Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 3 de 3
1.
Kidney360 ; 4(11): 1628-1631, 2023 11 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37853555
2.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 28(12): 672-681, 2023 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37697492

AIM: This cross-sectional survey aimed to determine the prevalence of Interventional Nephrology (IN) practice amongst nephrologists in the Asia-Pacific Region (APR), specifically related to dialysis access (DA). METHODS: The Association of VA and intervenTionAl Renal physicians (AVATAR) Foundation from India conducted a multinational online survey amongst nephrologists from the Asia-Pacific to determine the practice of IN in the planning, creation, and management of dialysis access. The treatment modalities, manpower and equipment availability, monthly cost of treatment, specifics of dialysis access interventions, and challenges in the training and practice of IN by nephrologists were included in the survey. RESULTS: Twenty-one countries from the APR participated in the survey. Nephrologists from 18 (85.7%) countries reported performing at least one of the basic dialysis access-related IN procedures, primarily the placement of non-tunnelled central catheters (n-TCC; 71.5%). Only 10 countries (47.6%) reported having an average of <4% of nephrologists performing any of the advanced IN access procedures, the most common being the placement of a peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter (20%). Lack of formal training (57.14%), time (42.8%), incentive (38%), institutional support (38%), medico-legal protection (28.6%), and prohibitive cost (23.8%) were the main challenges to practice IN. The primary obstacles to implementing the IN training were a lack of funding and skilled personnel. CONCLUSION: The practice of dialysis access-related IN in APR is inadequate, mostly due to a lack of training, backup support, and economic constraints, whereas training in access-related IN is constrained by a lack of a skilled workforce and finances.


Nephrology , Humans , Nephrology/education , Renal Dialysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Catheterization/methods , Asia/epidemiology
3.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg ; 103(2): 192-6, 2009 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18930301

An outbreak, characterised by fever, arthralgia and myalgia, in Malé and other islands of the Maldives began in December 2006. The illness was suspected as being due to chikungunya virus based on clinical symptoms and the prevailing chikungunya epidemic in the Indian Ocean region. The Department of Public Health initiated an investigation and collected blood samples from 67 patients; 21% were IgM-positive for chikungunya and 96% were PCR-positive. Six percent were positive for dengue by enzyme immunosorbent assay and 4% had evidence of dual infection. This is the first time that chikungunya fever has been confirmed in the Maldives. A total of 11,879 suspected and confirmed cases affecting 61% of inhabited islands (attack rate ranging from 0% to 72% on individual islands) were reported by the end of the epidemic in April 2007.


Alphavirus Infections/epidemiology , Chikungunya virus , Disease Outbreaks , Public Health/methods , Alphavirus Infections/diagnosis , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/analysis , Chikungunya virus/immunology , Disease Reservoirs , Female , Humans , Indian Ocean Islands/epidemiology , Insect Vectors , Male , Tropical Climate/adverse effects
...