blood for uric acid, creatinine, and urea levels were obtained as well as body mass index, from all the patients. During Ramadan, patients were monitored for gouty arthritis or renal calculi attacks, as well as low-purine diet and medicine adherence. RESULTS: Twenty-one and 22 patients from groups 1 and 2, respectively, completed the study. Mean serum uric acid, urea, creatinine, and body mass index levels at the end of Ramadan fasts in group 1 patients were 8.11 mg/dL, 26.38 mmol/L, 0.87 mg/dL, and 31.0 kg/m, respectively, as compared with 7.92 mg/dL (P = 0.707), 24.54 mmol/L (P = 0.769), 0.84 mg/dL (P = 0.180), and 30.5 kg/m (P = 0.907) respectively, obtained just prior to the fast. No significant change in any parameter was seen also in group 2 patients. There also was no significant change between the 2 groups in arthritis or renal calculi attacks and also in medication and low-purine diet adherence, during Ramadan. CONCLUSIONS: There was no risk for a significant increase in gouty arthritic/renal calculi attacks or serum uric acid in patients with gout during Ramadan fast.


Fasting/physiology , Gout/blood , Gout/complications , Islam , Uric Acid/blood , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Allopurinol/therapeutic use , Body Mass Index , Case-Control Studies , Colchicine/therapeutic use , Creatinine/blood , Female , Gout/therapy , Gout Suppressants/therapeutic use , Humans , Israel , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Urea/blood
...