Ultrasound combined with microbubble mediated immunotherapy for tumor microenvironment.

The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays an important role in dynamically regulating the progress of cancer and influencing the therapeutic results. Targeting the tumor microenvironment is a promising cancer treatment method in recent years. The importance of tumor immune microenvironment regulation by ultrasound combined with microbubbles is now widely recognized. Ultrasound and microbubbles work together to induce antigen release of tumor cell through mechanical or thermal effects, promoting antigen presentation and T cells' recognition and killing of tumor cells, and improve tumor immunosuppression microenvironment, which will be a breakthrough in improving traditional treatment problems such as immune checkpoint blocking (ICB) and himeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy. In order to improve the therapeutic effect and immune regulation of TME targeted tumor therapy, it is necessary to develop and optimize the application system of microbubble ultrasound for organs or diseases. Therefore, the combination of ultrasound and microbubbles in the field of TME will continue to focus on developing more effective strategies to regulate the immunosuppression mechanisms, so as to activate anti-tumor immunity and/or improve the efficacy of immune-targeted drugs, At present, the potential value of ultrasound combined with microbubbles in TME targeted therapy tumor microenvironment targeted therapy has great potential, which has been confirmed in the experimental research and application of breast cancer, colon cancer, pancreatic cancer and prostate cancer, which provides a new alternative idea for clinical tumor treatment. This article reviews the research progress of ultrasound combined with microbubbles in the treatment of tumors and their application in the tumor microenvironment.

Application Value of Ultrasound Elastography Combined With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Quantitative Analysis in Differentiation of Nodular Fibrocystic Changes of the Breast From Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.

This study aimed to compare the value of ultrasound elastography combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) quantitative analysis in the differentiation of nodular fibrocystic breast change (FBC) from breast invasive ductal carcinoma (BIDC). We selected 50 patients each with nodular FBC and BIDC, who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University from January 2018 to December 2021. Their ultrasonic elastic images and CEUS videos were collected, their ultrasound elastography scores and the ratio of strain rate (SR) of the lesions were determined, and the exported DICOM format videos of CEUS were quantitatively analyzed using VueBox software to obtain quantitative perfusion parameters. The differences between the ultrasound elastography score and SR while comparing nodular FBC and BIDC cases were statistically significant (p < .05). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ultrasound elastography scores in the differential diagnoses of nodular FBC and BIDC were 74%, 88%, and 81%, respectively. Additionally, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of SR in the differential diagnosis of nodular FBC and BIDC were 94%, 78%, and 86%, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed in the CEUS quantitative perfusion parameters PE, AUC (WiAUC, WoAUC, WiWoAUC), and WiPI in both nodular FBC and BIDC according to the VueBox software (p < .05). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CEUS quantitative analysis in the differential diagnoses of nodular FBC and BIDC were 66%, 82%, and 74%, respectively. Using the pathological findings as the gold standard, ROC curves were established, and the area under the curve (AUC) of the CEUS quantitative analysis, elasticity score, SR, and ultrasound elastography combined with CEUS quantitative analysis were 0.731, 0.838, and 0.892, as well as 0.945, respectively. Ultrasound elasticity scoring, SR and CEUS quantitative analysis have certain application value for differentiating nodular FBC cases from BIDC; however, ultrasound elasticity imaging combined with CEUS quantitative analysis can help in improving the differential diagnostic efficacy of nodular FBC cases from BIDC.

Diagnosis of malignant versus tuberculous ascites using tumor markers and globulin ratios in serum and ascites: A Fisher discriminant model.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: This study was conducted to investigate the significance of tumor and biochemical markers in serum and ascitic fluid in the differential diagnosis of tuberculous and malignant ascites. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Based on findings from natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and postoperative pathology or cytology of 63 patients, they were divided into the malignant group (31 patients) and the tuberculous group (32 patients). Levels of tumor markers, albumin, globulin, and lactate dehydrogenase were measured simultaneously. Data were statistically analyzed, and a Fisher discriminant model was established. The receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to confirm the discriminant value. RESULTS: The levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), and globulin in serum and ascitic fluid were different between the tuberculous and malignant ascites groups (P < .05). The ratios of ascites-to-serum levels of CEA, CA125, and CA 19-9, as well as the ratio of serum-to-ascites of globulin levels, were different between the two groups (P < .05). The Fisher discriminant model was established based on the ascites-to-serum ratios of CEA, CA125, and CA 19-9 levels and the serum-to-ascites ratio of globulin levels. The area under the curve was 0.908, the sensitivity was 0.838 (26/31), and the specificity was 0.875 (28/32). CONCLUSION: A Fisher discriminant model can be established using serum and ascites tumor markers and globulin ratios, which is valuable in the differential diagnosis of tuberculous versus malignant ascites.