RESUMEN
iStent implantation is thought to augment the trabecular outflow channel in the anterior segment of the eye. We hypothesized that iStent with subsequent selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) would better control the intraocular pressure (IOP) compared to standalone SLT in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). We, therefore, determined if the presence of an iStent combined with SLT was statistically associated with IOP lowering compared to standalone SLT. Through retrospective electronic medical record review, records of 824 eyes from 440 patients who received primary SLT without a history of iStent were considered. Additionally, 42 eyes from 28 patients who received SLT after combined phacoemulsification and iStent implantation that failed to control intraocular pressure (IOP) and/or the progression of the disease were retrospectively reviewed. IOP and number of medications, which were tracked in each patient for up to 12 months post laser, were also examined. Successful outcome was defined as a statistically significant reduction in IOP or number of medications at 6 months. As defined in univariate analysis (p ≤ 0.01), multivariate analysis included iStent, age, sex, race, and initial IOP as variables. IOP reduction was statistically associated with patients pre-SLT IOP (p < 0.001) but not with patients with iStent (p = 0.222). Medication reduction was statistically associated with the pre-SLT number of medications (p < 0.001) and iStent (p < 0.001). In eyes that received SLT, iStent was not statistically associated with a greater reduction in IOP compared to controls, but was associated with a higher reduction in the overall number of medications used 6 months after receiving SLT. The work presented should guide clinicians to consider SLT as an effective therapy after iStent implantation, in terms of glaucoma medication reduction in iStent patients, but clinicians should know that the presence of an iStent does not necessarily make subsequent SLT more effective at lowering IOP.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Pain is a frequently reported symptom in dry eye disease (DED). We examine the factors associated with ocular pain severity and patient-reported improvement in ocular pain to commonly used dry eye and pain treatments. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of patients presenting for dry eye management. Demographics, ocular and medical history, OSDI, numeric pain scale, pain descriptors, and subjective response to tried eye drop, systemic, and non-pharmacologic treatments were collected. Statistical analysis was performed to identify differential treatment response in patients with various pain levels using the non-parametric test for trend. RESULTS: 144 patients were categorized into 4 groups according to reported pain severity. Increasing pain was significantly associated with younger age, history of refractive surgery, higher OSDI score, and less likelihood of corneal staining. Patients with higher pain intensity were more likely to report a history of fibromyalgia, depression, anxiety, and migraine. Patients with greater pain severity were less responsive to treatment with artificial tears (p < 0.001), lubricating ointment (p = 0.002), steroid eye drops (p = 0.03), cyclosporine 0.05% (p = 0.03), 20% autologous serum tears (p = 0.01), hot compresses (p = 0.04), lid hygiene (p = 0.002) and punctal occlusion (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Dry eye patients with severe ocular pain often have associated psychological and systemic pain conditions. Treating the underlying DED is beneficial in reducing ocular pain, however the low rate of a satisfactory response highlights the need for further investigation of effective therapies. Cross-sectional studies can provide guidance in the treatment of patients with dry eye-related ocular pain and guide future prospective studies on potentially effective therapies.
