A multicenter retrospective study of clinical features, laboratory characteristics, and outcomes of 166 hospitalized children with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A preliminary report from Iranian Network for Research in Viral Diseases (INRVD).

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to analyze the clinical features and laboratory profiles and risk factors associated with critical illness of children with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODS: One hundred and sixty-six coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Iranian pediatric patients were recruited through a collaborative research network between March and May 2020. Demographics, clinical, laboratory, and radiological results were obtained from patient files. RESULTS: Of 166 patients, 102 (61%) and 64 (39%) were males and females, respectively. Ninety-six (57.8%) and 70 (42.2%), had moderate and severe conditions, respectively. Thirty (18%) of patients died. The common symptoms were fever (73%), cough (54%), and shortness of breath, headache decrease in neutrophil and platelet counts; increase values in lactate dehydrogenase, decrease in the blood pH and HCO3 were significantly associated with the disease severity. 54% and 56% of patients showed abnormal radiographic appearance in Chest X-ray and in chest computed tomography scan, respectively. Sixty-one (36.7%) of patients were referred to intensive care unit (ICU). The coexistence of comorbidity was the main factor associated with ICU admission, shock, arrhythmia, acute kidney injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute cardiac injury, and death. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a higher than previously recognized rate of COVID-19 mortality in Iranian pediatric patients. Epidemiological factors, such as the relatively high case fatality rate in the country and the presence of underlying diseases were the main factors for the high death rate.

Diagnostic Value of CRP, Procalcitonin, and Ferritin Levels in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Children with Meningitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Bacterial meningitis is a serious disease with high rate of mortality and morbidity in children. Invasion of pathogens causes brain and meningeal inflammation, which leads to the release of biomarkers into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Identification of these biomarkers can help the physicians to differentiate between bacterial and aseptic meningitis. In the current study, some of these biomarkers such as Procalcitonin, C reactive protein (CRP), and Ferritin, were compared in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with bacterial and aseptic meningitis. METHODS: In a prospective cross sectional study in a referral children hospital in Tehran during 2011- 2013, the CSF levels of Procalcitonin, Ferritin, and CRP were measured in 57 children with clinically suspected meningitis. The Mann-Whitney u test and the chi-square test were used to compare two groups, children with bacterial and aseptic meningitis. The cut-offs of biomarker levels for differentiation between the 2 groups were constructed by receiver-operating - characteristic curve (ROC). RESULTS: 57 subjects (30 bacterial and 27 aseptic meningitis), were enrolled in this survey. In comparing the two groups, the CSF levels of Ferritin, CRP, and procalcitonin in bacterial meningitis were significantly higher than in aseptic meningitis (P values=˂0.001, 0.001, ˂0.001respectively), with sensitivity/ specificity being 92.9% / 68%, 92.9% / 84%, and 96.4% / 80%, respectively. Positive Predictive Values (PPV) were, correspondingly, 96.4%, 92.8%, and 92.8% for procalcitonin, Ferritin, and CRP. Corresponding Negative Predictive Values (NPV) were, respectively equal to 95.4%, 70%, and 88%. CONCLUSION: CSF of children with bacterial meningitis contains higher levels of inflammatory mediators including Procalcitonin, Ferritin, and CRP, compared to aseptic meningitis The biomarkers provided high sensitivity (especially PCT) and specificity (especially CRP). Using these complementary biomarkers would be useful for early diagnosis of bacterial meningitis and selection of appropriate treatment.

Detection of the M. pneumonia in Synovial Fluid of Children with Negative Culture Arthritis: A Cross Sectional Study in Tehran, Iran.

BACKGROUND: Arthritis could be caused by different etiologies ranging from rheumatologic diseases to infectious conditions. Therefore, early diagnosis of etiology and treatment is important. The purpose of this study was to determine the the M. pneumonia in synovial fluid of children with arthritis by 2 methods (serology and qualitative PCR). METHODS & MATERIALS: This trial was carried out as a cross sectional study in pediatric and orthopedic ward of Rasoul-e Akram hospital in Tehran, Iran. Seventy three patients (39 boys and 34 girls) with mean age of 11± 3.9 y/o were selected by continuous sampling after synovial fluid aspiration. All samples were evaluated by direct smear, culture and latex tests. Septic arthritis was diagnosed in 18 patients (25.4%). PCR and serology tests for M. pneumonia (specific IgM and IgG) were performed in 50 cases with negative culture. The results were compared by Independent T test. RESULTS: According to physical examination and culture 18 patients (25.4%) were diagnosed with septic arthritis, 50 patients with non-septic arthritis were studied. Seventeen patients (33.3%) were IgG positive and 2 patients (4%) were IgM positive. Only 2 patients (4%) showed weakly positive results on PCR which did not demonstrate any association with serology. CONCLUSION: Positive PCR in SF (4%) definitely indicates active infection and M. pneumonia induced arthiritis. Although positive SF-IgM (4%) suggests either a current or a very recent M. pneumonia infection but not for SF-IgG (previous infection). So, we can summate that PCR, though being the best and most accurate method to detect M. pneumonia infection arthritis, is not considered a practical one due to costs and availability issues. Hence it can be safely replaced by serology test (Specific IgM) in SF for diagnosis of M. pneumonia arthritis, which is available in most of the hospitals and is much more economical as compared to PCR.