Palliative care screening tools in Japan: cross-sectional utility study.

OBJECTIVES: In Japan's ageing society, the utility of US-based and UK-based palliative care screening tools in the inpatient setting is unknown. The purpose of this study is to identify the unmet palliative care needs of patients who are admitted to an acute care hospital using the US-based and UK-based screening tools. METHODS: This single-centre, cross-sectional study included patients who were admitted to an acute care hospital in Tokyo, Japan, from November 2019 to January 2020. We used the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicator Tool and Palliative Care Screening Tool in the Emergency Department among admitted patients. RESULTS: 126 patients (51.6%) were screened positive in total. Among these patients, the main comorbid conditions were dementia/frailty (85.7%) and neurological disease (50.8%). CONCLUSIONS: One out of every two internal medicine inpatients at acute care hospitals may have palliative care needs. Given the lack of adequate palliative care workforce in Japan, a modified screening tool to capture the most high-risk patients may be necessary.

Enduring Positive Impact of a Virtual Communication Skills Workshop of VitalTalk Pedagogy in a Non-U.S. Setting.

CONTEXT: While in-person workshops on serious illness communication skills using VitalTalk pedagogy have been shown to have a long-lasting impact, whether changing the format into virtual would maintain its enduring impact is unknown. Objectives. To examine long-term impacts of a virtual VitalTalk communication workshop. METHODS: Physicians in Japan who participated in our virtual VitalTalk workshop were asked to complete a self-assessment survey at 3 time points: before, immediately after, and 2 months after the workshop. We examined self-reported preparedness in 11 communication skills on a 5-point Likert scale at 3 time points, as well as self-reported frequency of practice on 5 communication skills at the pre- and 2-month time points. RESULTS: Between January 2021 and June 2022, 117 physicians from 73 institutions across Japan completed our workshop. Seventy-four participants returned the survey at all the 3 time points. Their skill preparedness significantly improved upon the completion of the workshop in all 11 skills (P < .001 for all items). The improvement remained at the same level at 2 months in 7 skills. In 4 of the 11 skills, there was further improvement at the 2-month point. The frequency of self-directed skill practice also increased significantly in the 2-month survey for all 5 skills. CONCLUSION: A virtual workshop of VitalTalk pedagogy improved self-reported preparedness of communication skills, and the impact was long-lasting in a non-U.S. setting as it likely induced self-practice of skills. Our findings encourage the use of a virtual format in any geographical location considering its enduring impact and easy accessibility.

Culturally Acceptable Emotional Expressions Perceived by Non-U.S. Physicians Undergoing U.S.-Based Serious Illness Communication Skills Training: A Cross-Sectional Study.

CONTEXT: Responding to emotions is a key feature of U.S.-based serious illness communication skills training, VitalTalk®, of which trained actors portraying seriously ill patients is a component. The cultural appropriateness and perceived utility of the actors' emotional expressions remain to be empirically evaluated outside of the U.S. OBJECTIVES: To determine the cultural appropriateness and educational utility of VitalTalk® actors' emotional expressions, as perceived by clinicians. METHODS: From January 2021-April 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional study of physicians in Japan attending virtual VitalTalk® training in Japanese, each session focusing on: responding to emotions (#1) and discussing goals of care (#2), respectively. We examined their perceived authenticity and utility of the actively and passively intense emotional expressions portrayed by actors in VitalTalk® role-plays. RESULTS: Physicians (N = 100, 94% response rate) from across Japan voluntarily attended two-session workshops and completed post-session surveys. Eighty-eight participants (88%) responded that both actively and passively intense emotions portrayed by the actors provided useful learning experiences. For session #1, the participants found actively intense emotional expressions to be more clinically authentic, compared to passively intense ones (4.21 vs 4.06 out of a 5-point Likert scale, PP= .02). For session #2, no such difference was observed (4.16 vs 4.08 of a 5-point Likert scale, P = .24). CONCLUSIONS: Even in a culture where patients may express emotions passively, any intense and authentic emotional expressions by actors can be perceived as facilitating learning. Most participants perceived both the Name, Understand, Respect, Support, and Explore '(NURSE)' statements and Reframe, Expect emotion, Map out patient goals Align with goals and Propose a plan '(REMAP)' frameworks as useful in routine clinical practice in Japan.

The Feasibility of Virtual VitalTalk Workshops in Japanese: Can Faculty Members in the US Effectively Teach Communication Skills Virtually to Learners in Japan?

BACKGROUND: VitalTalk is an established training program for serious illness conversations in the US. Previously, this training course has been provided in-person in Japanese, but never virtually. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of a virtually administered VitalTalk workshop in Japanese. SETTING/SUBJECTS: We conducted a virtual workshop which consisted of 2 days (3 hours per day) of synchronous sessions and preceding asynchronous modules. Five VitalTalk faculty members in the US facilitated 4 workshops for 48 physicians from 33 institutions across Japan. Learners completed surveys before and after the workshop. MEASUREMENTS: To evaluate the feasibility, learners were asked for their satisfaction with the workshop and the virtual format as primary outcomes and their self-assessed preparedness in serious illness communication as the secondary outcome. Each question employed a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: All learners (n = 48, male 79%) participated in the survey. The mean score of the learners' satisfaction was 4.69 or higher in all questions. The mean score of the virtual format's satisfaction was 4.33 or higher in all questions. The mean score of self-reported preparedness on the 11 questions were between 2.30 and 3.34 before the workshop, all of which significantly increased to 3.08 through 3.96 after the workshop (p < 0.01 in all questions). CONCLUSION: Learners in Japan perceived the virtual format of our VitalTalk workshop as satisfactory, and their self-reported preparedness improved significantly after the workshop. VitalTalk faculty members in the US were able to provide virtual communication training to physicians in Japan.

Physicians' Perceptions and Suggestions for the Adaptation of a US-Based Serious Illness Communication Training in a Non-US Culture: A Qualitative Study.

CONTEXT: US-based serious illness communication training pedagogy has not been well studied outside of the United States. OBJECTIVES: To explore the perception of a US-based, serious illness communication training pedagogy in a non-US culture and to identify aspects requiring cultural adaptations. METHODS: In September 2019, we conducted a qualitative study using convenient sampling at two urban, academic medical centers in Tokyo, Japan. Semistructured interviews were conducted to Japanese physicians who participated in the four-hour VitalTalk training in Japanese. We explored six majored themes: 1) global impression of the training; 2) main goals from participation; 3) appropriateness of didactics; 4) role play experiences; 5) take away points from the training; and 6) changes in their own communication practice after the training. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using phenomenological approach. RESULTS: All 24 participants found the VitalTalk pedagogy novel and beneficial, stressing the importance of demonstrating empathy, reflecting on own skills, and recognizing the importance of feedback that emphasizes the use of specific words. Participants also pointed out that Japanese patients generally do not express their strong emotions explicitly. CONCLUSION: Our study found empirical evidence that the VitalTalk pedagogy is perceived to be novel and beneficial in a non-US cultural setting. Cultural adaptations in expression and response to emotion may be required to maximize its efficacy in Japan. To meet the needs of clinical practice in Japan, further studies are needed to empirically test the suggested refinements for the VitalTalk pedagogy.