Increased-risk versus standard-risk donation in lung transplantation: A United Network of Organ Sharing analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Donors with characteristics that increase risk of hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and HIV transmission are deemed increased-risk donors (IRDs) per Public Health Service guidelines. Compared with organs from standard-risk donors (SRDs), IRD organs are more frequently declined. We sought to investigate the outcomes of IRD lung transplant recipients following the 2013 guideline change. METHODS: We retrospectively identified lung transplant recipients using the United Network of Organ Sharing registry (February 2014 to March 2020). Patients were divided into 2 cohorts, based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention risk status of the donor: SRD or IRD. Demographics and clinical parameters were compared across groups. Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazard model was performed to identify variables associated with survival outcome. RESULTS: We identified 13,205 lung transplant recipients, 9963 who received allografts from SRDs and 3242 who received allografts from IRDs. In both groups, most donors were White, male, and <30 years old. IRDs demonstrated greater rates of heavy alcohol, cigarette, and cocaine use. SRDs had greater rates of cancer, hypertension, previous myocardial infarction, and diabetes. Survival analysis demonstrated no significant difference in 90-day, 1-year, 3-year, or 5-year survival outcome between SRD and IRD recipients (P = .34, P = .67, P = .40, P = .52, respectively). Cox regression demonstrated that double-lung transplants were associated with 13% decreased mortality risk compared with single-lung (P = .0009). CONCLUSIONS: IRD and SRD recipients demonstrated equivalent survival outcomes. Our study suggests that IRDs offer a safe approach to expand the donor pool and increase availability of lungs for transplantation.

Lung transplant survival with past and concomitant cardiac revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease is common among lung transplant (LTx) candidates and has historically been viewed as a contraindication to the procedure. Survival outcomes of lung transplant recipients with concomitant coronary artery disease who had prior or perioperative revascularization remain a topic of conversation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all single and double lung transplant patients from Feb, 2012 to Aug, 2021 at a single center was performed (n = 880). Patients were split into 4 groups: (1) those who received a preoperative percutaneous coronary intervention, (2) those who received preoperative coronary artery bypass grafting, (3) those who received coronary artery bypass grafting during transplantation, and (4) those who had lung transplantation without revascularization. Groups were compared for demographics, surgical procedure, and survival outcomes using STATA Inc. A p value< 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Most patients receiving LTx were male and white. Pump type (p = 0.810), total ischemic time (p = 0.994), warm ischemic time (p = 0.479), length of stay (p = 0.751), and lung allocation score (p = 0.332) were not significantly different between the four groups. The no revascularization group was younger than the other groups (p<0.01). The diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis was predominant in all groups except the no revascularization group. The pre-coronary artery bypass grafting group had a higher portion of single LTx procedures (p = 0.014). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significantly different survival rates after post-LTx between the groups (p = 0.471). Cox Regression analysis showed diagnosis significantly impacted survival rates (p 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative or intraoperative revascularization did not affect survival outcomes in lung transplant patients. Selected patients with coronary artery disease may benefit when intervened during lung transplant procedures.

Red Blood Cell Transfusion Prior to Lung Transplantation: Impact on Patient Outcomes.

There is an established association between red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and increased mortality and morbidity in cardiac surgery; however, there is little data demonstrating the influence of blood transfusion while awaiting lung transplantation. Therefore, our study compared the impact of pretransplant RBC transfusion on patient survival and post-transplantation adverse events. Adult lung transplant patient data were extracted retrospectively using the United Network for Organ Sharing thoracic database. Patients were stratified into two groups based on pretransplant transfusion status. In total, 28,217 patients were analyzed in our study (transfused: n = 1,415 and not transfused: n = 26,802). There was an increasing trend in pretransplant transfusion rates from 2006 to 2020. Transfused patients had a higher incidence of adverse events post-transplantation, including dialysis, stroke, and acute organ rejection before discharge. Multivariable survival analysis found an increased mortality risk in patients who required pretransplant transfusion(s) compared to those who did not have a transfusion (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-1.41; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome development between groups (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.82-1.04; p = 0.185). To conclude, our study provides data to suggest that RBC transfusion(s) before lung transplantation are associated with increased patient morbidity and mortality, but have no association with chronic graft rejection development.

