Scoring the Clinical Frailty Scale in the Emergency Department: The Home FIRsT Experience.

We evaluated predictors of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) scored by an interdisciplinary team (Home FIRsT) performing comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in our Emergency Department (ED). This was a retrospective observational study (service evaluation) utilising ED-based CGA data routinely collected by Home FIRsT between January and October 2020. A linear regression model was computed to establish independent predictors of CFS. This was complemented by a classification and regression tree (CRT) to evaluate the main predictors. There were 799 Home FIRsT episodes, of which 740 were unique patients. The CFS was scored on 658 (89%) (median 4, range 1-8; mean age 81 years, 61% women). Independent predictors of higher CFS were older age (p<0.001), history of dementia (p<0.001), mobility (p≤0.007), disability (p<0.001), and higher acuity of illness (p=0.009). Disability and mobility were the main classifiers in the CRT. Results suggest appropriate CFS scoring informed by functional baseline.

Home FIRsT: interdisciplinary geriatric assessment and disposition outcomes in the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Older people in the Emergency Department (ED) are clinically heterogenous and some presentations may be better suited to alternative out-of-hospital pathways. A new interdisciplinary comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) team (Home FIRsT) was embedded in our acute hospital's ED in 2017. AIM: To evaluate if routinely collected CGA metrics were associated with ED disposition outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: We included all first patients seen by Home FIRsT between 7th May and 19th October 2018. Collected measures were sociodemographic, baseline frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale), major diagnostic categories, illness acuity (Manchester Triage Score) and cognitive impairment/delirium (4AT). Multivariate binary logistic regression models were computed to predict ED disposition outcomes: hospital admission; discharge to GP and/or community services; discharge to specialist geriatric outpatients; discharge to the Geriatric Day Hospital. RESULTS: In the study period, there were 1,045 Home FIRsT assessments (mean age 80.1 years). For hospital admission, strong independent predictors were acute illness severity (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.50-2.70, P<0.001) and 4AT (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.13 - 1.42, P<0.001). Discharge to specialist outpatients (e.g. falls/bone health) was predicted by musculoskeletal/injuries/trauma presentations (OR 6.45, 95% CI 1.52 - 27.32, P=0.011). Discharge to the Geriatric Day Hospital was only predicted by frailty (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.17 - 1.97, P=0.002). Age and sex were not predictive in any of the models. CONCLUSIONS: Routinely collected CGA metrics are useful to predict ED disposition. The ability of baseline frailty to predict ED outcomes needs to be considered together with acute illness severity and delirium.

Opt-out screening for HIV, hepatitis B and hepatitis C: observational study of screening acceptance, yield and treatment outcomes.

BACKGROUND: We initiated an emergency department (ED) opt-out screening programme for HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) at our hospital in Dublin, Ireland. The objective of this study was to determine screening acceptance, yield and the impact on follow-up care. METHODS: From July 2015 through June 2018, ED patients who underwent phlebotomy and could consent to testing were tested for HIV, HBV and HCV using an opt-out approach. We examined acceptance of screening, linkage to care, treatment and viral suppression using screening programme data and electronic health records. The duration of follow-up ranged from 1 to 36 months. RESULTS: Over the 36-month study period, there were 140 550 ED patient visits, of whom 88 854 (63.2%, 95% CI 63.0% to 63.5%) underwent phlebotomy and 54 817 (61.7%, 95% CI 61.4% to 62.0%) accepted screening for HIV, HBV and HCV, representing 41 535 individual patients. 2202 of these patients had a positive test result. Of these, 267 (12.1%, 95% CI 10.8% to 13.6%) were newly diagnosed with an infection and 1762 (80.0%, 95% CI 78.3% to 81.7%) had known diagnoses. There were 38 new HIV, 47 new HBV and 182 new HCV diagnoses. 81.5% (95% CI 74.9% to 87.0%) of known patients who were not linked were relinked to care after screening. Of the new diagnoses, 86.2% (95% CI 80.4 to 90.8%) were linked to care. CONCLUSION: Although high proportions of patients had known diagnoses, our programme was able to identify many new infected patients and link them to care, as well as relink patients with known diagnoses who had been lost to follow-up.