Lung Transplantation for COVID-19 Pulmonary Sequelae.

BACKGROUND: The role of lung transplantation for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related lung failure is evolving as the pandemic persists. METHODS: From January 2021 to April 2022, 20 patients (median age 62 y; range 31-77) underwent lung transplantation for COVID-related lung failure at our institution. We reviewed their clinical and intraoperative characteristics and early outcomes including postoperative complications. RESULTS: Eleven patients (55%) had chronic lung disease when they contracted COVID-19. All 20 patients required hospitalization for antivirus treatment. Median lung allocation score was 74.7 (33.1-94.0). Thirteen patients (65%) underwent single-lung transplants, and 7 patients (35%) underwent double-lung transplants. Concomitant coronary artery bypass graft surgery was performed in 2 (10%) patients because of severe coronary artery disease. Postoperatively, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was needed in 3 patients (15%) because of severe primary graft dysfunction; all were eventually weaned. Ten patients (50%) experienced deep venous thrombosis, and 1 eventually developed a major pulmonary embolus. The median intensive care unit stay and hospital stays were 6.5 d (3-44) and 18 d (7-77), respectively. During a median follow-up of 201 d (47-418), we experienced 1 late mortality due to COVID-19-related myocarditis. Among the 13 patients with single-lung transplant, 5 demonstrated improvement in their native lungs. CONCLUSIONS: Lung transplantation yielded favorable early outcomes in a heterogeneous patient cohort that included older patients, obese patients, and patients with coronary artery disease or preexisting chronic lung disease. Our data also shed light on the transforming role of lung transplantation for the pulmonary sequelae of a complex multisystem COVID-19 disorder.

Single Lung Transplant Remains a Viable Option for Patients With Severe Secondary Pulmonary Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Although double lung transplant is recommended in patients with severe secondary pulmonary hypertension (SPH), our institutional experiences suggest a role for single lung transplant in these patients. Here, we review our experience prioritizing single lung transplant in patients with SPH to minimize their surgical burden. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of our lung transplant database to identify patients with SPH who underwent single lung transplant. Patients were stratified as either mild SPH (mean pulmonary artery pressure 25-40 mm Hg) or severe SPH (mean pulmonary artery pressure >40 mm Hg). Singe lung recipients without PH transplanted over the same time were also examined. RESULTS: Between January 2017 and December 2019, 318 patients underwent single lung transplantation; 217 had mild SPH (68%), and 59 had severe SPH (18.5%). Forty-two patients without PH underwent single lung transplant. When the groups were compared, significantly higher pulmonary vascular resistance was noted in the severe SPH group, and obesity was noted in both the mild and severe SPH groups. Although the severe SPH group required more intraoperative cardiopulmonary support (37.3% versus 10.3% versus 4.7%, P < 0.05), there were no significant differences in most major postoperative parameters, including the duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation or the incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction. Survival 1 y posttransplant was not significantly different among the groups (93.2% versus 89.4% versus 92.9%, P = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience supports the option of single lung transplantation with appropriate intraoperative mechanical circulatory support in patients with SPH. This strategy is worth pursuing, especially with ongoing donor lung shortages.

Cyclosporin A Administration During Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion Preserves Lung Grafts in Rat Transplant Model.

BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) such as lung reconditioning, preservation, and evaluation before transplantation, deleterious effects, including activation of proinflammatory cascades and alteration of metabolic profiles have been reported. Although patient outcomes have been favorable, further studies addressing optimal conditions are warranted. In this study, we investigated the role of the immunosuppressant drug cyclosporine A (CyA) in preserving mitochondrial function and subsequently preventing proinflammatory changes in lung grafts during EVLP. METHODS: Using rat heart-lung blocks after 1-hour cold preservation, an acellular normothermic EVLP system was established for 4 hours. CyA was added into perfusate at a final concentration of 1 µM. The evaluation included lung graft function, lung compliance, and pulmonary vascular resistance as well as biochemical marker measurement in the perfusate at multiple time points. After EVLP, single orthotopic lung transplantation was performed, and the grafts were assessed 2 hours after reperfusion. RESULTS: Lung grafts on EVLP with CyA exhibited significantly better functional and physiological parameters as compared with those without CyA treatment. CyA administration attenuated proinflammatory changes and prohibited glucose consumption during EVLP through mitigating mitochondrial dysfunction in lung grafts. CyA-preconditioned lungs showed better posttransplant lung early graft function and less inflammatory events compared with control. CONCLUSIONS: During EVLP, CyA administration can have a preconditioning effect through both its anti-inflammatory and mitochondrial protective properties, leading to improved lung graft preservation, which may result in enhanced graft quality after transplantation.

Bronchial-arterial-circulation-sparing Lung Preservation: A New Organ Protection Approach for Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Compromised microvasculature resulting from disrupted bronchial arterial circulation appears to trigger chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Maintaining the microvasculature throughout the transplant process could improve the long-term health of transplanted lungs. We recently developed a bronchial-arterial-circulation-sparing (BACS) lung preservation approach and tested whether this approach would decrease microvascular damage and improve allograft function. METHODS: The lungs of Lewis rats were procured using either the BACS approach, where the bronchial and pulmonary arteries were synchronously perfused; a conventional approach, where only the pulmonary artery was perfused; or a conventional approach with a prostaglandin flush. After 4 hours of cold ischemia, physiologic function and vascular tone of the grafts were evaluated during ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP), and microvasculature damage was assessed using 2-photon microscopy analysis. Lung function was compared after transplant among the groups. RESULTS: After 4 hours of cold ischemia, the BACS group exhibited significantly higher adenosine triphosphate levels and lower expression of phosphorylated myosin light chain, which is essential for vascular smooth muscle contraction. On EVLP, the BACS and prostaglandin groups showed lower pulmonary vascular resistance and less arterial stiffness. BACS attenuated microvasculature damage in the lung grafts when compared with conventional preservation. After transplantation, the lungs preserved with the BACS approach exhibited significantly better graft function and lower expression of phosphorylated myosin light chain. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that BACS lung preservation protects the dual circulation inherent to the lungs, facilitating robust microvasculature in lung grafts after transplantation, leading to better posttransplant outcomes.

The Bronchial Arterial Circulation in Lung Transplantation: Bedside to Bench to Bedside, and Beyond.

Chronic allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains a major complication, causing the poor survival after lung transplantation (Tx). Although strenuous efforts have been made at preventing CLAD, surgical approaches for lung Tx have not been updated over the last 2 decades. The bronchial artery (BA), which supplies oxygenated blood to the airways and constitutes a functional microvasculature, has occasionally been revascularized during transplants, but this technique did not gain popularity and is not standard in current lung Tx protocols, despite the fact that a small number of studies have shown beneficial effects of BA revascularization on limiting CLAD. Also, recent basic and clinical evidence has demonstrated the relationship between microvasculature damage and CLAD. Thus, the protection of the bronchial circulation and microvasculature in lung grafts may be a key factor to overcome CLAD. This review revisits the history of BA revascularization, discusses the role of the bronchial circulation in lung Tx, and advocates for novel bronchial-arterial-circulation sparing approaches as a future direction for overcoming CLAD. Although there are some already published review articles summarizing the surgical techniques and their possible contribution to outcomes in lung Tx, to the best of our knowledge, this review is the first to elaborate on bronchial circulation that will contribute to prevent CLAD from both scientific and clinical perspectives: from bedside to bench to bedside, and beyond.

Targeting Circulating Leukocytes and Pyroptosis During Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion Improves Lung Preservation.

BACKGROUND: The role of the circulating leukocytes in lungs and their relationship with circulating proinflammatory cytokines during ischemia-reperfusion injury is not well understood. Using ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) to investigate the pathophysiology of isolated lungs, we aimed to identify a therapeutic target to optimize lung preservation leading to successful lung transplantation. METHODS: Rat heart-lung blocks were placed on EVLP for 4 hours with or without a leukocyte-depleting filter (LF). After EVLP, lung grafts were transplanted, and posttransplant outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Lung function was significantly better in lung grafts on EVLP with a LF than in lungs on EVLP without a LF. The interleukin (IL)-6 levels in the lung grafts and EVLP perfusate were also significantly lower after EVLP with a LF. Interestingly, IL-6 levels in the perfusate did not increase after the lungs were removed from the EVLP circuit, indicating that the cells trapped by the LF were not secreting IL-6. The trapped cells were analyzed with flow cytometry to detect apoptosis and pyroptosis; 26% were pyroptotic (Caspase-1-positive). After transplantation, there was better graft function and less inflammatory response if a LF was used or a caspase-1 inhibitor was administered during EVLP. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated that circulating leukocytes derived from donor lungs, and not circulating proinflammatory cytokines substantially impaired the quality of lung grafts through caspase-1-induced pyroptotic cell death during EVLP. Removing these cells with a LF and/or inhibiting pyroptosis of the cells can be a new therapeutic approach leading to long-term success after lung transplantation.

Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion: A Key Tool for Translational Science in the Lungs.

Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) promises to be a comprehensive platform for assessment, reconditioning, and preservation of donor lungs and has been dramatically changing the face of clinical lung transplantation. Besides its increasing role in lung transplantation, EVLP has also been recognized as a useful tool for translational research involving the lungs. Based on recent remarkable evidence and experience using EVLP in lung transplantation, there is growing interest in, and expectations for, the use of EVLP beyond the field of lung transplantation. By combining EVLP with advances in regenerative medicine, stem cell biology, and oncology, the evolving technology of EVLP has tremendous potential to advance pulmonary medicine and science. In this review, we revisit recent advances in EVLP technology and research and discuss the future translation of EVLP applications into life-changing medicine.

Extracorporeal Support During Bilateral Sequential Lung Transplantation in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension: Risk Factors and Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To identify preoperative predictors of extracorporeal support in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) undergoing bilateral sequential lung transplantation (LTx), and to examine outcomes associated with the use of extracorporeal support. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study. SETTING: Single organ transplantation and tertiary care university medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with PH (preoperative mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP)≥25 mmHg) who underwent primary bilateral sequential LTx during 2007 to 2013. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 262 patients with PH undergoing LTx, extracorporeal support was initiated intraoperatively in 149 (57%). Preoperative severe right ventricle (RV) dysfunction and moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) were associated with extracorporeal support. In the remaining 208 patients without those factors, increasing preoperative oxygen requirement (odds ratio [OR] 1.30 per 1 L/min, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.11-1.52, p = 0.001), presence of RV dilation (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.28-6.02, p = 0.010), and mPAP (OR 1.33 per 5-mmHg increase in mPAP, 95% CI 1.04-1.70, p = 0.021) were associated independently with extracorporeal support in the multivariable model. Analysis of 49 propensity-matched pairs showed longer intensive care unit (5 v 14 days, p = 0.006) and hospital stays (27 v 39 days, p = 0.016) and increased need for tracheostomy (16% v 41%, p = 0.017) in patients exposed to extracorporeal support but no differences in 30-day mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, or dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Severity of RV dysfunction, TR, RV dilatation, increasing oxygen requirement, and increasing mPAP showed significant associations with the need for extracorporeal support during LTX in patients with PH. Extracorporeal support was associated with increased length of stay and tracheostomy but not with mortality or other complications. © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Atrial arrhythmias after lung transplantation: Incidence and risk factors in 652 lung transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVES: Atrial arrhythmia (AA) after lung transplantation (LTx) is a potentially morbid event often associated with increased length of hospital stay. Predictors of postsurgical AA, however, are incompletely understood. We characterized the incidence and predisposing risk factors for AA in patients undergoing LTx. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted to identify LTx recipients between January 2008 and October 2013. Patients were divided into 2 groups on the basis of postoperative AA development. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to define differences between groups and identify factors associated with AA. Survival differences were assessed by the use of competing risks methodology. RESULTS: A total of 198 of 652 (30.4%) patients developed AA at a median onset of 5 days after transplant. Increasing age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.03 per additional year, P < .001) and previous coronary artery bypass grafting (HR 2.77, P = .002) were found to be independent risk factors. Counterintuitively, patients with a medical history of AA before LTx had a lower incidence of postoperative AA. Preoperative beta-blocker usage was not a significant predictor of postoperative AA. Postoperative AA was a significant predictor of long-term mortality (HR 1.63, P = .007) when we adjusted for other risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: AA is a common occurrence after LTx, occurring with greatest frequency in the first postoperative week, and results in a significant reduction in long-term survival. Increasing age and before coronary artery bypass grafting were identified as independent risk factors for AA development. Better understanding of these risk factors may improve identification of patients at heightened risk after transplantation.