Opt-Out Panel Testing for HIV, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C in an Urban Emergency Department: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVES: Studies suggest 2 per 1000 people in Dublin are living with HIV, the level above which universal screening is advised. We aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a universal opt-out HIV, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C testing programme for Emergency Department patients and to describe the incidence and prevalence of blood-borne viruses in this population. METHODS: An opt-out ED blood borne virus screening programme was piloted from March 2014 to January 2015. Patients undergoing blood sampling during routine clinical care were offered HIV 1&2 antibody/antigen assay, HBV surface antigen and HCV antibody tests. Linkage to care where necessary was co-ordinated by the study team. New diagnosis and prevalence rates were defined as the new cases per 1000 tested and number of positive tests per 1000 tested respectively. RESULTS: Over 45 weeks of testing, of 10,000 patient visits, 8,839 individual patient samples were available for analysis following removal of duplicates. A sustained target uptake of >50% was obtained after week 3. 97(1.09%), 44(0.49%) and 447(5.05%) HIV, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C tests were positive respectively. Of these, 7(0.08%), 20(0.22%) and 58(0.66%) were new diagnoses of HIV, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C respectively. The new diagnosis rate for HIV, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C was 0.8, 2.26 and 6.5 per 1000 and study prevalence for HIV, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C was 11.0, 5.0 and 50.5 per 1000 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Opt-out blood borne viral screening was feasible and acceptable in an inner-city ED. Blood borne viral infections were prevalent in this population and newly diagnosed cases were diagnosed and linked to care. These results suggest widespread blood borne viral testing in differing clinical locations with differing population demographic risks may be warranted.

Evaluation of a new needle catching instrument for suturing simple wounds in the Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVES: The Needlecatcher comprises a tissue forceps at one end, with a 'piston and barrel' system, which acts as a needle grasper, at the other end of the instrument. It minimizes exposure of the needle during suturing, potentially reducing risk of injury. We evaluate its effect on operator safety during simple wound closure. METHODS: Video analysis of 10 clinicians (six junior doctors and four advanced nurse practitioners) closing a standard simulated wound using their normal technique was performed. They were trained in the use of the Needlecatcher, and used it for 10 weeks closing simple wounds in the Emergency Department. Video analysis of wound closure was repeated, using the new instrument. Clinicians filled out a questionnaire for each episode of wound closure, which assessed how they perceived their safety was affected by the device. RESULTS: Video analysis of clinicians showed that the needle was secured in an instrument and thus unexposed for an average of 60% of the duration of the procedure by standard technique, compared with 95% using the Needlecatcher, with a change of 35% [95% confidence interval (CI): 14-58%, P = 0.005]. Episodes where the needle was grasped by an operator's finger were reduced by 50% (95% CI: 15-85%, P = 0.028). In the questionnaire study of 53 episodes of wound closure, operators perceived their safety to be increased in 38 (71.7%, 95% CI: 66.2-77.2%) episodes, were neutral in 10, and felt their safety was reduced in five. CONCLUSION: The Needlecatcher showed the potential to reduce the risk of needlestick injury while suturing.

Evaluation of suspected renal colic with noncontrast CT in the emergency department: a single institution study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Noncontrast CT (NCCT) has become the standard Imaging study in the emergency department (ED) diagnosis of nephro- and ureterolithiasis. We undertook to audit the results from the first 500 NCCTs performed for patients presenting to the ED with suspected renal colic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study at one institution from October 2003 to February 2006, 500 patients with suspected stone disease were investigated. In the study, NCCT findings, patient clinical records, and urinary microscopy results were evaluated for 166 women and 334 men. RESULTS: Renal or ureteral calculi were identified in 279 (56%) of NCCTs performed. Of the 500, 112 (19%) NCCTs performed identified unexpected intra-abdominal pathology. When the findings deemed to be of low clinical significance were excluded, the number of scans with additional pathology amounted to 67 (13%). These included vascular emergencies, new cancer diagnoses, and gastrointestinal conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The variety of diagnoses found unexpectedly on the NCCT that alter a patient's treatment demonstrates the pivotal role of NCCT in the triage of these patients rapidly toward optimal therapy. The rapid acquisition time of NCCT has enabled definitive ED patient diagnosis and less bed occupancy for clinically insignificant calculi.