The ripple effect of a complication in lung transplantation: Evidence for increased long-term survival risk.

OBJECTIVE: Lung transplantation is a life-saving procedure for patients who have end-stage lung disease. The frequency and severity of complications have not been fully characterized. We hypothesized that early in-hospital, postoperative complications decrease long-term survival. METHODS: We retrospectively identified in-hospital complications in lung transplant recipients, from the period January 2007 to October 2013. Complications were graded using the extended Accordion Severity Grading System (ASGS). Complications were categorized by event and organ system. Survival analysis was performed (P < .05) using a time-dependent model. RESULTS: Among 748 eligible patients, 3381 independent in-hospital, postoperative complications occurred in 92.78% of patients. Median follow-up was 5.4 years. Complications associated with significant decrease in 5-year survival were: renal (hazard ratio [HR] 2.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-4.48); hepatic (HR 4.08, 95% CI 2.86-5.82); cardiac (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.56-2.45). The maximum ASGS of ≥5 (18.5% vs 73.8%), and the weighted ASGS sum >10 (2.5% vs 73.8%), were found to be significant predictors of long-term survival. Multivariate analysis identified a weighted ASGS sum of >10, and renal, cardiac, and vascular complications as predictors of decreased long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Rigorous delineation of complications after lung transplantation showed that grade 5 ASGS in-hospital postoperative complications, and a weighted ASGS sum >10, were independent predictors of decreased long-term survival well beyond the initial perioperative period. These results may identify important targets for best practice guidelines and quality-of-care measures after lung transplantation.

Surgical Strategy for Lung Transplantation in Adults With Small Chests: Lobar Transplant Versus a Pediatric Donor.

BACKGROUND: Adult lung transplant recipients with small chests have traditionally received lungs from pediatric donors, placing an additional strain on the already restricted pediatric donor pool. Performing lobar lung transplantation (LLT) can circumvent issues with donor-recipient size mismatch; however, LLT imparts additional risks. Here, we review our experience using LLT and standard lung transplantation using a pediatric donor (PDLT) for adults with small chests. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with end-stage lung disease and a height of 65 inches or less who underwent LLT (n = 15) or PDLT (n = 15) between 2006 and 2012 at our institution, a high-volume lung transplant center. RESULTS: Lobar lung transplantation recipients were older (54 ± 10 vs 48 ± 8 years) and had higher pulmonary pressure (57 ± 11 vs 52 ± 27 mmHg) and higher lung allocation scores (70 ± 9 vs 51 ± 8) than PDLT recipients (all P < 0.05). Mean waiting time was 62 days for PDLT and 9 days for LLT. Postoperatively, the incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction and the incidence of acute renal insufficiency were higher, and the mean intensive care unit stay was longer in the LLT group, but the incidence of bronchial anastomotic complications was higher in the PDLT group because of significant size discrepancy in the main bronchus (P < 0.05). Interestingly, long-term functional outcomes and survival rates were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both LLT and PDLT are viable surgical options for adult patients with small chests. Because of the potential impact on posttransplant outcomes, the technical complexity of transplantation, decisions regarding the best surgical approach should be made by experienced surgeons.